Is it fair to let models use make-up and not let athletes use anabolic steroids?

Hello, everyone.

I welcome you to my blog. It is no news that in the world of professional sports, athletes are not allowed to use strength enhancement drugs. These strength enhancement drugs can help boost and improve athelete performance, but athelets are not allowed anywhere near them. The punishment that comes with testing positive for doping or using strength enhancement drugs can be very brutal, and if care is not taken, an athlete's career can even come to an end the moment they test positive for doping.

_{designed in canva.}

Imagine being banned for two years as an athlete; even the fans forget you exist, and if the athlete quits training all because the ban is a long one, then their career is gone. The punishment that comes with it makes athletes not even want to try it. Using these strength enhancement drugs imposes health dangers for athletes, and it's also quite difficult to determine an athlete's capability when they use strength enhancement drugs, which is why they are not allowed near them.

Looking at the modeling and fashion industry, we see something completely different from what we see in the world of professional sportsmanship: models are allowed to use makeup, jewelry, and ornaments to enhance their beauty. I hear people ask if makeup really enhances beauty, and the answer will definitely be yes, but some people argue that. But the truth is that make-up does enhance beauty. Why would models be allowed to enhance their beauty using make-up, but athletes are not allowed to use strength enhancement drugs?

Makeups are checked for toxicity before being used, which makes them safe to use as they do not impose health dangers. On the other hand, anabolic steroids or strength enhancement drugs are dangerous to health, maybe not immediately after taking them, but the aftereffects are always bad. They can help improve an athlete's performance on the field, but it doesn't end there.

Makeup helps the models to look good, as it is criteria for their line of work that one must look good. Anabolic steroids kill the user from the inside by attacking vital organs, and as an athlete, if those vital organs are attacked, they can no longer do the job. Asking someone with a heart problem to run is actually killing them; this is why they are not allowed near anabolic steroids and are punished severely if found using them.

For models, make-up helps them build self-confidence; they are always before people and cameras, but when you know you look good, you won't have a problem with that. It helps to cover blemishes and scars, which is a bad thing for models to have, but with makeup, their secrets are kept secret. Models need make-up more than anything in their line of work, while athletes don't really need anabolic steroids as they have their natural strength to get the job done without needing any strength enhancement drugs.

Anabolic steroids are drugs; athletes can get addicted to them and abuse them, which makes it even more dangerous to their health when they are abused, while make-up cannot be abused even though it is necessary. For athletes, anabolic steroids are like wants, while for models, makeup is a necessity. So yes it's fair for models to use makeups while athelets are not allowed to use anabolic steroids.

Thanks for reading my post.