Love in the modern age; How marriage has changed

Welcome to my blog!

Source

Marriage as a social phenomenon has been subject to transformation in the course of many years, changing from a compulsory family obligation to a voluntary Lifelong Companionship arrangement based on affection.

It has certainly influenced expectations and dynamics in today’s relationships: for the better, as relationships are deeper and more secure; for the worse, as ambiguity and anxiety have arisen as major relational themes.

All these years ago, marriage was seen more of as a business, where two individuals took that solemn vow for life because that is what was expected, as well as due to matters such as security, stability and family responsibilities. Until death do us part — this was not an easy word, as stating it, both partners assumed a lifetime responsibility and commitment.

This traditional way of thinking valued dedication and sturdiness over one’s well-being and joy.
However , with changing times and shifting culture the very definition of marriage has undergone a gradual evolution. The new phenomenon of romantic love has extended the purpose of marriages, hence completely changing how most lovebirds are tied in a bond together.

Today, marriage is thought to be the state in which two people, partners, decide to live together emotionally and legally and develop together as people.

This change from the aspect of duty to that of love has led to several positive changes within the union of couples in today’s society. It is worth noting that in this case, partners are more likely to focus on physical affection, self-satisfaction, and closeness, which translates into effective communication, tolerance, and patience. This results to better bonding as couples face life’s hurdles together, and build each other up during higher moments.

Further, the emphasis on love and support from each other have empowered couples to cultivate more equality in their relations. The traditional gender roles are no longer as strictly defined; people can either have hobbies of their own, want a partner who shares their passion, or have each other’s own dreams and ambitions.

Nevertheless, the evolution of marriage has created new questions and dilemmas that were not present in the past. As marriage no longer requires people to stay with each other until death, due to high rates of divorces and modifications in societal views, couples may never feel the pressure to stay together for life. Though such absence liberates, it also brings ambiguity and concern in terms of marriages’ duration and solidity.

In addition, the fact is that the tendency to pursue personal happiness and self-fulfillment can create certain illusory expectations that disregard the common good or social contribution. However, if not handled properly, this may lead to the partners feeling estranged from each other in the relationship.

In conclusion, the changes in marriages from civil obligation to affection-based relationship has open new opportunities and new problems to the modern alliance. Such shift to emotional connections as well as stress on establishing the personal fulfillment of the involved parties helps create and sustain stronger and more robust relationships; however, it also fosters new sources of vulnerability.

Thus, to cope with these changes, the couples should focus on the aspects such as compassion, understanding, and reciprocity. Analyzing the concept of marriage in terms of current social perspective and acknowledging the multifaceted nature of relationships, it is possible to establish a healthy long-term union that would satisfy both spouses and help them face any challenges on the way together. In conclusion, they are the peripheral details of how the institution of marriage has changed, which is a very important aspect of addressing the future requirements of people in the twenty-first century.

Thanks for reading...

I am @mummygo...

Posted Using InLeo Alpha