RE: LeoThread 2025-11-29 03-49
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
That claim has essentially zero practical relevance — pure Bourbaki-style mathematical masturbation.
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
That claim has essentially zero practical relevance — pure Bourbaki-style mathematical masturbation.
For a continuous distribution the probability of someone being exactly 1.78 m tall (the mean) is zero only under the assumption of infinite measurement precision.
In real-world science measurement precision is necessarily limited by instruments (or by Planck-like lower bounds). With, say, 10^-4 precision, the situation involves closed intervals like [1.7751, 1.7850], each of which has measure ≥ 0