RE: Tested Boundaries
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
???
"... maybe Charlie Kirk is raised to a higher level than he deserved ..."
Would you like to expand on this, so there is no misunderstanding of your intent in writing it?
0
0
0.000
That usually happens when people die, especially in tragic and emotional circumstances... All humans have flaws, and personally, I don't like any kind of radicalism (in any direction), although sometimes is probably needed. He was a guy defending his cause, with a good (even great) visibility and good arguments. He was also a polarizing person, because the other side would not have seen him with good eyes, for sure. I don't know if it's been determined why he was shot, but the fact that political assassination was among the top reasons why he could have been shot at the speculative level, right from the start, says a lot about how the other side saw him.
Okay. Thanks. Your word "deserved" stood out since, as I sure you are aware, many are publicly stating he got what was coming to him. He "deserved" to be killed.
From what you have now said, will not clearly stated, I will assume (hope) that does not include you.
Definitely not! It's like "shooting" the freedom of speech.
Exactly! Underscoring the fact, in spite of all the "useful idiots" once again screaming about the Americans "love affair" with guns, etc. this was an attack on our First Amendment freedom of expression. Not on our Second Amendment right to bear arms ...