Physical Absurdities

Something anyone competent enough at math will discover is that whatever is analyzed mathematically ends up becoming absurd. If you shoot a bullet up at the moon (or at the dragon eating the sun, as recently happened) it will strike the Earth. As absurd as that seems, it is easily demonstrable. Ballistics isn't just mathematical trickery, but how objects in motion do act.

Ok, you say, so if I am unhappy about the absurdity of ballistics and want to cease participating in the absurd universe, all I have to do is aim perfectly straight up and gravity will eventually turn the bullet back at me, and I'll shoot myself. But noooooo. That isn't what happens at all. Even if there's not the slightest breeze to blow the bullet off course - which, of course, is what happens in the real world - the Earth is spinning so fast that in ~24 hours the entire circumference of the planet is traversed by the point where you stand and aim your bullet, so you will spin madly away from the point at which you fired the bullet, during the time it takes for it to fall back down, some distance, and will miss you. If you fire a bullet that will take ~24 hours to fall back down, well, that bullet is too fast to fall back down at all, and even the fact that we're (Earth and everything on it) traveling along an orbital path as we spin won't even matter. If you just toss a heavy rock up, however, it will fall right back down on you. At the scale at which we can affect sticks and rocks manually everything makes perfect sense.

Orbital mechanics is a kind of ballistics, a mathematical description of objects in motion, that Newton described a few centuries ago. While his observations and math showed him that each and every object with mass attracted each and every other object with mass, he was perplexed that this force of attraction was somehow exerted across a vacuum, which he found absurd. Newton was an incomparable genius that independently invented the mathematical language necessary to his calculations, calculus, and his insights and brilliant understanding of the heavens were suitably admired and believed for centuries.

However, a clerk in a patent office that failed the university coursework in math completely refuted the genius Newton, and upended the cosmology and physics all his professors had learned and failed at teaching him. Einsteinian orbital mechanics interposed a kind of medium across which the force of gravity was conveyed - spacetime - through geometrical deformation of that medium in the presence of mass. Worse, there are credible accusations Einstein himself plagiarized his revolution in physics, which really brings the circus of absurdity into view in the center ring, as it were.

Popular science vlogger Veritasium illustrates just how absurd physics can get in this video, which I happily recommend to any and all with an interest in physics, black holes, space, time, spacetime, and absurdities. Einstein-Rosen Bridges, white holes, parallel universes, falling into - and out of - black holes, and more are all touched on in the video, which also notes that the mathematical solutions to Einstein's equations require dividing by zero, which you can't do. As far as math goes, dividing by zero is full retardation. Don't do it. Don't try this at home. Leave dividing by zero to the trained professionals that make a living coming up with ever more absurd cosmological explanations.

ProperOrbit.png
IMG source - Odysee.com/@veritasium - orbital mechanics says this is falling straight down

The reality that spacetime isn't static, which is how we perceive it, is provably true, and our senses lie to us because they didn't evolve to understand orbital mechanics, but mere ballistics of things propelled by hand, sticks and rocks, flung at prey in the hopes of gaining dinner, in which all this spinning and contraction don't come into play at all. We aren't designed to perceive the breadth of the universe as it is, but only that part of it we can affect with sticks and rocks manually, which demonstrates that scale really matters. Not only that, but we perceive space and time quite distinctly from each other, not as the actual web of reality they are - it is - as spacetime. This demonstrates just how absurd physics is from our human perspective, as our senses have evolved to lie to us in the most useful manner, regarding our daily supper, and this innate understanding we have of the reality we are in is quickly belied at other scales, whether too small or too large to be seen with Mark I eyeballs.

The bigger and badder the sticks and rocks we throw at each other become, the more absurd ballistics - and politics - become. I enjoy having my perspective twisted and warped by trained professionals, and Veritasium makes an admirable run at it. Have a look that you might become deranged enough this absurd universe makes sense to you.



0
0
0.000
10 comments
avatar

It is a grand design. You have studied well. I watched Flatland. We came up with the same conclusion. :)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @valued-customer! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You distributed more than 58000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 59000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

Hive Power Up Day - May 1st 2024
0
0
0.000
avatar

Hello
I love watching Veritasium, He explains complicated things in simple words.
I'm interested in what you said because I like astronomy.

Perhaps we have learned to detect gravity, to measure it, to use it primitively for our own purposes, but we have not been able to understand it. Those who divide by zero are great at calculating the gravitational maneuvers of satellites relative to heavy planets, although I personally do not understand the nature and mechanics of gravity even when I watch videos with visual models of space-time curvature by massive bodies.

I'll watch the video if I can find it in translation
Thank you!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I realize you, despite how well you read and write English, probably find it much more difficult to understand the spoken words. Even if it's difficult, and you have to take it in little bits with lots of time to translate the bits, I am confident it will help and inspire you to better understand gravity and relativity. I realized some while ago that gravity wasn't a force at all. It's just the shape of spacetime in the presence of mass. How gravity effects the shape of spacetime remains beyond me, but such realization as I have attained much simplifies the very bizarre things that physicists tell us their calculations reveal.

I still don't think we know half the things we think we do about the universe, because, like Newton, we are tricked by math into thinking we understand things we have completely wrong. The radical difference between Newton's cosmology and Einsteinian illustrates how very small mathematical differences reveal monstrously huge misunderstanding of reality. The calculations of rocket trajectories and orbits are almost identical in their result, but why they attain their results is vastly different, and the relativistic calculations are orders of magnitude more difficult than the Newtonian. As a result, rocket scientists use Newton's math to calculate rocket trajectories and orbits, despite the fact that the cosmology is absolutely false, because the results are close enough for rocket science.

It's possible that the video from Veritasium will help you to make that leap in understanding, if you take the time to well understand what is said and the diagrams that accompany his statements. It helped me to understand different ways of conceiving of Einstein-Rosen Bridging, and some other things, like parallel universes, as well as why some physicists maintain such things cannot exist.

My take that we aren't designed to understand these scales of physics, that we don't even perceive spacetime as the one thing it is, is a balm to soothe us when we face such absurdities uncomprehendingly. I need that soothing because I can count to 21 with my pants down, and the math these physicists do might as well be magic spells to me.

I hope you are edified and come to a better understanding of the world we live in from Veritasium's video, and I might have contributed to that good end by bringing it to your awareness.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!

Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).

You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support. 
 

0
0
0.000
avatar

you might become deranged enough this absurd universe makes sense to you.

Every religion should have this one belief: that once you die, the universe will suddenly make perfect sense and the absurdity of "space majik" and "dark matter" and "gas planets" will be cleansed from our minds, because (well we're dead and) the truth is so much simpler. IF we dip our toe in early while we're breathing, we can experience some of that simplicity right now, if we can tolerate the entire world shouting "heresy" and laughing at us... simpleton!

0
0
0.000
avatar

"...once you die, the universe will suddenly make perfect sense..."

I thought that's what all religions were about. As for me, I enjoy realizing life is a joke played on us. Anyone laughing at me is laughing with me, because I am too.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I still don't think we know half the things we think we do about the universe, because, like Newton, we are tricked by math into thinking we understand things we have completely wrong. The radical difference between Newton's cosmology and Einsteinian illustrates how very small mathematical differences reveal monstrously huge misunderstanding of reality. The calculations of rocket trajectories and orbits are almost identical in their result, but why they attain their results is vastly different, and the relativistic calculations are orders of magnitude more difficult than the Newtonian. As a result, rocket scientists use Newton's math to calculate rocket trajectories and orbits, despite the fact that the cosmology is absolutely false, because the results are close enough for rocket science.

Dear @valued-customer !
Perhaps an American elementary school student would not understand your brilliant ideas!
However, I think the universe is not understood by human science and mathematics!
I think Newton and Einstein's theories are imagining parts of the universe!

I believe in the existence of God, seeing that life exists only on Earth in the infinite universe.

On other planets in the universe, life could not be born at all due to the harsh environment.

The fact that life was born only on Earth in a universe completely devoid of life proves the truth of the Bible!

I am curious about the fundamentals and value of our existence as we live on Earth, running in an infinite universe completely unknown to humans!

Perhaps atheists commit suicide out of loneliness and despair that they are the only human beings in an infinite universe!

Even people stranded on an uninhabited island in the Pacific have a desire to survive because of the hope of meeting other people.

I am always curious about @valued-customer who lives across the vast Pacific Ocean and would like to meet him in person!😄

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am sure we would be well met should that happy meeting some day come.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000