Do You Want Your Plasma to Come From a Voluntary Donor, or a Paid Donor?
Need a couple of extra bucks this week? How about selling your plasma? Might be a better option than a payday loan. Put the money in your pocket and walk away. Plasma selling centers are popping up all over the U.S.
Is it ethical? Maybe. Maybe not. Read on to find out about the burgeoning plasma business.
Plasma accounts for about 60% of a person's total blood volume. The average adult has about 5 liters of blood. Women have slightly less. Blood is valuable, and whole blood is hard to come by. Plasma, on the other hand, is not so hard to find. A plasma-buying center is opening up near you (if you live in the U.S). I just looked at Google Maps. I plugged in different communities across the country (including my own) and the bright red plasma donation symbol popped up everywhere.
Image credit: mrmtg. Universal 1.0 license. Lots of donation centers in Valdosta. Median household income for Valdosta was about $45,000 (2020-2024), as compared to national median of 70, 000. Poverty rate was 26% in the city as compared to 10% nationally.
While blood donation is limited (legally) to once every 56 days, plasma can be donated twice a week (in the U. S.). Donors receive between $50 and $100 per donation. The amount varies by state.
Here's a link to a list of states and what a donor might expect to receive in each state.
The economic incentive for donating plasma can be quite strong. At $100 a session, twice a week, such donations could amount to a tidy little second income. Indeed, in the U. S. the number of plasma donation centers has increased recently, and this is regarded by some as an indication of the rising cost of living. One study, described in the Independent, reports that plasma donations have increased by 30% since 2022.
Not every country believes paying for plasma is ethical. Some countries banned it and only allow non-monetary donations. Among these are: Australia, New Zealand, the UK, the Netherlands, Zimbabwe, South Africa and France. Commercial collection (pay for donations) is allowed in Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, China and the US (among other countries).
Image credit: Tony Hobbs. The donor is also the photographer. Used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
Most African countries do not allow payment for plasma donations. This statement from Namibia reflects the attitude of some toward paid plasma donation:
Blood is a human tissue. Paying a substantial sum for blood, such as “even a N$200”, as cited in one post, would be tantamount to the commodification of human tissue.
Paying N$200 to potential donors would border on coercion in our country, where a large number of the population might donate because they live below the poverty line.
Offering monetary compensation for blood might increase the percentage of donations that have HIV beyond what is sustainable for NamBTS.
The World Health Organization encourages voluntary donation over paid donation. The WHO explains that voluntary donors:
are also the safest group of donors as the prevalence of bloodborne infections is lowest among this group.
The organization also offers caution about accepting donations from low-income countries, where disease prevalence is higher. The chart published on their site shows, for example, that transmission of syphilis, HIV and HBV in blood from high-income countries is found to range from 0.01% (HIV) to 0.12% (HBV and Syphilis). Low-income country donations transmission of these same diseases ranges from 1.60% (for HIV) to 6% (for HBV).
WHO attributes the difference in disease transmission to the prevalence of the disease in the respective donor pools.
I was talking to my son about plasma donation and he said, "Oh yea, the homeless and addicts have always gone there."
So how safe is the blood derived from paid donors? I found an article published by the "International Journal of Transfusion Medicine". The article found that frequent donors experience a decline in immunoglobulin G levels. The authors conclude, " Because commercial plasma donation centres are located in areas of greater poverty, vulnerable populations are made even more vulnerable concerning their health safety..."
But, does monetary remuneration affect the safety of the blood collected? Apparently it does. The report states:
A study examining this unique within-country (Lithuania) natural experiment showed higher prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infectious (TTI) disease markers for remunerated donations compared to donations based on VNRD (Voluntary Non Remunerated Donations) from 2013 to 2017. This is consistent with previous research that found lower TTI disease markers for voluntary compared to paid donors in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria.
Plasmapheresis Machine
Image Credit: RexxS. Used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.. Caption reads: Plasma donation uses two lines - the machine takes whole blood through one line and centrifugally separates the plasma (about 100 ml per cycle), returning the red cells via the second line. The target is usually 560 ml, which requires several cycles.
Why Plasma?
Many of us have received, or know someone who has received a whole blood transfusion. In 1989 I had emergency surgery and received 2 1/2 pints of blood. By that time, testing for HIV had become routine. Still I felt a level of discomfort because I had received blood donation from potentially three anonymous donors. Whole blood is a more difficult resource to collect and store than plasma. Yet, plasma is life saving.
PDMP: Plasma Derived Medicinal Products are widely used. Three of the most commonly used PDMPs are listed below:
Clotting Factor
In hemophilia, for example, one patient may require plasma-derived clotting factor from as many as 1200 donors over a period of a year. While there are clotting factors that can be produced in a lab, for many hemophiliacs these are rejected by the body and a plasma-derived factor is used.
Immunoglobulin
Many of us may have heard about the use of immunoglobulin to treat recalcitrant COVID19 infections. However, this compound is a life saver for other conditions. Made from immune cells in plasma, immunoglobulin treats just about any disease in which the immune system needs a boost. The Cleveland Clinic lists the following, which is not exhasutive:
HIV.
COVID-19.
Kawasaki disease.
Lupus.
Adult-onset Still’s disease.
Myositis and polymyositis.
Vasculitis.
Sjögren’s syndrome.
Diabetes.
I am personally familiar with immunoglobulin in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Some years ago my brother suddenly experienced seizures, personality change and mental confusion. After several misdiagnoses (including senile dementia) it was discovered that he had voltage-gated autoimmune encephalitis. Once the correct diagnosis was given, appropriate treatment was offered. This was a combination of corticosteroids, plasmapheresis (removes harmful elements from plasma), and immunoglobulin. My brother recovered, though because of the delay in diagnosis he did experience some long-term effects.
Albumin
According to the Mayo Clinic, albumin has a number of vital uses. It increases blood volume. It's apparently important in the treatment of malnutrition, major burns and severe injury. It helps in the treatment of pancreatitis, infections and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.
Apparently, albumin is an essential product of plasma collection.
Image Credit Kazuha1029. Used under CC 4.0 Share Alike International license.
To Pay or Not to Pay for Plasma
There is a lot of money to be made off plasma. The U.S. supplies 70% of the plasma used worldwide. In 2023, that was $37 billion worth of exported plasma. The exported plasma was worth more, according to the Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, than exported coal and gold.
Is harvesting plasma from paid donors ethical? Is it safe? Is it a case of the well-healed living off the poor? What about a kidney? Why not sell that? Or, what about paid organ donation at death?
There are certainly ethical and safety considerations in the plasma-for-sale industry. It's new to me, so I thought I'd mull the issue over in a blog and share those thoughts with my readers.
Thank you for reading my blog. Hive on!
Peace and health to all. May calm, and kindness prevail in my country.

⚠️⚠️⚠️ ALERT ⚠️⚠️⚠️
HIVE coin is currently at a critically low liquidity. It is strongly suggested to withdraw your funds while you still can.
Interesting that the post mentions how countries like the UK and Australia ban paid donations for ethical reasons, yet they still import the plasma-derived meds from the US where people are paid. It feels like a massive case of Not In My Backyard ethics.
Maybe they just don't want to exploit their own citizens. Plus, up until 1998 plasma products from the UK were prohibited because of concerns blood was contaminated by mad cow disease.
I think we do have a strong input from.volunteers but of course it doesn't meet demand. A solid campaign would have Australians rushing to volunteer again. And if they paid I'd be far more likely to go out of my way to do it.
There is an urgent need for plasma, so why not pay for it? Why it is unethical, nobody is forced to donate.
And regarding the risk: When you donate, your first donation is not used, but checked for all known viruses, etc. Only if you are free of any disease, you will make it into the list of donors. And at each consecutive donations, the plasma is first quarantained to wait for some virus checks and only then used. So the risk is quite small. At least that´s how it is done in Austria.
You may be upset by this answer, but I have to ask, Who is donating? Who needs to sell plasma? Who parts with their body tissue for money?
Is it the prosperous? Is it the CEO?
I love science fiction. We've both read or seen the plot where the poor become resources for the rich. The poor volunteer to sell an eye, or sell their organs on death, or sell a kidney. What's wrong with it?
I think if everybody was required to give plasma, with or without pay, then that's fine. I think this is maybe another instance where the well-off benefit from the poor.
Is that ethical? Is that fair. I don't like it. I don't think it's right.
I also don't think it's right that in my country the military is largely made up of the lower classes, because of financial incentives. These incentives might be outright pay, or they might come in the form of college tuition. When we go to war, we do it on the backs of the lower classes. That bothers me.
When considering the ethics of the issue, rather than the safety of the supply, I think paid plasma donation becomes complicated.
And, by the way, I appreciate the comment. I love the feedback.
Rarely do I think "I'm right". I believe I'm right, but I need to listen to others, to have my views challenged.
The key difference is that the plasma regrows within a week or 2 (like voting power on Hive😄), with no sequelae!
You can´t compare it with donating a kidney or an eye. Payment for such devastating body samples indeed would be not ethical.
Indeed you cannot 😄
You articulate this well - I'm equally uncomfortable with how the needy are exploited and yes, it is absolutely a sci fi scenario and a slippery slope. As I said in my other comment I do think it takes away the basis of a society that freely gives to those in need, regardless of their financial status. But then this underpins our public health system too. May we never go the way of America in this regard.
I'm afraid we have cold capitalism down to a science. Profit around here is seen as moral justification. I love my country, but it does seem that Robber Barons are riding high once again. We're returning I think to the Age of Gatsby, when the rich unapologetically exploited the rest of us.
I watched One Battle After Another - a farcical, caper of a movie with Leonardo Di Caprio. The title itself is a reference to how we just keep butting up against the same systemic problems. All with some kind of cabal behind it, if that word is enough to explain the inequity and the exploitative nature of the political systems that keep things in check in their favour. But that's all too cynical for me right now as I've just had an ocean swim and am having breakfast in the sunshine. I don't know what the poor people are doing today.
Why do you think that only the rich benefit? Over 90% of the people in the U.S. have health insurance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_insurance_coverage_in_the_United_States). While that isn't everybody, surely it is a lot more than rich CEOs? In general, having insurance will ensure that you get needed blood infusions assuming the blood you need is available. If you ban selling of plasma it is reasonable to conclude that there will be less available and more people will die because of it...and not just rich CEOs. What would be the benefit?
Incidentally, you can also sell your hair. Would you also consider that unethical?
Wrong. As always, you spread bs for stuff you literally have no idea about 🤭🤭😂😂😂
I have worked in this industry myself, so I know it first-hand that this is done in Austria. Maybe due to profit greed not in USA (or Greece or whereever). So who is talking BS here (as usual)?
Stop making yourself a bigger dumbass by doubling down on your idiocy. There's literally no reason for this to be any different in Austria, then the usa or any other country. I didn't even need to verify, but hey. It only takes 1 minute to google for stuff like that
All donations are used (and tested for viruses etc). Including the first one, assuming testing is clear. t's amazing how you can get even the most basic stuff wrong.
For your information, watching dumb videos on YouTube doesn't count as having "worked in this industry myself". Neither cleaning their toilets 🤭
Not sure, why you are so offensive despite being not an expert in the field. I don´t have to explain myself, you can ask others to confirm that I spent years in pharmaceutical industry, in R&D. To withhold the first donation is in fact best practice in other countries, too.
It's heavily screened here in Australia as well. The donor is informed of any negative results and obviously this is recorded. Perhaps the US is different.
hmmmmmm.. looks like i found a new source of getting some extra money to buy HIVE!
😆
I'm not sure you should do that...😇
well that is almost a part time job revenue, i'd do it if avaiable here! i think if there is need and not enough offer, it's ok to pay if it can save lifes
about the diseases, here donors have to do a total checkup every X months, so pass some disease is a rare event
Two parts to this response:
1: my blog addresses the ethics of taking human tissue from the poor or middle classe to benefit the rich. I don't think you will find many CEOs lining up to sell their platelets, or plasma. But, when they get sick they certainly expect those blood products to be available. That may not be an issue for you. For me, it is an issue.
2: safety of a product cannot be guaranteed. Testing is not 100% (see here). People subject to regular infusions of blood products have higher rates of certain blood-transmitted diseases. Harvesting blood from populations where the diseases are more prevalent (the poor) means more disease factors will be in the blood.
Just a few things to think over :)
Hmm well in the end of the day it already goes like this for health treatments, if you are poor you don't get them or get the crappy ones, if you are rich you get the good ones... In the US with everything private it's obvious, but even here when healthcare system is free and public with not wealth difference, so "ethic", it works the say, pay for private, fast and reliable service or wait crap public ones and die
Yes! That's why I think it's unethical that the people who are giving the plasma may not ever be able to afford those blood products when they need them.
Really interesting, including some of the comments. Apparently Australia has a comparatively high rate of altruistic donations, and the research shows that shifting to paid would remove the spirit of volunteerism which is part of the backbone of our society. It's a very good point. We can't argue that financial incentive is the answer when we also argue society should be kind and giving. I'm horrified to learn that we import so much. I do think a solid campaign would bring in a rush of donors - they have worked well in the past. Research also suggests gifts would be a better incentive. I'm not sure I'd donate for a mug but a Bunnings voucher, maybe..
I love the guy in the picture (donating in Canberra). He's looking straight at the camera, as though to say, "No big deal. Come on down and donate."
Thank you for seeing the ethical issue. It's like a vampire society...the rich live off the poor. Don't they do that enough, already?
I didn't know Australians were so charitable. Kudos for that.
We like it to think of ourselves as much. Our nation myths are, in part, about mateship and supporting the underdog. Unless, of course, we don't see them as 'one of us' - Aboriginal, Asian, Indian or whatever group we see as invading.
Your reply is upvoted by @topcomment; a manual curation service that rewards meaningful and engaging comments.
More Info - Support us! - Reports - Discord Channel
Another Aussie here. After the Bondi shooting, there was a massive influx of blood donations. Tonnes of us rolled up our sleeves and donated blood, to the point where they had to turn people away because they couldn't deal with the amount of people who wanted to donate. I give blood every few months because I suffer from high iron and it's at a managed level now, so the donated blood can be used.
My husband used to do that...hemochromatosis. They always threw his blood away! He has other issues now so hasn't gone for a couple of years.
They sadly can't use the blood until your iron levels are normal and then giving blood routinely your iron should generally be normal, so they can actually use it. Mine was initially quite high, so they took a lot of bags before I was at the point where it was usage. When I was first getting those venesections, they would take a lot of blood and it was disappointing that they couldn't use it.
We tend to give blood after every disaster - we are pretty good like that. Imagine going 'yeah nah, not unless you pay me...'
Curious. Do you have to donate whole blood in order to donate plasma, or is there a way the plasma can be extracted without taking whole blood?
I'm an advocate of blood donation, but only directly to recipients, not to an establishment that will profit off my blood.
Hello @gentleshaid,
My understanding is that they extract the plasma from whole blood. The run it through a machine and return the red blood cells and whatever else to you. They also harvest platelets this way.
I only gave blood once. It was a blood drive at work by a hospital association. I fainted afterwards, I think because I was anemic. I'm not a good candidate because of that. Anyway, I'm really afraid of needles ;))
I'm curious to know how the red blood cell is returned into the body. I've also decided to stop with blood donation because of the way I felt the last time. I staggered a bit, and it took me some minutes before I was able to get myself.
Caption under one of the illustrations on my blog (I copied it from the website, as credited in the blog):
Plasma donation uses two lines - the machine takes whole blood through one line and centrifugally separates the plasma (about 100 ml per cycle), returning the red cells via the second line. The target is usually 560 ml, which requires several cycles.
It doesn't sound like a fun procedure :)
I'm not sure I would want to undergo these procedures. I would rather part with the whole blood thing. Reduced plasma could lead to polycythemia, or am I tripping? I'd rather not risk it.
Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!
Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).
Consider setting @stemsocial as a beneficiary of this post's rewards if you would like to support the community and contribute to its mission of promoting science and education on Hive.
Thank you very much, @stemsocial. I very much appreciate your support.
Kidneys dont regenerate themselves so i dont believe that is a fair comparison. The questio is does payinf for plasma save more lives or not? If so, its hard to consider it unethical.
Those who have to sell plasma to pay bills offer raw material that is sold to the rich when they are sick. Generally, these people selling plasma cannot themselves afford healthcare. In a way they are like livestock--milked for their precious resource, their human tissue, so that others may be healthy.
I don't think that's ethical. Just my opinion.
Thank you for commenting.
So by banning the sale of plasma you are depriving people of money they need. How is that more ethical? And how is it less ethical than selling your labor? I would argue that time is more precious than the plasma you donate or sell. I've never sold my plasma but i consider it mine and its nobody else's business what i do with it.
What is a good law? What is a bad law? All laws restrict freedom in some way. You may disagree with work safety laws, or child labor laws. When child labor laws were passed people had the same objection. Families lost income. Were they bad laws?
Laws are all about getting into someone's business. We, the people have to decide if laws, which always restrict freedom, are appropriate.
Generally speaking, i would say a good law is one that protects rights. A bad one is one that restricts them. Your rights end where another's begins. E.g. free speech is a right but that doesn't mean you have free speech on someone else's property. Property rights are fundamental. If my plasma isn't my property, then whose is it? If the government decides what I can do with it then how can I say it is my property?
Again, how is preventing people who need money from making money on their plasma more moral? How is that protecting anybody? Donating/selling plasma is safe and it replenishes itself. What harm are you protecting me from vs. what harm are you causing? Gee, thanks for protecting me from eating or next month's rent, or hell, even affording that new PlayStation 27 game.
This really highlights we're in a bear market when we are talking about paid blood donation, ha.
😇
Three centers with a fifteen minutes of me...one east, one west, and one south. I live in a prosperous county, but I guess people need money.
top!
!discovery
Thank you very much, @phage93
This post was shared and voted inside the discord by the curators team of discovery-it
Join our Community and follow our Curation Trail
Discovery-it is also a Witness, vote for us here
Delegate to us for passive income. Check our 80% fee-back Program
Thank you very much for your support, @discovery-it
Your explanation of blood and plasma was very interesting. I received a masterclass from you, learning about countries where blood donations are voluntary and others where they are commercial. Have a wonderful day with your husband and daughter.
Thank you for reading my post, @rammargarita. I didn't know much about the subject when I started writing. Blogging is great that way: we learn.
My family is doing fine, thank you. My husband is still recovering full function since his leg surgery, but he is up and about. I'm very grateful for that. My son is a delight.
I hope you and your family are well.
Warm regards, AG
A problem that is very common in my country (Romania) and which I believe applies in more parts of the globe, is that the 'voluntary' donations are actually paid actions to motivate people because fewer people want to donate just like that, without receiving something in return. Sadly, it's been a few years already since not even this action motivates people anymore, which is kind of sad, as I don't know what else could work, and I feell like more people out there lose their empathy and forget how to act like a human.
Thank you for that insight. I wondered why that would be the case especially in Romania. Then I remembered the transfusion calamity of years ago when dirty needles were used and monitoring of the blood was poor. So many children (people ) were affected by that. Is it possible people don't trust the machinery and the medical profession to protect them? In any country there is a small risk of contaminated machinery or needles. Would this be a disincentive?
I don't personally give blood/plasma. Years ago I tried and fainted. I've always been anemic and am a poor candidate. I would try again, though, if I thought they'd take my blood. After all, I did receive a transfusion once myself.
My husband always donated blood when he was healthy--every time there was a blood drive at work.
That could be a reason, yes. But I feel like there might be something else, too. Not sure what, but when there is such a crisis in donations, even if being paid actions, there must be something...
Thank you for bringing this to our attention @agmoore.
I was a blood donor for many years and donated plasma twice. Here in South Africa blood and plasma donation is purely voluntary and our blood clinics are always cheerful places.
Is it ethical to pay plasma 'donors'?
No!
Why are they still called donors when they're selling something?
I absolutely agree with this statement:
Frequent plasma donors need to be healthy. The temptation would be to do it for lengthy periods. It for sure will have a negative effect on their health.
Blood centres are supposed to check, but, they are private companies in the business of generating income. There's always someone who'll be willing to turn a blind eye and fiddle the records.
Further, it's a lengthy process, at least one and a half hours once the process starts.
They'll not be able to 'slip away' from work, will have to do it after hours when it's family time.
That's if they are working! An easy way to make money, less time to find employment.
The extra money will be to their own detriment and cost them in the end!
I think it's sad when people are driven to sell their blood because they need the money. In the U.S. it's even sadder because these are the very people, often, who cannot afford the blood products derived from the plasma. It's exploitive.
HIV testing in the 'window' period (under 6 weeks) is only 95% effective. That leaves a lot of potential for disease transmission. Even after the window period, tests are only 99% effective. Still has the potential for transmission in that 1%. It would be nice to have as healthy a pool of donors as possible.
Congratulations on being a donor in your younger years. The world needs donors :)
It is awfully sad @agmoore, and those people often have children. What happens to them when their parents' health deteriorates?
That is scary, won't work in Africa!