Can Society Function Without Exiling the Unethical?

avatar


MINICANSOCIETYFUNCTION.png

This is a publication based on the suggested topic proposed in the Hive Learners community through their discord, which on this occasion is "ETHICS AND MORALS".


"Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do."
<< Potter Stewart >>



DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png


CANSOCIETYFUNCTION1.jpeg
Bing AI

Welcome my new readers and asiduos to my blog.

Today I am going to talk about ethics and morals, which is the topic that we are proposed in the community.

Actually, this is a controversial topic because, taking into account that each country has a cultural context and a way of acting and doing things, it is a topic that is delicate.

I think it is very important to consider ethics and morals when making and building laws in a country because it is necessary that the people who are in charge of reviewing those laws or implementing those laws carry out this process in an ethical way, based on the greater well-being of the people to whom these laws will be applied.

So, I think there must be a context and a consensus among all the people who empower these officials or magistrates who are making the laws and who must choose people who have an ethics and morals that have been tested so that in this way the laws that are imposed or that are approved are the best for all people.

Honestly, I think that if something is not ethical or moral, it should be put as something really illegal, inappropriate.


DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png


CANSOCIETYFUNCTION2.jpeg
Bing AI

People have to learn to lead a life according to certain social principles, and those who are not within those parameters should be considered as illegal entities or as illegality or at least that within the laws it was established that those people who are immoral or unethical should be considered legally as exiled and put to live outside the system or away from the common society.

I think that at least this is what should be done or what should be at least as a standard to be able to have a better society because imagine that it is allowed that these people who are not ethical and who are immoral continue to live with the common population.

Obviously, this would bring more chaos and more conflict.

It is like the saying that a rotten apple damages the rest of the basket.

So, these people who are not ethical should be taken out of this basket, exiled, and that they can continue to live their lives but away from the majority of people or the majority of the population.

I think that everyone has the right to do whatever they want if they are willing to assume the consequences, and in that sense, I think that the laws should specify directly if someone does not follow the rules, is exiled and lives outside.


DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png


CANSOCIETYFUNCTION3.jpeg
Bing AI

It is not that the person is forced to pay a tax or a fine for being immoral or for not being ethical but simply not regulate but legalize the fact that this person does not follow the laws and must be separated from society or the common denominator of the people.

At least, I see it as a possible and very viable solution. Of course, this is something that segregates people even more, it would be hurting a minority even more.

And although it may seem that I am in favor of this and that I am a harmful or toxic person for promoting this type of thinking, I believe that it is the best thing for the population or for all people. In reality, allowing these toxic or immoral people to continue living within society causes more harm than good.

What it does is lead and promote more corruption within people, that is, it continues to damage the rest of the apple, it continues to teach the way of how to corrupt people.

And perhaps many of you may think that it is important, and I agree with that, that it is important that these unethical and immoral people exist because they teach how to be able to learn from them how to be able to fight it and learn from the things they do to be able to fight and put the laws.

Although this is true, I am kind of encouraging these people to live within their own remote community, within their own rules of inethics and their own way of thinking with their equals, with the people who are equal to them and not that they live with the people who are morally ethical and that we have our morality and our way of proceeding. This is the way I see things.



DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png
This is my black cat "manclar", this account is to honor his dead (it happened years ago).


firmanclaravatar50.png
Visit the Neon Strike discord, the game of the future today! (Discord)


Credits:

Thumbnail image maded using Bing AI and edited with Canva.com
All images in the post are created by AI.
The text dividers were made by me using aseprite
Post translated from spanish to english using Deepseek AI

Posted Using INLEO



0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar

nice quote, I do not know who is potter steward

!BBH !ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

thanks, Here's an overview of Potter Stewart :


🎓 Who Was Potter Stewart?

Potter Stewart (1915–1985) was an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1958 to 1981. Appointed by President Eisenhower, he was known for his pragmatic, moderate approach and pivotal role in landmark decisions on civil liberties, privacy, and free speech.

⚖️ Key Facts:

  1. Early Life & Career:

    • Born in Michigan, raised in Ohio; son of a Cincinnati mayor and Ohio Supreme Court Justice.
    • Graduated from Yale Law School (1941), served in the U.S. Navy during WWII.
    • Practiced law in NYC and Cincinnati; served as a federal appeals judge (1954–1958).
  2. Supreme Court Tenure (1958–1981):

    • Confirmed at age 43 (youngest Justice at the time).
    • Often the decisive "swing vote" between liberal and conservative blocs.
    • Rejected rigid ideologies; famously called himself "a lawyer trying to do his best."
  3. Landmark Opinions:

    • Privacy Rights: Wrote the majority opinion in Katz v. United States (1967), declaring the Fourth Amendment "protects people, not places" (extending privacy to wiretaps).
    • Free Speech: Coined the phrase "I know it when I see it" in Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964) while arguing against defining obscenity too broadly.
    • Civil Rights: Supported banning racial discrimination in housing (Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 1968).
    • Abortion: Voted with the majority in Roe v. Wade (1973).
    • Death Penalty: Initially voted to halt executions (Furman v. Georgia, 1972) but later upheld revised laws (Gregg v. Georgia, 1976).
  4. Notable Dissents:

    • Opposed banning school prayer (Engel v. Vitale, 1962), arguing it did not violate the Establishment Clause.

🏛️ Legacy:

  • Retired in 1981 to spend time with family; succeeded by Sandra Day O’Connor.
  • Died in 1985; buried at Arlington National Cemetery.
  • Remembered for his integrity, moderation, and defense of constitutional balance. The Potter Stewart Award honors contributions to justice in D.C.

"He insisted that the law must be a framework for justice, not an instrument of ideology."

0
0
0.000
avatar

Laws could become chaotic if they are established on the basis of ethics and morals. For the legal system of society to the widely respected and accepted, the laws therein must apply the morals of such societies while making the law.

By principle, one of the sources of law is the culture (from which morals and ethics are derived) of the people.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Without a doubt, to live better the world in general needs much more moral and ethical.

Enchanted to receive you for my publication with your great comment, thank you very much.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi @manclar, we all know that the most immoral and unethical beings are in parliaments creating laws. I completely agree with the expulsion of all these bad people from society.

A very big hug.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, in reality the most ethical should be one living being self -sustainable and with politicians who really were honest, but that is a utopia.

I am dead, I just spent 70 dollars that I did not have for a new monitor (which by the way is not new, it is used but of good brand) and it has been an extremely rugged negotiation (you could not expect less of something in my life, things are extremely difficult for me to get), in short, I hope to be receiving it on Friday, I have run out of money, pfff that is hard to live in Venezuela.

All the best.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I hope you get some rest. Best regards.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have not even been lunch today, it has been a total Stress, a lot of pressure. Anyway, then another day we will talk, it will be on Sunday or next week, when all this fucking storm has passed.

a hug.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your post has been curated from the @pandex curation project. Click on the banner below to visit our official website and learn more about Panda-X. Banner Text

0
0
0.000