RE: LeoThread 2025-02-19 00:14
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Humor is a challenging terrain for AI due to some underlying issues. It is intrinsically linked to the personality of the humorist, or in fictional cases, the character being represented, such as in a comic like Dilbert.
0
0
0.000
AI lacks a personality or unique traits; it doesn’t possess the flaws that often enhance humor. Effective jokes resonate with thoughts many share but that often remain unspoken, an area where AI falls short since it can't train on personal
reflections. Replicating existing jokes leads to a predictable outcome devoid of excitement.
Moreover, AI is restricted from venturing into edgy, mildly offensive, or risky territory, where the impact of humor is often heightened by the shock factor of a comedian crossing boundaries.
A lot of humor stems from personal anecdotes, which can involve bizarre real-life interactions. AI doesn’t have its own experiences, and even if it did, it wouldn’t grasp what "super weird" means while remaining relatable.
When crafting humor, the process involves a mental exploration of various topics and punchlines, feeling a genuine reaction in the body when a joke hits the mark. Unfortunately, AI lacks the capacity for that kind of instinctive response.
So what can AI manage? It’s limited to wordplay, puns, and recycled dad jokes—nothing more.
In response to a query: “Why is it so challenging for models to grasp or create humor? Does reasoning actually complicate the process?”