Alternative Weekend: Rush - Just Beyond... 'Moving Pictures'

alternative112226_960_720.jpg
Source

Having listened in its entirety to Geddy Lee's 'My Effin' Life', I now find myself moving to 'Martin Popoff ‘s, Rush Across the Decades, Books 1-3'. It seems I can't get enough of them… or is it just that I am running short of material to listen to when driving back and forth to work?

In any case, my attention has been sent to the later years of the band, and by that I mean post 'Moving Pictures', which is years greater than 1981.

Not very recent, you may say, and I agree. When I was younger, I loved the progressive 'Rush' and felt nobody else sounded like them. The progressive dinosaurs mostly went extinct by 1980, or evolved into something more mainstream and Rush attempted to diversify.

You will never convince me that anything they did in the 1980's or beyond was as spectacular as '2112' or 'Hemispheres', but nevertheless, some of it is worth listening to.

Beyond 'Grace for Pressure', I am still in the dark, but listening to the aforementioned audiobook, which goes into great detail about their other albums, will eventually make me listen to even the 90s and beyond albums.

RedLine.png


Rush - Subdivisions (Signals – 1982)


smal_16642illustrationofanelectricguitarpv.jpg

I sold all my 33’s around 2003 to a bloke I no longer talk to. They were in perfect condition, all in plastic sleeves and contained many gatefolds.

Signals could have been among them, but I don't remember, such was the impact this newer music had on me. 'Moving Pictures' is considered the Rush classic, and it is good, but it was written in a transition period. Note what I said above about extinction.

Subdivisions sees Rush going all synthesisers, which were the cool thing to have in 1982. Although I was a fan of this type of music in that year, I didn't particularly like it coming from my favourite progressive hard rock band of that time.

Now, I appreciate it a little more and figure I could play that basic synthesiser riff if only I had somewhere to set up my ageing and faulty Roland XP-50 workstation, that's gathering dust on a top shelf.

Alex’s guitars are somewhat muted in this song with the keyboards dominating the sound, but it doesn’t half sound ominous (again).

The 'Subdivisions' in Canada appear to be a terrible place to live, but seem to be detached properties, albeit 'little boxes'. Compared to the shit places I grew up in, I wouldn't portray these houses as particularly terrible.

RedLine.png


Rush - Chemistry (Signals – 1982)


smal_16642illustrationofanelectricguitarpv.jpg

I have attempted to listen to 'Signals' in its entirety, and for the most part, it wasn't hitting me. Yes, there are lots of keyboards..., but not inspiring ones such as the British 'New Romantics' period that was happening at that time on the far side of the pond.

Was this a band that was forcing itself to reinvent, or simply making use of new gadgets that were appearing? The book I am reading states the latter.

'Chemistry' was the only other track from 'Signals' that hit my musical ticker in any form. Supposedly, it was going to be named 'Signals' and be the title track, but was changed somewhere during production.

This is a keyboard-heavy song, and I particularly like how Alex adds his guitar within the highlighted sections of the chorus. The verses sound a little lame to me, but when the synthesiser kicks in, it does make up for it somewhat.

The solo close to the end is more like the Alex Lifeson I have become accustomed to, and I did find this tune floating around in my head after a few plays. It must have something, then?

Fighting with the overwhelming keyboards must have been a tough call for the guitarist. He needed to be heard, but how?

RedLine.png


Rush - Afterimage (Grace Under Pressure – 1984)


smal_16642illustrationofanelectricguitarpv.jpg

Moving to the 'Grace Under Pressure' album, I bought this in 1984 from 'Adele, The Hot Minx', much to her extreme disapproval.

Perhaps that negative experience sits in my mind, which helps me remember this 33' was in my record collection, whereas I could have bought 'Signals' at any number of countless record shops a year or so earlier.

Like its predecessor, I was disappointed in this album, except 'Afterimage', which still sits freshly in my mind decades later. Gone was the keyboard overload in this track, and that old familiar Rush sound was back, just momentarily.

Angry and aggressive, this one kicks from the moment you start it, but until I listened to the audiobooks mentioned above, I had no idea it was about a former colleague who died in a car crash.

'Suddenly you were gone..', Geddy sings, but in 1984 I figured this was about some chick who might have dumped him because of his long nose.

Geddy Lee seems to be very aware of his facial anatomy, having mentioned it in his autobiography more than once. A side effect of being Jewish, I suppose.

As for the rest of 'Grace Under Pressure', nothing stands out whatsoever, even the singles released from it. I am a particularly fussy bastard when it comes to music.

RedLine.png


smal_16642illustrationofanelectricguitarpv.jpg

Guitar Image - Source
Three-Tune Tuesday logo was created by AI. Feel free to use it in your own 'Three-Tune Tuesday' posts.

RedLine.png

Do you like posting your Urbex content and photography for FREE on Facebook and YouTube? I like to get some form of reward for my work and every time I create I do just that. Take a look at The Urbex Community on HIVE.

If you want to keep creating for FREE then ignore what you are reading. If you want to be like me and gain something other than BUGGER ALL for your work then click here and learn about posting on the HIVE blockchain.


My Urban Exploration Tales can be found directly on the internet via my
Website: 'Tales of the Urban Explorer'.

RedLine.png

TalesLogo.JPG

RedLine.png


CurieCurator.jpg

RedLine.png

Drooling Maniac.JPG

If you found this article so invigorating that you are now a positively googly-eyed, drooling lunatic with dripping saliva or even if you liked it just a bit, then please upvote, comment, rehive, engage me or all of these things.



0
0
0.000
31 comments
avatar

Wow... Rush is one of my favorite and most iconic bands after Pink Floyd.
How great that you brought us this work!
Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I really need to dig back into Rush. For the longest time I couldn't stand them as I have mentioned in the past. They were on the no fly zone for myself and one of my ex's. I never really circled back to them after I moved on.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Was it the Geddy voice? I know it doesn't go down well with some, one of my friends has the same problem but seems to have warmed to it a little. Start with 2112 - The Overture.., where's there barely any vocals in the first section.. and you're making a good start.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That was it for me, but I don't really mind it so much anymore. For my ex it was more because someone they didn't like loved Rush, so it was just a non-starter.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Of all the songs, I liked this one, "Suddenly You Went Away...", sings Geddy, but in 1984, in my opinion, the song has more drive and power. I hope he's recovered from his heartbreak; some girls like big noses... hehehe

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well it's not about that, if you read it properly. That was my interpretation before I listened to the story and revisited the lyrics.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It’s always interesting to revisit the bands we grew up with, even if the magic hits differently now.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I appreciate that many younger writers wont have even heard of this band.., which is a sad state of affairs. My 21 yr old daughter refuses to listen to current music, labelling most as 'crap'. When I was 21, I loved the current stuff.

0
0
0.000
avatar

it’s so interesting to hear your experience with Rush and how your taste shifted over time. I’m just starting to explore older bands, and it’s cool (and kind of overwhelming!) how deep and complex their discographies are. I haven’t listened to Signals yet, but now I’m curious to check out “Subdivisions” and “Afterimage.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They are akin to The Rolling Stones. A band that lasted 30+ years. Not many do and there's generally a reason why so few survive this long. That yields a large discography in kind.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's cool to see someone else who understands that feeling of being a longtime fan who appreciates the band's evolution, even if it wasn't always a smooth transition. It's a reminder that even when bands change, some songs transcend time.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They had to change, and beyond 'Grace' I have listened to nothing. There are probably gems in there somewhere.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Red barchetta is one of my all time Rush favs from moving pictures!

0
0
0.000
avatar

'Moving Pictures'.., it got all the plaudits and I do like it. There's not one weak song on the album yet I don't rate it as highly as say 2112. 'The car song' I know is very popular.., I do like the start of it, with the eerie keyboards and it has a unique lyrical flavour to it, with it's theme.

'The Camera Eye' and 'Vital Signs' are tracks off that, which I particularly like.

0
0
0.000
avatar

And then there is YYZ..

0
0
0.000
avatar

YYZ.. everyone makes such a fuss about that one. I really like the short synth part in the middle.., but rest.. yes its virtuosity.., but it's not one of my favourites.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wonder if they will ever tour again with a new drummer..

0
0
0.000
avatar

From what I read in both books I mentioned in the post, I don't think so.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Time tends to change one's sentiment. Wouldn't surprise me if someone steps into that role at some point. We will see. Hopefully, but they are getting up there in age.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Never heard of this band, perhaps too busy bringing children up or simply never hit the ears as something to listen to previously.

Another walk down memory lane one way or another, music always appears to provoke something we never realized back then.

!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is not the heavy stuff, more the keyboards sound of the early eighties. The didn't fare too well on the radio, so it does not surprise me that you haven't heard of them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Eighties too busy with children, would only have caught them on the radio to/from work or around town.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Subdivisions feels like a good description of neighborhoods today. When I was studying drafting and design, many contractors were hiring people to draw tract homes with minor variations to fill new developments during the early 2000s boom. It was soulless, but there were other opportunities. I worked instead for a custom home builder and then a local architectural firm.

It's a good song, too. I have heard it on the radio a couple times. I don't really get anything from Chemistry, but Afterimage is poignant. I don't think I've heard either of them before.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your 'neighborhoods of today' are better than ours in the case. Here everyone's squashed up together, in a country full of 'boat people'. You might have heard about all this perhaps?

Thanks for listening and giving me feedback. Most don't bother.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If I upvote something, it's because I read it, even if I don't comment. I'm never just another bot!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Such a great band and my inspriation for learning bass guitar!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have to admit that I've never listened to Rush. I always avoided them, even though I heard a lot of bands from that era. Now, I'm not even sure why exactly.
But it's okay that I have something undiscovered from the past, so that I can dig deeper after your post. Thanks for sharing.

0
0
0.000