Never, We Are Not Monkey's
There is no evolution that says we evolved from being monkeys to human, here is my actual take;
While humans share semiler features with monkeys and people portrayed that we have common ancestors, but I'm telling you humans are not product from monkeys but some people view and encoded that we humans have generated from a distant ape's ancestor that lived millions and dunkings of years over time.
This is the real science that explain how this evolution envelope.
To survive as human and living organisms, you must adapt to habitation and environment. Many a times, there are several genetic manipulations that gives specific member of a species some advantage, enabling the inhabitants to survive and transfer the beneficial streaks to it descendants.
Source
Through many generations, more humans with same features survive and produce, vividly leading to the evolution of different kinds of new species better and suit to its normal environment.
This medium of natural delegation has demonstrated simple changes in animals and among mice's, it illustrates how little genetic changes gathered over time, evolving in differs species which are too equipped to contact environmental and habitation changes with semiler challenges.
Unfortunately, i know evolution is a scientific fundings has been proven through abundant research and several evidence.
It gives scientist the system of predictions and it inspires new discoveries that consistently reveal different complexity of natural occurrences on Earth.
Gradually evolution of humans race has drastically changed for years from the formation of life to modern dispensation.
Source
Science is a valuable asset but it is not valid at all cost and not always true. It is an ever changing concept, founded on observation, interpretations, and research. What is acknowledge to be fact in today's world may be changed tomorrow. this creatures called; Dinosaurs that was once imagine to be as scales reptiles but science is now contemplating that it resemble chickens with feathers and beaks and again Tomorrow that same theories may change to different thing.
Science is the utmost Reflection of what our eyes can see, not generally what is acceptably true. It research on a universe that has already been on existence for year's. science does not create the truth, but gives several attempts to describe truth, Meanwhile many people place their complete trust in science, despite it consistent change and flux.
By reality, Gods Word is active reliable and unchanging. Referencing from the Bible, God made every living thing and creature according to its peculiar type and their kinds, sea creatures and creatures that fly, bird" on day five, different kinds of land animals and humans being on six day. This was intentionally design to complete, and grinded in order and not accidentally or fascinating.
Source
Therefore, where are you placing your trust??
In the ever deliberation and several conclusions of man,
Or in the concrete eternal and trusted truth that govern to rules all things, the real truth has it foundation in Jesus Christ.
Science is a an instrument. But Jesus is the only truth. One leading way to discovery. His path leads to life and peace
Source
My take on the issues of evolution, we are not monkey's we didn't generates our bearing from ape's, we are human, we are special and we rule control the general animal kingdoms, Man Is God to the nature and it's inhabitants.
Science is good but not totally true and not dependable.
We have seen and felt the impact of science, science aid many and several activities that patterns to humans but my view disagreed with that theories of evaluation that says we revolve from Ape's to human...
The End.
Congratulations @shedxy01! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 80 posts.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Hello bro, some of your images contains iStock photo water mark which simply means they're not free for use..
Also note that it's preferable to use just two or three photos in scenarios where the photos you are using aren't original but if they are originally owned by you, you can use as many as possible..
Alright sir
noted thank you sir...
I will be cautious next time @ovey10