RE: LeoThread 2025-03-02 12:25
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Insightful reply to a compelling inquiry.
"Indeed, the point raised is valid—the original aim was to clarify that foundational protocols need to remain neutral and permissionless.
0
0
0.000
Given that principle, it is important to examine the following issues regarding node decisions: a) deprecating the feature that inadvertently locked user funds, and b) opting to block specific transactions or disable chains.
It is essential that blockchains adhere strictly to their own protocol guidelines. In this context, decision-making resides with node operators who may introduce, withdraw, or pause features as defined by the rules.
While these choices are inherently subjective—reflecting individual preferences, legal environments, and operational judgments—they will ultimately converge through consensus, a hallmark of blockchain technology.
Regarding the freezing or deprecation of features that compromised solvency, the inclination leans slightly toward initiating a freeze and phasing out the problematic protocol.
Although this move might appear severe, it is aimed at preventing systemic failure that could lead to greater losses, even if the initiative carried inherent risks.