Additional Analysis of the US Strikes on Iran

I avoid enemedia like the plague. Therefore I depend on independent researchers to provide information from official sources, because I prefer honest discussion about lies to liars lying to me. However my last post was based on very cursory information regarding the actual situation that I derived from the post of President Trump, with very limited commentary from anyone telling the actual truth. While I do not believe I was wrong about the principles and consequences I stated, my information was that the bombing did impact radioactive material, which was implicit in Trump's claim of success. It may not have, and the ruinous consequences of such dirty bombing may therefore not issue, and that horror may not afflict innocent civilians or living ecosystems, which greatly mitigates the consequences of the terrorism I was given to understand.

IMG source - Substack.com

In 'A paedophile and a wanted war criminal are dragging us into World War III', Ricky Hale and Council Estate Media report the following:

"The US launched six bunker busters at Fordow from B-2 stealth bombers, and 30 Tomahawks at the other sites from a submarine. Trump is claiming the attacks were a total success, but that seems doubtful for reasons I'll get to later.

"The bombing was illegal on several counts: it was an act of aggression against a country that had not attacked the US, a country that was already the victim of an illegal war of aggression with Israel, and it was carried out without congressional approval, but more importantly than that, it was an attack on nuclear facilities."

Later he adds this:

"In the case of Fordow, the US reportedly destroyed the entrance and exits, leaving the core intact. This sounds plausible, given their own assessment was that a tactical nuke would be needed to finish the job (and there is no evidence of one being used).

"In the case of the other two sites, it's hard to see what impact those Tomahawks could have had."

and

"...Iran apparently suffered superficial damage in the US attack..."

In the event this analysis conforms to the actual damage on the ground, radioactive material is unlikely to have been aerosolized and inflicted on the environment, a blessing I had not considered possible with the limited, and apparently largely false, information President Trump provided. It is my earnest hope that is the case.

https://x.com/mashabani/status/1936629470540034218

If Iran, China, and Russia do not have to respond to radioactive fallout inflicted on Iran, it is yet possible humanity will not be embroiled in nuclear war. Despite the potential blackmail that has been alleged Trump is subjected to (by the claim made by Elon Musk in a now deleted tweet, viewed in the light of Trump's abject servility to Mileikowski/Satanyahu), Trump may have failed to light the world afire with nuclear conflagration as his diabolical master(s) (may have) sought.

Iran's response to this provocation may be what decides whether life on Earth is extinguished, or the terrorist regime of genocidal extortionist Israel comes to an end, as it should. In the best case all these evil bastards are toasting their successful deceptive propaganda campaign on a Zoom call and celebrating the massive profits that will be forthcoming as the new orders roll in to the defense contractor war profiteers, banksters financing them at compound interest, and from the ever increasing tax burden on the hapless tax cattle they afflict.

We shall see.