RE: AI: A future without Firewood
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I'm not taking a Marxist position, but I can see why it can be interpreted as if I am. I do however feel convinced that Capitalism is morphing into something else. I'll grant you what you said the other day, Late stage capitalism is an umbrella term for things that we don't like. That was, regrettably so, spot on. But, I appreciate those push backs, because they help me refine my positions.
All that said. We are not really in disagreement, not really. Like you, I think we will come up with new jobs and lots of people will probably find themselves busy doing something. However, I feel like what we call today "low skill job" (i do have a problem with the label, but for efficiency I'll use it) will have no replacement per se. To be blunt: Mcdonalds won't have a single human in the restaurants.
If we reach that stage, which I think we will, then UBI becomes the only viable solution in my opinion.
I only meant my reference to Marxism as a clarification of my own argument, not an assumption about yours, so I apologize if I was unclear there.
The root problem with all UBI schemes is that consumption can only follow production, so if someone is to receive UBI, someone else must produce first without recompense. AI is not able to do that.
The Andre Yangs of the world think that this is precisely what AI and Automation will do. In other words, machines would be working our land, our factories, driving out cars, generating surplus. People would have "rights" to the surplus generated by the machines.
I think I should re-read the book, its been a while. But Yang released a book called "the war on normal people" that sold me on this UBI thing back in 2018. Since then I've read a few more on the subject. Utopia for realists, also a great book.