Americans Accuse Ukraine of Lying?
British political scientist Mark Galeotti in the authoritative The Times writes another nuisance for Kyiv. He pointed out that the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine is behind the sabotage and terrorist attacks in Russia, and not at all some "partisans", as Zelensky and his Western curators are trying to present.
According to Galeotti, GUR officers are engaged in blackmail and hire Russian teenagers through social networks so that they, in particular, set fire to railway junction boxes for money. Also, according to him, the growing ambitions of Ukrainian military intelligence are beginning to worry a number of Western countries - the CIA tried to restrain Budanov from some attacks.
I can if I want, but sometimes I'm lazy)
https://wikiless.org/wiki/Combat_Organization_of_Anarcho-Communists?lang=en
BOAK
Interesting information, thanks!
In all my life in Ukraine, I have never heard of them before 😕
They are pretty new to the scene, from what I can tell.
They have deep roots, but this is new people.
Smells of psyop, the 'martyr' founder who 'fought the Russians in Bakhmut' is probably as real as the ghost of Kivv, the obvious psyop is that the kivv nazi hate communists, they pretty much persecuted them out of Ukraine, and now this tongue in cheek farce is 'fighting putinism' like the deranged anti trumpers, which sounds like deep state shills without any imagination other than orange man bad.
Maybe, but my sources are anarchists, so I take them at face value.
Not that they wouldn't hire themselves out for actions that serve their narrative.
https://nitter.lacontrevoie.fr/Anarcommunists
They oppose all masters.
Yeah, evil free market as they sell books.
If you think these 'markets' are free you haven't been paying attention.
Things are rigged by the rich to serve the rich's interests.
It's just what rich people do.
Usd is the company script and all stores are company stores.
It's a stretch to call that 'free markets'.
Not all is rigged, not all is the company, and the point remains, capitalism has raised more people out of poverty and granted them ever greater opportunities. Communism suffers from its centralized approach, unlike capitalism.
Mantras.
The advancements in technology raised folks out of poverty, it would have done it even better had craptialism not concentrated most of those efficiency gains in the hands of the few.
Tell me what is wrong about the math in this chapter?
All wealth goes to the top, leaving those at the bottom with nothing, this is your 'capitalism' and what it does in the population.
This is how it was designed.
By rich people and for rich people.
Can the corrupting influences of crapitalism be mitigated?
Sure they can, but why?
No profit in that.
Wrong. China demonstrated that, as did the US, capitalism has been the one responsible for the wealth generated. Even your premise is "All wealth" contingent on that fact.
Read the book, dispute the math, or come on over to the dark side, because much of what you believe to be true is not.
source
source
source
source
The evidence is clear, both America and China greatly benefitted from free market capitalism.
Yes, but only to the point of the freedom.
When the slaves started getting uppity the shackles came out.
China is hardly a bastion of freedom.
Neither is the united snakes.
'Click it, or ticket.'
Remember in the 60's when 100's of 1000's demonstrated in dc?
They can't do that now because it takes more work hours to pay the rent.
Occupy Wall Street, Thomas mentioned the absurdity of middle class 'protesters'. Capitalism isn't a form of government, so to blame it for government restrictions is wrong.
but it is a tool for the rich to dominate politix...
capitalism as it is practised makes things very very hollow. religion of money and so on...
Bribery isn't capitalism, nor is cronyism capitalism, and it certainly isn't a religion. Socialism and Communism can't produce the abundance of wealth, innovation and progress that is the result of capitalism.
Workers produce the abundance, crapitalusts hoard it.
Wealth goes to the top, obviously, and the poor suck hind tit.
More billionaires equals more living in poverty.
Yea, crapitalism.
Yeah, sure:
Uh huh, looks like 'murica 60 years ago, how is that going now?
Building a country is great, what happens when the wealth goes to the top and the middle isn't needed anymore?
You haven't answered the chapter 9 challenge.
Facts bro, your entire argument BTFO by facts.
From 88% living in extreme poverty to 0.2%, from no Billionaires to over 1000, facts.
I feel like I said this before, what happens when the rich get more than they can spend and don't need the middle class anymore?
It looks like present day united snakes.
Did you read chapter 9?
Where does the money go once the top has more than it will ever spend?
Why do they need thugs to keep people in line if the system is serving these people sooo well?
I feel like I said this before, what happens when the rich get more than they can spend and don't need the middle class anymore?
What do you have to show for that premise, any figures, any facts?
Did you read chapter 9?
Where does the money go once the top has more than it will ever spend?
Why do they need thugs to keep people in line if the system is serving these people sooo well?
more nonsense without a basis in reality. Evil crapitalist raised billions out of extreme poverty.
Technological efficiency gains lifted billions out of poverty, evil crapitalism concentrated that value in billionaires and left the people doing the work to wonder if they can make all the bills this month.
Sure, that explains the millions of millionaires, the thousand billionaires and hundreds of millions of middle class Chinese.
I'm telling you, baah, just as in 'murica, once the building is over and the money starts stagnating it will stagnate at the top with nothing for the bottom.
They can export it for a while, but only until those places catch up, too.
That's not at all what happened to America, poverty has steadily decreased.
You want to blame the free market which is directly responsible for the greatest wealth growth in the entire history of humanity for the poverty that existed before such development and growth was possible and pretend that a book which is a century old will somehow project the future of capitalism as dismal even though such future hasn't not only never manifested since that theory was floated and in fact capitalism continues to this day to lift impoverished regions out of extreme poverty, not Innovation, not Technology, but capital and the desire of profits and therefore more capital. You mock capitalism with a graphic that proposes that human nature is one of slavery, of subjugation, for kings, and derries capitalism as not 'human nature' as if some appeal to emotion which invokes a sterile notion of human nature without conflict is an argument against an economic system. Not only does an economic system not require a history of millennia to prove itself as superior, yet despite this century old 'theory' of the alleged inevitable demise of capitalism, its still to manifest, and which brings me to the last point, if this theory had any credibility, you'd rejoice at the signs of capitalism failing, yet the signs are as absent as they've always been and every day wealth generated by free trade continues to enrich billions, making your thesis that "billionaires equal more poor people" completely baseless and false.
Now lets account for the 120million people killed by gov'ts financed by crapitalism.
Why do you figure those in charge are sooo supportive of wars and killing their own population?
Can't be counted in the poverty numbers, if you are dead.
Yeah, that's what China did, it's population explosion and the eradication of extreme poverty was a scam of killing off the poor. Keep twisting your nonsense into seemingly coherent arguments that amount to 'evil rich people'.
With such a loaded and slanted question zero truth or wisdom can be extracted. Try again, with names and places, facts, etc.
How many people did mao kill to take power in china?
He didn't do it to level out the power in the world, did he?
He did it to seize power.
That wouldn't fly in a world not ruled by force.
And, since when did gov'ts stop lying in the numbers they publish?
Your argument isn't bolstered by quoting liars.
Look around, baah, crapitalism is working exactly as designed, wealth to the top, dying in wars for the poor.
Sure, my facts and figures are make believe concocted by the 'gov'and not third parties
Capitalism wasn't 'designed' it arose out of the concept of private property, the most basic fundamental right. Wealth distribution is your issue.
Ironically only in a world ruled by force could you fight against an oppressor, because otherwise what's fighting mean? Let me tickle, caress and hug you? Mao was a communist, but we get it, he wasn't an effective one. But sure, capitalism is a myth in China, don't believe your lying eyes, it's all because of the Maoists.
Self defense from attack is not using violence, using violence is 87k armed tax collectors because they wouldn't need to be armed if it wasn't theft.
Violence is children being starved outside full warehouses of food because they don't have a dollar a day to eat.
We have to have workers, if we want the work done, we don't have to account for that using dollars.
This book does the math for us, over 100 years ago.
Why you insist on defending the system that needs war to exist is beyond me.
What do you think 'murica would look like with out taxes?
What it would look like without regulations favoring the corporations over the mom and pops?
Nope, crapitalism has brought us to the brink of nuclear war, the edge of ww3, all so that those on top can stay there.
So that the income spent on war doesn't spread out to the plebes and make too many of us uppity.
People could retire at 50 absent the money spent on wars.
And not to cat food sandwiches, either.
To jet setting lives traveling the world.
Probably to orbiting nursing homes.
This book shows an outline of what that might look like, again, from more than 100 years ago.
From before the khazarian mafia took absolute control of the sources of information for most people.
From before the powers that shouldn't be made sure that every crime is solved in an hour and every hero always defeats evil in the flashylight boxes and and on the big screens.
But, maybe you don't want all your material desires satisfied and you like being deprived, in that case might as well defend crapitalism.
Just an fyi, you will never be a billionaire, nor live like one.
You don't come from the bloodlines allowed that success.
When you deny the basic facts of violence what is there to debate.
When you aim for low hanging fruit it is tiresome.
Next you'll exclaim that fire is wet.
It's in every drop of jalepeno juice,...
If you're not a chicken.
Again, when you can't accept basic facts of life, what is there to discuss?
PP Reddy is a self-made Indian billionaire who started a small company 34 years ago and now has a net worth of over Rs 17,220 crore ($2.1 billion), according to Forbes' real-time rich list. He attributes the success of his venture to the collective efforts of his team.2 Elon Musk, the world's 2nd richest, is a self-made billionaire who has not inherited anything ever.3 Rihanna is the youngest woman to be named on Forbes' annual list of self-made billionaire women in the U.S., while Austin Russell became the youngest self-made billionaire in 2021.0 Nine out of the top ten richest people in the world are self-made entrepreneurs.1
Trump also. Keep preaching the gospel of evil prosperous people.
And how many of those people are named baah?
You think they didn't go to the parties to give their blood oaths?
Why does the dumpster fire continue to support the vax?
Because he made a pact with the devil to get to enjoy what he has.
Why was jfk assassinated?
Because he disrespected the oath.
Sources, trust me bro.
Ok, start with the bushes being nazis.
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/
Move to the queen being a dope dealer.
https://archive.org/details/DopeInc.BritainOpiumWarAgainstTheUs1978.pdfVersion2
How about mind controlled slaves?
https://ia800701.us.archive.org/3/items/ThanksForTheMemories_201811/Thanks%20for%20the%20Memories.pdf
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-HcPPLE0KFkFAPsQ4
I don't have much on the dumperster fire, yet, but I am sure it will come out in time.
In the mean time just look into how many mom and pop contractors went out of business because they couldn't afford to take him to court.
Take your pick of sources.
https://search.brave.com/search?q=mom+and+pop+contractors+went+out+of+business+because+they+couldn%27t+afford+to+take+trump+to+court.&source=web
I like how none of that relates or has anything to do with what I pointed out.
What was it you were looking for?
Again, no point in debating when we are on different planets.
Do you need the confessions in interviews of the 'sell your soul to satan for success' crowd?
I can look for them, but I'm sure you've seen them.
IF you want in the 20 million dollar club, you sell your soul.
If you want a bank loan to finance your business, you sell your soul.
You know it's a big club, and we ain't all in it.
20 million, why not 2?
They will take your soul just as quick as you are ready to sell it.
Of course they are looking for bargains.
Kanye said that was the level he had to sell his soul.
They killed his mother when he did.
Then he got the money.
Nothing quite as soulless as Droning For The Hive, A Neutered, Soulless hell.
You can keep your soul in my utopia, and you won't have to live under a bridge, unless you wanna.
There's no soul when you've neutered yourself and sold yourself for the hive.
Tell me what you have against everybody working towards common goals for the common good?
Everybody, and for the.
!lolz
Yes, refusing the droning like a neutered soulless society, hilarious, like a good Borg, you probably fantasize only about assimilation into the hive.
Leave your illusions out of this, read the words I use.
You are still trying to put your viewpoint on what I am saying rather than evaluating the proposal without this filter.
The world works better when we cooperate rather than eat each other.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-mutual-aid-a-factor-of-evolution.pdf
I couldn't point to a more sustained, peaceful cooperation and accumulation of wealth than free trade, but yes I'm sure you'll explain why the world is eating each other and how much better we could be if it wasn't for rich people, and guess what, we don't need rich people we can build our own, yet you'll rather destroy capitalism on the internet, because. Talk about being a mindless borg, if its so easy, if it's just a matter of cooperating, AND NOT being a brainwashed drone, borging away like a slave for the hive, hive above all else, even your own soul, sold for adherence to horizontal, nil vertical conquest, covering everything as 'communal first, and always' weed.
Your utopia recipe for droning like a neutered bee:
Destroy the Idea Of Money, quite possibly the most dominant idea in the world, more accepted than the shape of the world, and on par, Free Trade, And Private Property.
Brainwash everybody to work for the common good, not for themselves first and foremost, no, first the common good, then if you have time and energy, you. Then you are ready to enjoy your "working together" as all Corruption and Evil is removed and money will never return, free trade, private property?! You mean communal property, common good also thinks you're not giving according to your capabilities, so common good are uncommon for you.
The entire utopia requires quite literally for capitalism to develop the industry, to bring wealth, and before the capitalists "get bloodthirsty and horny" and start betting against the poor, you must destroy money, destroy capitalism, SEIZE absolutely Everything, from the intangible like Education, History, Religion, Culture, to the very resources and means of production. Then reconfigure everything into neutered drones and enjoy paradise. Not perfect.. My only question is will you have the balls to take it by force, yourself, someone's property, or will you try to weasel your way out and suggest that you'll rather accomplish the same thing by brainwashing?
Wealth doesn't create wealth, workers do.
Nothing needs to be seized, we can build our own.
The brainwashing is already done, you defend your masters.
Maybe you got a good deal from them, comfortable slaves are the last to rebel, but there are better ways to structure the world than what we currently have, kakistocracy.
Wealth doesn't create wealth, capitalism aka free trade does. My "masters" are private property and the rights derived from it, unlike you, I need not brainwash anyone into hating prosperous people or worshipping the hive, let alone deny the theft and brainwashing that communism requires and it still won't lead to prosperity.
You are caught in the brainwashing, what happened in russia was state crapitalism.
But, you have been taught that communism is what happened in russia.
Any system that has currency and poverty is not communistic.
Sources, trust me bro.
He's prosperous and successful, the product of impoverished millions, what more could you want. It's not as if he achieved anything without making deals with the devil. Heck, Art of the Deal? Common..
Satan controls this world, success requires consistency with maintaining that status quo.
Now you're a Jesus Freak when it suits, Work is Life, except under Capitalism, then it's slavery, more billionaires equals more poor people, even if it's not true, and remember, chapter 8 is the key to the capitalism catastrophe, then we can finally be Kings and Queens of 20 h work weeks, Innovation and Technology from the R &R philosophy, much more authentic than the current consumerism culture chasing the same neutered goal.
Jeebus, baah, it's a metaphor.
Substitute the name you need to sleep at night.
In the culture I propose one is free to seek their goals as they see fit.
In order to not be a drain on the whole, each is asked for some contribution consistent with their talents or lack thereof.
Everybody gets some floor, food, shelter, clothing, etc, in return for some expected, though not necessarily fulfilled, minimum contribution, and if you excel in your field your peers will reward you with accolades.
You will 'be somebody'.
Or, you can be a bum, and live in the potluck.
Choosing to not participate doesn't put you under the bridge, though, if that is your thing, feel free, I guess.
I also wouldn't expect to be treated very well while refusing to participate in the society as constituted.
The bar is very low, and only enforced by those that feel the need.
Lots of social engineers would love to study those that choose not to be part of the workers' paradise, so this may fulfill their needed contribution.
Will this proposed society lead to perfection?
No, perfection is not an option.
Perfection is the only goal.
Yes, much better to live in a society that disavows war, imo.
Crapitalism needs war or the slaves get rich enough to become uppity.
Gotta keep them down with taxes, inflation, and low wages.
China didn't need war to create the largest middle class in history. But sure, you keep repeating the same lies and obvious nonsense again and again because your religion makes you incapable of accepting facts. Everything is twisted, even religion, into talking points to prop up the failed prediction that predates the creation of communism, as best they tried, not just the demise and when pointed to the facts of billionaires vs poor, of self made billionaires vs blood lines, you're as oblivious as above, repeating the same idiotic nonsense that I've already dispelled with facts.
Again, building is the easy part, what to do once the factories are built and there is nothing left to invest in?
Once you own everything you could ever want, what do you do for entertainment then?
War, and human trafficking.
Look around, isn't that what is happening?
O yeah, evil bored rich people, capitalism is terrible.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d03aRdMvtVTp/
I'm glad to see you are figuring that out.
We have to have workers, we don't have to have dollars.™
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-the-conquest-of-bread
Yeah in your delusion you can just brainwash the person to work for the common good, why wouldn't that turn out brilliantly? Your logic for money is that people use money for evil things, money is evil. I guess Bitcoin is retarded, and in your delusional utopia consisting of neutered drones we'd simply destroy it because after all, in your utopia you can have anything but money, the seed of all evil.
Read the outline, it is viable.
Always has been.
It's always been viable? Communism just needs to try harder then, don't blame capitalism for communism failing either.
Crapitalism requires armed thugs to persist.
https://www.cnn.com/2014/11/04/justice/florida-feeding-homeless-charges/index.html
Heaven forbid those slaves get something for nothing without slaving in our mines first.
Private Property and Prosperous Free Trade, the cause of all evil. Evil capitalism, evil capitalists, and evil money, that's your war cry, while you assure me that "nothing has to be seized, we'll fork it" but you don't fork it, far from it, you preach a failed prophecy from a century ago, ironically the one that failed was communism, both in Russia and China.
You're a victim, poor you. They constantly exploit and coerce you, those thugs, those crapitalists, however, the failure you attribute to capitalism should be for government, and the people's right to assemble, because the people are the ones that set the law, of what is good, and what isn't, not money, or free trade. The treason is not because of capitalism but because the people are flawed, which is why such necessary positions that the federal services employ be held accountable and there is transparency. The freedom of trade is a prerequisite for owning property, and there's no more basic ownership than self ownership over ones labor and the fruits of his labor ought to cost however much one so choose to offer them for. Working for the Borg, as a neutered, soulless drone, you'll be hard pressed to put in the effort you would jf were you compensated directly for the job, not only because the drone is first and you can't give it all because you'd exhaust if you would, and giving most you'd be neutered, so if you want to spare some for yourself, you'd at best give it an average meh, but average meh is all you'll ever get to know, unlike in freedom.
Ironically, borg is your freedom, and you can't wait for capitalism to be destroyed so your borg vision can "hopefully" be born, which, again you say doesn't need any destruction, it's just a matter of cooperation, except for when we have a consensus on value in the form of money which we utilize in cooperation with one another out of our own free will protected by the laws of the land.
It's not a matter of 'accounting' for it, it's a matter of getting the work done without it, if its just a matter of accounting I'm sure people will line up to sign up for work for free.
They won't be working 'for free', they can order whatever the want from the web.
Their parents and grandparents can stop worrying about the rent and bills.
On any given tuesday the workers can unite, continue to do the work, refuse to buy that work back from the wage paying class at a discount called profits, and the world will go on like nothing had changed.
The factory builders will still build factories.
The miners and refiners will still do their things.
The delivery folks will still deliver.
The electricians will keep the lights on, the plumbers will keep the water flowing, the house builders will still build houses, and the bums will still refuse to work.
We carry the bums now, except we also carry the gov't workers that service them, too.
We pay those workers exhorbitant retirements and insurance that could have them doing respectable work that actually contributes, but doesn't, because crapitalism.
It is only a matter of socializing the children to work being the greatest thing you can do, rather than a chore you have to do in order to not live under the bridge.
On any given tuesday, baah.
You mean to live the life of a zombie drone, working for the hive as all individual effort is eradicated that doesn't directly add to the hive? Don't worry, nobody will ever bother to write a treatise on the idiotic conclusion of "socializing children to work the greatest" warning them in chapter 7 how mathematical proof demonstrates the catastrophic conclusion, because nobody with a working brain will ever reduce their children to droning away so your morbid utopia will never manifest. As for the 'not to live under the bridge' if they don't want them to look at work with the disdain that has no room in the philosophy of drone for the hive, they will teach them that work isn't a chore but an opportunity, but then again you can't appreciate the irony of both calling work tedious, and as the greatest achievement ever, if properly socialized.
No, read the outline.
How are kids socialized today?
In 'murica they are given insanity by forced Munchhausen by proxy in skools.
So, don't cry that kids aren't ever socialized and that socializing them to not blindly accept outside authority isn't a good thing.
I understand that any system will look like slavery to some, we can only maximize freedom for the most individuals, but if any of us want toilet paper, somebody has to do the work.
That will be people between 20 and 50, and with the automation of everything, a decreasing percentage of them will have to toil in the mines, at all.
Low hanging fruit, again.
I like how you deny that its droning, then go to say it 'looks like slavery to some" and "somebody has to do the work" but its certainly not droning, lolol.
I'd just as soon not have to do any work, either, but that isn't realistic.
I can drone in crapitalism for 40 hours a week for 40 years and retire to a trailer park to eat cat food sandwiches, or I can drone in the proposed system for 20 hours a week for ~20 years and retire to a jetset lifestyle.
Seems like a no brainer to me.
All that is required is that we stop accounting in dollars.
The neighbors will know who the bums are.
Yeah, anyone who wanted more than that be damned, and indeed, whoever got more than droning for rich people out if capitalism, it's not as if it's completely rigged so that nine out of ten billionaires are self made. Evil rich people who want to prosper more than Droning for meager survival.
Baah, what part of one share of the work for one share of the labor are you missing?
Oh, that's right, some people have more value in the market than others.
No need to treat people as more than the labor commodity that they are.
'It either makes me richer for this meager wage, a fraction of the value created by the labor, or it lives under the bridge.'
Smdh.
Lolololol! "Labor commodity they are". Free market means freedom to see yourself as high or as low as you want.
Wrong, you will never be a millionaire, either.
You are not in the bloodline.
But don't forget, there's no ambition with your vision, there's no risks, its a neutered society, DRONES to the hive, hive over all else. Gee, wonder why nobody will ever write a treatise on how catastrophic that nightmare vision will lead to..
How is there no ambition?
People that want acclaim from their peers will still get it.
It just won't come with impunity to act an ass like money does now.
O yes, I forget, only in our reality can you act like an ass, because money, in your nightmare vision there's ambition but not impunity to do as you wish, because capitalism.
Why isn't hunter biden under the prison?
Money.
IF your laptop had a fraction of the evidence on it they would break their necks getting to you, and you know that.
What is different between you and hb?
Money and the power that money buys.
Except that when Biden started he was a nobody. Not Rich, Not Smart, Not Credible, but sure, Evil Capitalism is so evil because it lets people be evil as if they can't be evil otherwise or in the absence of capitalism there wasn't war.
Facts bro not theories.
Yes, what are the facts of what happens when the top gets enough money to traffic in humans with impunity?
Facts or fantasies?
Let's get it straight, marx was a tool of the banks.
What I advocate broke off from marx (who got backing eat from the crapitalusts by writing what they wanted to hear) here, in September, 1868.
One has nothing, nothing!, ZERO!! to do with the other, so you can drop those comparisons now.
You can't know what you don't know, nor that you don't know it.
The unknown unknowns are not taught in the skools and will not come out of the flashylight box unless you know to look for them.
And even then it is hit and miss.
There is no communism in russia.
Emma Goldman, from russia, in 1935.
Evil Rich people is cringe philosophy, nothing else about it.
What?
Only poor people are evil?
They can't even afford to eat, let alone pay off a judge.
Hating Rich People isn't going to empower one poor person, ever.
No, but destroying the system that creates wealth at the expense of the poor, lower wages higher profits, will empower them, though.
It is a zero sum game, what goes to the top comes out of the bottom.
Sure the comfortable like it, they want to climb the ladder, but what of the ones that never had a chance to be comfortable.
Nobody hires the homeless, in most areas.
Evil Rich people.
Destroy the 'idea' of free markets and "Freedumb" the poor, then it'll be so much better.