RE: The DFH Return Proposal - Are you aware of it?

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I had already voted a while ago and had already written about the fact that Hivewatcher costs more than it brings. Mind you, I think it not only costs more than what it generates in downvotes, I think it is detrimental to Hive and has a negative effect on the activity of many users.

I will check again if my other accounts follow this when voting, even if they only have a few HP. As you say, every HP counts.

I just have to find out where I can set it so that they vote the same as my main account.

hive crypto inleo news money ctp proofofbrain
0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar

"I think it is detrimental to Hive and has a negative effect on the activity of many users."

No question. It does some good. It does, however, far more damage ... And the whales who vote to keep it active are complicit in not holding themselves accountable to this hard reality.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Remember back on STEEM when we had voting bots? I know the Hivewatchers guys were part of that. Voting bots are a taboo subject but they gave STEEM a really good use case, one HIVE has never had.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Yep. I remember. In my last post, I even touched on that a bit. Specifically, my brief time being personally associated with Hivewatchers - focused on voting bots in the early days of the Hive blockchain ... They just "changed their spots," and morphed into something else ...

The lack of clarity on establishing a "black and white" (again, touched on in my final post) focus of Hivewatcher's efforts, along with outright hypocrisy in ignoring ... "abuse" ... brought that to an end.

0
0
0.000
Reply