RE: The Leo finance proposal: to vote or not to vote?
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Personally, I've gotten caught up in the Leo Teams HYPE marketing a few times now.
They talk big, aim big, Hype as much as they can which isn't a bad thing cause it's how marketing works on socialmedia these days, hype is good..
But.. they don't deliver results, not results that are good enough in my book anyways.
Basically. They have been paid an awful lot of money, tried many things and produces mediocre result each time.
At what point do you say enough is enough.. You tried, you failed. we're not paying for this anymore.
0
0
0.000
Hmm I would love to talk with you more about this and why you think we've produced mediocre results. A few years ago, one of the biggest things we set out to do was bring microblogging to Hive. We delivered that in a huge way and now microblogging accounts for 35% of all on-chain comment engagement.
We aimed to onboard Dash which is a $300m+ ecosystem. Now, they talk about INLEO and Hive on a near-daily basis on X.
Over the last 18 months on our proposal, we became the #1 onboarder of new Hive accounts. Not every single account is going to be perfect and retained on Hive but we have a 3-5x higher retention rate than traditional social platforms.
Onboarding and growth is not easy but IMHO, can you point to anyone doing it better than us? Delivering more results than us?
If you can, please do and I will learn from them to better our approach. I feel that we overpromise and over deliver on a technology, onboarding and growth front. I am hard-pressed to find any evidence that we are not delivering.