RE: Gaslighting About 9/11

"...I'd like to see that question addressed."

Dr. Judy Woods has written a book about it, claiming the towers were atomized with some unknown DEW device with that capability. I do not ascribe to this theory, and can only recommend you watch more building demolitions. I have seen they typically produce identical clouds of dust. Here's a few.

I recall that for weeks after the event, pools of liquid iron remained too hot for work to proceed on the ground. This cannot happen from office fires. That can only be the result of special incendiary compounds that demolition teams use to cut steel beams when pulling a building, thermite and thermate. Both were detected in the debris by researchers as well. There is also video that shows molten steel pouring out of the towers prior to their collapse. Office fires did not produce that heat. It is not physically possible for anything other than thermite or thermate to have done that during a controlled demolition.

"...why tower 7 fell like a controlled demolition..."

Lucky Larry famously confessed that (((they))) decided it was too damaged and made the decision to 'pull it', which is demolition jargon for demolishing the building. However, the work to install the charges and prepare the building for demolition takes weeks, and was already done on Building 7, demonstrating that the demolition had been planned in advance and the building was loaded with explosives prior to 9/11.

It is not lawful to occupy a building that has been wired and loaded with demolition charges, and that crime was never investigated, like any of the other crimes that were committed.

Further a whistleblower has confessed on his deathbed to have been part of the team that did the preparation of Building 7 for demolition.

Edit: I hadn't watched that video on controlled demolitions and didn't realize many of the demolitions weren't of office buildings, but highways, radio masts, and silos. Sorry.

Also, something I forgot whether I have mentioned it or not, but the BBC broadcast a video report on Building 7 having collapsed, while the reporter was shown with Building 7 still standing behind her. They were obviously notified it was coming down, and were misinformed or erred on the timing of the demolition.