United 93 - Even More Things That Don't Make Sense - PART 3

Today is part 3 of my United 93 deep dive. This time I will mainly focus on what happened just before the crash, the site and how this was investigated. If you haven’t read my other articles you can check them out below.

While I have been researching United 93 and the alleged crash site in Shanksville Pennsylvania there is shockingly little publicly available information.

The United 93 crash had the most evidence collected out of the 9/11 flights, yet it is the least publicly documented crash in aviation history. I found out the government has claimed to have had

• Physical debris
• DNA from all passengers
• Flight data recorder
• Cockpit voice recorder
• Radar track
• ATC tapes
• Military tracking
• FBI evidence recovery
• Crime scene excavation for weeks
• 800plus ground witness statements.

For a normal NTSB crash it will release all documentation. No full NTSB crash report, No public debris field, no official map of where each piece of debris was found, no publicly released photos of any of the evidence, no ground witness statements, no firecrew / EMS statemetns, a lot of early media interviews with witnesses have now been scrubbed, no unredacted CVR audio, no timeline of debris found in Indian Lake and no explanation for mid-air debris miles away from the crash site.

Plane Sightings After the Official Crash Time

The official timeline states that United 93 crashed after 10.03am and buried itself in the ground which covered it over before anyone got to the scene. Yeh right. As we saw in the last article there is plenty of evidence that United 93 was still in the air after this time.

Multiple witnesses at Indian Lake (several miles away from the crater) saw a plane flying low shortly after they heard an explosion.

They described

• debris falling after the explosion
• a loud engine
• a plane flying low and fast over the lake.
• and in some cases no seeing ANY crash.

The Mystery White Jet (Seen After the Alleged Crash)

Multiple witnesses, including Susan McElwain (video below) and others in Indian Lake said

• It was not a commercial jet
• no windows
• very low
• circled the area
• flew away at high speed
• appeared minutes after the explosion

A Plane Headed Toward Washington AFTER the Crash

Air Traffic Control transcripts (and live news reports) referenced a plane still visible heading toward Washington After 10.03am.

• ATC reported a plane near Camp David
• News Outlets reported a possible crash or explosion near Camp David
• ATC also tracked a plane near Hagerstown on approach path toward Washington
• This was all AFTER the time UA93 allegedly crashed

Header 2Unknown Aircraft Over Dulles Airport at 10.57am

Below is from ATC transcripts.

Dulles International Airport staff reported an unidentifiable aircraft in restricted airspace at 10.57am, almost an hour after UA93 supposedly crashed. This was mentioned in FAA logs, Dulles radar discussions and early internal reports. It was dismissed later but taken seriously at the time.

Witnesses on the Ground

In the clip above is Viola Taylor, and she tells the interviewer that it was after hearing an explosion, that she looked up and saw a plane coming directly toward her, flying low and fast. She was that scared she moved out the way.

In the above clip is Susan McElwain. It wasn’t until after an explosion that she saw a small white plane, and it flew just above the treetops and right over her car. She said it didn’t have any windows or markings and was way too small to be a Boeing 757. She made it clear that it was after the explosion, and circled briefly and shot away at high speed.

Also in the clip above is the Mayor of Indian Lake who also states that a low flying plane flew over head after an explosion. This is a good statement to find as a Mayor isn’t just anybody.

These 3 witnesses all say the same thing making their statements very credible.

The Coroner Statement

The coroner of Shanksville, Wally Miller, and one of his interview is below.

Below is also a news article from the Washington Post I managed to find where he says the following statement.

‘i stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes’.

Why These Statements Are Important

The Coroner’s statements leave no need for any speculation. You have a Coroner saying ‘no bodies’ and a Mayor saying ‘no plane’ and first responders saying there was nothing there. This is direct observational evidence, but very difficult to find any of the clips of interviews with ground witnesses, they appear to have all be removed.

Missing 302s & FOIA Blackout

Whilst deep diving into Shanksville, especially anything to do with ground witnesses and the crash site, you see that there are

No publicly released FBI witness statements???
This is not normal.

Evidence the FBI Usually Releases

After all major aviation crashes, even small accidents, the public record will contact all witness statement from first responders, early responder logs, residents interviews, crash site photos, wreckage analysis, NTSB first and final reports and a witness locaton map. NONE OF THAT EXISTS IN PUBLIC FOIA RELEASES.

What Evidence is Publicly Available

This is what I have been able to find…

• Airline employees interviews
• Phone call related FBI witness statements
• FAA staff statements
• ATC statements
• Military co-ordination records
• Lab reports for tiny debris fragments
• Timeline reconstruction memos

But there is a complete blackout of residential, first reponder and mining worker statements

They Did Collect Statements

The National Park Service has publicly stated

We have conducted over 800 interviews with witnesses, first responders and community members connected to the crash of United 93.

As I showed you above there are statements from residents, officials and first responders, so where are their official statements?

What the Absense of Statements Suggests

In my opinion is that these statements did not match the ‘official story’ and contradicted the last minute, put together narrative. The early media reports with witnesses have been quietly removed from the internet or are difficult to find. These statements must all confirm that they didn’t see any evidence of

Evidence That Should Exist (But Doesn’t)

I’m sure at some point in your life you have seen or been on a Boeing 757, it is one of the largest aircraft there is, it weights over 100 tons, is nearly 50m long and has a wingspan at 125ft, with four ton engines and thousands of identifiable compondents.

When a plane of this size crashes at high speed, there is wreckage, lots of it. It is recognisable, photographed documented, catalogued and released.

Except at Shanksville. United 93 is the only high speed airliner crash in modern history that has no

• visable fuselage
• wings
• tail
• engines
• seats
• luggage
• landing gear
• cockpit
• cabin debris field
• NTSB reconstruction
• official wreckage photos.

We were told and expected to accept that the plane disintigrated and buried its self, covered itself with soil, before anyone arrived on the scene.

Header 2What Should Have Been There

I found real high speed, nose down, catastrophic impact crashes to show you what the crash sites looked like

Air India - Flight 855 (1978)

700mph, near vertical impact, ocean crash.

Pacific Southwest Flight 1771 (1987)

770mph vertical dive - Far faster and more violent that United 93

Germanwings 9525 (2015)

430mph into the French Alps

SilkAir Flight 185 (1997)
790mph dive into riverside terrain

MH17 (2014)

Shot down at high altitude, hitting the ground in one piece.

United 93 (2001)

All of the above flights were at a higher speed, steeper angle, stronger impact, greater altitude, had explosions involved, broke up in air and landed in remote areas.

United 93 is the only crash where

• The Coroner found no bodies
• Witnesses saw no plane
• First responders found no wreckage
• Debris was found scattered miles away (although it had supposedly landed in tact into the ground, how does paper and seats appear)
• No debris field map exists.

What Has Been Released

A few plane pieces

A staged photo of a passport fragment, convenient.

Interestingly no passengers passports were ever photographed, logged or entered into evidence however 2 hijackers passports were. None of the victim’s IDs, including driving licences survived the crash. So the hijackers passports survived a plane being ‘vapourised’. They survived temperatures that incinerated bodies, luggage and metal.

The crater without aircraft debris.

Flight Data Recorder was ‘recovered’ but no public reconstruction exists

The FDR logs things like altitude, speed, control inputs and is stored in an indestructable, crash survivable box in the tail of the air craft.

The recovery of the FDR was reported in the press and NTSB documents but there is no mention in any FAA or FOIA records. This is strange. There is a full factual report however the public doesn’t get to see the full data.

Cockpit Voice Recorder

Only a transcript was released for this, no audio has been made available to the public.

Fragment Only Evidence

FBI evidence report list tiny fragments of paper, small metal shards and personal effects but no major aircraft components.

The United 93 Paradox

The Crash with the most claimed evidence became the crash with the least publicly documented proof. When you actually look into what was released you hit the paradox. Here are the contradictions.

Claimed a 100 ton Boeing 757 crashed - almost no large aircraft debris was released, only scraps.

They claimed they recovered everthing - No NTSB crash report. This is unprecedented.

Claimed ‘we have the black boxes’ but only a transcript was released, no audio and no FDR data.

Claimed dozens of witnesss interviews were collected - there are zero ground wintess statements released to the

public.

Claimed the passengers fought back - phone calls continued after the offiial crash time.

Claimed the plane ‘disintegrated’ - Hijacker passports survived intact, however no passengers passports were found.

What the Evidence Actually Points To!

Looking at the receipts like the ATC transcripts, FAA command centre calls, CVR timelines, radar tracking, lack of physical evidence and the ground witness testimonies, a different picture emerges.

There is a pattern, a pattern which points toward mutiple overlapping anomalies, none of which point to a ‘plane crashed at 10.03am’ narrative.

The combined evidence doesn’t point to a single plane impact at Shanksville. It points to a plane still airbourne, an event in the sky and a narrative locked to a crash site that doesn’t contain a plane.

The Silence Says Everything

For a crash this public and dramatic and thoroughly investigated, when you go looking for official documentation from Shanksville, it simply isn’t there.

No FBI 302 interviews with ground witnessess have ever been released.

No NTSB witness reports or crash analysis exist for United 93.

No FAA on scene interviews with locals or first responders.

No police or EMS statements.

No official transcripts of the dozens of interviews taken that day.

For an event that should have the clearest documentation, Shanksville has become the exact opposite, the least transparent crash site in mordern history.

And that silence does speak louder that anything the official record does contain.

What Actually Happened?

At this point I feel the simplest explanation may be the most explostive - something went wrong. Whatever the original plan was for United 93 was, it didn’t happen as planned and a new narrative had to be stitched together to cover up a catastrophic mistake. That would explained scrambled timelines, the impossible radar data, the missing witness statements, the vanishing evidence and a story that feels like it was written backwards from a conclusion no one was allowed to question.

Maybe the contradictions aren’t accidents, Maybe the paper trail was meant to be a maze - a patchwork of some truth, designed to put off anyone who tries to follow it. Because as I have laid out, every document disagrees with the next one. When the evidence undermines the story it is supposed to support, it feels like you are not looking at incompetence…

You are looking at a cover up built in real time.

And the cracks in that rushed narrative are exactly where the truth is starting to shine through.

So let me know your thoughts on this now you have seen all the evidence.