RE: Hive needs to get out of Rehearsal
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Yet I'm still here...
You spend a lot of effort on trying to change my mind and it's not too effective. I'm conscious that Hive has issues, but I still believe it has potential for good.
Love and peace.
!BEER
0
0
0.000
Yes. Hive has "issues" and the main issue is that people still "believe" in it when they should use their brain and a voice of reason than just blind faith.
@valued-customer shows you that all those slogans who has suppose to be a firmament of hive are lies. There is no decentralization, there is no freedom of speech and P2P value transfer. There is no true web3 here so that what you supporting is Facebook on blockchain ;] For what reason? For money? Why not supporting Facebook then? :P Smaller risk of loose profits.. This is pointless efforts to still build something that as we can clearly observe after yeras, that it not making any differences against what we actually want to change. It is like a fight against oligarchy by build your own oligarchy XD Pure absurdity
You don't know my reasons for being here or my experiences with it and the people behind it. So let me make my own choices and you make yours. I don't get why anyone would focus on me anyway.
I don't have to know you to know what the reasons might be:
Generally, it doesn't matter whether I know or not your reasons ;] It's rather you who should ask yourself whether YOU know why you're here and also whether you're definitely aware and certain that your goals are definitely consistent with what you have here. because maybe you only thought that was the case because you don't know the whole truth or maybe your never think about that ;]
Someone I daily interact with here on Hive strongly promotes that exact policy. He says if you don't like what the majority stakeholders are doing, you need to buy more stake so you can make the rules. If only it was that easy, eh?
About what? I'm just pointing out facts. I have no agenda for you to adhere to. These are the facts. What you think about them isn't in my wheelhouse. I just want to be able to have discussions about policies based on mutually agreed on facts. If you believe these data are false, I am open to any evidence you might provide. If we can agree that these are the facts of the matter, we can discuss what is the best way to proceed in this environment.
I have chosen to post here, no less than have you. It seems we are substantially natively in agreement as far as that goes. Insofar as we have any disagrement, I have perceived it as matters of fact, so I provided probative evidence of facts I am aware of so we can reach agreement - not with any political, financial, or economic agenda - but simply to facilitate substantive discussions from a factual basis.
What do you think I would try to change your mind about? That strikes me as being defensive without any reason to be. You seem intent on reason, dedicated to ethical actions in our mutual society. I certainly don't want to change that!
I think we have different views on various things that will shape how we see Hive. Some of what you call facts are opinions. I know what I see and I choose who to trust.
The links I posted are not my opinions. Some of the facts I mention aren't linked, but if you disagree on some particular you can specify it and I can provide evidence of it.
If you don't want to see evidence, you want to believe.
That's ok. It's an important thing to know about, though.