Gaslighting About 9/11
The inimitable James Corbett has noted the present energizing of the vast machinery of propaganda to corral the beginnings of the stampede of public acceptance of the fact that 9/11 was an inside job. I also noticed the recent public statement by Sen. Ron Johnson that there were irreconcilable inconsistencies in the official 9/11 narrative that he intended to resolve via a public inquiry.
IMG source - RenegadeTribune.com
Corbett notes that the alternative media darlings like Tucker Carlson are coming out with fresh willingness to discuss the matter, despite prior excoriation of the 9/11 truthers as conspiracy theorists.
"I never questioned anything about 9/11 and I actively attacked people who did. I’m ashamed of that. But that's a fact. I did it on tape more than once because my feeling was, well, you know, "that's divisive" or whatever. I was a child and an idiot."
--Tucker Carlson, quoted by the Corbett Report
Is that credible? He just dismissed factual evidence because 'I was an idiotic child, or whatever'? Tucker was an integral part of the enemedia at the time, availed a large staff and phat budget. Corbett also notes Matt Taibbi presently claiming 'no one has been covering' the 9/11 conspiracy. But Taibbi did cover for the official story, vehemently and with extreme prejudice. When Tucker and Taibbi suddenly start coordinating reversing their messaging it demonstrates that there is a new effort to direct and corral the public into restricted mindspace because the old one has proved inadequate.
By their fruits you shall know them. It is by this coordination of messaging you can differentiate between controlled opposition and honest reporting. The assassination of Achmed Shah Masood, the Lion of Panjshir, by the ISI isn't likely to be covered by Taibbi or Tucker, either, because it reveals that the spooks that engineered 9/11 were silencing Masood who had held a press conference in Paris on 9/10/01 warning of the impending attack.
Here are some resources that will not be likely to be covered in coming public hearings.
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Anthrax_Mystery:_Solved
https://cryptome.org/dea-il-spy.htm
Usama bin Laden cannot have caused the USG to stand down on 9/11. Only spooks with participation of the leadership of the White house, Pentagon, and enemedia can have done that. The provision of a patsy is the MO of the spooks that use fake news to create plausible deniability of their murderous crimes, like the iceberg that sank the Titanic, Sirhan Sirhan, Lee Harvey Oswald, Usama bin Laden, and Anthony Fauci. In all these crimes the same bankster spook institutions were the actual perpetrators, which they conceal by offering up patsies.
The coming gaslighting will be designed to divert focus away from Mossad, the CIA, and the Bush administration officials that were critical to enabling the plane strikes to happen by the various drills coordinated, the destruction of evidence, and the fake news we were all sold (although some of us wouldn't buy it). Fingering the actors that were actually critical to the success of the operation would lead to the banksters they served, and concealing that Machiavellian cohort is the purpose of gaslighting. Corbett recommends we use this limited hangout that is coming to 'Yes, and...' to enable the provable involvement of officials and agencies the corral is intended to keep people away from.
Something I will add is the need to counter the well poisoning of DEW, holograms, and ayliums that have been imposed, like the Flat Earth conspiracy, to taint folks that speak unapproved truth with completely false BS. The destruction of the three buildings on 9/11 are ordinary controlled demolitions. No aylium space death rays or Bluebeam holographs required. Forewarned is forearmed, and these obvious traps will be sprung again, so be prepared to brush off the lies like flies, because they'll be biting again.
The real perps coordinated all these institutions and agencies, provided the patsies, and paid for the fake news, including Tucker and Taibbi, and they still are. Government is infested with traitors, and has been for a long time, like Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld that coordinated the theft of $2.3T and the myriad drills that hopelessly confused the military response on 9/11. The enemedia includes controlled opposition like Tucker and Taibbi, who are allowed limited hangouts to create credibility. Spooks work to prevent real news from coming out, such as by assassinating Achmed Shah Masood. The real perpetrators of 9/11 necessarily control these agents and agencies, and the only people that can do that are the investors that own BlackRock. That doesn't mean we shouldn't charge, prosecute, and hang lesser traitors they have corrupted to act as their minions. It just means we shouldn't be satisfied with that, but should take this chink in their armor for the opening it is to strike the heart of the beast.
I would like to see sober assessment of the evidence that is not consistent with the conclusions arrived by the first 9-11 commision so soon after the event. When the discussion is shut down then people are free to assume whatever they want, no matter how it sounds, because the official explanation is lacking.
I would like to have a grounded explanation for why there was so little rubble - maybe the picture I saw was taken after most of it was removed? Maybe a building that high grinds its rubble more so that it doesn't resemble other demolished buildings? Maybe building 7 happened to have an insulation between all the floors that we now know explodes under those conditions?
The conspiratorial theories may be more difficult to prove, but the science should be straightforward reverse-engineering. If the science fails then it should be declared loudly.
Regarding the amount of rubble, you have to look at a room you're in and understand that the vast majority of the volume of a building is empty space. Buildings are very thin shells of highly engineered materials and lots of empty space. Compare pics you have seen of the 9/11 collapses to other controlled demolitions. When I did that I was no longer convinced something other than explosives had been involved, but your judgment will suit you better than mine.
There were claims that the North and South towers, at least, had asbestos insulation. It is extraordinarily inert. As long as it's not being ground into dust, asbestos is an awesome building material, but in the form of rock wool, which is the only way I've seen it used as insulation, it sheds like a cat. It sure doesn't explode. It just is claimed to cause cancer, and the owner or lessor would have had the obligation of removing and replacing all that insulation had it not blown up. Lucky Larry was really super lucky, I guess.
Thanks!
I saw a picture that was doing that very thing: comparing a demolition of a smaller tower to that of 9-11. The smaller tower had much more debris in larger chunks. It might have been a doctored comparison, but I'd like to see that question addressed. One theory was that the debris was underground, and the response to that was that the river beneath the towers was not affected - I didn't know the river ran beneath, but this is what I read. There are much extreme conspiracy theories out there that I believe might be there to be associated with valid questions.
The insulation idea was my out-there explanation as to why tower 7 fell like a controlled demolition in response to fires that allegedly melted all the floors at the same time. I really don't care for exotic explanations - I want the truth.
Dr. Judy Woods has written a book about it, claiming the towers were atomized with some unknown DEW device with that capability. I do not ascribe to this theory, and can only recommend you watch more building demolitions. I have seen they typically produce identical clouds of dust. Here's a few.
I recall that for weeks after the event, pools of liquid iron remained too hot for work to proceed on the ground. This cannot happen from office fires. That can only be the result of special incendiary compounds that demolition teams use to cut steel beams when pulling a building, thermite and thermate. Both were detected in the debris by researchers as well. There is also video that shows molten steel pouring out of the towers prior to their collapse. Office fires did not produce that heat. It is not physically possible for anything other than thermite or thermate to have done that during a controlled demolition.
Lucky Larry famously confessed that (((they))) decided it was too damaged and made the decision to 'pull it', which is demolition jargon for demolishing the building. However, the work to install the charges and prepare the building for demolition takes weeks, and was already done on Building 7, demonstrating that the demolition had been planned in advance and the building was loaded with explosives prior to 9/11.
It is not lawful to occupy a building that has been wired and loaded with demolition charges, and that crime was never investigated, like any of the other crimes that were committed.
Further a whistleblower has confessed on his deathbed to have been part of the team that did the preparation of Building 7 for demolition.
Edit: I hadn't watched that video on controlled demolitions and didn't realize many of the demolitions weren't of office buildings, but highways, radio masts, and silos. Sorry.
Also, something I forgot whether I have mentioned it or not, but the BBC broadcast a video report on Building 7 having collapsed, while the reporter was shown with Building 7 still standing behind her. They were obviously notified it was coming down, and were misinformed or erred on the timing of the demolition.
As there is no source in the article linked and the youtube video is a picture with a TTS, I find more credibility in my own observation of the towers collapsing. I had that exact thought at the time and told my coworker something like, "I think it's going to come out that they triggered a demolition to control the destruction because they didn't want it to fall into other buildings." If it is this dependable that every building just needs a sloppy fire to neatly fold it into its foundation then why do we do controlled demolitions? I was guessing that it was setup that way for a while and they triggered it - not that the entire attack was planned weeks ahead of time. These are questions that need addressing: was it a false flag attack or was there an illegal installation of explosives that were triggered - including for building 7?
Including Aliens zapping it with DEW seems to me to be a distraction. Besides, we know what happens when the aliens do it: It blows up with a cascading explosion of the entire city. I watched Independence Day, ya know! 😁
It's an extensive job to place explosives to implode a building, as all three were on 9/11, and you cannot do that in buildings that are afire. Those demolition charges necessarily had to be in place in advance.
If by 'linked article' you refer to the Alex Jones piece on Archive.org, I personally saw Lucky Larry on video saying 'we decided to pull it', so you can cite me on that point. Anyway you're completely right about the need for an actual investigation rather than a cover up, charges filed, and prosecutions of the guilty, preferably in time to hang them before they all die of old age.
The Israeli art student angle continued to figure into the planting of charges in the Twin Towers. For some reason they documented their work photographically.
Thank you for your witness vote!
Have a !BEER on me!
To Opt-Out of my witness beer program just comment STOP below
View or trade
BEER.Hey @harvestmoon299, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your
BEER.View or trade
BEER.Hey @harvestmoon299, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!Do you want to win SOME BEER together with your friends and draw the
BEERKING.Do you suspect that Trump is one of these patsies? I do.
I don't think he was set up to be a patsy, but I do think he has a lot more information than he shares. Fred Trump, President Trump's father, built Brighton Beach for Russian emigres back in the day, and that is where the Donald became associated with Jews, whom he has had a lifelong relationship with ever since, as those emigres were largely Jews, Chabad Lubavitchers, and mobsters (according to research I have seen reported, not by my own personal knowledge). As such I think that ilk is who sets up the patsies (as spooks in the various intelligence agencies, Mossad, MI6, CIA, DIA, and etc.), but the real shot callers are the investors in BlackRock that basically have a controlling interest in every stock corporation in the world. Mossad clearly was closely surveilling the claimed hijackers, which suggests to me they set them up as the patsies.
If evidence comes to light that President Trump is shown to have foreknowledge of 9/11 - which I do not assert, but can neither deny - then he would probably become a patsy. He's done a lot to set his kids up, and I think he'd take that hit to protect his family. Rudy Giuliani exited the building in which he had his mayoral office with his entire staff immediately prior to the planes hitting. That strongly suggests Mayor Giuliani did have foreknowledge of 9/11 to me, and Giuliani had a long relationship with President Trump thereafter, and to an unknown extent prior, that would make that foreknowledge almost certain to have come up after the event, at least. I would absolutely demand to know why Giuliani took his entire staff out of the building immediately prior to the event were I his employer, which the Donald was for years.
Thanks!
Bringing Trunp into 9-11 isn’t helpful at all. It’s got silly vibes. He was so low level in 2001 it just isn’t even helpful trying to make that connection.
I have pointed out the very significant training the Donald received after his lifelong association with Chabad Lubavitch and the Russian mob, from Roy Cohn. When this is added to his business operations in NYC and financial connections to the Rothschild banksters, and then to the blackmail files that have been acquired since his presidencies, I think you are steeply discounting his fundamental utility to the enemies of humanity that have mandated the jabs incorporating SV40 carcinogens by his hand, the imposition of functional mechanisms to disappear civilians by sending them to El Salvador, which has far greater capacity and lack of access than Gitmo, and the financial machinations now being implemented.
He may not be the king of the world, but he's certainly playing that part on TV, and his specific skill set is fundamental to managing political power in the West, fueled by the extortion files he has acquired during his presidential administrations. I don't think you can name anyone with more power in the world today, despite he is but a minion of covert overlords in families that have wielded that power for generations, centuries, even perhaps millennia.
Like JFK, 9/11 is really about who dun it.
Sure, we can talk all we want about how, and the timeline of events, but if we start talking about Bushies using this moment to renew tons of bonds, that everyone would have asked, how did he have these?
And then IsReal? was involved.
And Bin Laden, everyone's favorite uncle, playing patsy.
And whomever was controlling air traffic and response.
And that filing cabinet who was living at the Pentagon. That poor filing cabinet.
And then you had ALL the NYC dump trucks working on this project, that day.
How many peoples is that? What? Its like all of them?
They are the same people on that other list that they can't quite release?
But as (James) Corbett Report said in 5 minutes they didn't investigate the flow of money because it was of "Little practical significance"
Rumsfeld announcing that $2.3T was just lost on 9/10/01 is just too cohencidental for me. Then there's the shorts on American Airlines that made somebody $B's. There's also the massive store of bullion that was under the towers that just vanished. Lucky Larry wasn't the only bandit that profited from 9/11.
Thanks!
Dear @valued-customer !
Are you claiming that Donald Trump had something to do with 9/11?😨
Are Jews with ties to the Trump family responsible for 9/11?
As I recall, Giuliani was the mayor of New York when 9/11 happened.
I find it hard to believe that Trump and Giuliani caused the deaths of thousands of Americans!
The United States could have created any number of reasons to invade Iraq and Afghanistan about 24years ago.
If your guess is true, Trump and Giuliani will have to watch out for your gun for the rest of their lives.
Trump in 2001? Honestly. Bringing 2001 Trunp into 9-11 discussion is ridiculous and comes off as a disinformation distraction. I know @valued-customer only has good intentions, but this is beyond ridiculous and regardless of anything only comes off 2 discredit us.
I very strongly disagree. The Donald's career and education prior to the present day inform his purposes and abilities that we should carefully reckon to establish our support or opposition to his policies. The fact that the Weiner laptop, the NXIVM files, Epstein's files, and now Diddy's files, have all been acquired by law enforcement, and yet the only prosecutions that resulted from these phat databases of horrific child trafficking and extortion of US and other government and public figures are of Epstein, a few NXIVM principals, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Weiner (for sexting a minor), without any revelations of the specific crimes of Kill Gates, for example, reveal that the Donald's decades long apprenticeship to Roy Cohn, whom confessed on his deathbed to being a pimp of little boys to powerful politicians in order to extort them, has been formative to his present policies. The maintenance of secrecy of that information enables it to be useful blackmail, and the Donald reveals that his training by Roy Cohn has enabled him to rule the free world as the premier extortionist in the world today.
This might also explain the revulsion and dislike Trump is accorded by so many corrupt politicians and lying enemedia, whom are all certain to be implicated in capital crimes by that covert evidence. 9/11 is linked to this extortion racket through the Mossad perpetrators of the preparation of the towers for demolitions, the 'Israeli art students', to whom you can find a link in the OP.
Please reconsider the structure and nature of political power in the West today in light of the information I have provided in the OP.
No. What I say, and you quote above, is the following.
That is not a claim that Trump even knew in advance of the 9/11 attack, much less that he was somehow involved.
I suggest you examine the evidence, and make your judgment based on what can be shown to be true. Giuliani demonstrably exited his offices with his entire staff on the morning of 9/11 prior to the planes hitting the towers. What your judgment of that fact is depends on whether you believe there is any more plausible explanation for that unique act than foreknowledge. Neither does foreknowledge imply further responsibility for that attack.
What criminal treason followed on from those attacks had very little to do with Giuliani, as the Mayoral office he occupied was not involved in military attacks on Afghanistan or Iraq.
The end of Giuliani's career has already been imposed on him by the exposure of his sexual acts with a masseuse, following his complete failure to provide any evidence to defend himself from a lawsuit regarding election irregularities and his claims about them. There is no point to bothering with that obvious scumbag. I think the Donald has put paid to that traitor already, and at his age hanging him is but scant solace. There are yet covert actors continuing to oppress and wrack America with traitorous operations that are better targets for free men today, and there are better things to do than wrangle with corrupt courts and bureaucracies when our lives, treasure, and freedom depend on our development of productive capacity to provide for our economic and civil felicity as ever more tyrannical governance is serially imposed on the West.
My guess is that the treachery of traitors will earn them their just recompense in the fullness of time. I am neither judge nor teacher, father nor executioner, of my fellow sovereigns, and I intend to see to my knitting to ensure myself, my family, and my community are secure, prosperous, and free in the days to come before I am delivered my eternal reward for my acts in this world. That is what I recommend the rest of my fellows do also, and when we have done that we might be bothered to dismantle the crime against humanity corrupt government is, although once we are free of it's machinations and duplicity, it would be comparable to hunting fleas once we are immune to their bite.