RE: Hive Needs Services Not Users

Very good post as usual, and I must say that, for the most part, I agree with what you're saying. However, I disagree with the proposed solutions. Here's a post I wrote a couple of days ago with some opinions: https://inleo.io/@uncubanomas/el-papel-del-creador-de-contenido-dentro-de-hive-the-role-of-the-content-creator-on-hive

In response to your comments about what Hive has to offer the public: Content, YouTube, Twitter, Spotify, Netflix are examples of a profitable business. The real issue lies in the distribution of rewards. It's been wrongly believed that writing a 600-word article with proper citations entitles you to monetize. On any social network, generating a lot of traffic is essential to making money, and for that, the content needs to be not only of high quality but also of mass interest.

Videos with low quality, no post-production, unappealing thumbnails, singers with poor audio, and articles that are pure filler should not be rewarded. Instead, reward creators who are genuinely going the extra mile, creating content capable of competing with other social media platforms to attract an audience.

Excessive support for Hive-related content.

Regarding the use cases of the Hive token: Stop supporting projects that continue creating new tokens, such as games or front ends that could easily use Hive instead. Improve the APR of staking; it's ridiculous to earn 20% for doing nothing with your HBD, and barely reach 8.7% by optimizing your curation strategy to the fullest with HP

NOT bringing in companies or specialists from outside to do the work seems like a mistake to me. No one does their job better than a specialist, an active community participant may do good marketing, but never like a professional with years of study and experience. This applies to all sectors. If you want to see Hive as a company, you need professionals to manage it.

I think that covers it, greetings.