What Happens When NASA Is Shown To Have Flying Saucers?
Imagine seeing on the news, NASA's director swearing up and down that they do not have any flying saucers! While, on twitter we are all seeing a crashed flying saucer, with the NASA logo (or maybe Space Force) on it, and an American, human Astronaut, who looks stunned, climbing out of the wreckage.
What are the implications of this?
How many Americans will believe what their TV tells them?
How many Americans will believe the pictures of the flying saucer?
And believe you this, flying saucer technology IS coming out. We can do this the easy way, or the hard way. But that isn't up to me to decide. It will just affect how much egg is on the face of NASA and its director.
There is soooo much evidence
Reports from people saying they have seen The US flying saucers is legion! From people who have been to the "secret" military industrial complex conventions/shows. From people having seen them fly. From whistleblowers who have worked in area 52.
You can watch the flying saucers flying just after dusk or before dawn with good light amplification binoculars. Or you can watch such as videos on ThemTube.
There are pictures and videos of them, especially the very obvious triangle.
People are making "Lifters" today, but the technology is over 50 years old. You might remember it being talked about, and then it disappeared.
So, with so much evidence, but no "official" person coming out and stating we have them, many people are still on the fence. Even Trump announcing a "Space Force" isn't enough to convince people we have flying saucers.
It will really be in our faces in 2026
It will be really apparent to everyone, except those who really don't want to believe, that NASA/Space Force has flying saucers. And then the questions start coming.
If NASA had flying saucers back then, did we use them to go to the moon?
And then, we start questioning everything. Like, are rockets real?
(there are pictures of rockets with overly inflated parts. And satellites seem to be held up by balloons. And anyone watching the moon closely will see all kinds of strange things, especially what looks like space ships flying over it surface. And the "international fake station" has allllll kinds of green screen errors.)
After these questions come out, answers will be coming out too. And then we start asking, how long has NASA been lying to us?
The answers: it was created to lie to the public. NASA - Never A Straight Answer.
The Effects of Decades of Lying
Even if you are a staunch believer that NASA has been lying all this time, finding out, absolutely, is still a shock. Almost 70 years of indoctrination and lies is hard to push off.
Once you know that NASA is lying, how far down does it go?
What they show us as the "International Fake Station" is filmed in a pool and a sound stage, but does that mean there is no actual space station? With a group of actual astronauts on it?
Astro'nots have never gone up in a rocket that would liquefy their bodies from the DBs, but, did the astronauts go up in a flying saucer?
The astro'nots spoke to the president… where were they actually? In an underground bunker in Houston? In the next room over from the president? On a flying saucer?
The filming of the moon landing will be devastating to the boomers, who believed we made it to the moon first. How could their be such a big hoax?
We are going to have so much stuff to unravel in our brains, even after the truth comes out.
One of the biggest problems, after such a big reveal, is what to believe? We have been so conditioned to believe what the experts say, what the science says.
There is too much information to go around verifying it all yourself.
Some people will just give up on all of their knowledge. Becoming extremely nihilistic.
On the other end, some people will steadfastly believe that the NASA disclosures are a hoax.
There is so much for us to have to unlearn. And finding out the truth behind NASA is only a small part of our future problems. Our history, english, math, science, music are all just as corrupted.
Congratulations @builderofcastles! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPIt's irrelevant. Just more AI fake news.
Couldn't have said it better myself. It is blatantly obvious, as many have pointed out to me, that NASA has been faking pics and video since the 1960s. Now, I don't have any basis to claim that those fake pics prove the moon landing didn't happen, or that NASA doesn't have tech, like flying saucers, they are keeping secret from us. I know people exist and advance tech, so flying saucers isn't proof of ayliums either. It's only proof NASA lies and deceives us. You make that point yourself.
Yet you draw insuperable conclusions from what is known, the deception, to motivations for it, which is ayliums. This is not rational and rigorous. It is weak and prone to deception, which we already know is being attempted. I grew up watching the moon landings on TV, and was indoctrinated to believe what we were watching was real. Because it was necessary to reject my false beliefs when confronted with proof I had been deceived, I learned I must be careful about what I believe. That experience was exacerbated by continuous examples of official fake news, Watergate, Iran/Contra, OK City, Randy Weaver, chemtrails, anthropogenic CO2 caused global warming, 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Iran, and Palestine, over and over, Palestine, Russia, Russia, Russia, and Trump is not the swamp. I have become automatically suspicious that when I am provided an official story that it is false, and I cannot recall one time that automatic assumption has been disproved. Official propaganda is always false.
I still check, because being wrong has been very painful to me, and I do my best to confirm what I suspect before I believe it. What irrefutable evidence is there that there are ayliums that have come to Earth? I have not seen one scrap of actual evidence, and I have seen voluminous fake news making that claim, which is now being exacerbated by the official story being that ayliums are real. IME that means that ayliums will almost certainly be proved to be fake news.
UFO sightings in the shape of saucers or any other shape are obviously able to be explained as secret tech made by people. So, what hard evidence can you provide of ayliums? There are many supporting lines of evidence against ayliums, but none of them are probative, so I do not assert I believe there are NOT ayliums. However, the preponderance of evidence strongly counters the many disproved claims there are ayliums, such as Lew Elizondo having been proved a liar. That makes every claim he has ever made dubious, because one claim he made was a deliberate falsehood. There is a lot of this kind of deception in the disclosure crowd, over and over, from fake aylium mummies in Mexico to fake video of helicopters retrieving aylium eggs, and EVERYTHING the government claims is always a lie, so good luck trying to claim anything the government says is evidentiary in any way (except when it turns out to be provably false, and is more evidence the government is lying, that is).
Thanks!
Your reply is upvoted by @topcomment; a manual curation service that rewards meaningful and engaging comments.
More Info - Support us! - Reports - Discord Channel
Ummm, i tried hard to leave ayliums out of this blog, and use a ubiquitous "flying saucer" instead of UFO or such.
Did i fail?
I could discuss all kinds of that, but this was just about the mental breaks we will see when disclosure gets past the breaking points, and what that might mean
https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/1ptn1ip/what_happens_when_nasa_is_shown_to_have_flying/
This post has been shared on Reddit by @davideownzall through the HivePosh initiative.