RE: Byte (March 1985)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
That page count is hilarious, considering they billed themselves the "small systems journal". :D
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
That page count is hilarious, considering they billed themselves the "small systems journal". :D
The "systems" were small not necessarily the "journal" I guess :). Even that is confusing by today's standards. But that was just a reference to mainframes and mini-computers which were larger systems. At this time Byte did cover computers that were meant to be business machines vs. "home computers" (though they covered those as well). A lot of these were PC like but not necessarily with much IBM PC compatibility.