RE: LeoThread 2025-08-10 23:04
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Ser, please stop, the logic here is overwhelming!
I overheard someone claim, "Let's not act like Tornado Cash isn't used for illegal activities."
0
0
0.000
There’s no pretense here about what Tornado Cash is used for—it's irrelevant what people do with software or their money. No one should meddle in that.
Simply moving money isn't a crime. All surveillance, AML, KYC, and privacy invasions stand against ethics and morality. None have a place in a free society.
If a money transfer breaks a legitimate law, law enforcement can pursue it. Legitimate laws defend against crimes with direct victims; anything else is neither ethical nor valid.
The presumption of guilt and oppressive regulations on all are wrong. Penalizing people for innocuous violations that harm no one is a misguided innovation.
Not long ago, tyrannical control over financial dealings was unfathomable—even oppressive regimes didn't enforce such stringent regulations. IDs for stock trading weren't even needed until the 90s.
The belief that privacy or transferring money freely is criminal is misguided. These restrictions should be abolished for rightful, unrestricted money movement.
Curb unnecessary inquiries like questioning cash deposits or withdrawals. This approach lacks morality and ethics.
The fight must escalate to a broader level beyond individual cases, addressing the illegitimacy of KYC and AML regulations in conversations with lawmakers as a violation of human rights and freedoms.
Addressing terrorism and trafficking should focus on the actual perpetrators, not criminalizing the global population, obstructing the economy, or complicating transactions. Follow the criminals, not the innocent populace.
Protecting privacy is a fundamental human right.