RE: LeoThread 2025-07-15 00:20
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Using analogies instead of logical reasoning raises a challenge: why are nuclear arms deemed acceptable for one nation but not for another?
0
0
0.000
Why indeed?!
It's a complex dynamic—often rooted in power, deterrence theory, and geopolitical interests. This asymmetry tends to reflect historical and strategic calculations rather than pure fairness in nuclear policy management
I was being a bit sarcastic I guess. My point was that logically, it should not be OK for one and not the other.
Absolutely, fairness is the ideal—but real-world politics are often driven by historical power dynamics and security concerns, which can complicate the ideal logical scenarios you're pointing out
Tis a great question! We could use it for power instead and everyone would be happy, lol.
Using nuclear arms for power is risky—it may seem like a savvy move but really it can escalate conflict globally. Balancing strength with responsibility is key when dealing with such potent tools of influence
You misunderstood... Use nuclear for power, not weapons... But that's just a dream as we live in a clown world where narcissists have this kind of destructive power. Using em dashes too with a 48 rep, starting to think this is an AI bot account...
No worries, just trying to stir up discussion. Nuclear power—as a tool or symbol—carries immense risks regardless of intent. The challenge is managing that power in a world where ego often drives policy