RE: Somebody Prove this is AI Please - Hive.Blog users will see a blank post. Use Peakd to see this Post.

"...finding the bullet should have been priority # one. Crime scene should have been frozen till they found it."

This is an excellent point I didn't raise, but is absolutely true. It is diagnostic of false flags that security and investigative procedures are blatantly violated, evidence quickly destroyed by authorities, or never being collected. There is no good reason the FBI doesn't have that bullet. An ordinary .30-06 hunting round would absolutely have shattered vertebra(e) had it struck the spine, and Kirk's head would not have remained supported had the spine been struck. That bullet would also establish a trajectory. There is an entire field of blood spatter science that has been developed to parse that kind of evidence, and there's been no mention of any such thing by the FBI to my knowledge. There was only one wound visible from the front, which means the bullet didn't travel from beside Kirk on a directly lateral path, because that would have left two wounds visible from the front (it struck the jugular, which is in front of the spine, and the bullet would have continued on into the crowd to either side), but relatively in line from front to back. Had the bullet come from behind him it would have also continued into the crowd, and that didn't happen. The wound was off center, but caused by a projectile coming from in front of him and an '06 would create a substantial exit wound, blood spatter, and a bullet impact on something behind him which would establish the exact trajectory from which it came.

Destruction or concealment of evidence by authorities is a characteristic feature of false flags where the actual evidence disproves the official narrative, and the failure to produce the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk is strong evidence of a false flag.

Thanks!