RE: Over 33% of ALL Staked HIVE Needs to Vote a DHF Proposal Right Now to Pass
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I think to a large extent the proposals were so bad, because the overall impression was "wow, there is money up for grabs, so let´s request it, or otherwise it is not used anyway". There was no punishment for bad proposals with the low threshold and not enough reasoning why a particular one should be funded, why it is really needed and worth the dilution. And most of them got renewed.
Now it is not as easy anymore to get to that honey pot, so it is only good - for the Hiveprice (25K HBD less selling per day) and for the quality of any future proposal that might come up.
I really hope that @blocktrades will stay with his decision!
0
0
0.000
I would agree. But how do you get 36% of the staked HIVE (more actually, if we account inactives without proxy) to vote on a proposal? What I see going on next, if this continues, is a push for HP stakeholders to proxy their governance vote, maybe for a small incentive (a platform already does that for a good while, but not with terrible success, apparently). So, we will probably have more HP voting on governance, but a strong hit to decentralization, indirectly.
And proposals will still get funded, eventually...
If ecency can get funded, any other reasonable one can get, too.
Maybe. Not everyone has a highly used front end that reminds and encourages users to vote on their proposal (I don't know if ecency does that, but others do). Not that this would work for every stakeholder. For some, it is an annoyance, especially if the reminder is continuously displayed.
Hear hear!