RE: Hive's Stake Weighted Voting And The Importance Of Hive Power
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Right, what one needs to do and what one can do are rarely in equal standing. I'm disappointed that @taskmaster4450 went the old cliche route with this one. The guy with 20m hive will never get overtaken by the average person. It requires a billionaire to do that. Also, last I heard, it only takes 14 of the highest staked account to choose the witnesses and take the majority of the rewards pool. No dedication or real knowledge of the platform needed.
0
0
0.000
With 30 votes each there should be 120 concensus witnesses imo.. I think you should only be able to vote for 5 max with 20. Split your HP stake percentage however you deem fit. But I like the idea of more witnesses AND less votes the best... file that in the not-gonna-happen drawer..
I agree, because with 30, the highest stakes can by default control all the top 30 witnesses
20 accounts take 50% of the reward pool, half for themselves, and half for their beneficiaries.
Is that currently with their actually activity or if they use their full daily 10 100% VP and blog once a day?
Daily.
Day after day.
Year after year.
50% of rewards go to 20 accounts.
Most of that to the top 5.
I don't know if they use all their vp, or not.
I would suspect that they don't.
It would be some evidence that they do feel shame.
I would suspect large sockpuppet activity, but I have no direct evidence.
Steemit launched with skimming ops in place.
A stincy dev as much as admitted it on a live stream.