A Missing Element
Part of the reasons I'm not too attached on the idea of self-sovereignty and its realization is as an end state in and of itself is because I think there's a missing element of conscious interdependence, i.e the recognition that individual purpose finds its fullest expression when it contributes to a unified whole that transcends pure independence.
From an individual perspective, being your own person, fully self-reliant, independent, having the freedom to do what you want whenever you want is no doubt an incredible achievement from previous situations of pre-modern times.
We now possess perhaps "too much" agency over many aspects of our lives, with the most recent one being fundamental identity formation.
Also, the ability to reinvent ourselves through pursuing education regardless of social class or just travel across continents and connect with like-minded individuals globally, and then also challenge traditional authority structures arguably represents a quantum leap in human potential and dignity, I think.
The self-responsibility part tends to get overlooked however, given that with great freedom comes the weight of constant choice-making, based on the burden of self-definition and anxiety of crafting meaning in an increasingly atomized world.
Should I pursue becoming an engineer or just focus on creative work? Why or why not?
It could always go either way and when every decision becomes our own to make, we somehow lose the wisdom that comes from understanding how our individual gifts might serve something larger than ourselves.
How about looking at it from "what do I want?" to "what does the world need from my unique combination of talents, and with whom can I create the most meaningful impact?"
Node Autonomy
In some ways, I think you could use decentralized nodes across the globe as another reference point to understand this concept.
Blockchain networks derive their strength from their interconnectedness and ability to validate each other's transactions.
On a similar fashion, human flourishing emerges from networks of sovereign individuals who choose to collaborate, support, and build together.
Each node maintains its autonomy while contributing to a larger, more resilient system.
Arguably, one could say the trade-off on this incredible achievement is the dissolution of traditional community structures, such as weakening of extended family bonds and the loss of shared rituals and collective meaning-making, although the latter still happens more or less in a rather digitally native way.
But more so I believe the pendulum will swing back towards these fundamental human needs/principles, albeit with a self-reinforced foundation where each individual chooses their community consciously rather than being assigned to it by circumstance.
Shared Principles
As primal as it may sound in our digital age, I think tribes will continue to be held in high regard and necessity even as we enter into a more technologically advanced age.
I was watching a crypto podcast just yesterday of a guy who joined this space around the peak end of the last bull cycle and have made well for himself from that point up until now.
When asked why he joined the space, he mentioned the libertarian principles is what drew him here as he himself resonates with those principles. I think this a rather common, that many people who joined this space have.
The human "need" for shared identity, collective problem-solving, mutual support etc, transcends technological progress. If anything, our advancing technology makes these primal needs more pronounced, not less relevant.
Better Navigation
I think it makes a lot of sense to add self-sovereignty also includes having the know-how to know when and how to connect, contribute, and commit to something larger than ourselves.
If you knew what unique value you bring to the world and how to identify communities aligned with your deepest purposes, wouldn't decision-making become much simpler?
In this sense, self-sovereignty serves as a gateway rather than a destination for enabling us to choose our interdependencies wisely as opposed to accepting them by default.
Thanks for reading!! Share your thoughts below on the comments.
Congratulations @takhar! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPOne of the things that I see in HIVE as in every other social media is the tendency to look for echo-chambers. It's easier to connect digitally with people who think the same, than going out and be confronted with the dissenting views on things from the neighbors. That, too, is something that is fragmenting our society. We do not confront ourselves with "the other" anymore, but rather try to stay comfortable and seek only the like-minded.
Yes, it's a path of least resistance, which depending on the pov can be both a good and not so good aspect of our modern social life. I think identifying too much on the echo chamber digital communities we're part of is detrimental for retaining a sense of objective reality as how life works. I personally like to be at the other side of the spectrum and hear about things that are opposing even remotely to what I currently resonate with. In many cases, I can find pot holes on my own preferences but there's also no smooth straight highway on both ends of the spectrum.
Thanks for stopping by :)
I do, too, and one can find those in the internet for sure. But in the long term, it's a lot healthier for oneself and especially the community around us to get those dissenting views from our neighbors, exchange views and values with them. They will be there when push comes to shove. The internet people probably won't.
Very true, that's the part most tend to overlook. Internet community wouldn't be able to help fast enough when push comes to shove, the direct relationship for that is best built with people around our proximity.