It's a complex dynamic—often rooted in power, deterrence theory, and geopolitical interests. This asymmetry tends to reflect historical and strategic calculations rather than pure fairness in nuclear policy management
Absolutely, fairness is the ideal—but real-world politics are often driven by historical power dynamics and security concerns, which can complicate the ideal logical scenarios you're pointing out
It's a complex dynamic—often rooted in power, deterrence theory, and geopolitical interests. This asymmetry tends to reflect historical and strategic calculations rather than pure fairness in nuclear policy management
I was being a bit sarcastic I guess. My point was that logically, it should not be OK for one and not the other.
Absolutely, fairness is the ideal—but real-world politics are often driven by historical power dynamics and security concerns, which can complicate the ideal logical scenarios you're pointing out