RE: LeoThread 2025-09-29 11:20
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I think it's good that way, you can't expect to get paid twice even for something you don't want to hold anymore.
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I think it's good that way, you can't expect to get paid twice even for something you don't want to hold anymore.
There in nothing about get paid twice. I am talking about the surge dividends that suppose to be mine. I never said I don't want to hold but it doesn't mean I can't set an order at high price.
I think a should be official statement is needed if they won't pay for them who set sell order of SURGE.
I agree. If it is up for sale, it is still owned buy you until it actually sells!
Hmm.
Not wanting to hold it in the future does not change the fact that you do indeed still hold it and are entitled to the yield that is promised.
Intent to sell has nothing to do with it.
But, he said in the thread that he has placed a sell order, which I thought might be considered as someone who already sold.
No. Looks like he placed a limit sell order which only sells when the price specified is reached. Until that price is reached, it is still owned by that person.
I understand it now.