The Billionaires’ Wealth Tax: A Disaster Waiting for California?
California is currently floating the possibility of introducing a one-time 5% tax on anyone worth over a billion dollars - that's roughly 200 people and would bring in around 100 billion dollars in total to spend on health care and education, primarily.
However, while hitting the rich with one big sting may sound like a simple win, nothing is ever that simple, especially not in California!

The Exit Threat
Predictably, big names like Peter Thiel and Larry Page are making noise about leaving if the tax goes through.
And the problem for California State is that at this level of wealth this isn't just an idle threat... Billionaires can pick up and move in ways most of us can’t even imagine.
They don’t just have a house—they have a dozen. They can move their companies, shift their assets, switch their legal residency, and turn their finances into a labyrinth.
And when so few people make up so much of the tax base, just a handful leaving could punch a big hole in the budget.
People already complain California taxes the rich too much. Back in 2012, lawmakers hiked the top income tax rate by 3%, calling it “temporary”—then stretched it out to 2030 anyway. So, opponents of this new wealth tax say don’t be fooled; once it’s in place, it’ll be back whenever the state needs cash.
So there is a historical problem here of not being able to trust the Californian state...
The Progressive Pushback
On the other side, supporters aren’t exactly crying for the billionaires. For someone like Larry Page, losing $13 billion sounds like a lot—until you realize his net worth swings that much when Google stock hiccups. For him, it’s just another day.
And then there's the fact that these tech giants didn’t get rich in a vacuum. California built the roads, the universities, the laws, the whole environment that turned ideas into fortunes. So, why shouldn’t a sliver of that wealth go back to public goods?
And of coruse a 5% haircut still leaves these folks with 95% of fortunes most people couldn’t spend in three lifetimes.
Final Thoughts..
It's a tricky problem of balance: getting the right amount of tax without tripping over the point where the super rich all move to the Middle East...
This is a common argument against taxing the rich. I wonder who puts it out there...
That said, these people may actually want to stay where they are as they like the people/culture/weather/whatever. I know some rich Brits buggered off to Dubai, but they may be more restricted in what they can do there. They generally dodge some tax anyway using whatever loopholes their expensive accountants can find. I have little sympathy for them. What about the Patriotic Millionaires who are happy to contribute more? There's a US version too.
https://www.reddit.com/r/bayarea/comments/1rcte18/proposed_5_tax_haircut_on_billionaires_would_bay/
This post has been shared on Reddit by @davideownzall through the HivePosh initiative.