The Stealth Tax Hike....

The Labour Party promised to end the freeze on income tax thresholds in their election manifesto by the 2028/29 tax year, however they've since refused to rule out keeping it in place beyond that date.

An extra year's worth of freeze could raise an additional £7 billion going into 2029/30.

The UK's current tax thresholds look like this:

Screenshot 2025-07-31 at 09.16.38.png

And the same applies to National Insurance thresholds.

This means that while inflation makes wages rise, the thresholds at which people begin to pay tax, or move into higher rate bands, do not shift. So more people pay more tax—even though their real income hasn't increased significantly.

Economists refer to this process as "fiscal drag." It is a subtle, because rates technically never increase and no new taxes are imposed. Instead, people simply pay more cumulatively.

This kind of policy, introduced by the Conservatives, is politically expedient, as the tactic avoids the wrath that typically accompanies direct tax hikes and can be packaged as maintaining the status quo.

--

A Risky Business...?

If the government does delay changing the threshold by another year then they miss out on a golden opportunity to offer voters a sweetener... there ain't nothing quite like an effective tax reduction policy to win votes.

And maybe that's about right too...the UK already has the highest tax burden in history, and this proposed freeze will only make that pressure worse.

It also has the perverse effect of putting people off working more in those middle-income brackets.

Such a tax freeze weighs most heavily on middle and lower income groups—those least able to shield themselves from rises in tax. A pay rise fueled by inflation can unintentionally place an individual in a higher rate band, erasing any actual increase. The result is a squeeze on disposable incomes when families are already under pressure from high cost of living.

Final thoughts...

To my mind it's surprising that more public uproar has not been levelled at this sustained stealth tax hike.

But as more and more workers feel squeezed, the indignation will grow. The longer the freeze, the greater the public outcry.

If the government is serious about tax transparency and equity, it may need to reconsider this sneaky tax hike. Fiscal prudence is necessary, but raising revenue in a way that hurts the average employee disproportionately can do lasting damage—to confidence in government and to growth.

Posted Using INLEO



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

I think the government needs to be more transparent about these policies and their real impact on everyday families.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think they have been pretty transparent, it's basically 'suck it and see'.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This means that while inflation makes wages rise, the thresholds at which people begin to pay tax, or move into higher rate bands, do not shift.

untitled.gif

I don't have any comment on that... When I see numbers 20%, 30%, or more, I remember the history books when people were raising revolutions because they had to pay 10% to their rulers/occupiers...

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's simply not worth earning over £50K a year here, unless you SIPP everything over that threshold, which I imagine a lot of people do!

0
0
0.000
avatar

We call it 'Tax Bracket Creep' here in Canada, and that cost the incumbent Prime Minister his job the following election.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ah now that is interesting, the problem here is I don't think there's any choice - cut public services is the only other option, everything is a vote loser!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @revisesociology! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the week.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

0
0
0.000