RE: Deadly Deception | A 1994 lecture by Dr. Robert Willner
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Well, thanks for your feedback.
It would only look absurd to those fully programmed with the contemporary, trendy worldview - people who have a ton of unrecognized pseudoscientific assumptions and confusing that with provable facts or the scientific method itself.
What is absurd to me is when someone repeats the same old tired logic of the evidence is somehow buried or implied in the sheer volume of studies out there!
The assumption is: They can't ALL be wrong! Of course they can be. Since when is the majority right by definition? I find it more likely all people taking part in those "studies" have the same worldview baggage you seem to, because it is part of our culture. And of official education.
You ask me for "proof that viruses do not cause illness" which is sort of like asking for proof that Santa does NOT bring gifts through the chimney.
I cannot prove he doesn't, I can only point out the lack of proof for Santa himself.
If you choose to believe in his existence because some neighbors claim they have heard him - that is fine, but don't make it seem like you are on logical high ground here solely because you have the backing of an indoctrinated and hypnotized society and I do not ;)
What I am criticizing in my post is the absence of PROOF that pathogenic viruses exist at all. I have not seen any convincing evidence for it and have instead heard very good cases against that notion. The jury is still out - you know, the way science should work!
What I instead get all the time is a vague reference to the majority stance on any topic, rather than concrete evidence. This is science, not politics. And majorities do not mean anything when this is about evidence not about fads or popular opinions.
I am saying, the evidence for your assumptions is missing and has never been delivered but rather assumed. So it is on the virus believers to show pathogenic viruses do exist, and not on me to show they don't.
I am not talking about "studies", you can study all sorts of fictional ideas and relationships all day long, and academia often does.
Maybe we differ in that I share my best estimation of a subject after diving in and thinking long and thorough about what I found. You on the other hand refer to a consensus of experts, implying to me that your worldview is not based on immediate experience and your own discernment but rather on the outsourcing of your interpretations to people and vested interests you have never met or talked to.
If you feel comfortable believing the priests rather than reading the holy book yourself that is fine. I do not.
If you are truly curious about the whole story of this most enormous pseudoscientific blunder, that dub will be released in the near future. This 1994 lecture by Willner is only a tiny puzzle piece of the story and will not substitute for using your own mind and discernment.
Sorry for the mouthful
@paradigmprospect i got your back
@paradoxtma this one's for you...you may not like what you're about to see...but here it is...
https://odysee.com/@halloftruth:c/irish-government-admits-no-proof-that-sars-cov-2-exists-gemma-o'doherty:1
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/A-Farewell-To-Virology:02
https://odysee.com/@ivikthor:c/p1bkp55x78aK:2
MOTHAFOCKIN BANG
we all thought this was settled. finding out that it isn't comes as a shock for any of us having grown up in the west.
needless to say that if pathogenic viruses do not exist, then all the stories about an alleged lab leak in china are complete fabrications, meant to retain control of the narrative.
thanks for sharing all those resources brother!
I will tell the world now as a Chinaman...
the lab leak shit is all false.
Bro if all countries and heads of these countries (all puppets fuck them) have signed the Antartica Treatise amongst each other...then it makes sense that every Crisis that has ever happened in society is fabricated and meant for another purpose....and the hoax of virology is no different.
All our ancient forefathers in their medical works, either the ancient Indian Sages, or the Traditional Chinese Medicine, right to pre-han Dynasty Daoist internal arts of alchemical healing, all know that it's not the external that causes illnesses. That's why their arts have all been attacked in modern history.
But they can't stop the truth.
agreed. finding out about the antarctic treaty holding steady even during the so-called cold war was such a massive red flag.
thanks for sharing your take brother. nothing is what we have been told ahahaha.
not sure we can ever piece it all together but this virus idea will lead to utter dystopia if left unchecked
It's unstoppable now...this narrative. It was built, refined and proliferated too deeply into society way before our time...and it will continue way after our time. That's the main mechanicsm of control for the coming new world.
I just hope those who can wake up will wake up soon.
well said
Lack of evidence isn't evidence of lack.
Just because someone is lying doesn't mean what they're not saying is true.
If two evil people are fighting, which one is the good guy?
That's the assumption you're making, that since lying profiteers aren't telling you the truth about viral disease, then there must not be pathogenic virii. That is not a logical conclusion.
Don't be sorry, stand for the truth fuck them
You're not standing for truth, you're simply supporting contrarians that you arbitrarily agree with.
🤣🤣🤣
I'm not talking about anything vague.
We have imaged viruses. We have seen how they work. We have grown them, and infectious bacteria, in cultures. We've seen their interactions with other cells.
And when I say we, I mean me, personally, with my own eyes and equipment.
I do not trust studies and papers just because they're from 'scientists'. I replicate experiments.
Is it fair to assume you do not have the same hands on experience?
That is correct, I do not have firsthand experimental experience, nor am I a chemist or microbiologist. I am a curious inquirer with no prior stake in the matter one way or another. This goes for most topics, I am autodidact in most things which has helped me retain an open and inquiring mind.
What I do is to sort through the alleged narrative everybody believes by learning about it and its alleged explanations, and compare it to what the critics say who have pointed out the flaws in the story. If I come across a lecture or work that sums the criticism up well I will do my best to dub it as accurately as I can and put it out there for people to consider.
If you have access to a laboratory and can do experiments yourself I would love to ask you specifically about some things when the dub releases that I am working on. Provided you are willing of course.
Thanks!
I don't currently have access, but could probably quickly remedy that, depending on the experiments you wish to perform. There are people I could reach out to, if you're looking for something beyond my capabilities.
If you're near a university, it couldn't hurt to post something on a bulletin board near the science wing. There are usually at least a handful of students like me, who prefer doing experiments for themselves. Any one of them would have more time to discuss such things, and better lab access than I currently have.
You could probably find students who would run your experiments just to fulfill their lab requirements.
thanks a ton for that offer and suggestion. i will get back to you when that dub releases. looking forward to be proven wrong so i can let all of this go ;)
it's not the first time in my life i wish I had taken a deeper interest in chemistry sooner. that spark came way later in my life.