RE: Embracing Collaboration With AI...
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I'm not also fond of this AI thingy,as a teacher of today's generation,learners today seemed more reliable with this technology -most especially AI's partly they become more lazy and dependent so much in AI.
0
0
0.000
however, here we are running into the issue of how/why to use - and just fitting new tools into an old 'learning/teaching model,' rather than considering how might the models be upgraded in parallel given the new tools available.
i.e. the clickbaity study deducing "ChatGPT users have decreased brain function" -> that's not at all a representation of all AI users, but a small subset of students who are using it for the primary purpose of having it do their assignments for them - a means of facilitating laziness/efficient in the old model to produce what's being required to pass the school's curriculum. meanwhile, there are entirely different types of people using the same tools in completely different contexts for completely different reasons - who would probably show increased intelligence, as they're not just using it to help them 'think outside the box,' but build entirely new systems beyond the shape of a box.
thus, the educational institutions I'd give more credit to are the ones teaching students how to use AI to expand their capacities and innovate. not just for the purpose of duplicating the completion of homework to check the boxes of what a "good student" does in the old system, but that are a testament to & embodiment of a focus & intention of the starting point of "how do we use this to make ourselves smarter and not just "succeed" in the old system, but build new ones that serve in better ways than the old ever did... 😉✨
Timely on topic:
plus one other good one:
Shocking is the effect of this AI...its danger is a memory loss if this used for long-term..brain dead or brain fog would be deadly if thats the case.
you might have missed the key points in the video for which reason(s) I shared it...
namely: negative or positive effects depend not on the technology, but how a person uses it.
the difference is not random.
it comes down to a matter whether a person becomes reliant upon the tech to do their thinking for them, or keeps their critical thinking skills intact, engaging with the tech to practice & sharpen those critical thinking skills.
focusing on the "danger" is just as productive as focusing on the "dangers" of driving a car -> is it more constructive to remain in fears of worst-case scenarios of what could happen the moment you step into a vehicle, or learn to drive, building the skills to use the technology correctly, ensure you're present & conscientious when on the road, remaining alert (including defensive-driving), and taking responsibilty as building safe habits to ensure the result of consistently safe arrival?
look past the clickbaity video title and thumbnail. dig in and listen to what's actually being said throughout it all on where the difference lies between destructive and constructive use of the tools... 👀💎
Thank you for the key points you've shared.True.On the other side I'm not thinking there's also a positive side of using it,and that the problem is not the technology but rather it's the one using.
I'm only one sided thinking only the negative side and whats the danger of it to people wherein fact there's more also a good things brought by technology to people.
I apologize for missing out one of the key points and not highlighted and elaborated it all the details on whats the video is all about..
Have a good day.Thank you for the enlightenment about this matter.
no apologies necessary. I'm just glad you see what I was pointing to now. 🙂
Thank you for your insights.
I appreciate your effort of sending videos just to let me get to the point.