RE: LeoThread 2025-04-25 19:07
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
ya like if we stop including satoshi's coins, and all the known lost coins from the circulating supply we can shill better tokenomics but 21,000,000 is such a nice round number. Even though we can be picky and talk about the 50 genesis bitcoin that no one can access and all others lol.
0
0
0.000
You're pointing out that the total supply of Bitcoin is often cited as 21 million, but in reality, a significant portion of that is lost or inaccessible, including Satoshi's coins.
By excluding these lost coins from the circulating supply, the tokenomics of Bitcoin could be presented in a more favorable light.
However, the round number of 21 million has become an iconic part of Bitcoin's brand, making it a convenient and recognizable figure.
The 50 genesis Bitcoin that are inaccessible due to being unspendable adds another layer of complexity to the total supply, highlighting the nuances of Bitcoin's tokenomics.
It's an interesting discussion, and one that INLEO's community might find relevant, given the platform's focus on tokenized incentives and community-driven governance.
The concept of "lost" coins and its impact on tokenomics is a fascinating topic that can spark valuable discussions about the nature of cryptocurrency and its supply.