Can Tech Ever Give Life?

Recently i was wondering if tech would ever had the ability to give life, decided to through the question to Google and it responded with Cryonics, currently tech can't give life but humanity hope it does in the nearest future.

Source

Cryonics sounds like science fiction, but the gist is simple, right after you’re declared legally dead, a team cools your body very fast, replaces your blood with special cryoprotectants, and stores you in liquid nitrogen at extremely low temperatures. The hope is that, someday, medicine and technology will be able to repair the damage from illness and freezing, and restart you or at least recover your mind and memories. It’s not cheap, it cost millions of dollars, The wealthy are the ones signing these contracts, paying serious money to reserve a spot in a steel tank, betting on a future that doesn’t exist yet. Honestly i see the idea to be less a medical plan and more a philosophical gamble.

I’ll admit, I can understand the drill, If you have the money, and you’re terrified of dying, cryonics feels like buying a lottery ticket for tomorrow, maybe not for you now, but for you later. And then when I think about brain computer interfaces and the way neural tech already helps paralyzed people move cursors or robotic arms, I can see reasons why some people imagine a day when we can repair frozen tissue or even upload the pattern of a mind into a new body or a machine. It sounds wild but five decades ago, so did video calls on a phone and recent innovations sound.

But then i thought further and doubts begin to step in. There’s the science problem that freezing forms ice crystals that can tear cells even with cryoprotectants, you can still have damage. We don’t have a method to freeze a full human brain and bring it back working. That’s a huge set back although cryonics still asks us to trust that future researchers, future machines, future laws, and future society will line up perfectly for you to return not just alive, but yourself. Hmmm, that’s a lot of ifs stacked on top of each other.

Imagine a world where some people buy a second chance at life while others never had a fair shot at the first. That thought sits badly with me, I'll feel cheated. And what happens if a few revived people wake up a hundred years from now, do they become trophies of the future, charity projects, or quiet outsiders in a world that has moved on without them? If all your loved ones are gone, your culture changed, your language shifted,does survival still feel like a win?

Culturally, we’ve seen versions of this idea in stories for a long time. Think of all the movies where a frozen hero wakes up in a strange new time line, We’ve watched movies where dead leaders are resurrected after several years of their embalmment, especially in Egyptian themed stories for instance in the Marvel X-Men Apocalypse. It sounds like cryonics on the surface, but in those tales it’s rituals that bring them back, not technology, it's incantations, sacred objects, gods. The goal in both is similar though but the methods and the mindset are very different. One puts faith in the spiritual and the other puts faith in tools and science. I don’t think one cancels the other; I think both reveal how deeply humand wish to continue life. Whether we look to priests or programmers, the ache is the same: we don’t want to say goodbye forever.

There's something I’m more cautious of,I worry about privacy and control of information,who holds your data?, your contracts?, your story? when you’re not around to fight for it. I worry about the inequality it'll create, there'll be revival for the few, memorials for the many. And I worry about responsibility, if a person gets revived, who takes care of them? What rights do they have? What happens if they wake up with no assets, no family, and no place in the new economy? Cryonics companies talk about funds and trusts, but the future is messy, we can barely get today’s systems to work fairly; imagining them managing the rights of time travelers feels ambitious.

Still, I won’t pretend the idea doesn’t spark something in me. A small, stubborn part wants to see how the story of humanity turns out in future times,the cities, the art, the tech, the kindness we might grow into. But another part of me feels grounded in the present: the people I love are here now; the conversations, the music, the food, that’s where life is certain. If I had the money, would I sign up? I’m honestly torn, I respect the wish to try, but I don’t want to outsource my peace to a future I can’t touch.

So my personal take is this: cryonics reflects our fear of endings and our faith in human ingenuity. It’s understandable, even moving, that people reach for it but I think the healthier everyday practice is simpler, live so fully now that you don’t feel owned by the fear of not existing later. If you still want the frozen safety net, go in with clear eyes, firm ethics, and no guarantees.

Posted Using INLEO