RE: Absolute Evil is Attacking Humanity Today, and What you can do about it.

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I did the search, and read the articles. The only thing in this whole post that those articles backed up is that such vaccines exist. All the horrors about them seem to be pure speculation.



0
0
0.000
12 comments
avatar

I am baffled by this comment. Having read extensively dozens of papers detailing the mechanisms of action by which the pseudouridinated mRNA causes enduring manufacture of spike proteins, and the ways in which spike proteins cause injuries in every organ of the body; having also read how the snippets of DNA contaminating the plasmids in which the mRNA is transported into the cells, where those snippets are occasionally transfected into cellular DNA, and how many autoimmune and cancerous consequences that causes; and finally how the plasmids are concentrated in human reproductive organs where their payloads are delivered to our reproductive mechanisms and impact our germ cells, sperm and egg, so genetically altering our progeny, I cannot grasp how you could call the vast reams of evidence that these jabs cause dramatic harm, including death, anything short of horror.

The only way I can imagine you can say it's pure speculation is if you didn't, in fact, read those papers that I have. Accordingly I can only account for the content of your comment if it is non-factual in one way or another.

Just the bare fact that replicon is a laboratory manufactured virus is an unconscionable horror, because that agent is inflicted on populations that have not consented to be treated with it. It's very existence is a crime against humanity, as defined in the Nuremberg protocol, and several others as well.

I can see no means of interpreting and understanding your comment from a standpoint of a human person that seeks to survive. Calling the deliberate release of an infectious agent into the human population only a speculation of horror, when the bare fact of such release is a capital crime against humanity seems too negligent of desire for personal survival to be the view of an actual living, breathing human being.

Is your entire library of knowledge derived only from Rocket47's post, and absolutely no other information about the adverse effects of mRNA has come to your attention? I can not find that to be a credible basis for your claims here either. Do you deny that the alleged harms ascribed to the mRNA jabs are real and occur? That no myocarditis has been causing children and young adults to drop dead of heart attacks decades before such ailments have heretofore impacted populations? No turbocancers have arisen, no dormant virii activated causing shingles and the other viral diseases? No Bell's Palsy, genital necrosis, or the vast and myriad variety of ailments that have suddenly arisen since 2020 that are temporally and dosimetrically correlated with the jabs? Do you deny that all causes mortality has increased only after the jabs were released, that misscarriages have increased by ~4x, and that birth rates have plummeted?

Please do explain further.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't deny that such reactions occur, I deny that they are widespread, or even common. They seem in fact to be extremely rare, and I don't concern myself too much with extremely rare events.

And yes, I absolutely deny that death by all causes is up 4x, or at all. The numbers don't support it in what I can verify locally, or what I've seen reported on statewide, nationally, or globally.

Birth rates have been plummeting since the onset of cheap birth control in the 60's. I have seen no sudden decline that can be attributed to the jabs.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

You are a statistician actually looking at the data? If not, there are plenty that are, like Ed Dowd, Denis Rancourt, and more. If you haven't seen their reports, you have been trying to avoid seeing the data, because they're published in peer reviewed journals, on every social media site, and in the corporate media too.

Edit: It's not all causes deaths that have risen by 4x.

"...misscarriages have increased by ~4x..."

Reading more carefully may help to keep you abreast of the actual events ongoing.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I've been looking, and can't find anything to back up that stat on miscarriages, either. Do you have a link to the study?

edit: This is the same guy (paradoxtma), different account.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I searched 'misscarriages 4x'. These are the first 5 links that come up.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/vaers-showing-4070-increase-miscarriages-stillbirths-since-mrna-roll/

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/switzerland-miscarriages-stillbirths-covid-shots/

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-03-analysis-miscarriages-stillbirths-linked-to-covid-vaccines.html

https://expose-news.com/2023/04/27/covid-injections-linked-to-increase-in-miscarriages/

https://dailyclout.io/miscarriages-in-covid-19-vaccinated-mothers-as-reported-in-vaers/

These aren't dusty stacks of scrolls hidden in some tomb, or dark, dank forest of ill repute. While I haven't parsed these sources exhaustively, as I said, they're the first 5 links that came up searching the indicated phrase, which I just wanted to avail you as you seem to not have undertaken to search that information, I am confident that links to source are available on these sites. The Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is long associated with Children's Health Defense, which is well and commonly known, and has also written some books regarding the issues generally of vaccines and particularly regarding the modmRNA vaccines Anthony Fauci has attempted to mandate since 2020. The Daily Clout is associated with Naomi Wolf, who, as a woman, has paid particular attention to the issues surrounding women's health that the modmRNA jabs have raised, because the LNP's (lipid nano-particles) in which the modmRNA code is packaged in order to be delivered into human cells have been known since 2012 to concentrate in the ovaries, particularly, and to have toxic effects, per studies conducted by Pfizer.

This has the effect of delivering the payloads into the ovaries of jab recipients that have them, and then to impact the germ cells, eggs, located there with whatever effects those payloads have. Since massive contamination of these LNP's with artificial and other DNA snippets, specifically including SV40 promoter sequences that are strongly associated with cancers caused by vaccination since the 1950s, a causative mechanism of misscarriages resulting from modmRNA vaccine effects expected from published research more than a decade ago, and demonstrated by numerous more recent publications since the jabs have been implemented, to wit the genetic alteration of embryos by the insertion into the DNA of the eggs of the massive loads of artificially created DNA and carcinogenic SV40 promoter sequence in particular, is demonstrated. Research also shows that the rate of misscarriages is dose dependent, so the more GMO jabs women receive, the more misscarriages they suffer, which is considered a probative demonstration of causation.

I find the claim that you've looked for this information difficult to believe, given the ease with which it is found. However, the information in which links to studies that have been published is easily enough provided, so I have provided it. I have no doubt that links to peer reviewed research demonstrating the above mentioned facts are contained in the links provided, and that should you undertake to read those reports and follow those links, your search for information will be satisfied. There are many more links that follow the ones I have listed here, which are only the very first five that were provided. I hope you are hereafter able to locate similar information, such as exploding rates of cancers that proceed extremely rapidly, unprecedented heart disease in children and healthy young people, massive increases in neurological disease, and the extensive list (nine pages, single spaced) of adverse effects known to the FDA committee prior to issuing the EUA that enabled the jabs to be inflicted on Americans and the peoples of the Earth, that are the results of these jabs.

"The safety of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has been investigated in clinical studies conducted in the United States, Europe, Turkey, South Africa, and South America and included over 43,000 patients aged 16 years and older."

--NON-INTERVENTIONAL INTERIM STUDY REPORT 5
C4591021
BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine)
12 March 2024

The above is just one study provided by the manufacturers themselves that shows adverse effects of the jabs, and the predictable attempts of these manufacturers to spin these data to support sales of their products, despite utterly unprecedented rates of adverse events and harms they undeniably cause.

It has been shown, further, that whatever was provisionally approved is not what was delivered and injected in Americans, because the adverse effects of these jabs varied widely, in three general types, depending on the lots of batches manufactured by the companies that contracted with the US DOD to provide the jabs - which is itself unprecedented, because these contracts were not with health agencies and authorities, but with the military and spooks - which strongly suggests Dr. Francis Boyle's contention that these jabs are bioweapons is factually correct, as the contracting agency was concerned with war and weapons of war. This variability proves that multiple different kinds of injections were inflicted on people, and that shows that many of the people injected were not injected with whatever was provided EUA provisional approval.

AdverseEventLotVariability.png
IMG source - onlinelibrary.wiley.com

I hope you are hereafter surfeited with factual information regarding these bioweapons.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your first 5 links are all things I had seen. They definitely show an increase in miscarriages with the rollout of the jab. However, they show a decrease in miscarriages as the number of jabs went up in subsequent years, all the way back down to normal levels today. That doesn't exactly support the jabs as a direct cause, but would rather suggest that the stress associated with lockdowns and the prevalent vitriol regarding both masks and vaccines might have had to more to do with it. Jabs have been increasing, stress has been decreasing. So, I'll just say it again...

I don't see what you're so alarmed about. If this is a depopulation agenda, it's failing miserably.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have myself counseled against a depopulation agenda, but I am, I believe quite rightly, exercised at being considered a suitable guinea pig for DOD bioweapons tests, which the jabs appear to have been, and still be, by all evidence.

While your prior statement was that you had seen no evidence, and now presented with it you say you had seen it already and now dismiss it as a temporary effect of stress, I am rather nonplussed by your casual approach to evidence. Something you neglect in your dismissal is that birth rates have plummeted. Rather than a restoration of prior fertility rates, far fewer pregnancies are occurring.

Neither have jabs been increasing. After 2022 they plummeted as the pathogenicity of SARS2 variants dramatically decreased, and the reports of toxicity of the jabs equally dramatically increased. Uptake of the jabs dropped off to single digits, and the majority of jab recipients never got a booster at all.

Regardless of whether there is or isn't a depopulation agenda, the sovereignty of human people is grievously disregarded by the MIC, the WEF, and every government on Earth, with no government I am aware of not having agents that are not guilty of capital crimes against humanity that either will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of just laws, or will leave my sons and their peers facing a desperate struggle to maintain their human rights as a global conquest by a technocratic totalitarian tyranny proceeds.

I am glad I taught them to shoot straight and respect themselves.

I would appreciate greater attention to matters of fact in your discussions henceforth, as the variance was overly wide between your prior claim you had seen no evidence of 4x increase in misscarriages you now tell me wasn't true and that you had seen it, but dismissed it as unlikely to be related to the toxicity of the jabs. Even though I went to some lengths to point out the toxicity of the LNP's and their known propensity to collect in the ovaries, as well as SV40 and excessive contamination with artificial and fragmentary DNA, you do not address it and rely on what appears to be speculation about stress without any evidentiary basis. I do seek rigor in discerning facts, and dismiss hunches and gut feelings as transitory and generally without merit.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You're not dismissing hunches and gut feelings, you're using them to extrapolate a statistic blip.

I'm using them to dismiss your blip.

Only time will show which of us is right.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your inability to maintain your narrative while remaining conformant to facts dismisses your narrative. It is the fruit of lies, and like all such will be discarded in due time, as it should be.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Absolutely nonsense. Clearly u didn't spend a second digging or checking

0
0
0.000