Gensler to be removed as SEC Commissioner?

United States Representative Warren Davidson recently announced he'll be introducing a Bill to remove Gary Gensler as SEC chairman in response to Gensler's abuses of power as Chair of the SEC.

You can check out his rational for introducing the Bill and a summary of Gensler's abuses on Twitter, but it basically boils down to the fact that Gensler is setting too many new investment rules too fast with too little consistency and allowing vested interests too little time to provide input into his decisions....

https://twitter.com/WarrenDavidson/status/1648379560122105882?s=20

According to Davdison this has resulted in an uncertain investment environment in the U.S. with capital leaving the country and it is stifling innovation.

We of course know this from his attitude towards crypto - Gensler's failure to provide regulatory clarity and then hit, out of the blue, exchanges with law suits that label certain cryptos as securities without having gone after the initial ICO companies themselves has created what he calls a 'hotel California' approach to crypto regulation - lack of regulation for the last decade has made it easy to check in, random regulation now makes it difficult to check out, possibly impossible if you're a U.S. Binance customer and scared enough to stick to the letter of law when using the platform!

If you follow the Twitter feed you can basically see that Davidson is entirely justified - in one clip Gensler is questioned on wether ETH is a security, and he fails to give any sense of clarity.

A more decentralised SEC...?

The Bill proposes removing Gensler and all five current commissioners and creating instead a structure consisting of a separate executive director position who answers to six commissioners.

Personally I kind of like the sound of the new structure: it's more decentralised and in thus in line with crypto.

Of course the problem is that it could mean new legislation is slower in coming, so it might end up unintentionally stifling rapid innovation when it's needed.

Will it pass?

I honestly don't know - this one goes to the heart of American Politics: executive power verses decentralisation - Davidson himself is a small-government democrat, and that kind of sentiment may appeal to enough people across parties for this to get through?

Something needs to change at the SEC, that's for sure, I'm not sure crypto can handle another two years of this Gensler twat.



0
0
0.000
21 comments
avatar

Not loving how the SEC is handling crypto. Hurting the people they think they are helping by cutting them off from their money and options.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sooner or later, he will be kicked out and another peon will come... The circle of politics... 😃

0
0
0.000
avatar

Maybe it is flawed thinking structural change will do any good?!?

0
0
0.000
avatar

YOu have probably noticed from my posts and comments that I'm not a big believer in current, traditional, governing systems... 😃

Maybe I'm just a conspiracy theorist thinking that money moves the world and not politicians that are coming and going every 4 years... 😃

0
0
0.000
avatar

I guess he's only got another two years left, that's something! That 4-5 year cycle is damaging.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If this guy is removed from this position, it will be very good for the market and we will see in the near future we will see the market going very high because of this guy, many people will lose. Had to pick up

0
0
0.000
avatar

Everyone was so hopeful when Gensler came in. He was the one who understood crypto. Not sure what happened.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can’t image this getting past both chambers and being signed into law. But even if it just gets a few hundred votes in the House, that might be enough to get Gensler’s attention, maybe even nudge him to reconsider some of his policies.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wish everything about SEC can just be canceled. It is meaningless and causing us pain

0
0
0.000
avatar

The proposed structure of a more decentralized SEC with an executive director and six commissioners does sound intriguing but I am not sure aligns well with the principles of crypto. However, as you rightly mentioned, the potential downside could be slower legislation, which may unintentionally stifle rapid innovation when it's needed the most. It will be interesting to see how this bill progresses in American politics, where the balance between executive power and decentralization is a key consideration.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Gensler to be removed as SEC Commissioner?

I fucking hope so.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Gary is doing the biggest disrespect to crypto industry.

0
0
0.000