RE: LEO Delegators Still Receive 6-8% APR

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

my assumption was that 16% apy would mean:
($ value of Hive delegated) x 0.16 annual / 365 days / $ price LEO) => meaning always spot 0.0438% on daily basis (regardless of price speculation)

That is 16% apy , paid daily.



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

Yes, have you done the math for your delegation?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

yeah! Your calculations check out. Received 6.9 LEO instead of 14.6 LEO (which would be 0.16/365 apy) did the math for last month and get same results as you.

0
0
0.000
avatar

it's funny how Khal is just not accepting this fact and is somehow getting 21%... He certainly is smart enough to understand the basic calculations. Don't have a problem with a low APR if that's what they choose, it's just that they should make it more transparent

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Also - APY from leo.voter currently is 8.31% https://hivestats.io/@leo.voter

As there is 0 inflation and the funds are purchased on open market , the return for delegators can only be self sustainable if it is below 8.31% (curation rewards - any fee or slipperage).

Therefore if returns for delegation would be 16% - while curation rewards are 8.31% that would mean someone is sponsoring (and it would not be sustainable)

0
0
0.000
avatar

We’ll make a post and include actually transparent data. Commenting back and forth isn’t productive as I already commented and you’ve decided to keep making blogs to beat the same dead horse

The system is designed to bare minimum pay 16% APR. When adding compounding and PA from getting paid a scarce asset that isn’t being inflated (reduced in price over time), you get 21%+

The 8.3% or whatever you’re calculating here is a misrepresentation of how the system works. The continually posting of a half-baked picture is making me question the motive here — especially when I’ve already corrected and shown the math on how this system works. We’ll just put up a post with the real math so people can see how it works (again, as we’ve already done this but you seem to be hell bent on getting people to undelegate)

0
0
0.000
avatar

again, as we’ve already done this but you seem to be hell bent on getting people to undelegate)

@khaleelkazi is this reply directed at me? I must say I am a bit surprised by this reaction.

If I asked any questions on inleo it was to do research, which I would encourage others to do their research aswell (in any investment) - but please enlighten me, where do I tell/suggest people to undelegate? I noticed this post today and did the math today based on my delegation reward I received today ($ value of delegation x apy / interval rate = $ value delegation reward).

Regardless of whatever calculation method we use, I am not really sure where the quoted hostility is coming from?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am not trying to get people to undelegate. I simply think the system should be transparent. That said, I think I am starting to see the misunderstanding on how the system works (you seem to be basing the return on future outcomes, whereas I am looking at current returns). Definitely looking forward to your post. BTW I am really impressed by the amount of quality work you guys are putting into the Dex.

0
0
0.000