RE: Blackrock Is Going To Lose In Ukraine
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
but they are also that much closer to NATO countries.
Yet they want to make Ukraine part of NATO which would put it right on Russia's border.
Where has Putin shown he wants to take over all of Ukraine? That is the problem. The media is lying so much that it is going to end up costing the West dearly.
0
0
0.000
This only came up because of what Russia did. I believe they continuously denied Ukraine's attempts to join. Since Russia is trying to move closer to NATO borders anyways, might as well increase an ally, than let the enemy get more people and area.
A simple google search seems to contradict this:
I guess if you want to be literal about it, Putin doesn't want to take over something he considers doesn't exist. The media can be lying about a lot of things, but I don't think it is worse than what Russia has been spouting all this time. I believe they said this was just a training exercise when it first started.
Considering that this all centers around the West not adhering to the Minsk agreements, something that Merkle admitted was a sham by the West, we can isolate what Putin's intentions were.
As long as people think Putin is the monster, the West can claim to be the moral authority.
In a few years, Ukraine will not exist and it will not be due to Putin but the West. The country will end up destroyed with the directive coming from Washington.
Why do you think Johnson showed up and put a halt to any peace agreements? Isnt it the responsibility of the Ukraine leadership to do what is best for its nation?
This is all a plot by the likes of people like Lindsey Graham and his ilk to try and weaken Russia so the West can destroy it.
Can you share your sources? I am interested in seeing the other side of this. The ones I've been reading have been the opposite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsk_agreements
I think Putin did this himself, by being the aggressor/attacker.
If Putin didn't attack, I doubt Ukraine will no longer exist. Or am I missing something here?
Wikipedia? LOL
That is the epitome of propaganda.
Armstrong blog is the best source of information of what is going on. The guy has his finger on the pulse of a lot of things.
Wikipedia just compiles them. They use references from different sources. This is the first time I'm hearing of Armstrong blog though.
Seriously. Wikipedia has a huge bias.
They choose what they compile.