The PREP Act, Duty of the Government to Regulate, and the Elimination of the Natural Rights of Sovereigns Specified in the Constitution by Deception
Tens of millions are dead from the Covid jabs contracted by the MIC with Pfizer to be manufactured per FDA regulations. It has become common knowledge that the FDA colluded with Pfizer to market the jabs despite the provably fraudulent submissions Pfizer successfully provided to attain EUA approval, and subsequent full approval by the FDA.
Sasha Latypova has published today a report on how the PREP Act has been used by the USG to prevent redress of grievances by the people harmed, and the survivors of the dead killed by the jabs. This is absolutely contrary to the underlying principles upon which the USG is founded, established by the original Articles of Confederation and modified by the Constitution (The Constitution was later usurped when the corporation by the name of the United States was formed after the Civil War, IIRC in 1871, and US courts today apply the law regulating corporations, Admiralty Law, the Law of the Sea, and have no lawful jurisdiction over Common Law, which is the actual and continuing status of Natural people, whom are not corporations, legal fictions, contracted held in trust by the US, Inc., the corporate entity created in 1871. Through various deceptions and machinations we are misled to submit to Admiralty law governing contracts, and the vast majority of us are utterly unaware we are being deceived and treating ourselves as slaves in indentured servitude to this corporation, rather than free and sovereign people to whom the lawful Constitution and Articles of Confederation still apply. IANAL and am incompetent to apply the specific language operant differentiating the different legal systems and governing entities, in which words like 'for' and 'of' are critical, differentiating between the Common Law that treats Sovereign Americans, and commercially contracted legal fictions to the corporation treated in Admiralty Courts, so I am not attempting to use that specific language because my incompetence could mislead by mistaking 'for' for 'of' and exacerbate the confusion and deception of my readers).
Despite the Republic being legally restrained by the original Common Law Constitution and the sovereignty and allodial status of American nationals remaining fully operant, this corporate fiction is substituted by deception through legal language that has completely different meaning in Admiralty Courts than in English. This includes words like 'you', and 'I', which we think we well understand, because we use them every day to mean our natural person, born of our mother, free and sovereign in the Common Law, but when applied in Admiralty Court refer to the presumed incompetent ward of the State entrusted to the US, Inc.
To better understand this deception and it's existential consequence, the deadly difference between being a legal person, and a natural person by virtue of the vast difference between the body of law governing the land, and the law of the sea, I strongly recommend the report of BurnTheCorporateFiction to gain the necessary true information requisite to understanding our existential danger resulting from this deception. He has succinctly explained law, the Law of the Land, and the Law of the Sea, and how we become deceived to allow our sovereignty to be stripped from us and act as a legal fiction subject to contractural provisions not explained to us, many of which we have never signed, and in truth do not apply to us as natural living sovereign people.
This is how the PREP Act can ignore our sovereign rights to informed consent, to rule our government constituted 'by the people, for the people, and of the people', because in Admiralty Court we are not people, but assets held in trust, availed not sovereign rights, but equity of our assets allowed us by the real owner(s) of those assets. Registration isn't merely letting the State know you own some asset. Registration is legally giving our asset to the State, whom grants us the equity (the conditional right of use) of it. See the above video by BurnTheCorporateFiction for the etymology of the word registration, which was developed by William the Conqeror, and offered the Anglo-Saxons he conquered to reduce the burden of legal wrangling they had to undertake in application of the Common Law. I will point out that the prefix 'Reg' refers to the State, as in Regent, Regal, Regnant, Regulate, which at the time was embodied by the monarch, the king.
Scales of deception will drop from your eyes when you understand how we give our title to land, our private vehicles, and even our bodies to the State, when we register our title and our births are registered by our parents. By these Machiavellian deceptions we are misled into total enslavement and subjugation by the State, when we by right of our natural existence are sovereign. The truth is that if we don't stand upon our sovereignty but accept our enslavement and subjugation to the State, the Common Law cannot apply to us, but we voluntarily submit to being the property of the State under Admiralty Law. Because of the specific meaning of words that are both used commonly in English and courts of law, we must use specific words and language in court that reflect their legal use, rather than our common use in English speech, so we can't just say 'I've sovereign, and this doesn't apply to me' or we'll fail. See BurnTheCorporateFiction's report for details.
The inimitable Frances Leader has published a report on the proposed FCC rule, "Build America: Eliminating Barriers to Wireless Deployments", that will enforce the covert construction of a national surveillance grid (because radio signals, like Wifi, are now able to be used to precisely locate us, and even model our movements and posture) by preventing the several States and local jurisdictions from imposing any regulation countering Federal Law regarding placing antennae or transmission equipment for radio signaling purposes, such as Wifi, Starlink, 5G, IOT, IOB, or whatever technology they might devise or impose whatsoever, at their sole option and whim, without any recourse or petition for grievance potential to us at all. Just like the PREP Act, but for EM radiation.
IMG source - FederalRegister.gov
If they want to construct a microwave tower that blasts your home with 1M watts of microwave radiation, neither you nor your municipality, County, or State will have any ability to object or seek relief from being nuked to death instantly.
These impositions of existential harm, the mRNA jabs, the EM irradiation, even with malevolent, murderous intent, are quite lawful for a property owner to subject their chattel to under the Law of the Sea, Admiralty Law. If you assent to being chattel, which you do by using your Birth Certificate that has registered your birth - has given you to the State - and every other deceptive trick that puts your person and assets into chattelhood. Consider the following argument of a materialist denying the existence of rights, and consider your legal position as a chattel, instead of a natural person with inherent sovereignty.
As chattel he correctly states you can be gutted like a fish. As a sovereign you have the lawful right to kill him if he tries. That is the difference between rights and privileges.
These regulations are crimes against humanity in Common Law, but that doesn't apply to you or Admiralty Courts if you attempt to assert your sovereign rights in such court. US Admiralty Courts, such as District and Circuit courts, have no jurisdiction over natural persons accorded sovereignty. They only deal with the Law of the Sea, the Commercial Code, governing property of corporations, whether held in trust by an executor for a beneficiary (which you, as the ward of the State, are, and are permitted the equity in your person, your titles, and appurtenances thereto, subject to conditions and payment to their actual owner or executor) or owned outright.
Chattel has no rights. Admiralty Court, the Law of the Sea, has only jurisdiction over chattel and it's disposition by it's owners or executors. If the court in which you are appearing has an American flag with a gold fringe, you are in an Admiralty Court. If you intend to assert you are a sovereign by virtue of your natural birth and are subject only to the Law of God, the Common Law the Anglo-Saxons constantly wrangled over that William the Conqueror relieved them the burden of wrestling with, then you need to establish the jurisdiction of the right law regarding your sovereign status, and not try to beg your master that owns you to relieve your suffering they impose for their benefit.
The FCC does not have any idea of how many, nor the siting, of myriad EM transmitters that bathe us in radiation constantly, and is not fulfilling it's duty to sovereign American nationals to regulate the radiation we are exposed to. Chattel can be radiated to the heart's content of property owners or executors.
Watch the video linked above by BurnTheCorporateFiction to understand why the PREP Act and proposed FCC rule can legally be imposed on you as chattel - but not if you assert your inherent rights as a sovereign, natural person, because you have the power over your government - at least American Nationals do - as established by the documents that constituted such government. As a sovereign, natural person you are owed the duty by the State to regulate the EM radiation, the biological medical interventions marketed to you, and eliminate restrictions on your use and enjoyment of your property according to the Common Law, not the Law of the Sea.
Unless you are contracted to the US, Inc. or are it's rightful chattel.