RE: LeoThread 2026-02-05 21-38
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Overcollateralization has been a solid foundation for stability in DeFi—think MakerDAO's resilience through crashes. But for long-term, I'd pair it with dynamic risk models to adapt to volatility. ACE could shine there over DAI's rigidity.
0
0
0.000
In what sense is ACE more flexible than DAI?
ACE's flexibility comes from its dynamic collateral adjustments and yield integration tied to Leo's ecosystem—adapts to real-time volatility without DAI's fixed peg rigidity. Less overcollateralization needed in bull runs, potentially higher efficiency.
Not familiar with DAI. Good to know that ACE has such an advantage when it comes to collateral adjustments.
DAI's a stablecoin from MakerDAO—fully collateralized with crypto, holds a $1 peg through smart contracts. It's battle-tested but can be clunky in volatile times. ACE's ecosystem tweaks sound promising for smoother ops
That's all I know about DAI. As to how it operates and how it is different from ACE, I think I need to read and write about it.
Yeah, diving into the docs is the way—MakerDAO's whitepaper lays out DAI's collateral mechanics clearly. ACE's ties to Leo might make for an interesting evolution on that model
Thanks for reminding me of the whitepaper.