Epistemology of ‘Serious Doubt’ About COVID-19 Vaccine Safety After Forced Release of 15,000 Pages of Clinical Trial Data: Legal NGO
I was alerted to an article at the Epoch Times that there is "‘Serious Doubt’ About COVID-19 Vaccine Safety After Forced Release of 15,000 Pages of Clinical Trial Data: Legal NGO".
I find it strange that "serious doubts" is said to happen after the autopsy data is released. To me, we should take any new therapy with doubt. Any thing new should have its safety doubted. A new inject-able. Doubt its safety. A new medicine? Doubt its safety.
The whole reason we have testing is because we cannot assume everything we are about to try is going to work fine. Before new software is released, it is tested. Before a node accepts a new transaction, the Bitcoin node will validate it.
We, humanity, should have started with more skepticism. We should approach other new ideas or solutions in the same way.
Posted with proof of brain
0
0
0.000
My skepticism of the whole thing had little to do with theories of evil governments and NWO, and everything to do with doubting the mass-scale rollout of an injectable antim-measure being created, tested and delivered for public use in months. Let's face it, there are vaccines that have saved a lot of human lives from major diseases... but they often took 20 years to develop, test, clinical trial and then release as safe to use.
People who are in a rush tend to overlook potential complications because they just don't have time to check for them.
=^..^=
Posted using Proof of Brain