Shakeup at the CDC, Monarez is out, at least four Follow, Covid Jab EUAs' Revoked?
I receive email notifications from Karen Kingston, a solid source regarding legal and contractual analysis of law and acquisition of the Covid jab contracts. I have learned a great deal from reading her posts, such as the jabs were contracted not by the FDA, but by the US military. Prior to her present work she assisted during contract negotiations between pharmaceutical companies and agencies, which she has long experience doing, so few might have a better understanding of these issues than she does.
Today I received an email from her that jolted me awake after a long day left me ready for a nap. Directly underneath the opening paragraph, alarming because it contained the phrase 'CDC is Gone', particularly after the recent shooting by a man enraged he was suffering adverse side effects from the jabs, was the following:
"August 28. 2025: Shortly following HHS Secretary Kennedy’s announcement that the FDA has revoked the emergency use authorizations for ALL COVID-19 injections, HHS posted on X that CDC Director Susan Monarez is no longer with the CDC."
All the EUAs were revoked? I have spent about 10 minutes scouring Brave search results seeking confirmation, or more information regarding that claim, but have not succeeded yet. However, this claim is so substantive I felt it wise to provide this information to you without delay, so the better, wiser, Hive community can seek to confirm or deny Kingston's claim for themselves.
I have however confirmed the headline. The phrase 'CDC is Gone' seems to come from NY Mag, which, though behind a paywall, has already been archived so I was able to read it on Archive.is where the above link leads. It does not refer to some kind of terrorist attack, thankfully, but the resignation under protest of CDC Director Susan Monarez and four associated agency mucky mucks so far. Apparently she was unwilling to make 'changes to vaccine policy', which isn't a confirmation of Karen Kingston's claim the Covid jabs' EUAs were revoked, but certainly could refer to that.
Big Pharma has raked in $T's from the plandemic, and tens of millions have died, with potentially billions of people injured by the jabs. Heretofore, HHS Secretary Kennedy has fired a couple staffers that approved an EUA while he was out of the office, and rescinded funding for half a $B in research into more mRNA jabs. Only yesterday Marty Makary, who heads FDA, stated that the mRNA jabs might be banned quickly, reported in an email I receive from Jon Fleetwood (who coincidentally is confirming Karen Kingstons claim the EUAs' have been rescinded, and whose email to that effect arrived in my inbox after I started this post).
https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/1960742897201872969
This appears to confirm Karen Kingston and Jon Fleetwood's claim the EUAs have been rescinded. I had not realized that wouldn't ban the jabs themselves, and they appear to still be available to folks that want them, or to inflict them on their children. Given the massive amount of peer reviewed research that has been published showing these injections increase the likelihood of subsequent infection, more severe illness and hospitalization, and deaths, in addition to causing heart failure, neurological harm, turbo cancer, and many more side effects just as severe, I would have expected them to be pulled from the market.
I still do. These aren't merely (bad) medical interventions. They are bioweapons (per Dr. Francis Boyle, the bioweapons legal expert who provided the definition of bioweapons in law and authored the treaty signed by President George H.W. Bush) and were contracted by the US military to be produced by Pfizer, not by health authorities.
Anyway, as poorly researched and rushed as this post is, here is the relevant information that I initially hoped would end the horrific death toll America and the world have suffered from these jabs. DYOR, and let me know as you discover more I have not had time to learn yet. Apologies for any formatting, grammar, or spelling errors that may reveal the haste with which this post was written.
The medical system has been used as an instrument of control, built on protocols followed blindly by those indoctrinated to never question, decisions are often accepted as “right” because they come from authority and we follow them blindly, during COVID time, I ended up arguing with a few in theatre for scheduling all staff to get vaccinated, out of 60 surgical teams, only 2 of us against it. Only a few stopped to look deeper. I hope people have opened their eyes and start questioning, especially when it involves their health.
RFK is a blessing for bringing truth to light and trying to set things right. But still many refuse to see it, because accepting the truth is uncomfortable and even frightening especially the older generations who seemed to trust so much on the medical system's decision, like last week I told off one of my older neighbours nagging the pharmacy because she hasn't received the vaccine. The truth is the only path to freedom, and it’s worth facing, no matter how difficult. I hope those in power will not try the same thing again, knowing that people are becoming aware, but at the same time, we must not underestimate how bad and greedy those in power can be. Thanks for the update. :)
Your experience is telling about your co workers blind faith, or complete complacence, regarding the industry. I grew up a close friend of a classmate that eventually became a highly skilled nurse, working in post-transplant care. All our lives we were able to discuss any topic, and I often learned a great deal, as my friend was far smarter than me. However, when the plandemic rolled out, that all changed, and I was scathingly criticized for doubting, and even daring to decline the jabs. I was stunned, but despite my inability to understand why my friend would be so wedded to the narrative regarding the plandemic, there simply was no longer any capacity of my friend to consider contrary information or reason.
Somehow, the issue reduced some people to faith in dogma in a way nothing else ever did. I found that very strange.
Thanks!
Ma'am, RFK is also part of their clique. He only brings the truth that he is allowed to bring. Another shill. Too many shills...
Don't trust a word he says, though he may sprinkle some truth into his fallacitious narratives.
He is coming out saying big things that threaten the pharmaceutical industry and just that is a big act that will benefit the whole of humanity. :)
🙂
Dear @valued-customer !
Do you think HHS Secretary Kennedy can solve the problem?
Hmm, Why do you trust the Kennedy family so much?😯
Your hero, John F. Kennedy, died 63 years ago.
I don't understand. Where have I indicated trust, or any lack of it, other than my complete lack of trust in politicians, save one, whom has retired? I note that your question regarding my feelings is a misdirection from the content of the post, which is a common debating technique used by disputants that haven't good reason to refute an opponents position, and therefore seek to divert the debate to matters they feel they have stronger arguments regarding. I do not recall you doing this, or anything similar before, and wonder if it's merely the appearance of tactical debate. I can't imagine any reason you might have to dodge issues around personnel shakeup at the CDC.
Do you have a particular reason to suspect I trust Sec. Kennedy?
Thanks!
Dear @valued-customer !
I hope you understand that my English conversation skills are at the level of an American elementary school student!
I assumed you admired John F. Kennedy! So, I figured you'd have a special affinity for the Kennedy family descendants!
Why RFK Should be Secretary of Health and Human Services
You have argued in the past that RFK should become the US Secretary of Health and Human Services!
So, I thought you trusted RFK!
I can see with this context why you would think this. As to the answer to 'why' I would refer you to the contents of the linked post - and while I haven't re-read it to confirm this - I expect that it does not indicate trust, but rather simply notes the track record of Kennedy in succeeding to curtail the criminal abuses of the companies he has sued. While that isn't faith, which is the fruit of trust, it is the best means available to assess candidates for positions.
This has bit me in the ass before, when I though Christopher Wray would demonstrate similar spine leading FBI because he took down the criminals of Enron. It is only evidence, and not proof, which that mistaken expectation reveals. The scientific method is a process of observing events and carefully collecting data that can enable finding information that disproves a hypothesis. Unless such data is available, and corrupt liars strive to conceal such information to the best of their abilities, a full understanding isn't possible and hypotheses cannot be disproved. This doesn't mean they're true. It only means they will only be disproved when all the data that reveals the truth is considered. This is why Newton's cosmology persisted for centuries, and only when very small inaccuracies were better explained by relativity was Newtonian physics disproved.
Let's hope that any evidence that reveals a better candidate is discovered quickly, so that we don't suffer the problems that come of putting corrupt people in power, as happened with Wray.
Dear @valued-customer !
Joseph from Oregon seems to have faith in Trump, while you seem like a skeptic!
I guess you have a skeptical streak because you have experienced so much good and evil, faith and betrayal, success and failure in the world!
I don't know the life you've lived so far, so I don't know if your judgment is right or wrong!
I believe you have no reason to lie to me!
I don't know much about Newton's cosmology or Einstein's theory of relativity. I thought you observed the world and humans through inductive reasoning!
You are a scientist, so you use inductive reasoning, but I am a historian, so I use deductive reasoning!
I guessed you were an American Democrat!😄
I hope your health and longlife!
When I was a child I was involved with poor company. I knew a smuggler who used a boat to bring a kilo of cocaine to my village. Shortly after he arrived he was killed by the police, and the police began selling cocaine out of the local police station.
The police reported he shot himself twice in the heart with a lever action rifle, which is impossible, and this is the basis for my trust and faith in government at all levels. If the police in a village on an island in Alaska are this corrupt, all government is that corrupt or worse. I believe it is far worse, and we had it good in the village where I grew up.
I am not a Democrat, nor a Republican. I am sovereign, an Autocrat. I note that each and every human being largely rules themselves, each deciding when to sleep, when to wake, when to brush their teeth, how to style their hair, and etc. No one makes these decisions for them - yet we are robbed of our treasure by gangs who claim to have authority over us to tell us what to do and when. We call this gang government, and we pay because we don't want to shoot ourselves twice in the heart with a lever action rifle, so they don't rob and murder us.
I am an anti-gang crusader, and seek to live my life as a free man, encouraging all men to do the same.
Be well.
Dear @valued-customer !
I remembered you living in France as a child, but I was surprised to learn that you lived on an island in Alaska!😲
I remembered that Alaska was the most violent state in the United States because it had the weakest public authority.
I remember that in many parts of the United States, civilians formed vigilante groups because there were no police or military to maintain public authority! Perhaps you were part of one too?
I find it difficult to understand the United States from my perspective because it has such a large territory and diverse human groups!
I had a dangerous imagination that you were an anarchist!😆
It isn't violent because of weak public authority. It is violent because there's 10 men for every woman. Weak public authority doesn't cause violence in a high trust society. People themselves maintain order. It has been shown that civilians use their personal arms to prevent crimes 4x more often than crimes are committed with weapons. In places where it's against the law to have personal arms, such as New York City, Chicago, and London, crime rates are far higher, because criminals don't obey the law so they have weapons, but good people do obey the law and they are helpless to prevent crime.
Police never, ever prevent a crime from happening. They are only called AFTER a crime has occurred. Only armed civilians ever prevent crimes from happening.
Dear @valued-customer !
For someone living in a small world like mine, it's hard to understand the vast and diverse world of America!
I also don't trust the police or the military, so I think we need vigilantes!
The overlords of East Asia do not tolerate armed civilians!
The overlords of East Asia believe that armed civilians will kill them!
Perhaps I should go deer hunting with you in America to understand your life!
I hope your health and long life!
When we are ruled by murderous thieves, the thieves definitely prefer unarmed helpless victims to rob. Overlords prefer unarmed victims, but this doesn't help society or benefit communities. It only benefits murderous robbers, which is what overlords are.
I am confident this will enable you to better understand yourself, and your actual place and function in the real world. Understanding me better is the least important thing you would learn from it.
Prosper in joy.
Most people are unaware that deer eat seaweed, and forage on beaches. Deer are also powerful swimmers, and I have seen deer swimming in the ocean to travel from island to island, where islands can be less than an acre and incapable of permanent residency by deer.
Elk are ~5x the size of deer. The spike bulls in the herd I chased around yesterday were easily >5x the size of that spike buck.
Thanks!
My hero!
@valued-customer, I paid out 0.651 HIVE and 0.125 HBD to reward 8 comments in this discussion thread.
It seems something's changed at least, which is positive.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/fda-approves-fall-covid-shots-but-with-new-restrictions/ar-AA1LkLuE