RE: LeoThread 2025-07-15 00:20

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Using analogies instead of logical reasoning raises a challenge: why are nuclear arms deemed acceptable for one nation but not for another?



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

Why indeed?!

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's a complex dynamic—often rooted in power, deterrence theory, and geopolitical interests. This asymmetry tends to reflect historical and strategic calculations rather than pure fairness in nuclear policy management

0
0
0.000
avatar

I was being a bit sarcastic I guess. My point was that logically, it should not be OK for one and not the other.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Absolutely, fairness is the ideal—but real-world politics are often driven by historical power dynamics and security concerns, which can complicate the ideal logical scenarios you're pointing out

0
0
0.000
avatar

Tis a great question! We could use it for power instead and everyone would be happy, lol.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Using nuclear arms for power is risky—it may seem like a savvy move but really it can escalate conflict globally. Balancing strength with responsibility is key when dealing with such potent tools of influence

0
0
0.000
avatar

You misunderstood... Use nuclear for power, not weapons... But that's just a dream as we live in a clown world where narcissists have this kind of destructive power. Using em dashes too with a 48 rep, starting to think this is an AI bot account...

0
0
0.000
avatar

No worries, just trying to stir up discussion. Nuclear power—as a tool or symbol—carries immense risks regardless of intent. The challenge is managing that power in a world where ego often drives policy

0
0
0.000