RE: AI slop and the death of Art

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

A camera is a machine, operated by a human :P

pob
0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar

Come on, the gun argument? Just take the compliment and be happy with it... 🤣

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Holoz0r and the Machine!

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I'll buy that album. You could send sample of your pics to the band, maybe they'll take them for the next album?

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar
(Edited)

I'll get right onto Ai generating the album, you've already said you'll buy it. :P

The symbols used in the album Art of Dance Fever (which I am writing about now) is 100% my favourite Aesthetic style.

The only problem is I, myself, do not identify as a pre-raphaelite muse. I am just a mind, given tools to express.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Sure. But you take the tools and add your self to them, creating an outcome with a deepness worth thinking about.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

This is the second nicest thing I've read written about me all day :)

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

The camera is a tool used by a human. Would you dismiss an architectural drawing because CAD is a machine?

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

No, and by extension, paradoxically, a LLM is still a tool - a generative model is a tool, but that tool has distinct, perfectly reproducible outputs given the same staring conditions.

Prompt + Trained Model + Random Seed = Same outcome. Always. It is a mathematical surety.

Our human "random seeds" have much more fuziness. Stuff that we cannot encapsulate through words, reduced to tokens and a long integer.

On the determinism of AI outputs: I suppose the same thing can be said of a guitar with standard tuning, an identical plectrum and the same velocity of hand upon the region of open string.

0
0
0.000
Reply