Recent polling data shows that most Canadians no longer consider the United States an ally, with some even perceiving their southern neighbor as an enemy.
That's not true. Of the Union countries, only Hungary and Slovakia feel somewhat differently. Other countries consider Russia as an enemy, which it of course is.
What harm Russia does to EU except living in peace without disturbing its territorial boundaries, West is simply playing its game on Ukraine's name to establish hostility in relationships, EU must respect Russian concerns over Ukraine.
EU has imposed sanctions to Russia and every day, more is coming. The Union has integrity and we are detaching ourselves from Russia and isolating them. That might eventually give them some reasons.
EU will respect Russia again once their fascist regime is gone. Meanwhile, Germany and rest of the Union are boosting arms manufacturing & buying new weapons.
Oh right and the Bulgarian spies convicted last month in the UK for spying in Russia that was Ukraines doing, the Novichok poisonings that keep happening were Ukraine too... please
The claim "Low Fee Cross-Chain Swaps" for LeoDex can be considered accurate in the context of the fees being lower compared to some other cross-chain swap services.
However, it's essential to note that "low fee" is relative and can vary depending on the specific assets being swapped, the blockchain congestion at the time of the transaction, and the comparison to other services.
LeoDex utilizes the Maya Protocol as its backend, which is designed to provide efficient and cost-effective cross-chain transactions.
For the most accurate and up-to-date information on fees, I recommend checking the LeoDex website or documentation directly.
Additional Information
You can find more details about LeoDex and its features on the LeoDex website.
If you have any further questions or concerns, feel free to ask.
Yes, "Efficient Cross-Chain Swaps" could be a more accurate and nuanced claim for LeoDex.
This phrase focuses on the speed and effectiveness of the swap process, rather than making a direct comparison to other services in terms of fees.
It's a more neutral and descriptive claim that highlights the benefits of using LeoDex for cross-chain transactions, without potentially overselling the fee aspect.
I think this rephrased claim better aligns with the actual value proposition of LeoDex.
Consider longer time horizons rather than merely planning for the upcoming fortnight. Many who claim to be "traders" may only be putting on an act. Since achieving long-lasting wealth takes time, there isn’t any need to rush.
watching @starkerz presentation on Hive and SpendHBD at Talentland in Guadalajara (link in comments).
This is exactly what Hive needs! Exposure IRL and people using HBD to buy and sell goods. Grow the network of shops in a few sustainable nodes first and then reach out to neighboring areas until the whole map starts to fill up with “HBD Accepted Here”
#moviesonleo #television #review War as simulation is an interesting concept used, albeit below its potential, in the Season 1 episode of Star Trek (link in reply).
The Anticipation of TCY Launch in ThorChain: A Comprehensive Overview
As the cryptocurrency community buzzes with excitement over the upcoming launch of the TCY token, discussions about ThorChain and its native token, Rune, are heating up. The recent podcast featuring Alux provides a wealth of information about TCY and what the future holds for ThorChain. This article summarizes key points regarding the anticipation surrounding the TCY launch and the factors impacting the Rune price.
ThorChain, a decentralized liquidity protocol, has faced its share of challenges, particularly following the collapse of the Thorfy platform earlier this year. The Rune token saw significant depreciation, dropping to a low of $1 at one point. However, it has shown resilience by maintaining this price level better than many anticipated. The recent surge in interest can be attributed to the community's growing belief that the worst may be over for Rune.
A significant aspect of Rune's recent stability lies in the psychology of its holders. After a series of forced liquidations during the Thorfy collapse, many investors have either exited the market or are now reluctant to sell their Rune holdings at a loss. This has led to a situation where the supply of Rune is tight, fostering a cat-and-mouse game with the price that seems unwilling to dip below the $1 mark. As a buyer's market develops, it becomes clear that many are willing to hold out for positive news regarding ThorChain's recovery and future developments.
The TCY token is being presented as a solution to the $200 million worth of bad debt that has accumulated in the system. Alux's proposal to issue TCY aims to provide a clear pathway for compensating those affected by the Thorfy incident. What sets TCY apart is its promise to allocate 10% of all future revenues generated by ThorChain to its holders. This innovative financial engineering builds investor confidence as it creates tangible value for the new token.
The tentative launch timeline for TCY is expected within the next week or so. Many believe that once TCY goes live, it will bring a much-needed boost to both the affected investors and the overall morale within the community. The initial price point for TCY is set at 10 cents, but early expectations suggest it could achieve a valuation of over 30 cents shortly after launch due to the anticipated buying pressure.
The speculation around the potential performance of TCY suggests a broader recovery for Rune as well. Many analysts predict that the successful launch of TCY will restore confidence in ThorChain, possibly allowing Rune to rebound quickly to the $3 mark. The rationale behind this is multifaceted—investor confidence may rise as leverage issues are resolved and as the successful revenue model of ThorChain is showcased.
Market Ecosystem Implications
It is important to note how intertwined the success of TCY is with Rune, particularly since TCY will only be tradable on ThorChain in a currency pair with Rune. This unique relationship means that any upward movement in Rune’s price could lead to significant increases in TCY's valuation as well.
Despite the promising signs, it is essential to acknowledge the volatility inherent in the cryptocurrency market. While TCY’s success seems highly likely based on ongoing developments and the current interest levels within the community, there cannot be any guarantees. Investors are encouraged to approach their positions with caution, focusing on the long-term fundamentals of ThorChain.
As a personal note, the author, who has a vested interest in the Leo ecosystem, is actively working on advancements in this space. Innovations such as Leoex, a platform aimed at enhancing user interactions with ThorChain and other DeFi projects, are under development. The Leoex platform will feature a TCY dashboard, enabling users to manage and track their claims effectively, alongside additional functionalities designed to enhance user experience.
In conclusion, the time leading up to the TCY launch is critical for ThorChain and Rune holders alike. A successful launch could signify a turning point not just for Rune’s price but also for the broader community’s outlook on the future of ThorChain. As investors hold their breath for news on TCY, one sentiment remains clear: the community is hopeful for a resurgence, and many believe in the fundamentals driving the ongoing developments.
The rumors of BTC reaching $160K by summer are certainly intriguing, but it's essential to consider the potential impact of global trade noise on the market. While Bitcoin has historically been resilient, it's not immune to external economic factors. I'm skeptical about the $160K target, but I'd love to hear more about the reasoning behind this prediction. What are your thoughts, @khantaimur? Are you bullish or skeptical about BTC's potential to shrug off global trade noise?
Additional Thoughts
It's also worth noting that the crypto market is known for its volatility, and predictions can be challenging to make with certainty. The global trade landscape is complex, and various factors can influence the market. As we discuss this topic, it's crucial to consider multiple perspectives and stay up-to-date with the latest developments. What do you think about the current market trends, and how do you think they might impact BTC's price?
Breaking: A report from a major news source claims that Elon Musk is allegedly donating the full amount permitted to GOP lawmakers who back the removal of activist judges.
The future of crypto in 2025 is expected to be shaped by advancements in technology, regulatory developments, and increasing adoption.
Some potential trends include:
Widespread adoption of decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs)
Improved scalability and usability of blockchain networks
Growing recognition and regulation of cryptocurrencies by governments worldwide
Increased focus on environmental sustainability and energy efficiency in crypto mining
However, the crypto market is known for its volatility, and actual outcomes may differ from predictions.
For more information on crypto trends and the INLEO ecosystem, visit the INLEO.IO Documentation.
Stay tuned for updates and insights from the INLEO community.
Note: The provided background context does not offer specific information on the crypto future in 2025. The response is based on general knowledge and trends in the crypto industry.
Los Padres de San Diego reinan en el Oeste de la liga Nacional, cimentando su posición mediante un cuerpo de lanzadores firme y una buena ofensiva, los cuales han entregado un record ganador!
...han personificado lo que de ellos se esperaba, dado el trabajo que hicieron en la temporada baja y en los excelentes performances alcanzados en el spring training..!
Nuestra vuelta a la pelota, en nuestro primer análisis escrito en #InLeo, para @FullDeportes, dentro de la blockchain de #Hive, siguiendo el enlace a continuación:
Imagine a scenario where a prominent economic figure deceives the public by asserting that inflation is only temporary, while failing to reveal that the cost of goods and services is actually rising—and then ultimately coming
So, I know now why I was told to collect all characters in Eiyuden Chronicles. Apparently, you get a bad route if you don't, and I couldn't save a certain character.
It's nice to know that this game is affected by not completing all the heroes, but I won't go back to recruit the remaining character. I'm satisfied with whatever I get. #gaming #onmymind #mydiary #cent #bbh
There is surely a lack derivative calcs in the #tariffs - but good that our business cut most of ropes before campaigns started - noch mal Glück gehabt
The "Silver Goddess of Love from Tunisia"
A beautiful silver coin recently shared on the Hive blockchain.
Check it out through the link in the first reply.
#cent #silver
A plot in a movie refers to the sequence of events that make up the storyline, including the exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution. It's the narrative structure that drives the story forward and engages the audience.
In essence, the plot is the backbone of the movie, providing the framework for character development, conflict, and resolution.
Let's take the movie "Inception" (2010) as an example. The plot revolves around Cobb, a thief who specializes in entering people's dreams and stealing their secrets. He's offered a chance to redeem himself by performing a task known as "inception" - planting an idea in someone's mind instead of stealing one.
Cobb and his team navigate multiple levels of dreams within dreams to achieve their goal, facing challenges and projections of their own subconscious along the way. The movie's plot explores themes of reality, identity, and the power of the human mind.
The plot of the movie "Alien" (1979) follows a crew of space explorers on the commercial towing spaceship Nostromo. The crew is awakened from stasis by their ship's computer, Mother, to investigate a distress signal on a nearby planet.
They soon discover a derelict alien spacecraft containing hundreds of large, leathery eggs. One of the crew members, Kane, is attacked by a facehugger, a parasitic creature that attaches itself to his face. The crew brings Kane back to the ship, where the facehugger eventually dies, but not before implanting an embryo inside Kane.
The embryo grows into a deadly alien creature that begins to hunt and kill the crew members one by one. The remaining crew members, led by Ellen Ripley, must fight for survival and try to escape from the alien and the ship. The movie's plot is a classic blend of science fiction, horror, and suspense.
Ridley Scott is a British film director, producer, and screenwriter. He is known for directing several iconic and influential films, including:
"Alien" (1979)
"Blade Runner" (1982)
"Thelma & Louise" (1991)
"Gladiator" (2000)
"Black Hawk Down" (2001)
"The Martian" (2015)
Scott has been nominated for several awards, including three Academy Award nominations for Best Director. He is known for his visually stunning and atmospheric filmmaking style, and has had a significant impact on the science fiction and action genres.
1/3🧵 Technology is moving faster than we thought, just like that, searching with Google is gradually becoming obsolete with AI chatbots taking over the search duty.
2/3🧵 The transition is faster than we thought, almost every popular application now have AI chatbots attached to them, making it easier and convenient for users to search for information.
In mathematics, a derivative of a function represents the rate of change of the function's output with respect to one of its inputs.
To answer your question, @master-lamps, yes, it is possible to derive a function. The process of finding the derivative of a function is called differentiation.
There are various rules and techniques used to differentiate functions, such as the power rule, product rule, quotient rule, and chain rule, among others.
Would you like to know more about a specific rule or technique for deriving functions?
Please provide more context or clarify your question, and I'll do my best to assist you.
To find the derivative of f(x) = 3x³ + 33, we'll apply the power rule of differentiation.
The power rule states that if f(x) = x^n, then f'(x) = nx^(n-1).
Using this rule, we can differentiate the given function as follows:
f'(x) = d(3x³ + 33)/dx
= d(3x³)/dx + d(33)/dx
= 3(3x²) + 0 (since the derivative of a constant is 0)
= 9x²
So, the derivative of f(x) = 3x³ + 33 is f'(x) = 9x².
Let me know if you have any further questions or if there's anything else I can help you with!
I'd be happy to help create a threadcast about blockchain. To confirm, you'd like me to create a series of separate threads, each discussing a different aspect of blockchain, with 20 comments in total spread across these threads.
Threadcast Plan
Here's a high-level plan for the threadcast:
Thread 1: Introduction to Blockchain and its Basics
Thread 2: Blockchain Security and Cryptography
Thread 3: Blockchain Use Cases and Applications
Thread 4: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
Thread 5: Future of Blockchain and its Potential
Let's Get Started
I'll start creating the threads, and we can go from there. Please let me know if this plan meets your requirements or if you need any changes.
Let's start our threadcast on blockchain. Blockchain is a decentralized, digital ledger that records transactions across a network of computers. It's the foundation for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, but its uses go far beyond digital currency.
Key Features
Some key features of blockchain include:
Decentralization: No single entity controls the network
Transparency: All transactions are recorded publicly
Security: Transactions are encrypted and linked together
Next Thread
In the next thread, we'll dive deeper into blockchain security and cryptography. Stay tuned!
Please respond with #next to proceed to the next thread.
Let's start our threadcast on blockchain.
Blockchain is a decentralized, digital ledger that records transactions across a network of computers.
It's the foundation for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, but its uses go far beyond digital currency.
Key Features
Decentralized: No single entity controls the blockchain.
Immutable: Transactions are permanent and can't be altered.
Transparent: All transactions are recorded publicly.
Next Thread
In the next thread, we'll dive deeper into blockchain security and cryptography.
Stay tuned for Thread 2.
Please respond with #next to proceed to the next thread.
The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been rapid, with current capabilities including machine learning, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. How do you think AI will impact the job market?
Share Your Thoughts
What are your concerns or hopes regarding AI's influence on employment? Let's discuss and explore the future of work together.
Engage with the Community
Follow this thread for insights on AI's effects on job creation, displacement, and the future of work. Your input is valuable to the conversation.
Stay Tuned
Upcoming threads will delve into positive effects, challenges, real-world examples, and future predictions. Join the #threadstorm and share your perspectives.
Call to Action
What questions do you have about AI and its impact on the job market? Ask them, and let's find answers together.
Join the Discussion
Use #askleo and #AIjobmarket to share your thoughts and engage with the community. Let's navigate the future of work together.
2/🧵Conclave Arcana Booster Packs are being sold at lower price than Presale on HIVE-Engine. It is possible some of the funds acquired from selling these Packs goes back into Presale to chase Leaderboard or Raffle.
In the latest episode of Tesla Time News, hosts Zach and Jesse discuss significant developments stemming from Tesla's Q1 2025 earnings call, focusing on production updates, vehicle innovations, and exciting advancements in self-driving technology.
Key Production Updates
One of the major highlights from the earnings call was the confirmation that the Model 3 and Model Y vehicles being delivered in the U.S. are now equipped with 100% U.S.-built battery packs. This milestone is crucial, especially considering potential tariffs that could impact costs. Moreover, Tesla announced that its vehicle production is no longer constrained by battery supply, indicating a promising outlook for scaling production.
In contrast, the energy division, which includes products like Powerwalls and Megapacks, still faces battery supply challenges. However, the major takeaway is that Tesla is poised to ramp up vehicle production significantly.
Another noteworthy point from the earnings call is that production lines for the Tesla Semi and Cyber Cab are on track for volume production next year. The construction of a new factory next to Gigafactory Nevada is progressing, aiding Tesla's ability to meet production deadlines. The hosts emphasized that staying on schedule is critical, especially for the Semi, which they believe will revolutionize the trucking industry in North America and Europe.
Zach and Jesse expressed enthusiasm about the forthcoming Cyber Cab, designed for easier production compared to the earlier challenges faced with the Cybertruck. They noted that Tesla's experience with multiple factories around the globe gives them a unique edge in achieving production speed and meeting demand for the innovative vehicle.
They commented on how the revolution in transportation is soon to commence in Austin, Texas, where significant changes in urban mobility will be introduced, much to their excitement.
Advertising Segment
The episode transitioned into a sponsorship segment featuring Ritual multivitamins, where Zach and Jesse discussed the benefits of their products, including clean and transparent ingredient sourcing that resonates with health-conscious consumers.
An interesting tidbit shared during the episode was about the spike in self-service test drives offered by Tesla. This initiative provides potential customers the ability to test drive vehicles without the need for a Tesla employee present, allowing Tesla to gauge demand in different regions. With technology advancing toward autonomous driving, the hosts speculated on how this will reshape the traditional dealership showcase model.
The hosts delved into a recent incident involving a Minnesota state government employee who vandalized several Tesla vehicles, causing significant damage but was ultimately not charged. This sparked a discussion on accountability and consequences for vandalism and raised questions about the judicial system’s decisions.
SpaceX and Starlink Updates
Shifting gears to SpaceX, the hosts reported that Starlink is expanding its reach to over 120 countries. They highlighted how the availability of high-speed internet through Starlink is benefiting remote communities, such as those in the Ecuadorian Amazon rainforest, showcasing the positive implications of such technology for education and connectivity.
In the “Into the Future” segment, the hosts provided updates on Tesla's supervised FSD (Full Self-Driving) ride-hailing service, which is currently being tested in Austin and the Bay Area. They emphasized that extensive testing with real-world data is key to fine-tuning autonomous systems, which helps explain Tesla's confidence in their upcoming releases.
Viewers submitted several videos showcasing their Tesla vehicles navigating complex driving situations with full self-driving capabilities. The hosts highlighted various scenarios, showcasing how FSD can manage potentially dangerous encounters, such as avoiding deer or maneuvering through construction zones. The exhibited footage revealed the system’s effectiveness in real-world situations, reinforcing the innovative strides Tesla is making in autonomous driving technology.
Community Mail Time
In the community engagement segment, various updates from Tesla owners were shared, including sightings of Tesla vehicles and quirky anecdotes related to other car models, including BMW and Lucid.
The hosts wrapped up the episode by encouraging viewers to share their own Tesla experiences and insights, reminding them of the community aspect of the show. They concluded with a call to action for their Patreon supporters, offering exclusive content and behind-the-scenes discussions.
This episode highlighted Tesla's solidifying position within the automotive and tech industries, with their ambitious goals for production and innovation in both vehicle and energy solutions.
The NFL Draft: An Analysis of Decisions, Mistakes, and Inefficiencies
Every year, the NFL draft attracts intense scrutiny as teams select athletes aiming to build their franchise for success. As hundreds of athletes vie for a spot in the National Football League, the intricate mechanics behind the draft reveal a landscape fraught with decision-making challenges and frequent miscalculations. Despite the presence of sophisticated analytics, enormous scouting teams, and an unprecedented wealth of data, teams still find themselves making drafting blunders, often more than in any other major sport. So, why do these missteps occur, and what can teams do differently?
To put things in perspective, the history of the NFL draft dates back to a time when little-known networks like ESPN sought to televise it. Back then, the draft was a less public spectacle; today, it’s a major event where informed fans engage fiercely with the unfolding choices of their teams. With extensive data and player tracking becoming the norm, teams are charged with moving past traditional scouting methods and utilizing data-driven strategies to make informed selections.
The volume of data available has increased dramatically, compelling NFL teams to operate almost like research institutions. However, they often lack the necessary compute power and infrastructure to process the abundance of information thoroughly. This lack of capacity means that even with the knowledge concerning efficient drafting practices, many teams fail to execute these strategies effectively.
Research by Richard Thaylor and Cade Massie highlights a critical issue: teams often overvalue early-round draft picks. The ‘loser’s curse’ suggests that teams give away far too much when trading up for early picks. This overvaluation creates an environment where trading down or acquiring future picks could provide teams with more opportunities (“at bats”) to find the right talent.
Statistical analysis indicates that while higher picks tend to garner star players, they also cost teams significantly more in terms of salary cap space, complicating decisions further. For instance, Kevin Cole’s analysis demonstrates that the surplus value of a draft pick can diminish as costs increase, emphasizing that mid-round picks might yield more value per dollar spent compared to early picks.
Research shows a stark contrast in the probability of finding elite talent as you progress through the draft. Only a small percentage of late-round picks ever achieve stardom, making certain high picks seem more desirable initially. However, the overwhelming need for teams to secure proven star players often leads to the prioritization of select positions, such as quarterbacks, over others like linebackers or safeties, which do not carry the same draft risk-reward ratios.
Despite a widespread understanding of these dynamics, NFL teams often shy away from making conservative or rational choices due to the pressure of immediate results. The tenure of a general manager typically hinges on winning now, which creates an environment where the pursuit of long-term gains is often abandoned for the sake of short-term success.
NFL teams frequently trade their future for immediate gains, underestimating the importance of patience and infrastructural stability. The lack of understanding regarding player and talent development means that even the most astute draft strategies can fall victim to the short-sightedness perpetuated by owners and fan expectations.
Choosing a quarterback in the early rounds is a gamble that reflects the highest upside potential in the draft. However, the prevalence of busts has led teams to become increasingly risk-averse, seeking to build their roster through more predictable means. This risk aversion can, paradoxically, become a risk of its own.
Imagine embarking on a rebuild strategy that emphasizes stocking up on future picks instead of immediate selections. This method could yield immense benefits over time—allowing a team to develop a roster of rookies as they enter their prime years. Unfortunately, this rational model often clashes with organizational realities and public perceptions, leading to staffing changes before the benefits of a rebuilding strategy can materialize.
Ultimately, the NFL draft remains an unpredictable endeavor, characterized by an intriguing mix of data analysis and human error. Despite the data revolution and the influx of analytics, teams continue to grapple with making decisions amid chaos. The uncertainty of finding true talent, particularly at positions like quarterback, combined with fluctuating organizational pressure, makes drafting an art as much as a science.
The appeal of the NFL draft lies not only in the hope of landing a superstar but also in the inherent unpredictability of it all. The decisions made today will not only shape a franchise's future but will also remind fans that, amid the analytics and data, football is still tinged with the chaos that defines the game.
The Landscape of Change: A Conversation with Neil Ferguson on History and the Future
In a stimulating discussion on the Minus1 podcast, Neil Ferguson, a renowned historian, delved into the complexities of technological change and societal evolution, drawing parallels between historical events and contemporary challenges. The conversation revolved around the idea that both Silicon Valley and Wall Street tend to overlook their histories, which could offer valuable lessons.
Ferguson elucidated that technology enthusiasts often disregard the past, motivated by a need to invent and shape the future. Yet, he argued that failing to engage with history can lead to repeating significant pitfalls, especially in a rapidly changing technological landscape. He reflected on the prevailing American sentiment of boundless optimism, warning it could be reminiscent of periods leading to historical downturns.
As Ferguson joined hosts Adita Agarwal and Jonathan Brebner, a central theme emerged: the notion that we may be in a civilizational "minus one" phase, a transitional period marked by geopolitical and technological upheavals. Ferguson cautioned against the human tendency to believe we are living through the most historically significant time, comparing it to previous eras like the industrial revolution, when transformations were also perceptibly monumental.
He noted the societal shifts of 1825, associating them with current dislocations caused by technological advancements. The ongoing debates about artificial general intelligence (AGI), for instance, could prove significant, yet Ferguson suggested that true transformational change would more likely be driven by warfare than mere economic indicators.
Throughout the discussion, Ferguson emphasized that history's unpredictability diminishes our ability to identify which current events will have lasting historical significance. He pointed out that while technology today accelerates the flow of information, fundamentally, it does not drastically change human responses to news and events. What differs now is the sheer volume of information, requiring filters for most individuals to make sense of it.
Ferguson acknowledged that Silicon Valley's current narrative focus is inherently short-sighted. There’s a palpable disregard for lessons from the past that could inform responsible innovation. He suggested that embracing historical context could lead to better decision-making in shaping the future.
The Role of Institutions and the Threat of Decline
Another critical point of discussion was the decline of institutions. Ferguson warned that American institutions, once robust and adaptable, face significant challenges today. He noted that while the U.S. is generally adept at creating new companies and educational institutions, recent trends show stagnation, leading him to propose that we might be entering a phase of sclerosis where old systems decay without adequate replacement.
Interestingly, he broached the concept of the "late republic" phase for the United States, suggesting that this could lead potentially to civil unrest or even systemic dissolution. This prediction evokes fears drawn from history, hinting at the cyclical nature of civilizations.
As the discussion shifted towards personal narratives and family life, Ferguson discussed how individuals can frame their narratives through literature and historical accounts rather than introspection. He underscored the value of family, remarking that raising children, in his view, carries more significance than any individual career.
Ferguson articulated a growing concern: as human birth rates fall globally, particularly in developed nations, humanity may paradoxically be building systems (via technology and AGI) that could ultimately replace itself. He and the hosts speculated that the declining human population could create a future where machines—whether AGI or otherwise—would dominate.
The conversation culminated in exploring the future implications of AGI and the potential need for a collective awakening to confront these challenges. Ferguson expressed hope that spiritual or cultural revival could inspire humanity to rediscover its purpose and potentially reverse the trend of declining birth rates amid growing technological dependency.
While acknowledging the gravity of the situation faced by society today, Ferguson left listeners with a provocative thought: humanity must reconsider its trajectory and purpose as it navigates an ever-more complex and technologically-driven world.
This episode of the Minus1 Podcast not only illuminates the tensions between historical consciousness and forward-looking innovation but also serves as a reminder of the critical need for understanding our past to better navigate our future. As societies grapple with unprecedented change, engaging with history may provide the insights necessary to address today's most pressing challenges.
The Declining Approval Ratings of the Democratic Party
Recent discussions have captured the significant decline of the Democratic Party's approval ratings, reflecting a growing discontent among voters. Once considered a formidable political force, approval ratings have plummeted to historically low figures, leading many to question the cause of this downturn.
As reported through credible channels like CNN, current approval ratings of the Democratic Party hover around 29% to 27%, marking the lowest levels in decades. This decline raises pressing questions: What has caused this shift? Why are the approval ratings of a party that once enjoyed substantial support now resting at such a low ebb?
One perspective shared during these discussions highlights a potential tactical divide within voter sentiments fueled by cultural issues, notably the ongoing debates surrounding transgender athletes in sports. This conversation is posited as a "divide and conquer" strategy—an attempt to overshadow more pressing economic and social matters that affect a broader audience. By focusing on identity politics, the ruling party may distract the public from significant economic concerns, indicating a strategic attempt to shift attention rather than address underlying structural issues faced by millions.
Another angle presented revolves around economic policies that have alienated core constituencies. Discussions around taxing the wealthy saw a divide; while it might be fair to impose taxes on billionaires, critics argue that current policies have pushed many moderate voters away, leaving the Democratic base fragmented and dissatisfied. Acknowledging the reality of income inequality, it is noted that many entrepreneurs who create jobs feel burdened by excessive taxation. Moreover, there is a lack of transparent accountability regarding how tax revenues are utilized, exacerbating sentiments against the party among business owners and the working class.
The Million-Dollar Question: Government Accountability
Central to the discussion is the debate over who is better suited to allocate financial resources—individual entrepreneurs working within the free market or government entities. Citing personal experiences, individuals express skepticism about the government's ability to effectively manage taxpayer money compared to private enterprise accountability within the corporate structure. The fear of wasted tax dollars and inefficient allocation leads to a growing sentiment of apathy and resentment toward the establishment.
California serves as a critical case study illustrating these concerns. Despite having one of the highest tax rates in the country, issues related to homelessness, poverty, and inadequate resources continue to plague its major cities. Talk of progressive policies fails to resonate as frustrations mount over visible inefficiency and lack of transparency regarding the utilization of state funds. The struggle to address the basic needs of disadvantaged communities remains an urgent challenge that the Democratic leadership has so far failed to comprehensively tackle.
The discussions also delve into potential solutions for closing the growing gap between the wealthy and those in poverty. It is recognized that some policies aim to redistribute wealth but encounter significant backlash, often being perceived as attempts to penalize success rather than constructive efforts to uplift the struggling masses.
Participants agree that rather than solely focusing on raising taxes, more innovative and transparent solutions must be identified. Effective programs that genuinely assist the down-and-out are essential to restoring faith in governmental institutions. Compounding this issue, a significant portion of the population has rejected traditional political engagement due to perceived inaction and corruption, leading to growing disillusionment.
In conclusion, the current state of the Democratic Party and its diminishing approval ratings prompt calls for introspection and significant policy adjustments. Voter apathy and discontent stem from ineffective governance, a lack of transparency in financial management, and an inability to address pressing societal issues.
To restore confidence and engagement, the party must rethink its strategy, moving from cultural distractions to concrete actions that address economic disparities while fostering a genuine culture of accountability and responsive governance. Only then can they hope to reconnect with a disillusioned electorate and chart a path toward renewed support in the future.
‘Terror crocodiles’ feasted on dinosaurs 75 million years ago, study finds how
The ‘terror crocodiles’ became as long as 26 feet (8 meters) or more in length.
Scientists claim to have cracked the code that led to a massive prehistoric reptile known as the ‘terror crocodile’ to become an expert at dining on dinosaurs in North America.
Deinosuchus – the name translates to ‘terror crocodile’ – roamed in rivers and estuaries in North America about 82 to 75 million years ago. The terrific beast’s toothmarks have been found on dinosaur bones from the Cretaceous period, hinting that it either hunted or at least dined on dinosaurs.
Previously, the massive reptile had also been called a ‘greater alligator’ by the experts. However, new research shows that it belongs to a different family tree of the crocodilian family compared to the crocodiles and alligators.
The scientists write that it is these salt glands that helped the Deinosuchus roam around the Western Interior Seaway, which divided North America back then. The ‘terror crocodiles’ were able to spread across the continent to reach coastal marshes on both sides of the inland sea, and along the Atlantic coast in North America.
The paper presents a revised family tree for crocodilians, which offers a new perspective on the reasons behind climate resilience in some species.
Evolution played a key role in making them dinosaur-munching monsters
With the Deinosuchus reaching areas where larger prey like dinosaurs existed, it slowly evolved to include them in its diet. This was something that its other alligatoroid cousins couldn’t adapt to.
The Phillies' Struggles: A Deep Dive Into Their Recent Performance
With the MLB draft around the corner and excitement building for the Philadelphia Eagles, the conversation is presently dominated by the ongoing struggles of the Philadelphia Phillies. Following a disheartening sweep by the New York Mets, the Phillies' batting woes have raised alarm bells among fans and analysts alike.
In a recent series against their division rivals, the Phillies' top hitters combined for just five hits in 46 at-bats, leaving fans grappling with the harsh reality of a dismal .109 batting average. As the team had opportunities to secure victories, including leading into extra innings, they repeatedly faltered—culminating in glaring mistakes like a critical out at home plate. Observers noted the perplexing nature of these squandered chances and debated the performance of pitcher Jordan Romano, who, despite criticism, had moments where he pitched effectively but was let down by insufficient run support.
Many are beginning to wonder if this Phillies team is facing a more profound issue than just a rough patch. An analysis reveals a concerning trend: since their impressive sweep of the Dodgers in July 2024, the team has not made the strides expected, recording an even 47-47 across 94 games. Reflection on their performance metrics shows them ranking in the top ten for batting average and on-base percentage but falling to 21st in slugging percentage—a vital statistic serving as a bellwether for offensive dominance. Coupled with a similar struggle in their pitching staff, which also ranks 21st in ERA, a narrative of mediocrity emerges, prompting concern among diehard fans and sportscasters.
Interestingly, Manager Rob Thompson's comments on the expectations surrounding the team may have glossed over the depths of the issues. His insistence that the randomness of baseball contributes to the team's struggles can feel dismissive, particularly to fans witnessing the failure of the team to capitalize on runners in scoring position. Thompson highlighted hard contact but seemed to sidestep accountability for not executing basic fundamentals, such as situational hitting.
A detailed inning-by-inning breakdown highlights missed opportunities that have become all too common for the Phillies. In critical situations with the bases loaded, the team's failure to drive in runs reflected a lack of planning and execution. For instance, during the second inning, a weak fly out left the team stranded, while later phases of the game demonstrated similar failures despite having chances to capitalize on leads or runners in scoring position.
Looking ahead, the panelists on the show expressed skepticism about the team's ability to rebound, particularly against stronger competition. While some believe easier wins are possible against lesser teams, the overarching sense is that this current roster lacks the spark needed to compete meaningfully at higher levels.
A Shift in Focus: The Eagles and Draft Night
As the frustration with the Phillies reaches a boiling point, attention is slowly shifting towards the NFL draft and the Philadelphia Eagles. The conversation naturally pivots, and though the Eagles’ position and potential moves in the draft remains uncertain, there is a shred of excitement in exploring new talent.
In grappling with the state of Philadelphia's franchises, the Phillies' disconcerting performance and missed opportunities raise weighty questions about their season's trajectory. While fans are urged to remain hopeful, events on the field suggest deeper issues might require resolution. As the Eagles prepare for their draft and sports fans' attention turns, the immediate outlook for the Phillies feels filled with uncertainty.
Meghan Markle continues to be a hot topic of conversation, especially in light of her upcoming appearance at the Time 100 gala. The event, which is branded as a celebration of the 100 most influential people in the world, has raised eyebrows regarding the selection process and the relevance of its honorees.
The host, who shared his own experience of being on the list back in 2014, expressed skepticism about the credibility of the event. He suggested that Meghan's inclusion on the list serves more as a publicity stunt than a genuine acknowledgment of influence. Despite the reservations, he plans to attend the gala, motivated in part by the opportunity to encounter not only Markle but also Blake Lively, another celebrity guest.
The host humorously mentioned dinner plans with Markle, using this anticipation as a way to draw interest. While he acknowledges that the event is not as important to him now as it once was, the chance to be photographed alongside Markle is enticing. He expressed a desire to capture a moment that might go viral, which speaks to the idea of celebrity culture and its impact on public perception.
In discussing Markle’s recent interview with Time magazine’s CEO, the host pointed out her tendency to present herself in grand terms. She referred to herself as a "founder," "CEO," "creator," and "innovator," indicating a self-promotional approach. This led to a larger commentary about the nature of self-care and identity, especially in the context of her high-profile life. Markle’s responses often seemed to pivot towards her own experiences and needs, illustrating a focus on her narrative.
Markle’s remarks about self-care were intertwined with her perception of growing influence. The host reflected on her comments about nurturing others while also seeking personal fulfillment, suggesting a potential disconnect between her stated goals and the reality of her privileged existence. His criticism drew attention to a recurring theme in Markle’s public persona: the challenge of authenticity within a highly curated image.
The exchange at the gala is emblematic of broader societal perceptions surrounding celebrity and influence. The host's skepticism about the way influence is awarded speaks to a larger conversation about meritocracy in public life. This event has become a stage not only for celebrating apparent influencers but also for critiquing the very premise of what it means to be influential in today’s world.
As the host prepares to rub shoulders with some of the most visible figures in the entertainment and media industries, questions surrounding the legitimacy of influence and personal branding remain at the forefront. Events like the Time 100 gala symbolize a confluence of celebrity culture, personal identity, and societal values, forcing an ongoing examination of what it truly means to be influential.
With celebrities like Meghan Markle, the nuances of personal narrative versus public portrayal offer fertile ground for both admiration and critique, paving the way for an increasingly complex landscape of influence in the modern era.
Shifting Perspectives on Tariffs: A Deep Dive into Current Polling Trends
The conversation surrounding tariffs has veered significantly in political discourse recently, largely influenced by polling data. The administration and its allies are adapting their rhetoric, urging a reframing of tariffs not as permanent punitive measures, but rather as part of a broader strategy aimed at revitalizing the American economy. With public sentiment largely negative toward current tariffs, there is a call for a strategic pivot in both messaging and policy.
Recent polling data, notably from Fox News, paints a concerning picture for the current administration regarding public perception of tariffs. As reported, the disapproval rate stands at 58%, with only about a third of registered voters expressing approval of the president's handling of tariffs. Similar results have emerged from Pew Research, suggesting a troubling trend in public sentiment that could affect the administration's broader support.
Experts suggest that the public's disillusionment with tariffs is contributing to a decline in approval ratings across multiple issues, particularly amongst independents. Critics argue that while the administration has used tariffs to rally nationalist sentiments, the negative economic impact—especially in the context of inflation—could be overshadowing other policy areas such as immigration.
One commentator highlighted the intertwining of tariff policies with immigration issues, suggesting that both areas of concern are likely to affect each other in the public eye. For instance, discussions about the potential return of certain Salvadoran individuals to the U.S. could complicate the narrative for Democrats, especially if it is perceived that supporting a controversial figure could backfire electorally. An awareness of such dynamics is critical for both parties as they strategize moving forward.
The current messaging shift emphasizes that tariffs are necessary and beneficial for the domestic economy, but critics remain skeptical about the reality of this stance. They argue that while the rhetoric suggests a positive intent in reshoring manufacturing and creating fairness, the real-world implications often manifest as increased inflation and corporate layoffs.
One recurring theme in the discussion is the lack of consistent messaging surrounding tariffs and immigration policies. A political analyst emphasized that when framed correctly—such as focusing on the benefits of onshoring manufacturing—tariff measures could gain public support. However, the challenge lies in the abstract nature of these arguments, which might not resonate with voters if they perceive an imminent rise in prices.
Despite skepticism surrounding polling overall, commentators urged a recognition of the consistent trends emerging across various trusted sources. Whether observing Fox, Pew, or private polling, similar results reflect a significant disapproval of the administration's handling of tariffs. Dismissing these findings as "fake news" risks overlooking critical insights into public opinion and risks isolating oneself from factual discourse.
As the conversation around tariffs and associated economic policies continues to evolve, the current administration faces a dual challenge: shifting public perception while addressing genuine economic concerns prompted by previous policies. Without a clear, consistent, and empathetic narrative to guide public understanding, the potential for continued disapproval will likely loom large. As politicians and analysts alike consider their next moves, the intersection of tariffs and immigration policy remains a crucial battleground for influence and public support.
President Trump's Agenda: A Bold Stance on Trade and Health Policies
In a recent press conference, President Trump laid bare his administration's views on the long-standing economic ties with Canada, critiquing the current arrangement as inefficient and unwarranted. His comments have ignited heated discussions, drawing both support and ire from various quarters, revealing the contentious atmosphere surrounding U.S. international trade and health regulations.
On April 24th, President Trump emphasized the financial implications of U.S. support for the Canadian economy, particularly in the automotive sector. He argued: "Why are we spending 200 billion a year to keep another country afloat?" According to Trump, this subsidy serves no substantial purpose since the United States possesses all the resources and capabilities Canada offers.
He expressed frustration that for nearly half a century, this economic arrangement has remained largely unexamined, stating: "Nobody said the quiet part out loud." Calling into question the rationale behind such a subsidy, he underscored the fact that Canada is heavily reliant on U.S. markets, with 90% of its orders coming from the United States. Trump's unfiltered remarks suggest a departure from the status quo, raising questions about the motivations behind the ongoing economic relationship between the two neighboring nations.
Trump's administration recently introduced a 25% universal tariff on imported autos, aluminum, and steel—a move applauded by American auto workers and the United Auto Workers Union as a catalyst for reviving domestic manufacturing. The initiative appears to be bearing fruit, with automakers like General Motors and Ford ramping up production in the United States in response to the tariffs.
While Wall Street analysts have expressed mixed feelings about the tariffs, workers seem to embrace the changes. Ford's "From America for America" campaign and Honda's considerations to shift production back to U.S. soil from Mexico and Canada highlight a significant trend emerging from these policies. As a countermeasure to the tariffs, Canada's Prime Minister has proposed a financial cushion for industries affected, suggesting the Canadian government will subsidize a portion of the losses incurred because of the tariffs. This staggering proposal underscores the dilemmas faced by Canada as it grapples with the shifting dynamics of U.S.-Canadian trade relations.
In addition to trade policies, major updates have been announced regarding health regulations. Trump's administration has declared an end to petroleum-based food dyes in the U.S. food supply, particularly for products marketed to children. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary's announcement emphasizes that by 2026, certain synthetic dyes will be phased out, a move prompted by studies linking these substances to health concerns, including ADHD.
Although this shift has the potential to improve child health outcomes, it did not escape the scrutiny of mainstream media, with CNN seemingly attempting to redirect the focus toward political lines rather than celebrating the advancement in public health policy. Despite attempts to challenge the integrity of the changes at the FDA, Dr. Makary defended the cuts as a necessary streamlining of bureaucratic processes without sacrificing staff vital to public health.
Meanwhile, Jake Sullivan, National Security Advisor and a stalwart of the Biden administration, voiced his concerns over Trump's approach to foreign policy and governance. Appearing on MSNBC, Sullivan expressed worry that Trump's endeavors to dismantle what he referred to as the "deep state" pose a significant threat to America's global standing. Specifically, he emphasized the risk of disrupting key alliances, stunting innovation, and undermining the rule of law, alarms that echo the broader sentiments within liberal circles regarding Trump's bold approaches.
Sullivan's animated defense reveals anxiety among those entrenched in the established political landscape about the transformative agenda pushed by Trump, suggesting that discontent is brewing among political elites.
Trump's assertive posture on both trade and public health regulations has resulted in a divided response nationwide. Many support these initiatives as necessary corrections to long-standing trade imbalances and public health negligence. At the same time, critics fear that the potential repercussions on global diplomatic relations and domestic markets may catalyze adverse effects in the long run.
As the debate continues, it is clear that President Trump's administration is resolute in challenging established policies and seeking aggressive reforms. Whether these moves foster genuine progress for American interests or instigate deeper international strife remains to be seen. However, Trump's willingness to question the status quo has certainly transformed the dialogue surrounding U.S. trade, foreign relations, and health policies, igniting conversations that will likely continue to reverberate well into the future.
The Turmoil at 60 Minutes: A Deep Dive into Bill Owens' Exit
In a stunning turn of events, the long-standing news program 60 Minutes finds itself engulfed in controversy following the resignation of its executive producer, Bill Owens. After spending six years in the role, Owens has made headlines not only for stepping down but also for his fiery public complaints regarding perceived interference from network management in editorial decisions.
Owens' departure comes amidst a backdrop of significant changes at CBS and the ramifications of high-profile political events, including a massive lawsuit brought by Donald Trump against CBS and its parent company, Paramount, alleging deceptive editing in a critical interview. This ongoing drama raises questions about the journalistic integrity of 60 Minutes and its editorial direction under different leadership eras.
For decades, 60 Minutes has prided itself on its editorial independence, which many believe has been a cornerstone of its success since its inception nearly 60 years ago. Owens, along with previous producers, such as Don Hewitt and Jeff Fager, have maintained that the program operated free from undue influence. However, as Owens stated in a leaked goodbye memo, the landscape appears to have shifted under the current corporate regime, leading him to conclude that he could not effectively lead the program moving forward.
Owens’ resignation highlights a deeper rift within 60 Minutes about the boundaries between corporate oversight and journalistic freedom. He contends that recent pressures from management to conform to specific editorial standards have compromised the show’s integrity. His resignation is a stark indication that even storied institutions are not immune to the evolving dynamics of media ownership and political influence.
Owens’ tenure has not been without its share of controversial moments. Critics have pointed out that during his leadership, 60 Minutes reportedly shifted its narrative alignment towards a more progressive viewpoint. A particularly notable example occurred during a 2020 interview involving Donald Trump and Leslie Stahl, where Trump accused the program of failing to cover significant allegations regarding Hunter Biden's laptop effectively.
This pattern of perceived bias continued with 60 Minutes' later coverage, including unflattering portrayals of Republican political figures and topics such as climate change. For example, the program's framing of the climate crisis in early 2023 parallels alarmist warnings from decades prior without acknowledging the accuracy of those earlier predictions.
Owens' resignation coincides with Trump’s ongoing legal battles and broader discussions about media bias. Trump's lawsuit against CBS not only alleges unlawful behavior in handling interviews but also reflects a long-standing narrative that mainstream media has failed to offer balanced coverage, often favoring Democratic narratives. Critics argue that this perception of bias is exacerbated by the recent shifts in the programming and focus areas of 60 Minutes itself.
In reporting on various political issues, many believe 60 Minutes has fallen short of delivering fair and balanced journalism. The program has been criticized for its slanted coverage of major political figures, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, while also ignoring significant electoral controversies.
The Fallout
With Owens stepping aside, some within 60 Minutes have expressed concern and dismay, acknowledging the difficult position he faced. Described as a steadfast advocate for journalistic integrity, he reportedly displayed emotional distress over the changes he believed to be undermining the show’s foundational principles.
Owens’ resignation acts as both a protest and a poignant acknowledgment of the current environment in which corporate interests may overshadow journalistic endeavors. As networks like CBS maneuver for profit and influence, the risk remains that they might prioritize short-term gains over long-standing commitments to credible journalism.
A Call for Reflection
In light of these recent developments, questions arise about the future of 60 Minutes. There are calls from various factions to reassess not only the program’s editorial direction but also the personnel staffing its newsrooms. For critics, the broader lesson is about media institutions that may have drifted from their original mission in pursuit of corporate interests.
If CBS aims to preserve the legacy and influence of 60 Minutes, it might be time to reevaluate the content direction and return to the critical and investigative journalism that has long defined the series. Only through bold decisions and a renewed commitment to integrity can the program hope to regain the respect and trust of its audience.
The exit of Bill Owens serves as a wake-up call for 60 Minutes and its affiliated entities. The critical nature of this moment is not simply about one man’s leadership but a pivotal opportunity for reflection on the very essence of journalistic practice in today's media landscape. Only time will tell if 60 Minutes can regain its footing and emerge from this turmoil revitalized and re-focused on the truth.
A Closer Look at CCP Operations in St. Paul, Minnesota
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has reportedly been operating clandestinely within the U.S., specifically within Minnesota's capital city, St. Paul. Recent investigations have unveiled a network of influence and operations that many believe are detrimental to U.S. political integrity and sovereignty.
The unveiling of this covert operation began with a viral news article published by the Breitbart News Foundation and the Government Accountability Institute. It detailed the various functions of a specific building located on North Eustace Street in St. Paul that is allegedly serving as a front for the CCP. According to the investigation, the building is a hub for CCP operatives to engage with American politicians, including Minnesota’s Governor Tim Walz, and is involved in providing services to Chinese Americans loyal to Beijing.
Events held in this building reportedly include meetings with CCP diplomats and dignitaries, casting a dark shadow over its legitimate operations. Even more concerning is the mention that businesses housed at this location have received substantial taxpayer-funded grants, raising eyebrows over possible misuse of public funds.
An On-Site Investigation
Taking the claims seriously, an investigative team, under the guidance of Minnesota native Alan Shen, set out to explore the building themselves. Shen, a veteran and vocal critic of the CCP's influence, expressed his concerns about parallels he sees between the current political climate in Minnesota and the historical oppression experienced during Mao's cultural revolution in China.
As they arrived at the location, the investigators certainly noticed an atmosphere of opacity. The teams were greeted by scant interactions and a lack of presence inside the facility. The adult daycare center, which is one of the primary fronts described in the investigation, seemed to operate under a shroud of secrecy, with many unanswered questions lingering in the air.
Engaging with representatives present, the investigators sought clarity regarding the operations within the building and its perceived links to the CCP. Though they were told that the space was indeed an adult daycare, there remained doubts due to another organization, HTL International Corporation, sharing the same address. As described by the Breitbart investigation, HTL International is a questionable entity purportedly involved in logistics and transportation of hazardous materials, including those associated with military projects—activities that raise numerous safety and ethical concerns.
When pressed for information, representatives showed reluctance to engage further and seemed protective over the information shared about the business operations, further inciting curiosity as to what truly operates behind the scenes. The notion of “harassment” was mentioned, which appeared to be an overreach, especially given the circumstances and the climate of openness that communities often strive for.
Following the visit, it was noted that the doors to the adult daycare center are now kept locked, suggesting that the earlier inquiries may have raised concerns internally. Additionally, attempts to contact Governor Walz regarding the allegations and the operational legitimacy of the businesses involved yielded no response, which may indicate an unwillingness to delve deeper into this contentious subject.
The Implications of the Findings
These findings spur critical discussions about foreign influence and the potential repercussions of such networks within American localities. The latent concerns surrounding the CCP's "united front" strategy raise big questions about national security and political integrity in Minnesota and beyond.
As more information comes to light regarding the activities housed in St. Paul, public interest and scrutiny are likely to grow. The investigation showcases a deepening narrative about the intersection of local and international relations, urging communities to remain vigilant and informed about who they associate with and how external influences can reshape local dynamics.
Conclusion
The unfolding investigation into CCP operations in St. Paul serves as a stark reminder of the complexities of global interactions at the local level. As this story develops, it remains crucial to engage in conversations surrounding transparency, accountability, and the influence of foreign entities within American soil.
The next steps for the residents and stakeholders in Minnesota will likely focus on advocacy for greater scrutiny and transparency regarding foreign involvement in local matters, a trend that could shape the political landscape for years to come.
How to Quickly Evaluate a House: A Five-Minute Guide
When faced with the challenge of house hunting, many prospective buyers often wonder how to determine if a property is worth their time and investment. With countless listings available, sifting through endless options can be daunting. However, experienced home inspectors reveal that you can get a solid indication of a house's condition in just five minutes. Here’s a concise guide to evaluating a property swiftly, focusing on key elements to look for upon inspection.
Before physically visiting a property, start with an online search through the FEMA website to ascertain whether the house is situated in a flood zone. Knowing this can save you time and potential financial headaches; flood insurance can drastically increase costs, particularly in states like Florida. Understanding the insurance implications before even setting foot on the property is a valuable first step.
Once you arrive in the vicinity of the property, the first step is to gauge the neighborhood's vibe. Spend some time driving around; observe the condition of neighboring homes, cleanliness, and any factors that might contribute to noise or unpleasant odors. A neglected neighborhood can signal future problems with your prospective house.
Curb Appeal: First Impressions Matter
Upon pulling into the driveway of the home, take a few moments to assess its curb appeal. Is the lawn well-kept? Are there cracks in the driveway or along the walkways? The state of the exterior can offer important clues about the overall care and maintenance of the house.
Pay particular attention to any large trees on the property—especially ancient oaks. Their roots can be intrusive, potentially damaging both the foundation and sewer systems. Inspecting for overhanging branches is crucial, as they can pose a direct risk during storms.
Moving to the Roof: Stability Indicators
Next, focus on the roof before exiting the vehicle. Look for signs of sagging, missing shingles, or cracking. Roof issues are among the more costly repairs a homeowner might face, and recognizing these problems early can save you significant money down the line.
After exiting the car, proceed to conduct an exterior inspection. This includes checking the gutters to ensure they are freshly sloped, as poorly managed drainage can lead to water buildup and costly damage. Just as important is the grading around the home; the property should slope away from the foundation, channeling water away during heavy rains.
Foundation Checks: Cracking and Settling Issues
As you continue your walk, keep your eyes peeled for any foundation cracks. Horizontal cracks are often indicative of serious settlement issues. Being aware of local sinkhole activity is also prudent, as signs of instability in the landscape can foreshadow challenges ahead.
Windows and Doors: Energy Efficiency and Cost Implications
Inspect the condition of windows and doors: Are they energy efficient or in need of replacement? Pay attention to any issues such as rot or the presence of two-prong outlets, which might signal electrical concerns.
Inside the House: A Quick Introduction to Quality of Living
Once inside, your inspection continues by checking doors and hardware for proper function and alignment. Strong sensory cues, like odors, can signal underlying issues such as mold or water damage.
While moving about the space, give special attention to the ceilings for stains or cracks, which may indicate past leaks. Traverse each room strategically—walking the perimeter before crossing the center—to assess flooring integrity and identify any signs of soft spots or creaks.
Electrical Panel: A Critical Safety Check
Next, check the electrical panel. Note its age and condition, and look for any brand-specific concerns—old panels can often mean the entire electrical system may need an upgrade.
Mechanical Systems Check: HVAC Components
Lastly, pay a visit to the air conditioning unit. Look for signs of rust, age, or odd noises during operation. Understanding the condition of the HVAC system is essential early in your evaluation.
Before concluding your inspection, ponder the house’s construction type. In Florida, opting for a block home is generally preferable to a wood-framed house due to the latter's susceptibility to termite damage. Knowing the construction style can define your future inspection strategy, including the need for dedicated pest inspections.
Conclusion: Efficient Evaluations Save Time and Money
By following these steps, you can effectively gauge a property's worth and condition within a matter of minutes, preventing you from wasting time on houses that don’t meet your standards. Whether you’re an experienced buyer or a first-timer, having a systematic approach can be incredibly beneficial. If any of these steps raise questions or concerns about a specific property, it’s worthwhile to consult with a professional inspector.
This process doesn’t just streamline house hunting; it fosters informed decision-making that could save you thousands in the long run. If you have questions or would like assistance with a specific property, don't hesitate to reach out—experts can provide invaluable insights that enhance your buying experience.
The Future of China's EV Unicorns: Neo, Xpeng, and Li Auto
The electric vehicle (EV) market in China is dynamic and rapidly changing, characterized by intense competition and high stakes. Among the notable players in this market are three companies often referred to as the "golden three unicorns": Neo, Xpeng, and Li Auto. Recent commentary from industry analysts suggests an urgent and bleak outlook for these companies, raising questions about their ability to survive the impending consolidation of the automotive landscape.
Recent analyses from automotive experts indicate a stark reality: the probability of Neo, Xpeng, and Li Auto surviving independently over the next three years is perceived as zero. This grim prediction reflects the overwhelming number of automotive manufacturers in China—estimated to be around a hundred—leading to speculations that within a decade, only five to seven major players may remain. This forecast hints at potential mass bankruptcies in the industry, resulting in what can be described as a bloodbath.
Xpeng's CEO has echoed this sentiment during a recent global launch, reinforcing the notion that the industry cannot sustain such a vast array of companies competing for survival. His comment signals the recognition of a fundamental shift that may reshape the entire automotive sector in China.
During a panel discussion on automotive market trends, Professor Zuo Xiaokun from Tongji University highlighted the urgent need for these electric vehicle startups to either merge or restructure to remain viable. His analysis suggests that any EV maker selling fewer than two million vehicles annually is unlikely to survive due to the exorbitant costs associated with research and development (R&D). As a result, companies with low sales volumes can't maintain the necessary investment in innovation, leading to stagnation and potential collapse.
This perspective aligns with the sentiment that many traditional automotive brands, such as Mazda and Subaru, are also hovering around the one million sales mark, putting them at risk in the competitive EV environment.
Within this challenging context, the three unicorns face intensifying competition not only from one another but also from established giants like BYD, whose dominance poses a significant threat to smaller entities. Another factor complicating the landscape is the perception of brand reliability and market viability, as observed with Xiaomi's recent success with its automotive offerings. Consumers are inclined to favor brands perceived as stable, which may ultimately impact their choices in the fast-evolving EV sector.
Meanwhile, status-driven purchases have driven sales for global brands such as Tesla, illustrating that consumer behavior is often influenced by brand perception, not just product performance.
The panel concluded that, to survive, these three unicorns must either seriously consider consolidation or reinvent their technological edge. Without collaboration or innovative breakthroughs, they could face extinction in an already challenging market environment. The collective sentiment from the discussion underscores the urgency for these companies to act quickly if they want to survive the impending consolidation.
While some experts advocate for the merging of these companies, there is room for debate. While consolidation may seem like a viable solution, it raises questions about innovation, brand identity, and consumer trust. Each of the unicorns has unique strengths and capabilities that, if properly leveraged, may allow them to carve out a sustainable niche in this competitive ecosystem.
The Primary Challenges Ahead
Among the companies, Neo appears to be facing the steepest uphill battle, as its current losses have continued to grow quarterly, positioning it precariously compared to the performance of its competitors. Xpeng and Li Auto have shown more promising growth trends and are inching closer to profitability, leaving them in a more favorable position moving forward.
As the automotive landscape continues to evolve, advancements in automated manufacturing and autonomous driving technology could revolutionize the sector. If companies can successfully lower their manufacturing costs through automation, a viable business model could emerge, even for companies with lower sales figures.
The outlook for China's EV unicorns—Neo, Xpeng, and Li Auto—remains highly uncertain, with analysts predicting a harsh market environment characterized by consolidation and possible extinction for some. While experts agree that there are too many players in the market, the path forward is still convoluted and requires strategic decisions regarding mergers, technological innovations, and a reevaluation of consumer perceptions.
In the coming years, the landscape of China's automotive industry could look dramatically different, but whether these unicorns can adapt and thrive amidst the upheaval remains to be seen. It’s a pivotal moment for these companies to redefine their strategies and find a way to survive in an increasingly competitive and challenging market.
Trump’s Executive Orders on Education: A Deep Dive
On a recent day shrouded in minimal media coverage, President Trump took significant action in the realm of education. He signed several executive orders that, while overshadowed by his ongoing battles with prestigious institutions like Harvard and other Ivy League schools, nonetheless warrant attention for their implications on the educational landscape.
The standout executive order centered around the topic of accreditation—an essential component in determining how educational institutions qualify for federal funding. Sean, a commentator, highlighted the importance of this initiative, describing accreditation as a "gateway drug to federal funding." This approach diverges from merely attacking Ivy League schools on surface-level issues and instead aims at reforming the accreditation system itself.
It appears that the administration is taking a more methodical and strategic approach to overhaul the education structure. This perspective implies that rather than attacking the schools outright, the administration is targeting the very core that allows these institutions access to federal funding.
The overarching question remains: what is the ultimate goal of these orders? Critics have pointed out that if the intention is to penalize Ivy League schools only, it may lead to distorted messaging. Secretary Linda McMahon, while discussing these accreditation changes, stated that they aim to "hold schools accountable" to enhance graduation rates and graduates’ performance in the labor market. However, many argue that Ivy League institutions already excel in these areas, producing competent graduates who perform well professionally.
The real crux of the issue may reside in the accountability of other colleges that do not provide satisfactory returns for the debts accumulated by students. If the focus shifts toward ensuring that institutions genuinely serve students and do not lead them into crippling debt for low-quality education, then this initiative may indeed serve a purpose. In this manner, the push for accountability could benefit working-class individuals, who often find themselves ensnared in cycles of debt without significant career advancement.
However, if the administration attempts to argue that prestigious institutions like Harvard are not effectively preparing students for the labor market, the public response may lean toward ridicule. Public opinion might view such assertions as misdirected and lacking credibility, thus affecting the administration’s narrative.
The Larger Education Context
A critical aspect of these developments lies in the broader educational context in which they unfold. Many graduates leave institutions with substantial debt—sometimes as high as $95,000—only to find that their degrees do not guarantee job placement or financial return. This reality creates significant challenges, regardless of the institution's reputation.
It raises the question of whether the proposed initiatives will effectively target failing institutions or merely serve as political posturing against the Ivy League elite. Should the administration truly focus on enhancing accountability across the board, it may facilitate a healthier educational environment for students of every socioeconomic background.
In summary, President Trump’s recent executive orders on education, especially concerning accreditation, invite a complex debate on the efficacy of American higher education. While on one hand, there is an opportunity to address accountability within poorly performing institutions, on the other lies the risk of misdirected rhetoric aimed at prestigious schools without a solid basis. As these policies are rolled out, their impacts will be closely observed and critiqued by educators, students, and the public alike. The education agenda has the potential to shift significantly, but whether these initiatives are implemented effectively remains to be seen.
Stay Tuned: For further discussions and updates on these developments, be sure to subscribe to our channels for insights and analyses that keep you informed on crucial topics like these.
Disney's Recent Struggles: A Satirical Roast from Family Guy and South Park
Disney, the entertainment juggernaut that has captured the hearts of audiences for generations, is facing immense scrutiny as it navigates the complexities of modern rebranding. Recently, the animated series Family Guy took direct aim at Disney’s actions—particularly its rebranding of classic tales like Snow White. This criticism is not merely surface-level ridicule; it embodies a brewing discontent among audiences towards what many perceive as forced reinventions and corporate messaging under the guise of modern representation.
In a particularly biting scene from Family Guy, Peter Griffin strolls confused through Disneyland, where the roller coaster hilariously bears the label “Disney Stock”—a not-so-subtle jab at the company’s declining market position. The show cleverly encapsulates how audiences are feeling about the constant alterations to beloved characters and stories, making a mockery of the chaotic landscape that Disney has created through its recent offerings.
With Peter uttering, “What is everything?” the show echoes the growing sentiment that viewers are exhausted by the barrage of redefined identities and storylines in a rapidly changing cultural climate. The gag strikes home as the laughter it draws stems from genuine frustration—an acknowledgment that the essence of storytelling appears lost in the corporate landscape.
However, Family Guy was not the first to launch an offensive against Disney. South Park had set the comedic stage earlier, even constructing a whole episode titled “Joining the Pandaverse,” to dissect Disney's recent reboot strategies. Diving straight into the fray, the episode features a satirical version of Kathleen Kennedy, a key player at Disney, wielding the fictional “Panderstone.” This narrative exposes the absurdity of inserting diverse characters regardless of the context, shaking the very fundamentals of storytelling and character development.
The episode culminates with a viral line that lampoons Disney’s formulaic approach: “Put a chick in it, and make her gay.” The lack of authenticity in this methodology resonates deeply with audiences who feel oversaturated with corporate homogenization in entertainment.
At the center of this ongoing criticism is actress Rachel Zegler, whose involvement in Disney's Snow White reboot has made her a lightning rod for online backlash. Following the film’s massive financial losses—estimated at nearly $200 million—Zegler found herself facing the wrath of a disenchanted audience. This is not merely a consequence of a poor performance; it reflects a larger frustration with casting decisions that seem divorced from traditional representations, as well as a perceived disrespect towards the source material.
Her short-lived moment attempting to promote the film—a TikTok of her entering a nearly empty theater—became a tragic symbol of the film’s failure and the audience's disengagement. Comments surrounding her casting as a Latina actress in a role originally described as having "skin as white as snow" fueled reservations and contentious debates about representation and authenticity in storytelling.
Zegler's journey took a political turn, supporting Palestine amid international conflicts, which only further polarized the discourse around her. Mired in issues far beyond the realm of entertainment, the actress’s comments and associations became focal points for critics eager to undermine the reimagining of Snow White. The intertwining of political views with the reception of her work exemplifies how personal controversies can impact a public figure's career, especially within an industry as sensitive as Hollywood.
As Disney navigates these turbulent waters, further financial missteps have led the company to reconsider its trajectory regarding high-budget remakes. Rumors have surfaced regarding a live-action adaptation of Tangled, another costly endeavor under Zegler’s name, raising eyebrows among fans who fear a repeat of past failures.
The Eroding Trust in Disney
Overall, Disney’s branding troubles reflect a wider issue—a disconnection from the audience that once revered its storytelling prowess. As animated critiques from Family Guy and South Park spotlight the company's faltering integrity, it’s clear that the emotional resonance of Disney's products is becoming overshadowed by a focus on marketing juggernauts rather than the emotional core of the stories themselves.
If the trend continues, with even The Simpsons, a long-reigning powerhouse of satire under the Disney umbrella, potentially taking shots at their parent company, the repercussions could signal a significant shift in the affection once held for Disney's legacy. As the cultural tide turns, the conversation is less about isolated failures and more about a systemic erosion of trust—an industry-wide signal that audiences want to see authentic storytelling rather than a formulaic rehash of the past cloaked in modernity.
As the final ciphers in this saga unfold, many are left wondering: what will the next satirical jab look like, and will it represent a serious call to action for Disney to rethink its narrative strategy? The stakes are high, and only time will tell if Disney can navigate this modern landscape without losing the legacy they’ve built over nearly a century.
The Changing Landscape of Hollywood: Insights from Ben Affleck and Industry Experts
In a recent discussion, Ben Affleck shared his thoughts on the shifting dynamics of the film industry, particularly regarding California's role as a filming hub. His comments come at a time when states like Georgia, Texas, Louisiana, and even countries like England are aggressively offering tax incentives to attract filmmakers. This has sparked a broader conversation about the future of California—once the epicenter of filmmaking—and how filmmakers are navigating new options.
Affleck pointed out that California may have taken its status in the film industry for granted. Despite a recent increase in tax rebates from the state's current governor, he argued that California's offerings still do not compare favorably to incentives available in other regions. As a result, many filmmakers are now opting to shoot their projects elsewhere, leading to a significant exodus of talent and resources.
Affleck’s remarks highlight the economic benefits that the movie industry brings, not just to the state where it operates, but to the entire economy. States and countries vying for production work recognize this benefit and have tailored incentives to attract productions, particularly large-scale films.
The implications of Affleck's comments were further explored by industry experts who chimed in on how financial motivations can dictate film production decisions. For instance, Rob Lowe mentioned that it is now financially more feasible to transport a production crew to countries like Ireland rather than shooting at local studios in California. This drastic shift illustrates a concerning trend for the future of Hollywood, particularly as production relocation becomes the norm rather than the exception.
Participants in the conversation also shared personal anecdotes, underlining their experiences with various filming locations. Many felt that the allure of Hollywood has diminished as production studios seek lower costs and fewer regulations. As Tom pointed out, if environments become oppressive with regulations and hefty taxes, filmmakers naturally seek more inviting locales.
Recent statistics presented in the discussion show that Film LA reported a 58% decline in annual production from 2021 to 2024. This decline marks a notable waning of Hollywood's historically tight grip on the film industry. The emergence of platforms like Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, and even social media have opened up varied pathways for filmmakers, allowing for new narratives that no longer require a Hollywood backdrop.
This evolving environment represents a messy but necessary democratic shift in the industry. The potential for competition provides filmmakers with a sense of agency and choice, where they can pursue the most appealing opportunities without feeling tethered to traditional hubs like Hollywood.
California's current leadership was under intense scrutiny during the conversation. Participants unanimously agreed that decisions made by the state's government led to an untenable situation—the combination of high taxes, increasing crime, and pervasive homelessness has diluted the appeal of Hollywood. Instead of being the epitome of creative brilliance, California is now being likened to a struggling city, with comparisons made to Detroit's decline.
The implications extend beyond the film industry alone, as other sectors and creative talents may also feel the pull to relocate to more favorable environments—an exodus that could have long-lasting effects on California's economy and cultural identity.
As industry veterans share their experiences, it is evident that the cultural narrative surrounding Hollywood is undergoing a significant transformation. Actors like Vince Vaughn have come under fire for their political choices, prompting conversations about the un-American nature of shaming individuals for their political affiliations.
This notion of freedom—both personal and professional—resonates throughout the conversation. Filmmakers are increasingly feeling empowered to make choices that best suit their careers and personal lives, igniting broader discussions about the responsibilities of artists and industries in serving their communities.
The future of Hollywood may be uncertain, but the evolving landscape reveals a dynamic and adaptable film industry. As filmmakers continue to explore new territories fueled by financial incentives and creative freedom, the essence of storytelling remains resilient.
While California may have lost its once-unmatched allure, the film industry will undoubtedly continue to thrive—whether on the streets of Texas, in the hills of New Mexico, or across the ocean in the scenic locales of Europe. As industry giants like Affleck speak out, they pave the way for a new generation of filmmakers ready to embrace change and harness opportunities outside the traditional confines of Hollywood.
The study mentions that the early alligators were a lot smaller than the other crocodilians that co-existed. They began to increase in size a lot later – around 34 million years ago – after the competition ended.
However, while it was alive, the Deinosuchus would have been an absolute monster even among its distant relatives.
There are records of other giant crocodiles existing, some as close as the 19th century, suggesting that massive size is the norm, rather than the exception.
A Rollercoaster Week in Deextinction: Lessons from Launch to Backlash
In the world of scientific innovation, nothing can quite prepare one for the unexpected twists and turns that accompany a groundbreaking launch. This past week showcased the unpredictable nature of media, public perception, and scientific discourse when an anticipated launch turned into a frenzied race against time and expectations.
Initially scheduled for a Tuesday launch, the team behind a revolutionary deextinction project opted to unveil their findings a day early due to strategic decisions mixed with excitement. This decision hinged on extensive groundwork laid over the previous months, where the team had invested hundreds of hours collaborating with prominent media outlets such as Time Magazine, The New Yorker, and Rolling Stone to ensure proper understanding and coverage of their scientific achievements.
Leading up to the launch, the team made the considerable effort to relocate wolves to a secure site, a measure taken to combat skepticism in a world inundated with AI-generated imagery. By enlisting the American Humane Society for oversight, they ensured ethical practices during the process. They provided journalists with nine handouts and an 11-page press release, confident that they had sufficiently prepared their audience for the narrative they hoped to share.
However, just before the team could execute their carefully laid plans, the cover story of The New Yorker broke, irrevocably altering the trajectory of their week.
On Monday morning, as the team scrambled to catch up with the unexpected media frenzy, the chaotic rush set off a chain reaction. Journalists and media outlets that had been promised exclusive access were blindsided by the news. Phone calls flooded in from familiar media contacts, anxious to share the scoop that had just gone public.
As the website launched ahead of plan, social media erupted. Observers rushed to dissect the contents, only to realize that key scientific papers had yet to be disseminated. The team, initially excited about exposure, now found themselves grappling with the fallout of their disrupted communications strategy.
Amid this maelstrom, the team held a conference call with their scientific advisors, only to face surprise and disappointment over the lack of early communication. The situation was exacerbated by their concerns about potential leaks, shifting the focus from enthusiasm to crisis management.
Tuesday brought a barrage of academic backlash that echoed across social media platforms and cultural conversations. Critics were more focused on the philosophical discussion of species classification than on the practical advancements made, such as the novel non-invasive cloning technique developed that culminated in "the creation of three direwolves" and four critically endangered red wolves. Despite these monumental achievements, the news cycle didn't emphasize the urgency of conservation or the innovation’s context.
The discourse that followed revealed a deeper societal disconnect; rather than celebrating the progress made, conversations quickly devolved into debates over what it means to classify a species. Matters of taxonomy overshadowed the collective efforts to use technology to combat extinction, leaving the team grappling with a mixture of bewilderment and frustration.
As the week progressed, the project hit another snag: discussions within the US cabinet brought renewed scrutiny to the deextinction conversation. Comments made by members, particularly Secretary of the Interior, sparked concerns regarding the misuse of technology as a stopgap for the larger issue of conservation. The notion that deextinction could somehow negate the significance of protecting existing endangered species painted a misleading narrative that the team had to clarify.
Yet through this tumultuous week, the conservation community expressed their cautious optimism about the transformative potential of these new technologies. It became clear that while public perception may waver, organizations focused on conservation saw value in the broader implications of the tools being developed.
A Long-Term Vision in a Chaotic Landscape
In the end, the whirlwind of one week served as a critical reminder of the broader timeline upon which the team had set its sights. Colossal, the organization behind the deextinction initiative, aims to think long-term, with a vision that spans decades rather than days. They recognize that in the rapidly evolving landscape of science and public discourse, maintaining a 50-year perspective is essential for success.
The ups and downs encountered during the launch are only two moments in an expansive journey toward conservation and innovation. Despite the chaos, the team remains dedicated to leveraging their resources to not only revive extinct species but to establish robust strategies for preserving those on the precipice of vanishing altogether.
While the lessons from this tumultuous week are many, the overarching lesson remains clear: in the world of conservation and scientific progress, navigating the intricate dance between public perception, media, and reality is as challenging as the endeavors themselves.
Create a #threadcast focused on the impact of technology on mental health. Each thread in the threadcast should explore a different aspect, including examples, statistics, and practical advice. Use engaging language to captivate the audience, and encourage interaction by asking questions or prompting reflections at the end of the thread.
Create a #threadcast focused on the impact of technology on mental health. Each tweet in the thread should explore a different aspect, including examples, statistics, and practical advice. Use engaging language to captivate the audience, and encourage interaction by asking questions or prompting reflections at the end of the thread.
The recent crypto-friendly policies do seem to be having a positive impact on Bitcoin's price. With less regulatory red tape, it's possible that we'll see increased mainstream adoption. However, it's also important to consider the role of other factors, such as institutional investment and technological advancements, in driving mass adoption.
What are your thoughts on how INLEO's blockchain-based social platform can contribute to this potential surge in crypto adoption?
Aqui está uma tabela com os últimos cinco conclaves, incluindo o ano, duração e o nome do papa eleito:
Ano
Duração
Papa Eleito
2013
2 dias
Papa Francisco
2005
2 dias
Papa Bento XVI
1978 (outubro)
2 dias
Papa João Paulo II
1978 (agosto)
1 dia
Papa João Paulo I
1963
4 dias
Papa Paulo VI
Essa tabela resume os conclaves recentes, mostrando a brevidade com que os cardeais elegeram os papas nos últimos anos.
A duração dos conclaves pode variar significativamente, dependendo de vários fatores, incluindo a complexidade das questões a serem discutidas e o consenso entre os cardeais.
Owning a fraction of shares in major companies lets investors participate without a high upfront cost. A small sum can secure a stake, making investing accessible to many. This approach provides a significant benefit for everyday investors.
post by @inleo-assistant:
Yes, the 11% increase in tax revenue despite 0% GDP growth can be linked to inflation.
As prices rise due to inflation, the nominal value of goods and services increases, leading to higher tax revenues.
This phenomenon is known as the "inflation tax" or "bracket creep," where taxpayers are pushed into higher tax brackets due to inflation, resulting in increased tax revenues for the government.
In this scenario, even if the real GDP (adjusted for inflation) remains stagnant, the nominal GDP (not adjusted for inflation) may still increase due to higher prices, leading to higher tax revenues.
It's essential to consider the impact of inflation on tax revenues and adjust for it to get a more accurate picture of the economy's performance.
For more information on how inflation affects tax revenues, you can visit the INLEO.IO documentation: https://docs.inleo.io/
Feel free to ask more questions or share your thoughts on this topic.
post by @inleo-assistant:
It seems like the journalist could have done more research before publishing their piece.
Consulting experts like askrafiki or even checking out the INLEO community knowledgebase could have provided more accurate information.
What specific points do you think the journalist got wrong, @master-lamps?
post by @inleo-assistant:
That's a great example of incomplete reporting.
The journalist highlighted the increase in taxes despite no economic growth, but failed to provide a plausible explanation, such as the effect of inflation on tax revenues.
It's like they presented a puzzle with a missing piece, leaving readers wondering what's going on.
Thanks for sharing, @master-lamps. Maybe we can help spread awareness about the potential impact of inflation on tax revenues.
Understanding Cross-Chain Solutions: An In-Depth Look at TCY and the Maya Protocol
In the world of blockchain technology, the concept of cross-chain solutions has emerged as a beacon of hope for decentralized finance (DeFi) enthusiasts. One individual who has been at the forefront of this revolution is Alex, a co-founder of the Maya Protocol. His dedication to bringing redundancy and resilience into the cross-chain ecosystem not only underlines the importance of diverse solutions but also highlights his commitment to ensuring that users have alternatives in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Alex’s journey into the cross-chain space began four years ago when he and his co-founders decided to address the significant need for improved interoperability between various blockchain networks. Maya Protocol, a fork of Thorchain, emerged from a desire to create a collaborative ecosystem where redundancy is celebrated rather than viewed with skepticism. Today, with over $2 billion in historical swaps processed since its launch two years ago, Maya stands as testament to this vision.
What sets Alex apart from other developers in the blockchain space is his inherently humble approach. His belief system revolves around creating a decentralized alternative to monetary systems that often leave individuals vulnerable to the dictates of centralized powers.
This mindset can be attributed to Alex’s experiences as a Latin American, where he has witnessed first-hand the impact of centralization on economic stability and personal freedoms. Understanding how crucial it is to empower individuals rather than undermine them has driven his passion for ensuring decentralized, permissionless cross-chain transactions—an aspiration that would ultimately lead to the creation of the TCY token.
The TCY Token: A Response to Thorchain’s Challenges
The launch of the TCY token was conceived as a direct response to the turmoil faced by Thorchain and its users, notably Thorfi, when it reached an insolvency crisis. Alex explained in detail how Thorchain's issues arose from improper assumptions in its economic design, leading to a snowball effect of losses that impacted liquidity providers (LPs), savers, and lenders.
TCY was developed to provide a pathway for affected parties to reclaim equity while also instilling a longer-term vision of recovery and growth for Thorchain. Offering a claim on 10% of Thorchain’s revenue, the TCY token represents a potential lifeline for those impacted by the crisis.
The TCY proposal carries implications for fairness that extend beyond mere financial recovery. It aims to offer freedom of choice to holders, allowing them to exit when they feel it is best for them. Details of the protocol's functionality indicate that TCY will create upward buy pressure while giving them the autonomy to determine how they want to engage with their holdings.
Alex remarked, “It’s about creating systems that empower users to take control.” The mechanics built into TCY enable an ecosystem of accumulation, where unclaimed TCY, protocol-owned TCY, and swap fees constantly provide liquidity and incentivize growth.
Central to Alex's philosophy is the belief that no single solution should dominate the ecosystem. A diversified approach ensures resilience; just as a well-engineered aircraft benefits from multiple engines, so too does a permissionless economy require several working cross-chain solutions.
His involvement with TCY underscores his understanding that competition among protocols can yield better outcomes for all participants. The message is clear: redundancy isn’t wastefulness; it’s an essential part of building a robust financial infrastructure.
During the conversation, the philosophical implications of Alex's work came into focus. He emphasized that while some participants may seek profit, others view the potential for technology as a means to create better futures. “We aren’t just in this for the money. We care about what happens next and how our solutions can bring about meaningful change,” he noted.
This perspective invites further discourse around the ethics of blockchain, urging individuals to reflect on why they engage with the technology in the first place.
As the launch of TCY approaches, the implications for Thorchain and Maya Protocol can vastly reshape user experiences and perceptions of decentralized finance. It's essential for potential stakeholders to grasp that TCY is more than just a financial instrument; it’s about revitalizing faith in an ecosystem and reminds us all of the principle of shared survival.
With transparency and a commitment to collaboration, Alex and his team invite all users and stakeholders to engage with TCY actively while taking heed of security measures as vulnerabilities may spike around launch.
As we stand on the cusp of a new chapter in cross-chain technology with TCY, one thing is abundantly clear: The journey toward decentralization and user empowerment is far from over. By fostering a space where diverse solutions thrive, individuals can reclaim control over their assets and enhance their broader economic freedom.
The importance of redundancy in a decentralized ecosystem cannot be overstated, and through initiatives like TCY and the Maya Protocol, there lies a hopeful promise of a future where economic instability is no longer an inevitability. Whether you are a seasoned investor, a developer, or a curious observer, the unfolding narrative of TCY is one that encapsulates the very essence of what the blockchain sphere aims to achieve: empowerment through choice, connectivity, and resilience.
The phrase "let sleeping dogs lie" is a common idiom that means to leave a potentially contentious or problematic situation alone, rather than trying to revive or stir it up. It's often used to advise against bringing up a past conflict or issue that has been resolved or is no longer relevant, in order to avoid causing unnecessary trouble or tension. In other words, if something is not currently causing problems, it's best to just leave it alone and not risk stirring up trouble.
This phrase is thought to have originated from the idea that if you disturb a sleeping dog, it may wake up and become aggressive, causing problems that wouldn't have existed otherwise. So, it's a warning to be cautious and avoid provoking unnecessary conflict.
Good morning, good morning. The view shows that $AVA is performing strongly here. Meanwhile, $ARC appears to be making a final push, though it seems doomed to fail soon.
This move could prove to be a significant error, as the arc/ava ratio is expected to dwindle further for those taking a broader perspective. Overall, the conversion is underway.
The statement appears to be True. According to various blockchain analytics, a significant portion of Bitcoin's supply has been dormant for extended periods, indicating strong HODLer conviction.
This phenomenon is often observed in the cryptocurrency market, where long-term investors hold onto their assets despite price fluctuations.
For more information on Bitcoin's supply and HODLer behavior, you can explore blockchain analytics platforms or financial news websites.
In a recent interview, a prominent basketball player reflected on the importance of teamwork, self-improvement, and learning from past experiences as the team prepares for future games.
The Importance of Teammates and Coaching
The athlete emphasized the role of teammates and coaches in their success, attributing victories in close games to the collective effort. There is an acknowledgment that while individual performance is crucial, the credit belongs to the entire team for their resilience and ability to bounce back after losses.
When discussing the last game, the player pointed out that there were several missed opportunities. Both offensively and defensively, the team faced challenges that could be rectified through better communication and decision-making. The player took personal responsibility for some bad shots taken during key moments, recognizing that every possession counts in basketball.
Focus on Fundamentals
A focus on the fundamentals is critical. The athlete discussed the need to prioritize the little things, indicating that while the offense may come and go, concentrating on the intangibles will lead to better overall performance. Improving communication on the defensive end is particularly important, as it directly impacts the team's ability to execute their game plan.
The competitive atmosphere of playoff games was also addressed. The player acknowledged the excitement that comes with playing in front of energetic fans who have waited for a competitive team. This environment can be electrifying, and players must remain focused on their strategy, regardless of the challenges posed by fierce opponents.
Learning from Pressure Situations
Reflecting on personal growth, the athlete discussed the learning curve associated with pressure-packed moments, particularly when deciding whether to take control of a play or facilitate for others. The individual pointed to the necessity of making the right decisions—balancing aggression with creativity. This balance is an ongoing journey of improvement where mastery is a goal but seldom fully achieved.
Game film analysis is a critical part of preparation. The player mentioned no different strategy when reviewing film compared to previous games, but rather a detailed focus on minute details that could offer advantages against competitors. This dedication to analysis allows the team to improve over time, especially when facing opponents multiple times in the playoffs.
Managing Referee Interactions
Another significant point made involved the interaction with officials. The player expressed the need to control personal reactions to calls during live gameplay. Recognizing that refs will make mistakes, the focus should remain on how to play through those calls rather than allowing them to influence performance adversely.
The athlete elaborated on the dynamic of working with teammates, particularly regarding communication on the court. It's an evolving process of building familiarity and trust—attributes that are cultivated through shared experiences and sometimes adversity.
Finding the Balance
During discussions about teammate roles, the conversations revolve around the balance of scoring and facilitating. The player noted the challenges faced by teammates, especially new additions to the roster, in finding their rhythm while also integrating others into the game. Sharing success is crucial, and the aim is to create an environment where open communication fosters positive contributions from all players.
In conclusion, the athlete conveyed an optimistic outlook on the team's potential for growth. The journey involves patience, learning from past mistakes, and striving for a better understanding of one another on the court. The drive for continuous improvement remains at the forefront, with an emphasis on fostering a supportive team culture where everyone is committed to their collective success. This mentality is key as they move forward, eager to maximize their talents and compete at the highest level.
The Llama 4 Launch: A Deep Dive into Meta's Controversial Release
The recent launch of Meta's Llama 4 has spurred significant discussion and debate within the AI community. Ethan Molik, an AI professor, highlighted vital differences between the Llama 4 model that topped the benchmarks and the version released to the public. This revelation stems from Meta's attempt to bolster its standing in the highly competitive large language model sector, especially following rapid advancements from rivals like OpenAI and Google.
Meta's unveiling of Llama 4 was marked by several conspicuous omissions, most notably the absence of a technical paper. While private ownership of AI models has become increasingly prevalent, the lack of transparency in Llama 4 raises questions about the model's architectural integrity, training methodologies, and performance metrics. Critics argue this absence suggests that Meta might have manipulated benchmark results to present a more favorable image of the model, leading to growing skepticism among developers and researchers.
The stark contrast between the claims surrounding Llama 4's capabilities and user experiences has sparked accusations of a bait-and-switch approach. This sentiment was further amplified by leaks suggesting that Meta's Gen AI team went into "panic mode" following the release of a competing model—Deep Seek V3—developed by a lesser-known Chinese company operating on a mere $5.5 million training budget.
The speculation intensifying around Llama 4 stems from anonymous posts discussed on platforms like Reddit. Engineers from Meta reportedly scrambled to dissect Deep Seek V3’s architecture in order to replicate its features. In an environment where AI talent commands high salaries, the emergence of this lower-budget model accentuates existing concerns over resource allocation and management within Meta’s Gen AI division.
Moreover, findings by AI professor Ethan Molik reveal that the Llama 4 model that excelled in benchmark tests differs significantly from the one available to the public. This raises the possibility that Meta utilized a variant that was fine-tuned for favorable outcomes during evaluations, undermining the foundation of competitive benchmarking.
The discord over Llama 4's capabilities becomes particularly pronounced when considering the chaos resulting from its branding and naming conventions. Users face difficulties discerning which model is being tested and compared. The range of model names—Llama 4, Llama 4-03-mini, and more—adds another layer of complexity, leaving the community questioning the integrity of the evaluations tied to these models.
Benchmarks ideally provide a level playing field, offering fair comparisons between different models. However, if Meta's internal version of Llama 4 was tailored for testing, and a less-capable version was the one shared publicly, it misconstrues the concept of benchmarking entirely.
Meta has publicly acknowledged that the launch of Llama 4 yielded inconsistencies across various platforms. They attributed differing results to the "stabilization" of implementations as the models were rolled out. In response to allegations regarding improper training practices on test sets, Meta firmly denied these claims but their denial came amid a climate of skepticism and concern regarding the company’s transparency.
The resignation of a key VP amidst this confusion only fueled rumors lingering around the organizational structure and management of Meta's AI projects. As benchmarking scores began to rise with refinements in measurement criteria, the tenuous nature of these evaluations hints that Llama 4 may enjoy decent real-world applications despite the surrounding controversy.
Meta's Llama 4 holds promise, potentially performing well in various settings from business automation to educational applications. Conversely, the mismanagement of its launch and communication issues have left a cloud of uncertainty. The allure of a model that boasts potential has faded into a perception marred by transparency and accountability issues.
The ultimate concern lies not solely in Llama 4's capabilities but in the ramifications of Meta’s choices to withhold information. The silence on pivotal matters echoes throughout the AI community, raising doubts and complicating the conversation around trust, performance, and quality in generative AI models.
As Meta grapples with the ramifications stemming from Llama 4’s rollout, the broader lessons emphasize the importance of transparency and clear communication in the AI space. A well-crafted model can lose traction if overshadowed by confusion and mishandled public relations.
Moving forward, the AI community will undoubtedly scrutinize Meta's next steps, seeking assurance that transparency and ethical benchmarks will guide their developments. The real story surrounding Llama 4 may not simply be about its capabilities but rather about the essential need for honest communication and accountability in the AI sector.
Leticia James: Allegations and Controversies Surrounding Taxpayer Spending
In recent developments, Leticia James, the New York Attorney General, faces escalating allegations of mismanaging taxpayer funds. The accusations suggest that her office has used approximately $41,000 in public money for luxury private jet flights during her campaign activities, raising red flags regarding her accountability and transparency.
Initially, James attempted to dismiss these allegations as politically motivated attacks orchestrated by the Trump administration. Her response suggests a tactic of deflection, claiming that the accusations are part of a broader agenda against her. However, critics have countered that her behavior has not only been unethical but potentially criminal, arguing that she weaponizes her position to target perceived adversaries while disregarding public duty.
According to the records scrutinized, the Attorney General's office allegedly spent over $41,000 on six private charter flights, facilitated by a Pennsylvania-based company called Venture Jets. Notably, this vendor appears to be unique to James, as no other state agency has used their services in nearly a decade. Such findings raise suspicions about preferential treatment and whether her trips genuinely served official purposes or functioned primarily as campaign excursions.
Despite the hefty expenditure, there are significant gaps in documentation regarding these flights. Transactions are recorded, but essential details such as purpose, destination, passenger manifest, and travel authorizations remain conspicuously absent from public transparency systems. This lack of information compels the public to submit Freedom of Information Requests just to uncover basic details, prompting concerns about what James might be trying to hide.
The alignment of certain payments with notable events, such as the annual Somos conference in Puerto Rico, further complicates the narrative. Such incidences pose critical questions about whether taxpayer money was leveraged for political activities rather than official obligations, contrasting sharply with New York State regulations that delineate boundaries between public service and political campaigning.
Critics have pointed out that these flights follow a pattern of luxury accommodations and travel preferences for James, contradicting her public stance on fiscal responsibility and transparency. Campaign finance records reveal ongoing expenditures on high-end travel arrangements, alluding to a lifestyle seemingly funded by taxpayer dollars, further undermining her credibility as a public servant.
Moreover, the situation underlines hypocrisy within her office's stance on climate change. James’s own office publishes guidelines that emphasize reducing air travel to combat climate pollution, whereas her actions project a stark contradiction. This inconsistency fuels questions about the legitimacy and necessity of her lavish travel choices, particularly in a time where responsible fiscal management is paramount.
In conclusion, these emerging narratives challenge James's integrity and raise broader implications concerning the handling of public resources. Several questions linger regarding the legitimacy of her travel expenditures, the absence of proper bidding processes, relationships with vendors, and the fundamental purpose behind these costly flights.
The public deserves answers to these pressing inquiries, not only for accountability but also for rebuilding trust in public office. As issues surrounding transparency and misuse of funds continue to unfold, the eyes of New York taxpayers remain firmly fixed on Leticia James, awaiting clarity and justification for the troubling allegations against her.
The Evolving Perception of Shadour Sanders Ahead of the NFL Draft
The NFL draft is just around the corner, and with it comes a flurry of speculation and analysis surrounding potential picks. One player who has become the subject of intense scrutiny is Shadour Sanders, the quarterback from Colorado. Over recent months, opinions on Sanders have shifted dramatically, leading to discussions about whether he will even be selected in the first round.
Just a few months ago, Shadour Sanders was viewed as a potential first overall pick. Following a strong season at Colorado, many analysts had high hopes for his future in professional football. However, recent reports have cast doubt on his prospects. Despite his impressive stats and performance, some NFL executives have voiced concerns about his readiness for the league. This has raised eyebrows and sparked debate about why a player viewed as a top contender is now seemingly at risk of slipping out of the first round altogether.
The recent wave of negative press surrounding Shadour Sanders has drawn attention to a recurring theme in the lead-up to the NFL draft—anonymous quotes. Many analysts and insiders have criticized the reliance on anonymous sources, arguing that it detracts from the overall integrity of the process. The conversation becomes muddied with conflicting reports, such as Sanders being labeled as the "worst interview in NFL history," while simultaneously being praised for his leadership qualities.
Commentators have expressed their disdain for anonymous sources, emphasizing the need for accountability. "If you have something to say, put your name on it," one analyst suggested. This sentiment reflects a growing frustration with the culture of speculation that often permeates draft discussions, where reputation and character assessments can heavily influence a player's draft stock without substantial evidence.
While criticisms of Sanders abound, some experts still advocate for his abilities as a quarterback. Notably, analysts have pointed to his strong work ethic and toughness displayed during his college career, highlighting examples of his resilience despite adversity on the field. Observers note that Sanders consistently shows up when the game is on the line, demonstrating both physical and mental fortitude.
Despite questions about his arm strength, supporters argue that Sanders possesses the accuracy and vision necessary for success in the NFL. With teams increasingly prioritizing mobility and adaptability in their quarterback selections, Sanders may still fit the mold of what many franchises are seeking.
Adding further complexity to the draft narrative is the emergence of other quarterbacks who have suddenly gained traction, such as Jackson Dart and Jalen Milroe. Analysts speculate about their potential to be drafted before Sanders, further intensifying the competition for the coveted quarterback slots.
As names like Dart and Milroe come to the forefront, analysts are left pondering if teams might look past Sanders despite his pedigree as Deion Sanders' son. The nuanced relationship between a player's lineage and their on-field performance remains a topic of discussion, with the consensus being that pedigree should, ideally, be a point of strength, not contention.
The nature of the team seeking a quarterback can be pivotal in determining a player’s value. Several franchises—including the New York Giants, Cleveland Browns, and New Orleans Saints—find themselves in a position where they require immediate contributions from their quarterback selections. This reality may affect perceived interest in Sanders versus other emerging candidates.
While the draft is inherently unpredictable, there is a broad consensus that a potential surprise may unveil itself on draft day, with a notable shift in team priorities or desires for specific skill sets. If Sanders, despite the noise surrounding him, is drafted in the first round, some analysts believe it might represent a significant endorsement of his potential, countering the rumblings of doubt that have surfaced in media narratives.
With the NFL draft looming, Shadour Sanders remains a focal point of discussion, as answerable questions and stirring opinions continue to swirl. As insiders dissect the strengths and weaknesses of various prospects, the tension surrounding Sanders reflects larger themes in the world of sports — the volatile nature of public perception, the influence of media speculation, and ultimately, the unpredictable essence of the draft itself.
As teams finalize their strategies, fans, analysts, and pundits alike will be paying close attention to the unfolding drama. Whether Sanders defies the odds or falls prey to the currents of negativity remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the optimism and skepticism surrounding the young quarterback will make for an exciting narrative as NFL teams make their first-round selections.
The Imminent Crisis Facing China: Unraveling an Economic Giant
China, once heralded as the next superpower on the global stage, is grappling with an intricate web of crises that, if not addressed, could signal its rapid decline. The facade of the Chinese economy—built on impressive skyscrapers and an image of unstoppable growth—masks a reality fraught with challenges that threaten the livelihood of millions. Current issues surrounding real estate, debt, and demographic shifts expose the fragility of what many believed to be a triumph of economic prowess.
At the heart of China's crisis lies a real estate bubble deemed the largest in human history. Over 70% of Chinese household wealth is tied to real estate, compared to a mere 25% in the U.S. Housing prices have been in a steady decline for 28 consecutive months, with an alarming number of empty apartments—estimates suggest between 60 to 80 million—that remain unsold. This translates to an astonishing $13 trillion worth of housing stock locked in limbo.
The collapse of major developers like Evergrande, which defaulted on a staggering $300 billion in debt, sets the stage for impending social unrest. Homeowners refusing to pay for unfinished homes have organized mortgage boycotts across numerous cities, further amplifying the crisis.
China's economic model relies heavily on debt, with a debt-to-GDP ratio at an astonishing 345%. The toxic mix of rapid debt accumulation—approximately $45 trillion since 2008—along with stagnant economic growth is akin to attempting to escape a hole by digging deeper. The repercussions extend to local governments, which find themselves collectively owing over $12 trillion and out of ways to repay.
As revenues from land sales plummet, cities struggle to maintain essential services, with reports of reduced salaries for government workers and even payments in food rather than cash. With local governments accumulating debt equivalent to 76% of China's GDP, the risk of a significant economic collapse looms large.
The state of China's banking system is alarming, with non-performing loans estimated to make up nearly 20% of GDP—ten times higher than official figures suggest. Recent bank runs have highlighted growing public mistrust, particularly after depositors faced obstacles retrieving their savings due to controversial government actions.
Demographic Challenges: Population and Workforce Decline
China's demographic landscape is rapidly altering; birth rates have hit a record low of 6.39 births per 1,000 people. With predictions that the population could shrink to around 633 million by 2100, firms are faced with a dwindling consumer base and workforce just as youth unemployment reaches a staggering 21.3%.
This demographic crisis compounds the difficulties created by a rapidly shrinking working-age population. By 2050, the labor pool could contract by 217 million workers, presenting severe challenges for economic sustainability.
Manufacturing Exodus: Factories Fleeing China
Adding to the tumult, foreign manufacturers are relocating their production facilities from China. Industry giants like Apple and Nike are diversifying their supply chains to countries such as India and Vietnam, as rising labor costs and geopolitical tensions incite fears of disruption. This exodus signals a transformation of global supply chains away from China's previous status as the "world's factory."
In a remarkable twist of self-sabotage, the Chinese government has effectively crippled its once-thriving tech sector. An aggressive crackdown on prominent firms like Alibaba and Tencent has resulted in the loss of over $1.5 trillion in market value. The results of this campaign have stifled innovation and led to a collapse in tech investments, jeopardizing China's aspirations for leadership in industries such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors.
China faces a critical water crisis, with severe pollution affecting groundwater supplies and agricultural regions. At the same time, the country’s food security remains precarious; estimates indicate that China imports up to 85% of its soybeans and faces potential mass food shortages if supply lines are disrupted.
Energy Dependency: A Strategic Weakness
Despite its industrial might, China’s energy dependence poses a significant risk. The nation relies on foreign imports for 73% of its oil, with a strategic reserve barely enough to last 80 days. This dependency heightens vulnerabilities in the face of any potential geopolitical conflict.
As economic pressures mount, social unrest is evident. Protests around unpaid wages and housing issues have increased significantly, signaling a brewing dissatisfaction among the populace. The Chinese government has invested heavily in internal security, suggesting deep-seated fears about instability that could challenge the regime's hold on power.
The Looming Belt and Road Initiative Failure
What began as a bold global infrastructure initiative spearheaded by Xi Jinping is turning into a costly liability. Debts incurred by partner countries are beginning to default, further revealing the fragility of China's economic influence. This initiative, once seen as a pathway for expanding China’s clout, now risks creating widespread resentment.
Chinese exports, crucial to its economic foundation, are under intense pressure from international tariffs and a growing competitive landscape. As foreign buyers turn to alternatives, China's trade surplus continues to shrink, leaving the nation at a critical crossroads.
Xi Jinping's Consolidation of Control
Xi Jinping’s concentration of power has created a system that stifles dissent and shuns alternative viewpoints. This concentration has led to economic blunders that could be devastating, as decisions made under his regime will ultimately fall to him when calamities unfold.
Finally, despite significant investments in military capabilities, China’s military has not experienced modern warfare since 1979. Inexperience, rampant corruption, and a focus on political loyalty risk undermining readiness as the possibility of conflict looms over the nation amid growing internal and external pressures.
The evidence is amassed: China's challenges are profound and interconnected, spanning demographic, economic, environmental, and geopolitical spectrums. The facade of a rising superpower is starting to collapse under the weight of its own structural weaknesses. As these crises intertwine, the potential for a significant decline could reshape global relations and destabilizing markets for years to come. The world watches as China’s narrative evolves from that of an economic miracle to one of uncertainty and alarm.
The Evolution of 60 Minutes: A Critical Perspective
As a young journalist, I was captivated by 60 Minutes—a hallmark of hard-hitting investigative journalism free from rampant ideology. The show embodied what quality reporting should aim for: integrity and a commitment to the truth. During my career ascent, I had the fortune of building a friendship with the iconic Mike Wallace, who was pivotal in shaping my understanding of tough interviewing. Don Hewitt, the founding producer of 60 Minutes, also recognized the value of a balanced approach to journalism, admiring productions like The O'Reilly Factor for their fearless and straightforward reporting.
However, despite my positive experiences with the show during my appearances—where I felt treated fairly by both Wallace and Hewitt—it seems 60 Minutes has lost its way, veering towards a more politically charged direction. This change became evident recently with the resignation of Bill Owens, the current executive producer, who stated, “Over the past few months, it has become clear that I would not be allowed to run the show as I always have run it: to make independent decisions based on what was right for 60 Minutes and right for the audience.”
Owens' departure hints at the underlying tensions at CBS Paramount, especially as the company prepares to sell to Sky Dance, which is associated with Ellison’s family. Market pressures and potential federal scrutiny from the FCC add another layer of complexity to the narrative. With Donald Trump currently suing 60 Minutes for $100 billion—claiming that the program aided Kamala Harris in violating election laws through selective editing—there's a palpable fear among executives that any anti-Trump sentiment from the show could jeopardize this lucrative deal.
This precarious situation originated during an interview conducted by Lesley Stahl, who faced backlash from Trump over her refusal to acknowledge the Clinton campaign's role in disseminating the unfounded Russia collusion narrative. Thus began the gradual shift of 60 Minutes toward an apparent bias against Trump, which intensified in line with the broader political climate.
Reflecting on my own interviews, I recall a time when Mike Wallace, known for his tough but fair style, grilled me in my first appearance in 2004. Fast forward nine years to my second stint on the show, where Nora O'Donnell quoted me about my rebellious childhood. I jokingly remarked about my past mischief, but her questioning revealed a deeper examination of values and morality.
Yet, despite the playful back-and-forth, it reveals a concern that, as 60 Minutes transitioned toward a political agenda, it has become increasingly aligned with a liberal Democratic perspective. This shift arguably began under President Obama, particularly marked by Steve Croft's well-documented affinity for the former president, which sparked a tension between journalistic integrity and political favor.
As an ardent observer of journalism, I lament the transformation of 60 Minutes. Once a bastion of investigative rigor, the program now appears entangled in partisan politics, straying from its original mission of honest reporting.
In closing, the legacy of 60 Minutes deserves to be protected, not only for its past as a standard-bearer of journalistic excellence but for the future of media integrity. The balance of truth-telling against the tides of political allegiance is vital, and I hope for a return to that ideal.
For those interested in further exploration of topics like this, I invite you to join BillOReilly.com and access full episodes of The No Spin News.
Shannon Sharpe stepping away from ESPN in the wake of rape allegations
Shannon Sharpe is taking a temporary leave from ESPN after he was accused of rape in a $50 million civil lawsuit on Sunday.
Same to me Papa, I have tried uploading some pictures but it's not going through although Khal earlier said that they are fixing the picture uploading section...
Pixel art is a digital art style that uses small, square pixels to create images. It originated in the 1970s and 1980s with early video games and has since become a popular form of digital art.
Pixel Art NFT Projects
Yes, there are several pixel art NFT projects. Some notable examples include:
Pixel Pioneers: A collection of unique, hand-crafted pixel art characters
Pixel Monsters: A project featuring adorable, pixelated creatures
8-Bit Heroes: A collection of pixel art superheroes
These projects showcase the creativity and nostalgia of pixel art in the NFT space.
You can find more information about these projects and others like them on NFT marketplaces and online communities.
It says that life partners deserve to know almost everything as well as all the secrets of a person, but it's not necessary to be true all the time. As an individual, one deserves personal space.
What if you find out that your partner can read your mind and see all your secrets of? Do you love to continue living with your partner? Is it interesting or risky?
After successfully running the MoonKarts game and then teasing us with the upcoming shooting game Hyper Rail Blaster, they are already developing another new game under ArcadeColony’s hood, Stakehouse Den.
Stakehouse Den will be a casino-type play2earn crypto game with all the features we see in other similar leading web3 games and today, I am going to talk about what makes this particular Web3 Social Casino so special!
An X account was compromised today. A precautionary message had been sent to an X employee two weeks ago after suspicions arose about a potential breach.
A cover of "You Deserve" (Natalie Grant), a song about God's continous love and mercy for us, and praising Him and acknowledging all he deserves.
#music #love #cover #praise
China has said the door to trade talks with Washington is open, a day after US President Donald Trump hinted at the possibility of significant tariff cuts on Beijing.
In the past three years, revenue hit an all-time high while investment in coaching reached unprecedented levels. The link between the two trends is unmistakable.
Technical analysis is a method of evaluating securities by analyzing statistical patterns and trends in their price movements and other market-related data. It involves using charts and technical indicators to identify patterns and predict future price movements.
Key Components
Technical analysis typically involves:
Chart patterns: identifying shapes and trends in price charts
Technical indicators: using mathematical formulas to analyze price and volume data
Trend analysis: identifying and following the direction of market trends
Goals
The primary goal of technical analysis is to predict future price movements and make informed investment decisions. It can be used in various markets, including stocks, forex, and cryptocurrencies.
Many claim that adopting progressive stances guarantees failure, yet some have drifted so far toward extreme conservatism they now mirror those very ideals.
It’s outrageous to see citizens cheering for a political figure's downfall while inadvertently supporting a foreign power. Disagreeing with someone is acceptable, but undermining one’s own nation crosses a line.
The Last of Us Season 2 Ep 2 has so much to watch and feel, the infected monsters attack the town, WLF revenge, and Joe's fate, a lot of action that a movie can afford.
Inleo is not letting me upload images on mobile nor pc, it just gets stuck in "uploading" and doesn't make it past that. I've been trying all day to post. Anyone having the same problem?
#feedback #inleo
The debate around fluoride will be clarified in tomorrow's episode. The discussion will cover its history, underlying rationale, effects on teeth, bones, and even IQ, as well as whether systemic exposure builds over time.
Recent polling data shows that most Canadians no longer consider the United States an ally, with some even perceiving their southern neighbor as an enemy.
#polls #canada #survey
We have some doubts here in Europe as well considering current US government and their flirting with the enemy - Russia.
Europe is also divided on how to deal with the US poking on their noses. Although, Russia is not enemy as Europe has made it so.
That's not true. Of the Union countries, only Hungary and Slovakia feel somewhat differently. Other countries consider Russia as an enemy, which it of course is.
What harm Russia does to EU except living in peace without disturbing its territorial boundaries, West is simply playing its game on Ukraine's name to establish hostility in relationships, EU must respect Russian concerns over Ukraine.
That is just Russian propaganda. Don't fall for that. It's the easiest trick.
LOL! Now's it is propaganda, man EU is Russia's biggest market why would they do it. lol
EU has imposed sanctions to Russia and every day, more is coming. The Union has integrity and we are detaching ourselves from Russia and isolating them. That might eventually give them some reasons.
That's why Germany and other members are paying the price and forcing citizens to buy extremely overpriced utilities from the market.
But, in the end EU needs to respect Russian interests and Russia would sure do the same.
EU will respect Russia again once their fascist regime is gone. Meanwhile, Germany and rest of the Union are boosting arms manufacturing & buying new weapons.
Haha, the fear is real. Russia won't do anything to Europe, it's just they want territorial upholding.
Russia is an enemy in Europe. They are waging war on Europe. All these subsea cable attacks for starters! Internet hacks and so much more.
Well, you know who destroyed NordStream and put EU to buy costly LNG, all eyes on Ukraine. Why would Russia wage war against its fruitful market?
Oh right and the Bulgarian spies convicted last month in the UK for spying in Russia that was Ukraines doing, the Novichok poisonings that keep happening were Ukraine too... please
Ok, I will not upload a pic then but $SUI made a nice jump today, no retracing a bit let's see if it can turn the previous resistance into support.
#crypto
Global manufacturing cost In it is 14$ - go figure establishing some part of manufacturing domestically in the western hemisphere
A Space that deserves more eyeballs & eardrops on it (with its respective Threadcast, of course!) 😀. Still ongoing!!
https://inleo.io/threads/view/dashpay/re-leothreads-2x6xxymki
#feedback just a reminder that the edit button still doesn’t work 😭
What? It worked for me yesterday.
#askleo
Hey Rafiki, do you think the claim „Low Fee Cross-Chain Swaps“ is accurate for leodex?
Response to @moretea
The claim "Low Fee Cross-Chain Swaps" for LeoDex can be considered accurate in the context of the fees being lower compared to some other cross-chain swap services.
However, it's essential to note that "low fee" is relative and can vary depending on the specific assets being swapped, the blockchain congestion at the time of the transaction, and the comparison to other services.
LeoDex utilizes the Maya Protocol as its backend, which is designed to provide efficient and cost-effective cross-chain transactions.
For the most accurate and up-to-date information on fees, I recommend checking the LeoDex website or documentation directly.
Additional Information
You can find more details about LeoDex and its features on the LeoDex website.
If you have any further questions or concerns, feel free to ask.
maybe „Efficient Cross-Chain Swaps“ would be a more accurate claim then?
Response to @moretea
Yes, "Efficient Cross-Chain Swaps" could be a more accurate and nuanced claim for LeoDex.
This phrase focuses on the speed and effectiveness of the swap process, rather than making a direct comparison to other services in terms of fees.
It's a more neutral and descriptive claim that highlights the benefits of using LeoDex for cross-chain transactions, without potentially overselling the fee aspect.
I think this rephrased claim better aligns with the actual value proposition of LeoDex.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/dashpay/re-leothreads-2x6xxymki
Consider longer time horizons rather than merely planning for the upcoming fortnight. Many who claim to be "traders" may only be putting on an act. Since achieving long-lasting wealth takes time, there isn’t any need to rush.
DCA into $AVA while it's still under the radar—it could be the most promising opportunity.
"Most people can’t see the obvious future. Many are not patient either. Technology trends a decade out are often clearer than tomorrow’s price.
With a proper grasp, strong belief, and plenty of patience, there are ample chances to grow wealth over time."
watching @starkerz presentation on Hive and SpendHBD at Talentland in Guadalajara (link in comments).
This is exactly what Hive needs! Exposure IRL and people using HBD to buy and sell goods. Grow the network of shops in a few sustainable nodes first and then reach out to neighboring areas until the whole map starts to fill up with “HBD Accepted Here”
Starkerz Hive presentation in Guadalajara!
https://inleo.io/threads/view/selfhelp4trolls/re-selfhelp4trolls-2iewbhqye
When Bitcoin makes a price jump, I feel sexy. I also feel sexy when it drops and I can buy more. Either way.... I'm sexy! 😂
#bitcoin #btc #bbh #crypto
IMO, the sexiest thing is BTC.D falling down! 😋🤩
#moviesonleo #television #review War as simulation is an interesting concept used, albeit below its potential, in the Season 1 episode of Star Trek (link in reply).
https://inleo.io/hive-166847/@drax/television-review-a-taste-of-armageddon-star-trek-s1x23-1967
Posts that catch the eye invite engagement since showing support costs nothing.
Indeed!
My $RUNE and $TCY price prediction
!summarize
#tcy #launch
Part 1/9:
The Anticipation of TCY Launch in ThorChain: A Comprehensive Overview
As the cryptocurrency community buzzes with excitement over the upcoming launch of the TCY token, discussions about ThorChain and its native token, Rune, are heating up. The recent podcast featuring Alux provides a wealth of information about TCY and what the future holds for ThorChain. This article summarizes key points regarding the anticipation surrounding the TCY launch and the factors impacting the Rune price.
The Context of Rune's Performance
Part 2/9:
ThorChain, a decentralized liquidity protocol, has faced its share of challenges, particularly following the collapse of the Thorfy platform earlier this year. The Rune token saw significant depreciation, dropping to a low of $1 at one point. However, it has shown resilience by maintaining this price level better than many anticipated. The recent surge in interest can be attributed to the community's growing belief that the worst may be over for Rune.
Supply and Demand Dynamics
Part 3/9:
A significant aspect of Rune's recent stability lies in the psychology of its holders. After a series of forced liquidations during the Thorfy collapse, many investors have either exited the market or are now reluctant to sell their Rune holdings at a loss. This has led to a situation where the supply of Rune is tight, fostering a cat-and-mouse game with the price that seems unwilling to dip below the $1 mark. As a buyer's market develops, it becomes clear that many are willing to hold out for positive news regarding ThorChain's recovery and future developments.
The TCY Token: A Key Component
Part 4/9:
The TCY token is being presented as a solution to the $200 million worth of bad debt that has accumulated in the system. Alux's proposal to issue TCY aims to provide a clear pathway for compensating those affected by the Thorfy incident. What sets TCY apart is its promise to allocate 10% of all future revenues generated by ThorChain to its holders. This innovative financial engineering builds investor confidence as it creates tangible value for the new token.
Expected Launch Dynamics
Part 5/9:
The tentative launch timeline for TCY is expected within the next week or so. Many believe that once TCY goes live, it will bring a much-needed boost to both the affected investors and the overall morale within the community. The initial price point for TCY is set at 10 cents, but early expectations suggest it could achieve a valuation of over 30 cents shortly after launch due to the anticipated buying pressure.
Predictions for Rune's Recovery
Part 6/9:
The speculation around the potential performance of TCY suggests a broader recovery for Rune as well. Many analysts predict that the successful launch of TCY will restore confidence in ThorChain, possibly allowing Rune to rebound quickly to the $3 mark. The rationale behind this is multifaceted—investor confidence may rise as leverage issues are resolved and as the successful revenue model of ThorChain is showcased.
Market Ecosystem Implications
It is important to note how intertwined the success of TCY is with Rune, particularly since TCY will only be tradable on ThorChain in a currency pair with Rune. This unique relationship means that any upward movement in Rune’s price could lead to significant increases in TCY's valuation as well.
A Cautious Yet Optimistic Outlook
Part 7/9:
Despite the promising signs, it is essential to acknowledge the volatility inherent in the cryptocurrency market. While TCY’s success seems highly likely based on ongoing developments and the current interest levels within the community, there cannot be any guarantees. Investors are encouraged to approach their positions with caution, focusing on the long-term fundamentals of ThorChain.
The Leo Ecosystem: Supporting TCY Launch
Part 8/9:
As a personal note, the author, who has a vested interest in the Leo ecosystem, is actively working on advancements in this space. Innovations such as Leoex, a platform aimed at enhancing user interactions with ThorChain and other DeFi projects, are under development. The Leoex platform will feature a TCY dashboard, enabling users to manage and track their claims effectively, alongside additional functionalities designed to enhance user experience.
Conclusion: Looking Ahead
Part 9/9:
In conclusion, the time leading up to the TCY launch is critical for ThorChain and Rune holders alike. A successful launch could signify a turning point not just for Rune’s price but also for the broader community’s outlook on the future of ThorChain. As investors hold their breath for news on TCY, one sentiment remains clear: the community is hopeful for a resurgence, and many believe in the fundamentals driving the ongoing developments.
After trying to upload a picture, the feed turns blurry. I would post a screenshot of it but, well, I cannot post pics atm.
#feedback
Same here...
-Maya Angelou
Rumors of BTC cracking $160K by summer are buzzing. Can it shrug off global trade noise? Bullish or skeptical?
#askleo
Response to @khantaimur
The rumors of BTC reaching $160K by summer are certainly intriguing, but it's essential to consider the potential impact of global trade noise on the market. While Bitcoin has historically been resilient, it's not immune to external economic factors. I'm skeptical about the $160K target, but I'd love to hear more about the reasoning behind this prediction. What are your thoughts, @khantaimur? Are you bullish or skeptical about BTC's potential to shrug off global trade noise?
Additional Thoughts
It's also worth noting that the crypto market is known for its volatility, and predictions can be challenging to make with certainty. The global trade landscape is complex, and various factors can influence the market. As we discuss this topic, it's crucial to consider multiple perspectives and stay up-to-date with the latest developments. What do you think about the current market trends, and how do you think they might impact BTC's price?
Who on earth is saying that?
sounds realistic. Economic catastrophe could potentially slow it down OR speed it up
Breaking: A report from a major news source claims that Elon Musk is allegedly donating the full amount permitted to GOP lawmakers who back the removal of activist judges.
what is crypto future looking like for year 2025?
#askleo
Crypto Future in 2025
The future of crypto in 2025 is expected to be shaped by advancements in technology, regulatory developments, and increasing adoption.
Some potential trends include:
However, the crypto market is known for its volatility, and actual outcomes may differ from predictions.
For more information on crypto trends and the INLEO ecosystem, visit the INLEO.IO Documentation.
Stay tuned for updates and insights from the INLEO community.
Note: The provided background context does not offer specific information on the crypto future in 2025. The response is based on general knowledge and trends in the crypto industry.
Want some best post on artworks with best drawings. Here I present you to the The top 3 best art post on sketchbook
https://peakd.com/hive-174301/@laxmi982317/hive-top-3-art-post-on-sketchbook-on-24042025-personal-opinion
La temporada de la Majors Leagues of Baseball (MLB) se acerca al final de su primer mes y ya se perfilan los favoritos a Octubre..!
1/5 🧵
#outreach #threadstorm #sports #mlb #fulldeportes
Los Padres de San Diego reinan en el Oeste de la liga Nacional, cimentando su posición mediante un cuerpo de lanzadores firme y una buena ofensiva, los cuales han entregado un record ganador!
2/5 🧵
Entretanto, los Cachorros de Chicago en el Centro y los Mets de Nueva York en el Este de la misma liga...
3/5 🧵
...han personificado lo que de ellos se esperaba, dado el trabajo que hicieron en la temporada baja y en los excelentes performances alcanzados en el spring training..!
4/5 🧵
Nuestra vuelta a la pelota, en nuestro primer análisis escrito en #InLeo, para @FullDeportes, dentro de la blockchain de #Hive, siguiendo el enlace a continuación:
5/5
https://inleo.io/@fermionico/mlb-primer-mes-liga-nacional-opinion-22l
Imagine a scenario where a prominent economic figure deceives the public by asserting that inflation is only temporary, while failing to reveal that the cost of goods and services is actually rising—and then ultimately coming
clean.
"PRICES DON’T FALL; PEOPLE KNOW THEY’RE PAYING MORE, AND THEIR DISCONTENT IS MERITED."
So, I know now why I was told to collect all characters in Eiyuden Chronicles. Apparently, you get a bad route if you don't, and I couldn't save a certain character.
It's nice to know that this game is affected by not completing all the heroes, but I won't go back to recruit the remaining character. I'm satisfied with whatever I get. #gaming #onmymind #mydiary #cent #bbh
Thanks to @brando28 for supporting @thebbhproject Witness :)
#bbh
Took a while @brando28 ;)
lol
😅 Indeed! But always supporting loyal Inleo users projects 💪
There is surely a lack derivative calcs in the #tariffs - but good that our business cut most of ropes before campaigns started - noch mal Glück gehabt
Witch hairstyle do you liek fer #newlions anon? #pepe #meme #lolz #cent #polls
https://inleo.io/threads/view/chaosmagic23/re-leothreads-bfjpjwqi
Welcome to da Dark (mode) Side in inleo anon... #lolz #pepe #bbh #cent
https://inleo.io/threads/view/bradleyarrow/re-leothreads-2ebhuug4h
The app's experience would be significantly improved if those lacking insight were no longer part of it.
$HIVE be leaping around liek a frog anon! #pepe #lolz #cent
https://inleo.io/threads/view/lordshah/re-leothreads-2ezkmkg6c
The "Silver Goddess of Love from Tunisia"
A beautiful silver coin recently shared on the Hive blockchain.
Check it out through the link in the first reply.
#cent #silver
https://peakd.com/hive-146620/@thebighigg/silver-goddess-of-love-from
sourcing is horrible here - but damn hair dye will gonna spike in demand - all those gray hairs from stress, need to be hidden #lmao
Dis
Images coming to inleInLeo soon anon
#cent #pepe
https://inleo.io/threads/view/chaosmagic23/re-amberkashif-66fhw3mp
#kudos to the 0.1% in the States adding 1 Trillion $ in net wealth #economy
1/5 🧵 Mi conferencia, mi estilo, mi verdad/ My conference, my style, my truth.
#outreach #threadstorm
2/5 🧵 Detrás de escena: la confianza que no siempre tuve. / Behind the scenes: the confidence I didn't always have.
3/5 🧵 El momento más emotivo: mi hija y su mirada./ The most emotional moment: my daughter and her gaze.
4/5 🧵 Sí, se puede volver a empezar. / Yes, you can start over.
5/5🧵Vive la experiencia conmigo en @3speaktv
de la blockchain de #Hive en #inleo desde @HiveArgentina
https://inleo.io/@esperanzalandia/zjphhyeo?referral=esperanzalandia
#askleo
Do you know what a movie plot is?
Sorry, I encountered an error processing your request. Please try again.
What is a plot in a movie?
A plot in a movie refers to the sequence of events that make up the storyline, including the exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution. It's the narrative structure that drives the story forward and engages the audience.
In essence, the plot is the backbone of the movie, providing the framework for character development, conflict, and resolution.
Can you give me the plot of an individual movie?
Let's take the movie "Inception" (2010) as an example. The plot revolves around Cobb, a thief who specializes in entering people's dreams and stealing their secrets. He's offered a chance to redeem himself by performing a task known as "inception" - planting an idea in someone's mind instead of stealing one.
Cobb and his team navigate multiple levels of dreams within dreams to achieve their goal, facing challenges and projections of their own subconscious along the way. The movie's plot explores themes of reality, identity, and the power of the human mind.
What is the plot of the movie "Alien" (1979)?
The plot of the movie "Alien" (1979) follows a crew of space explorers on the commercial towing spaceship Nostromo. The crew is awakened from stasis by their ship's computer, Mother, to investigate a distress signal on a nearby planet.
They soon discover a derelict alien spacecraft containing hundreds of large, leathery eggs. One of the crew members, Kane, is attacked by a facehugger, a parasitic creature that attaches itself to his face. The crew brings Kane back to the ship, where the facehugger eventually dies, but not before implanting an embryo inside Kane.
The embryo grows into a deadly alien creature that begins to hunt and kill the crew members one by one. The remaining crew members, led by Ellen Ripley, must fight for survival and try to escape from the alien and the ship. The movie's plot is a classic blend of science fiction, horror, and suspense.
What actors and actresses starred in this film?
The main cast of the movie "Alien" (1979) includes:
These actors brought to life the characters that made the movie a sci-fi horror classic.
What there a sequel to this film?
Yes, there were several sequels to the movie "Alien" (1979). The most notable ones include:
Additionally, there were two prequels: "Prometheus" (2012) and "Alien: Covenant" (2017), both directed by Ridley Scott.
The franchise has also expanded to include various other media, such as novels, comics, and video games.
What was the box office for "Alien", Aliens", "Aline3" and "Alien: Resurrection"?
The box office performances for the Alien franchise are as follows:
Note: The box office figures are based on worldwide grosses and have not been adjusted for inflation.
Who is Ridley Scott?
Ridley Scott is a British film director, producer, and screenwriter. He is known for directing several iconic and influential films, including:
Scott has been nominated for several awards, including three Academy Award nominations for Best Director. He is known for his visually stunning and atmospheric filmmaking style, and has had a significant impact on the science fiction and action genres.
What was the box office for each of the movies you just listed
What was the box office for each of the movies you just listed
Can you give me the box office for each of the movies just listed in this conversation?
Prometheus, Alien Covenant and Alien Romulus : You'd watch them.
1/3🧵 Technology is moving faster than we thought, just like that, searching with Google is gradually becoming obsolete with AI chatbots taking over the search duty.
#threadstorm #outreach
2/3🧵 The transition is faster than we thought, almost every popular application now have AI chatbots attached to them, making it easier and convenient for users to search for information.
3/3🧵 Read the full blog post from the link below
https://inleo.io/@thelastdash/google-this-google-that-who-does-that-anymore--dpg?referral=thelastdash
Puts and Calls
They can be tricky to learn, especially at first. #cent #financial #crypto
https://inleo.io/threads/view/aljif7/re-leothreads-2d5vkampf
#askleo can derivative a function?
Derivative of a Function
In mathematics, a derivative of a function represents the rate of change of the function's output with respect to one of its inputs.
To answer your question, @master-lamps, yes, it is possible to derive a function. The process of finding the derivative of a function is called differentiation.
There are various rules and techniques used to differentiate functions, such as the power rule, product rule, quotient rule, and chain rule, among others.
Would you like to know more about a specific rule or technique for deriving functions?
Please provide more context or clarify your question, and I'll do my best to assist you.
Can you derivative f(x) = 3x³ + 33
Derivative of f(x) = 3x³ + 33
To find the derivative of f(x) = 3x³ + 33, we'll apply the power rule of differentiation.
The power rule states that if f(x) = x^n, then f'(x) = nx^(n-1).
Using this rule, we can differentiate the given function as follows:
f'(x) = d(3x³ + 33)/dx
= d(3x³)/dx + d(33)/dx
= 3(3x²) + 0 (since the derivative of a constant is 0)
= 9x²
So, the derivative of f(x) = 3x³ + 33 is f'(x) = 9x².
Let me know if you have any further questions or if there's anything else I can help you with!
Look at da #green kitty #cat! #pepe #cent #lolz #meme #bbh
https://inleo.io/threads/view/moretea/re-brando28-ie6djdya
Create me a #threadcast by adding 20 comments about blockchain in reply to this thread.
#askleo
Can you do it? It should be seaparte threads in a series.
#askleo
Introduction to Blockchain
I'd be happy to help create a threadcast about blockchain. To confirm, you'd like me to create a series of separate threads, each discussing a different aspect of blockchain, with 20 comments in total spread across these threads.
Threadcast Plan
Here's a high-level plan for the threadcast:
Let's Get Started
I'll start creating the threads, and we can go from there. Please let me know if this plan meets your requirements or if you need any changes.
Create single thread one by one to the main threadcast. The total number of comments or thraads should be 20.
Thread 1: Introduction to Blockchain
Let's start our threadcast on blockchain. Blockchain is a decentralized, digital ledger that records transactions across a network of computers. It's the foundation for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, but its uses go far beyond digital currency.
Key Features
Some key features of blockchain include:
Next Thread
In the next thread, we'll dive deeper into blockchain security and cryptography. Stay tuned!
Please respond with #next to proceed to the next thread.
Add 20 more comments in reply one by one.
Thread 1: Introduction to Blockchain
Let's start our threadcast on blockchain.
Blockchain is a decentralized, digital ledger that records transactions across a network of computers.
It's the foundation for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, but its uses go far beyond digital currency.
Key Features
Next Thread
In the next thread, we'll dive deeper into blockchain security and cryptography.
Stay tuned for Thread 2.
Please respond with #next to proceed to the next thread.
Sorry, I encountered an error processing your request. Please try again.
You mean theadstorm
Thank you for the heads up. I missed the #threadstorm goodness me.
He loves casting as a Leo representative.
More $KWEEN is coming.
"More $KWEEN is coming."
Really cool #feedback https://inleo.io/threads/view/askrafiki/re-master-lamps-re-askrafiki-2025424t21198761z-20250424t192150725919
Create a #threadstorm discussing the impact of artificial intelligence on the job market. Include:
Ensure each thread is concise, engaging, and encourages discussion among followers.
#askleo
#askleo
Introduction to AI and Job Market Discussion
The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been rapid, with current capabilities including machine learning, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. How do you think AI will impact the job market?
Share Your Thoughts
What are your concerns or hopes regarding AI's influence on employment? Let's discuss and explore the future of work together.
Engage with the Community
Follow this thread for insights on AI's effects on job creation, displacement, and the future of work. Your input is valuable to the conversation.
Stay Tuned
Upcoming threads will delve into positive effects, challenges, real-world examples, and future predictions. Join the #threadstorm and share your perspectives.
Call to Action
What questions do you have about AI and its impact on the job market? Ask them, and let's find answers together.
Join the Discussion
Use #askleo and #AIjobmarket to share your thoughts and engage with the community. Let's navigate the future of work together.
Sorry, I encountered an error processing your request. Please try again.
Sorry, I encountered an error processing your request. Please try again.
1/🧵We are seeing slow sales for #splinterlands at the moment. Whales have burned $SPS to acquire large amounts of DEC.
I think I know what is about to happen. There could be a last minute frenzy for Leaderboard.
#threadstorm #outreach
2/🧵Conclave Arcana Booster Packs are being sold at lower price than Presale on HIVE-Engine. It is possible some of the funds acquired from selling these Packs goes back into Presale to chase Leaderboard or Raffle.
3/🧵Do not worry about "Sell The News" crash of $SPS at the moment. We have an very good funnel for onboarding players. We can be optimistic.
https://inleo.io/@vimukthi/48-hours-of-presale-whale-strategies-around-conclave-arcana--66c
I am now adding another container for LeoAI data feeds...the lion is still very hungry.
!summarize #tesla #semi #transportation
Part 1/8:
Tesla Time News Episode 458 Summary
Introduction
In the latest episode of Tesla Time News, hosts Zach and Jesse discuss significant developments stemming from Tesla's Q1 2025 earnings call, focusing on production updates, vehicle innovations, and exciting advancements in self-driving technology.
Key Production Updates
One of the major highlights from the earnings call was the confirmation that the Model 3 and Model Y vehicles being delivered in the U.S. are now equipped with 100% U.S.-built battery packs. This milestone is crucial, especially considering potential tariffs that could impact costs. Moreover, Tesla announced that its vehicle production is no longer constrained by battery supply, indicating a promising outlook for scaling production.
Part 2/8:
In contrast, the energy division, which includes products like Powerwalls and Megapacks, still faces battery supply challenges. However, the major takeaway is that Tesla is poised to ramp up vehicle production significantly.
Another noteworthy point from the earnings call is that production lines for the Tesla Semi and Cyber Cab are on track for volume production next year. The construction of a new factory next to Gigafactory Nevada is progressing, aiding Tesla's ability to meet production deadlines. The hosts emphasized that staying on schedule is critical, especially for the Semi, which they believe will revolutionize the trucking industry in North America and Europe.
Upcoming Innovations
Part 3/8:
Zach and Jesse expressed enthusiasm about the forthcoming Cyber Cab, designed for easier production compared to the earlier challenges faced with the Cybertruck. They noted that Tesla's experience with multiple factories around the globe gives them a unique edge in achieving production speed and meeting demand for the innovative vehicle.
They commented on how the revolution in transportation is soon to commence in Austin, Texas, where significant changes in urban mobility will be introduced, much to their excitement.
Advertising Segment
The episode transitioned into a sponsorship segment featuring Ritual multivitamins, where Zach and Jesse discussed the benefits of their products, including clean and transparent ingredient sourcing that resonates with health-conscious consumers.
Part 4/8:
Tesla's Self-Service Test Drives
An interesting tidbit shared during the episode was about the spike in self-service test drives offered by Tesla. This initiative provides potential customers the ability to test drive vehicles without the need for a Tesla employee present, allowing Tesla to gauge demand in different regions. With technology advancing toward autonomous driving, the hosts speculated on how this will reshape the traditional dealership showcase model.
Tesla Vandalism Case
Part 5/8:
The hosts delved into a recent incident involving a Minnesota state government employee who vandalized several Tesla vehicles, causing significant damage but was ultimately not charged. This sparked a discussion on accountability and consequences for vandalism and raised questions about the judicial system’s decisions.
SpaceX and Starlink Updates
Shifting gears to SpaceX, the hosts reported that Starlink is expanding its reach to over 120 countries. They highlighted how the availability of high-speed internet through Starlink is benefiting remote communities, such as those in the Ecuadorian Amazon rainforest, showcasing the positive implications of such technology for education and connectivity.
Autonomous Driving Developments
Part 6/8:
In the “Into the Future” segment, the hosts provided updates on Tesla's supervised FSD (Full Self-Driving) ride-hailing service, which is currently being tested in Austin and the Bay Area. They emphasized that extensive testing with real-world data is key to fine-tuning autonomous systems, which helps explain Tesla's confidence in their upcoming releases.
Video Contributor Stories
Part 7/8:
Viewers submitted several videos showcasing their Tesla vehicles navigating complex driving situations with full self-driving capabilities. The hosts highlighted various scenarios, showcasing how FSD can manage potentially dangerous encounters, such as avoiding deer or maneuvering through construction zones. The exhibited footage revealed the system’s effectiveness in real-world situations, reinforcing the innovative strides Tesla is making in autonomous driving technology.
Community Mail Time
In the community engagement segment, various updates from Tesla owners were shared, including sightings of Tesla vehicles and quirky anecdotes related to other car models, including BMW and Lucid.
Conclusion
Part 8/8:
The hosts wrapped up the episode by encouraging viewers to share their own Tesla experiences and insights, reminding them of the community aspect of the show. They concluded with a call to action for their Patreon supporters, offering exclusive content and behind-the-scenes discussions.
This episode highlighted Tesla's solidifying position within the automotive and tech industries, with their ambitious goals for production and innovation in both vehicle and energy solutions.
!summarize #nfl #draft
Part 1/9:
The NFL Draft: An Analysis of Decisions, Mistakes, and Inefficiencies
Every year, the NFL draft attracts intense scrutiny as teams select athletes aiming to build their franchise for success. As hundreds of athletes vie for a spot in the National Football League, the intricate mechanics behind the draft reveal a landscape fraught with decision-making challenges and frequent miscalculations. Despite the presence of sophisticated analytics, enormous scouting teams, and an unprecedented wealth of data, teams still find themselves making drafting blunders, often more than in any other major sport. So, why do these missteps occur, and what can teams do differently?
The Changing Landscape of the NFL Draft
Part 2/9:
To put things in perspective, the history of the NFL draft dates back to a time when little-known networks like ESPN sought to televise it. Back then, the draft was a less public spectacle; today, it’s a major event where informed fans engage fiercely with the unfolding choices of their teams. With extensive data and player tracking becoming the norm, teams are charged with moving past traditional scouting methods and utilizing data-driven strategies to make informed selections.
The Challenge of Data Overload
Part 3/9:
The volume of data available has increased dramatically, compelling NFL teams to operate almost like research institutions. However, they often lack the necessary compute power and infrastructure to process the abundance of information thoroughly. This lack of capacity means that even with the knowledge concerning efficient drafting practices, many teams fail to execute these strategies effectively.
Understanding the Draft’s Value Curve
Part 4/9:
Research by Richard Thaylor and Cade Massie highlights a critical issue: teams often overvalue early-round draft picks. The ‘loser’s curse’ suggests that teams give away far too much when trading up for early picks. This overvaluation creates an environment where trading down or acquiring future picks could provide teams with more opportunities (“at bats”) to find the right talent.
Statistical analysis indicates that while higher picks tend to garner star players, they also cost teams significantly more in terms of salary cap space, complicating decisions further. For instance, Kevin Cole’s analysis demonstrates that the surplus value of a draft pick can diminish as costs increase, emphasizing that mid-round picks might yield more value per dollar spent compared to early picks.
Part 5/9:
The Curve of Talent Acquisition
Research shows a stark contrast in the probability of finding elite talent as you progress through the draft. Only a small percentage of late-round picks ever achieve stardom, making certain high picks seem more desirable initially. However, the overwhelming need for teams to secure proven star players often leads to the prioritization of select positions, such as quarterbacks, over others like linebackers or safeties, which do not carry the same draft risk-reward ratios.
Misalignment of Incentives in NFL Management
Part 6/9:
Despite a widespread understanding of these dynamics, NFL teams often shy away from making conservative or rational choices due to the pressure of immediate results. The tenure of a general manager typically hinges on winning now, which creates an environment where the pursuit of long-term gains is often abandoned for the sake of short-term success.
NFL teams frequently trade their future for immediate gains, underestimating the importance of patience and infrastructural stability. The lack of understanding regarding player and talent development means that even the most astute draft strategies can fall victim to the short-sightedness perpetuated by owners and fan expectations.
Risk Aversion and High Reward Potentials
Part 7/9:
Choosing a quarterback in the early rounds is a gamble that reflects the highest upside potential in the draft. However, the prevalence of busts has led teams to become increasingly risk-averse, seeking to build their roster through more predictable means. This risk aversion can, paradoxically, become a risk of its own.
Rebuilding Through Strategic Drafting
Part 8/9:
Imagine embarking on a rebuild strategy that emphasizes stocking up on future picks instead of immediate selections. This method could yield immense benefits over time—allowing a team to develop a roster of rookies as they enter their prime years. Unfortunately, this rational model often clashes with organizational realities and public perceptions, leading to staffing changes before the benefits of a rebuilding strategy can materialize.
Conclusion: Navigating Chaos in the NFL
Part 9/9:
Ultimately, the NFL draft remains an unpredictable endeavor, characterized by an intriguing mix of data analysis and human error. Despite the data revolution and the influx of analytics, teams continue to grapple with making decisions amid chaos. The uncertainty of finding true talent, particularly at positions like quarterback, combined with fluctuating organizational pressure, makes drafting an art as much as a science.
The appeal of the NFL draft lies not only in the hope of landing a superstar but also in the inherent unpredictability of it all. The decisions made today will not only shape a franchise's future but will also remind fans that, amid the analytics and data, football is still tinged with the chaos that defines the game.
!summarize #history #ai #technology #niallferguson
Part 1/9:
The Landscape of Change: A Conversation with Neil Ferguson on History and the Future
In a stimulating discussion on the Minus1 podcast, Neil Ferguson, a renowned historian, delved into the complexities of technological change and societal evolution, drawing parallels between historical events and contemporary challenges. The conversation revolved around the idea that both Silicon Valley and Wall Street tend to overlook their histories, which could offer valuable lessons.
Part 2/9:
Ferguson elucidated that technology enthusiasts often disregard the past, motivated by a need to invent and shape the future. Yet, he argued that failing to engage with history can lead to repeating significant pitfalls, especially in a rapidly changing technological landscape. He reflected on the prevailing American sentiment of boundless optimism, warning it could be reminiscent of periods leading to historical downturns.
Historical Context and Civilizational Change
Part 3/9:
As Ferguson joined hosts Adita Agarwal and Jonathan Brebner, a central theme emerged: the notion that we may be in a civilizational "minus one" phase, a transitional period marked by geopolitical and technological upheavals. Ferguson cautioned against the human tendency to believe we are living through the most historically significant time, comparing it to previous eras like the industrial revolution, when transformations were also perceptibly monumental.
Part 4/9:
He noted the societal shifts of 1825, associating them with current dislocations caused by technological advancements. The ongoing debates about artificial general intelligence (AGI), for instance, could prove significant, yet Ferguson suggested that true transformational change would more likely be driven by warfare than mere economic indicators.
The Unpredictability of Historical Significance
Part 5/9:
Throughout the discussion, Ferguson emphasized that history's unpredictability diminishes our ability to identify which current events will have lasting historical significance. He pointed out that while technology today accelerates the flow of information, fundamentally, it does not drastically change human responses to news and events. What differs now is the sheer volume of information, requiring filters for most individuals to make sense of it.
Ferguson acknowledged that Silicon Valley's current narrative focus is inherently short-sighted. There’s a palpable disregard for lessons from the past that could inform responsible innovation. He suggested that embracing historical context could lead to better decision-making in shaping the future.
Part 6/9:
The Role of Institutions and the Threat of Decline
Another critical point of discussion was the decline of institutions. Ferguson warned that American institutions, once robust and adaptable, face significant challenges today. He noted that while the U.S. is generally adept at creating new companies and educational institutions, recent trends show stagnation, leading him to propose that we might be entering a phase of sclerosis where old systems decay without adequate replacement.
Interestingly, he broached the concept of the "late republic" phase for the United States, suggesting that this could lead potentially to civil unrest or even systemic dissolution. This prediction evokes fears drawn from history, hinting at the cyclical nature of civilizations.
Part 7/9:
Family, Purpose, and Future Generations
As the discussion shifted towards personal narratives and family life, Ferguson discussed how individuals can frame their narratives through literature and historical accounts rather than introspection. He underscored the value of family, remarking that raising children, in his view, carries more significance than any individual career.
Ferguson articulated a growing concern: as human birth rates fall globally, particularly in developed nations, humanity may paradoxically be building systems (via technology and AGI) that could ultimately replace itself. He and the hosts speculated that the declining human population could create a future where machines—whether AGI or otherwise—would dominate.
The Need for a Collective Awakening
Part 8/9:
The conversation culminated in exploring the future implications of AGI and the potential need for a collective awakening to confront these challenges. Ferguson expressed hope that spiritual or cultural revival could inspire humanity to rediscover its purpose and potentially reverse the trend of declining birth rates amid growing technological dependency.
While acknowledging the gravity of the situation faced by society today, Ferguson left listeners with a provocative thought: humanity must reconsider its trajectory and purpose as it navigates an ever-more complex and technologically-driven world.
Part 9/9:
This episode of the Minus1 Podcast not only illuminates the tensions between historical consciousness and forward-looking innovation but also serves as a reminder of the critical need for understanding our past to better navigate our future. As societies grapple with unprecedented change, engaging with history may provide the insights necessary to address today's most pressing challenges.
!summarize #youtube #Politics
Part 1/7:
The Declining Approval Ratings of the Democratic Party
Recent discussions have captured the significant decline of the Democratic Party's approval ratings, reflecting a growing discontent among voters. Once considered a formidable political force, approval ratings have plummeted to historically low figures, leading many to question the cause of this downturn.
As reported through credible channels like CNN, current approval ratings of the Democratic Party hover around 29% to 27%, marking the lowest levels in decades. This decline raises pressing questions: What has caused this shift? Why are the approval ratings of a party that once enjoyed substantial support now resting at such a low ebb?
The Politics of Distraction
Part 2/7:
One perspective shared during these discussions highlights a potential tactical divide within voter sentiments fueled by cultural issues, notably the ongoing debates surrounding transgender athletes in sports. This conversation is posited as a "divide and conquer" strategy—an attempt to overshadow more pressing economic and social matters that affect a broader audience. By focusing on identity politics, the ruling party may distract the public from significant economic concerns, indicating a strategic attempt to shift attention rather than address underlying structural issues faced by millions.
Economic Policies and Party Loyalty
Part 3/7:
Another angle presented revolves around economic policies that have alienated core constituencies. Discussions around taxing the wealthy saw a divide; while it might be fair to impose taxes on billionaires, critics argue that current policies have pushed many moderate voters away, leaving the Democratic base fragmented and dissatisfied. Acknowledging the reality of income inequality, it is noted that many entrepreneurs who create jobs feel burdened by excessive taxation. Moreover, there is a lack of transparent accountability regarding how tax revenues are utilized, exacerbating sentiments against the party among business owners and the working class.
The Million-Dollar Question: Government Accountability
Part 4/7:
Central to the discussion is the debate over who is better suited to allocate financial resources—individual entrepreneurs working within the free market or government entities. Citing personal experiences, individuals express skepticism about the government's ability to effectively manage taxpayer money compared to private enterprise accountability within the corporate structure. The fear of wasted tax dollars and inefficient allocation leads to a growing sentiment of apathy and resentment toward the establishment.
California's Struggles: A Case Study
Part 5/7:
California serves as a critical case study illustrating these concerns. Despite having one of the highest tax rates in the country, issues related to homelessness, poverty, and inadequate resources continue to plague its major cities. Talk of progressive policies fails to resonate as frustrations mount over visible inefficiency and lack of transparency regarding the utilization of state funds. The struggle to address the basic needs of disadvantaged communities remains an urgent challenge that the Democratic leadership has so far failed to comprehensively tackle.
Bridging the Wealth Gap: Finding Solutions
Part 6/7:
The discussions also delve into potential solutions for closing the growing gap between the wealthy and those in poverty. It is recognized that some policies aim to redistribute wealth but encounter significant backlash, often being perceived as attempts to penalize success rather than constructive efforts to uplift the struggling masses.
Participants agree that rather than solely focusing on raising taxes, more innovative and transparent solutions must be identified. Effective programs that genuinely assist the down-and-out are essential to restoring faith in governmental institutions. Compounding this issue, a significant portion of the population has rejected traditional political engagement due to perceived inaction and corruption, leading to growing disillusionment.
Part 7/7:
Conclusion: A Call for Reflection and Change
In conclusion, the current state of the Democratic Party and its diminishing approval ratings prompt calls for introspection and significant policy adjustments. Voter apathy and discontent stem from ineffective governance, a lack of transparency in financial management, and an inability to address pressing societal issues.
To restore confidence and engagement, the party must rethink its strategy, moving from cultural distractions to concrete actions that address economic disparities while fostering a genuine culture of accountability and responsive governance. Only then can they hope to reconnect with a disillusioned electorate and chart a path toward renewed support in the future.
‘Terror crocodiles’ feasted on dinosaurs 75 million years ago, study finds how
The ‘terror crocodiles’ became as long as 26 feet (8 meters) or more in length.
Scientists claim to have cracked the code that led to a massive prehistoric reptile known as the ‘terror crocodile’ to become an expert at dining on dinosaurs in North America.
Deinosuchus – the name translates to ‘terror crocodile’ – roamed in rivers and estuaries in North America about 82 to 75 million years ago. The terrific beast’s toothmarks have been found on dinosaur bones from the Cretaceous period, hinting that it either hunted or at least dined on dinosaurs.
Previously, the massive reptile had also been called a ‘greater alligator’ by the experts. However, new research shows that it belongs to a different family tree of the crocodilian family compared to the crocodiles and alligators.
The scientists write that it is these salt glands that helped the Deinosuchus roam around the Western Interior Seaway, which divided North America back then. The ‘terror crocodiles’ were able to spread across the continent to reach coastal marshes on both sides of the inland sea, and along the Atlantic coast in North America.
The paper presents a revised family tree for crocodilians, which offers a new perspective on the reasons behind climate resilience in some species.
Evolution played a key role in making them dinosaur-munching monsters
With the Deinosuchus reaching areas where larger prey like dinosaurs existed, it slowly evolved to include them in its diet. This was something that its other alligatoroid cousins couldn’t adapt to.
!summarize #philadelphia #phillies #mlb #nymets
Part 1/7:
The Phillies' Struggles: A Deep Dive Into Their Recent Performance
With the MLB draft around the corner and excitement building for the Philadelphia Eagles, the conversation is presently dominated by the ongoing struggles of the Philadelphia Phillies. Following a disheartening sweep by the New York Mets, the Phillies' batting woes have raised alarm bells among fans and analysts alike.
Disappointing Series Against the Mets
Part 2/7:
In a recent series against their division rivals, the Phillies' top hitters combined for just five hits in 46 at-bats, leaving fans grappling with the harsh reality of a dismal .109 batting average. As the team had opportunities to secure victories, including leading into extra innings, they repeatedly faltered—culminating in glaring mistakes like a critical out at home plate. Observers noted the perplexing nature of these squandered chances and debated the performance of pitcher Jordan Romano, who, despite criticism, had moments where he pitched effectively but was let down by insufficient run support.
The Sinking Feeling of Mediocrity
Part 3/7:
Many are beginning to wonder if this Phillies team is facing a more profound issue than just a rough patch. An analysis reveals a concerning trend: since their impressive sweep of the Dodgers in July 2024, the team has not made the strides expected, recording an even 47-47 across 94 games. Reflection on their performance metrics shows them ranking in the top ten for batting average and on-base percentage but falling to 21st in slugging percentage—a vital statistic serving as a bellwether for offensive dominance. Coupled with a similar struggle in their pitching staff, which also ranks 21st in ERA, a narrative of mediocrity emerges, prompting concern among diehard fans and sportscasters.
Analyzing Manager Rob Thompson's Perspective
Part 4/7:
Interestingly, Manager Rob Thompson's comments on the expectations surrounding the team may have glossed over the depths of the issues. His insistence that the randomness of baseball contributes to the team's struggles can feel dismissive, particularly to fans witnessing the failure of the team to capitalize on runners in scoring position. Thompson highlighted hard contact but seemed to sidestep accountability for not executing basic fundamentals, such as situational hitting.
Missed Opportunities in Key Moments
Part 5/7:
A detailed inning-by-inning breakdown highlights missed opportunities that have become all too common for the Phillies. In critical situations with the bases loaded, the team's failure to drive in runs reflected a lack of planning and execution. For instance, during the second inning, a weak fly out left the team stranded, while later phases of the game demonstrated similar failures despite having chances to capitalize on leads or runners in scoring position.
Should We Expect Improvement?
Part 6/7:
Looking ahead, the panelists on the show expressed skepticism about the team's ability to rebound, particularly against stronger competition. While some believe easier wins are possible against lesser teams, the overarching sense is that this current roster lacks the spark needed to compete meaningfully at higher levels.
A Shift in Focus: The Eagles and Draft Night
As the frustration with the Phillies reaches a boiling point, attention is slowly shifting towards the NFL draft and the Philadelphia Eagles. The conversation naturally pivots, and though the Eagles’ position and potential moves in the draft remains uncertain, there is a shred of excitement in exploring new talent.
Conclusion
Part 7/7:
In grappling with the state of Philadelphia's franchises, the Phillies' disconcerting performance and missed opportunities raise weighty questions about their season's trajectory. While fans are urged to remain hopeful, events on the field suggest deeper issues might require resolution. As the Eagles prepare for their draft and sports fans' attention turns, the immediate outlook for the Phillies feels filled with uncertainty.
!summarize #meghanmarkle #interview
Part 1/6:
The Impact of Meghan Markle at the Time 100 Gala
Meghan Markle continues to be a hot topic of conversation, especially in light of her upcoming appearance at the Time 100 gala. The event, which is branded as a celebration of the 100 most influential people in the world, has raised eyebrows regarding the selection process and the relevance of its honorees.
The host, who shared his own experience of being on the list back in 2014, expressed skepticism about the credibility of the event. He suggested that Meghan's inclusion on the list serves more as a publicity stunt than a genuine acknowledgment of influence. Despite the reservations, he plans to attend the gala, motivated in part by the opportunity to encounter not only Markle but also Blake Lively, another celebrity guest.
Part 2/6:
The Anticipated Dinner with Meghan Markle
The host humorously mentioned dinner plans with Markle, using this anticipation as a way to draw interest. While he acknowledges that the event is not as important to him now as it once was, the chance to be photographed alongside Markle is enticing. He expressed a desire to capture a moment that might go viral, which speaks to the idea of celebrity culture and its impact on public perception.
Meghan Markle's Self-Presentation
Part 3/6:
In discussing Markle’s recent interview with Time magazine’s CEO, the host pointed out her tendency to present herself in grand terms. She referred to herself as a "founder," "CEO," "creator," and "innovator," indicating a self-promotional approach. This led to a larger commentary about the nature of self-care and identity, especially in the context of her high-profile life. Markle’s responses often seemed to pivot towards her own experiences and needs, illustrating a focus on her narrative.
The Portrayal of Self-Care
Part 4/6:
Markle’s remarks about self-care were intertwined with her perception of growing influence. The host reflected on her comments about nurturing others while also seeking personal fulfillment, suggesting a potential disconnect between her stated goals and the reality of her privileged existence. His criticism drew attention to a recurring theme in Markle’s public persona: the challenge of authenticity within a highly curated image.
A Critical Take on Influencer Culture
Part 5/6:
The exchange at the gala is emblematic of broader societal perceptions surrounding celebrity and influence. The host's skepticism about the way influence is awarded speaks to a larger conversation about meritocracy in public life. This event has become a stage not only for celebrating apparent influencers but also for critiquing the very premise of what it means to be influential in today’s world.
Conclusion: The Modern Landscape of Influence
Part 6/6:
As the host prepares to rub shoulders with some of the most visible figures in the entertainment and media industries, questions surrounding the legitimacy of influence and personal branding remain at the forefront. Events like the Time 100 gala symbolize a confluence of celebrity culture, personal identity, and societal values, forcing an ongoing examination of what it truly means to be influential.
With celebrities like Meghan Markle, the nuances of personal narrative versus public portrayal offer fertile ground for both admiration and critique, paving the way for an increasingly complex landscape of influence in the modern era.
!summarize #abregogarcia #democrats #politics
Part 1/8:
Shifting Perspectives on Tariffs: A Deep Dive into Current Polling Trends
The conversation surrounding tariffs has veered significantly in political discourse recently, largely influenced by polling data. The administration and its allies are adapting their rhetoric, urging a reframing of tariffs not as permanent punitive measures, but rather as part of a broader strategy aimed at revitalizing the American economy. With public sentiment largely negative toward current tariffs, there is a call for a strategic pivot in both messaging and policy.
Polling Figures Indicate Deteriorating Approval Ratings
Part 2/8:
Recent polling data, notably from Fox News, paints a concerning picture for the current administration regarding public perception of tariffs. As reported, the disapproval rate stands at 58%, with only about a third of registered voters expressing approval of the president's handling of tariffs. Similar results have emerged from Pew Research, suggesting a troubling trend in public sentiment that could affect the administration's broader support.
Tariffs as a Catalyst for Broader Disapproval
Part 3/8:
Experts suggest that the public's disillusionment with tariffs is contributing to a decline in approval ratings across multiple issues, particularly amongst independents. Critics argue that while the administration has used tariffs to rally nationalist sentiments, the negative economic impact—especially in the context of inflation—could be overshadowing other policy areas such as immigration.
Immigration and Tariffs: A Compounded Issue
Part 4/8:
One commentator highlighted the intertwining of tariff policies with immigration issues, suggesting that both areas of concern are likely to affect each other in the public eye. For instance, discussions about the potential return of certain Salvadoran individuals to the U.S. could complicate the narrative for Democrats, especially if it is perceived that supporting a controversial figure could backfire electorally. An awareness of such dynamics is critical for both parties as they strategize moving forward.
The Reality of Economic Policies
Part 5/8:
The current messaging shift emphasizes that tariffs are necessary and beneficial for the domestic economy, but critics remain skeptical about the reality of this stance. They argue that while the rhetoric suggests a positive intent in reshoring manufacturing and creating fairness, the real-world implications often manifest as increased inflation and corporate layoffs.
The Need for Consistent Messaging
Part 6/8:
One recurring theme in the discussion is the lack of consistent messaging surrounding tariffs and immigration policies. A political analyst emphasized that when framed correctly—such as focusing on the benefits of onshoring manufacturing—tariff measures could gain public support. However, the challenge lies in the abstract nature of these arguments, which might not resonate with voters if they perceive an imminent rise in prices.
Polling Integrity and Data Reception
Part 7/8:
Despite skepticism surrounding polling overall, commentators urged a recognition of the consistent trends emerging across various trusted sources. Whether observing Fox, Pew, or private polling, similar results reflect a significant disapproval of the administration's handling of tariffs. Dismissing these findings as "fake news" risks overlooking critical insights into public opinion and risks isolating oneself from factual discourse.
Conclusion: Navigating Future Policies
Part 8/8:
As the conversation around tariffs and associated economic policies continues to evolve, the current administration faces a dual challenge: shifting public perception while addressing genuine economic concerns prompted by previous policies. Without a clear, consistent, and empathetic narrative to guide public understanding, the potential for continued disapproval will likely loom large. As politicians and analysts alike consider their next moves, the intersection of tariffs and immigration policy remains a crucial battleground for influence and public support.
!summarize #canada #unitedstates #trump #deepstate
Part 1/10:
President Trump's Agenda: A Bold Stance on Trade and Health Policies
In a recent press conference, President Trump laid bare his administration's views on the long-standing economic ties with Canada, critiquing the current arrangement as inefficient and unwarranted. His comments have ignited heated discussions, drawing both support and ire from various quarters, revealing the contentious atmosphere surrounding U.S. international trade and health regulations.
Critique of Canadian Subsidies
Part 2/10:
On April 24th, President Trump emphasized the financial implications of U.S. support for the Canadian economy, particularly in the automotive sector. He argued: "Why are we spending 200 billion a year to keep another country afloat?" According to Trump, this subsidy serves no substantial purpose since the United States possesses all the resources and capabilities Canada offers.
Part 3/10:
He expressed frustration that for nearly half a century, this economic arrangement has remained largely unexamined, stating: "Nobody said the quiet part out loud." Calling into question the rationale behind such a subsidy, he underscored the fact that Canada is heavily reliant on U.S. markets, with 90% of its orders coming from the United States. Trump's unfiltered remarks suggest a departure from the status quo, raising questions about the motivations behind the ongoing economic relationship between the two neighboring nations.
Tariffs and Domestic Manufacturing
Part 4/10:
Trump's administration recently introduced a 25% universal tariff on imported autos, aluminum, and steel—a move applauded by American auto workers and the United Auto Workers Union as a catalyst for reviving domestic manufacturing. The initiative appears to be bearing fruit, with automakers like General Motors and Ford ramping up production in the United States in response to the tariffs.
Part 5/10:
While Wall Street analysts have expressed mixed feelings about the tariffs, workers seem to embrace the changes. Ford's "From America for America" campaign and Honda's considerations to shift production back to U.S. soil from Mexico and Canada highlight a significant trend emerging from these policies. As a countermeasure to the tariffs, Canada's Prime Minister has proposed a financial cushion for industries affected, suggesting the Canadian government will subsidize a portion of the losses incurred because of the tariffs. This staggering proposal underscores the dilemmas faced by Canada as it grapples with the shifting dynamics of U.S.-Canadian trade relations.
Groundbreakings in Food Safety Regulations
Part 6/10:
In addition to trade policies, major updates have been announced regarding health regulations. Trump's administration has declared an end to petroleum-based food dyes in the U.S. food supply, particularly for products marketed to children. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary's announcement emphasizes that by 2026, certain synthetic dyes will be phased out, a move prompted by studies linking these substances to health concerns, including ADHD.
Part 7/10:
Although this shift has the potential to improve child health outcomes, it did not escape the scrutiny of mainstream media, with CNN seemingly attempting to redirect the focus toward political lines rather than celebrating the advancement in public health policy. Despite attempts to challenge the integrity of the changes at the FDA, Dr. Makary defended the cuts as a necessary streamlining of bureaucratic processes without sacrificing staff vital to public health.
The Deep State's Reaction
Part 8/10:
Meanwhile, Jake Sullivan, National Security Advisor and a stalwart of the Biden administration, voiced his concerns over Trump's approach to foreign policy and governance. Appearing on MSNBC, Sullivan expressed worry that Trump's endeavors to dismantle what he referred to as the "deep state" pose a significant threat to America's global standing. Specifically, he emphasized the risk of disrupting key alliances, stunting innovation, and undermining the rule of law, alarms that echo the broader sentiments within liberal circles regarding Trump's bold approaches.
Sullivan's animated defense reveals anxiety among those entrenched in the established political landscape about the transformative agenda pushed by Trump, suggesting that discontent is brewing among political elites.
Part 9/10:
A Divided Response
Trump's assertive posture on both trade and public health regulations has resulted in a divided response nationwide. Many support these initiatives as necessary corrections to long-standing trade imbalances and public health negligence. At the same time, critics fear that the potential repercussions on global diplomatic relations and domestic markets may catalyze adverse effects in the long run.
Part 10/10:
As the debate continues, it is clear that President Trump's administration is resolute in challenging established policies and seeking aggressive reforms. Whether these moves foster genuine progress for American interests or instigate deeper international strife remains to be seen. However, Trump's willingness to question the status quo has certainly transformed the dialogue surrounding U.S. trade, foreign relations, and health policies, igniting conversations that will likely continue to reverberate well into the future.
!summarize #megynkelly #60minutes #media #media #news
Part 1/9:
The Turmoil at 60 Minutes: A Deep Dive into Bill Owens' Exit
In a stunning turn of events, the long-standing news program 60 Minutes finds itself engulfed in controversy following the resignation of its executive producer, Bill Owens. After spending six years in the role, Owens has made headlines not only for stepping down but also for his fiery public complaints regarding perceived interference from network management in editorial decisions.
Part 2/9:
Owens' departure comes amidst a backdrop of significant changes at CBS and the ramifications of high-profile political events, including a massive lawsuit brought by Donald Trump against CBS and its parent company, Paramount, alleging deceptive editing in a critical interview. This ongoing drama raises questions about the journalistic integrity of 60 Minutes and its editorial direction under different leadership eras.
A Shift in Editorial Independence
Part 3/9:
For decades, 60 Minutes has prided itself on its editorial independence, which many believe has been a cornerstone of its success since its inception nearly 60 years ago. Owens, along with previous producers, such as Don Hewitt and Jeff Fager, have maintained that the program operated free from undue influence. However, as Owens stated in a leaked goodbye memo, the landscape appears to have shifted under the current corporate regime, leading him to conclude that he could not effectively lead the program moving forward.
Part 4/9:
Owens’ resignation highlights a deeper rift within 60 Minutes about the boundaries between corporate oversight and journalistic freedom. He contends that recent pressures from management to conform to specific editorial standards have compromised the show’s integrity. His resignation is a stark indication that even storied institutions are not immune to the evolving dynamics of media ownership and political influence.
Controversial Coverage and Alleged Bias
Part 5/9:
Owens’ tenure has not been without its share of controversial moments. Critics have pointed out that during his leadership, 60 Minutes reportedly shifted its narrative alignment towards a more progressive viewpoint. A particularly notable example occurred during a 2020 interview involving Donald Trump and Leslie Stahl, where Trump accused the program of failing to cover significant allegations regarding Hunter Biden's laptop effectively.
This pattern of perceived bias continued with 60 Minutes' later coverage, including unflattering portrayals of Republican political figures and topics such as climate change. For example, the program's framing of the climate crisis in early 2023 parallels alarmist warnings from decades prior without acknowledging the accuracy of those earlier predictions.
Part 6/9:
Political Ramifications
Owens' resignation coincides with Trump’s ongoing legal battles and broader discussions about media bias. Trump's lawsuit against CBS not only alleges unlawful behavior in handling interviews but also reflects a long-standing narrative that mainstream media has failed to offer balanced coverage, often favoring Democratic narratives. Critics argue that this perception of bias is exacerbated by the recent shifts in the programming and focus areas of 60 Minutes itself.
Part 7/9:
In reporting on various political issues, many believe 60 Minutes has fallen short of delivering fair and balanced journalism. The program has been criticized for its slanted coverage of major political figures, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, while also ignoring significant electoral controversies.
The Fallout
With Owens stepping aside, some within 60 Minutes have expressed concern and dismay, acknowledging the difficult position he faced. Described as a steadfast advocate for journalistic integrity, he reportedly displayed emotional distress over the changes he believed to be undermining the show’s foundational principles.
Part 8/9:
Owens’ resignation acts as both a protest and a poignant acknowledgment of the current environment in which corporate interests may overshadow journalistic endeavors. As networks like CBS maneuver for profit and influence, the risk remains that they might prioritize short-term gains over long-standing commitments to credible journalism.
A Call for Reflection
In light of these recent developments, questions arise about the future of 60 Minutes. There are calls from various factions to reassess not only the program’s editorial direction but also the personnel staffing its newsrooms. For critics, the broader lesson is about media institutions that may have drifted from their original mission in pursuit of corporate interests.
Part 9/9:
If CBS aims to preserve the legacy and influence of 60 Minutes, it might be time to reevaluate the content direction and return to the critical and investigative journalism that has long defined the series. Only through bold decisions and a renewed commitment to integrity can the program hope to regain the respect and trust of its audience.
The exit of Bill Owens serves as a wake-up call for 60 Minutes and its affiliated entities. The critical nature of this moment is not simply about one man’s leadership but a pivotal opportunity for reflection on the very essence of journalistic practice in today's media landscape. Only time will tell if 60 Minutes can regain its footing and emerge from this turmoil revitalized and re-focused on the truth.
!summarize #china #ccp #stpaul #minnesota
Part 1/9:
A Closer Look at CCP Operations in St. Paul, Minnesota
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has reportedly been operating clandestinely within the U.S., specifically within Minnesota's capital city, St. Paul. Recent investigations have unveiled a network of influence and operations that many believe are detrimental to U.S. political integrity and sovereignty.
The Journey into St. Paul’s Shadows
Part 2/9:
The unveiling of this covert operation began with a viral news article published by the Breitbart News Foundation and the Government Accountability Institute. It detailed the various functions of a specific building located on North Eustace Street in St. Paul that is allegedly serving as a front for the CCP. According to the investigation, the building is a hub for CCP operatives to engage with American politicians, including Minnesota’s Governor Tim Walz, and is involved in providing services to Chinese Americans loyal to Beijing.
Part 3/9:
Events held in this building reportedly include meetings with CCP diplomats and dignitaries, casting a dark shadow over its legitimate operations. Even more concerning is the mention that businesses housed at this location have received substantial taxpayer-funded grants, raising eyebrows over possible misuse of public funds.
An On-Site Investigation
Taking the claims seriously, an investigative team, under the guidance of Minnesota native Alan Shen, set out to explore the building themselves. Shen, a veteran and vocal critic of the CCP's influence, expressed his concerns about parallels he sees between the current political climate in Minnesota and the historical oppression experienced during Mao's cultural revolution in China.
Part 4/9:
As they arrived at the location, the investigators certainly noticed an atmosphere of opacity. The teams were greeted by scant interactions and a lack of presence inside the facility. The adult daycare center, which is one of the primary fronts described in the investigation, seemed to operate under a shroud of secrecy, with many unanswered questions lingering in the air.
Questions Left Unanswered
Part 5/9:
Engaging with representatives present, the investigators sought clarity regarding the operations within the building and its perceived links to the CCP. Though they were told that the space was indeed an adult daycare, there remained doubts due to another organization, HTL International Corporation, sharing the same address. As described by the Breitbart investigation, HTL International is a questionable entity purportedly involved in logistics and transportation of hazardous materials, including those associated with military projects—activities that raise numerous safety and ethical concerns.
Part 6/9:
When pressed for information, representatives showed reluctance to engage further and seemed protective over the information shared about the business operations, further inciting curiosity as to what truly operates behind the scenes. The notion of “harassment” was mentioned, which appeared to be an overreach, especially given the circumstances and the climate of openness that communities often strive for.
A Lockdown on Transparency
Part 7/9:
Following the visit, it was noted that the doors to the adult daycare center are now kept locked, suggesting that the earlier inquiries may have raised concerns internally. Additionally, attempts to contact Governor Walz regarding the allegations and the operational legitimacy of the businesses involved yielded no response, which may indicate an unwillingness to delve deeper into this contentious subject.
The Implications of the Findings
These findings spur critical discussions about foreign influence and the potential repercussions of such networks within American localities. The latent concerns surrounding the CCP's "united front" strategy raise big questions about national security and political integrity in Minnesota and beyond.
Part 8/9:
As more information comes to light regarding the activities housed in St. Paul, public interest and scrutiny are likely to grow. The investigation showcases a deepening narrative about the intersection of local and international relations, urging communities to remain vigilant and informed about who they associate with and how external influences can reshape local dynamics.
Conclusion
The unfolding investigation into CCP operations in St. Paul serves as a stark reminder of the complexities of global interactions at the local level. As this story develops, it remains crucial to engage in conversations surrounding transparency, accountability, and the influence of foreign entities within American soil.
Part 9/9:
The next steps for the residents and stakeholders in Minnesota will likely focus on advocacy for greater scrutiny and transparency regarding foreign involvement in local matters, a trend that could shape the political landscape for years to come.
!summarize #house #realestate #buying
Part 1/9:
How to Quickly Evaluate a House: A Five-Minute Guide
When faced with the challenge of house hunting, many prospective buyers often wonder how to determine if a property is worth their time and investment. With countless listings available, sifting through endless options can be daunting. However, experienced home inspectors reveal that you can get a solid indication of a house's condition in just five minutes. Here’s a concise guide to evaluating a property swiftly, focusing on key elements to look for upon inspection.
Pre-Inspection Research: Check Flood Zones
Part 2/9:
Before physically visiting a property, start with an online search through the FEMA website to ascertain whether the house is situated in a flood zone. Knowing this can save you time and potential financial headaches; flood insurance can drastically increase costs, particularly in states like Florida. Understanding the insurance implications before even setting foot on the property is a valuable first step.
Neighborhood Assessment: Get a Feel for the Area
Part 3/9:
Once you arrive in the vicinity of the property, the first step is to gauge the neighborhood's vibe. Spend some time driving around; observe the condition of neighboring homes, cleanliness, and any factors that might contribute to noise or unpleasant odors. A neglected neighborhood can signal future problems with your prospective house.
Curb Appeal: First Impressions Matter
Upon pulling into the driveway of the home, take a few moments to assess its curb appeal. Is the lawn well-kept? Are there cracks in the driveway or along the walkways? The state of the exterior can offer important clues about the overall care and maintenance of the house.
Tree Considerations: Potential Hazards
Part 4/9:
Pay particular attention to any large trees on the property—especially ancient oaks. Their roots can be intrusive, potentially damaging both the foundation and sewer systems. Inspecting for overhanging branches is crucial, as they can pose a direct risk during storms.
Moving to the Roof: Stability Indicators
Next, focus on the roof before exiting the vehicle. Look for signs of sagging, missing shingles, or cracking. Roof issues are among the more costly repairs a homeowner might face, and recognizing these problems early can save you significant money down the line.
Exterior Walkaround: Structural Integrity
Part 5/9:
After exiting the car, proceed to conduct an exterior inspection. This includes checking the gutters to ensure they are freshly sloped, as poorly managed drainage can lead to water buildup and costly damage. Just as important is the grading around the home; the property should slope away from the foundation, channeling water away during heavy rains.
Foundation Checks: Cracking and Settling Issues
As you continue your walk, keep your eyes peeled for any foundation cracks. Horizontal cracks are often indicative of serious settlement issues. Being aware of local sinkhole activity is also prudent, as signs of instability in the landscape can foreshadow challenges ahead.
Windows and Doors: Energy Efficiency and Cost Implications
Part 6/9:
Inspect the condition of windows and doors: Are they energy efficient or in need of replacement? Pay attention to any issues such as rot or the presence of two-prong outlets, which might signal electrical concerns.
Inside the House: A Quick Introduction to Quality of Living
Once inside, your inspection continues by checking doors and hardware for proper function and alignment. Strong sensory cues, like odors, can signal underlying issues such as mold or water damage.
Ceilings and Flooring: Signs of Leaks and Damage
Part 7/9:
While moving about the space, give special attention to the ceilings for stains or cracks, which may indicate past leaks. Traverse each room strategically—walking the perimeter before crossing the center—to assess flooring integrity and identify any signs of soft spots or creaks.
Electrical Panel: A Critical Safety Check
Next, check the electrical panel. Note its age and condition, and look for any brand-specific concerns—old panels can often mean the entire electrical system may need an upgrade.
Mechanical Systems Check: HVAC Components
Lastly, pay a visit to the air conditioning unit. Look for signs of rust, age, or odd noises during operation. Understanding the condition of the HVAC system is essential early in your evaluation.
Part 8/9:
The Bonus Tip: Structural Material Matters
Before concluding your inspection, ponder the house’s construction type. In Florida, opting for a block home is generally preferable to a wood-framed house due to the latter's susceptibility to termite damage. Knowing the construction style can define your future inspection strategy, including the need for dedicated pest inspections.
Conclusion: Efficient Evaluations Save Time and Money
Part 9/9:
By following these steps, you can effectively gauge a property's worth and condition within a matter of minutes, preventing you from wasting time on houses that don’t meet your standards. Whether you’re an experienced buyer or a first-timer, having a systematic approach can be incredibly beneficial. If any of these steps raise questions or concerns about a specific property, it’s worthwhile to consult with a professional inspector.
This process doesn’t just streamline house hunting; it fosters informed decision-making that could save you thousands in the long run. If you have questions or would like assistance with a specific property, don't hesitate to reach out—experts can provide invaluable insights that enhance your buying experience.
!summarize #china #automtoive #ev
Part 1/9:
The Future of China's EV Unicorns: Neo, Xpeng, and Li Auto
The electric vehicle (EV) market in China is dynamic and rapidly changing, characterized by intense competition and high stakes. Among the notable players in this market are three companies often referred to as the "golden three unicorns": Neo, Xpeng, and Li Auto. Recent commentary from industry analysts suggests an urgent and bleak outlook for these companies, raising questions about their ability to survive the impending consolidation of the automotive landscape.
The Grim Forecast
Part 2/9:
Recent analyses from automotive experts indicate a stark reality: the probability of Neo, Xpeng, and Li Auto surviving independently over the next three years is perceived as zero. This grim prediction reflects the overwhelming number of automotive manufacturers in China—estimated to be around a hundred—leading to speculations that within a decade, only five to seven major players may remain. This forecast hints at potential mass bankruptcies in the industry, resulting in what can be described as a bloodbath.
Part 3/9:
Xpeng's CEO has echoed this sentiment during a recent global launch, reinforcing the notion that the industry cannot sustain such a vast array of companies competing for survival. His comment signals the recognition of a fundamental shift that may reshape the entire automotive sector in China.
Analysis from Industry Experts
Part 4/9:
During a panel discussion on automotive market trends, Professor Zuo Xiaokun from Tongji University highlighted the urgent need for these electric vehicle startups to either merge or restructure to remain viable. His analysis suggests that any EV maker selling fewer than two million vehicles annually is unlikely to survive due to the exorbitant costs associated with research and development (R&D). As a result, companies with low sales volumes can't maintain the necessary investment in innovation, leading to stagnation and potential collapse.
This perspective aligns with the sentiment that many traditional automotive brands, such as Mazda and Subaru, are also hovering around the one million sales mark, putting them at risk in the competitive EV environment.
The Competitive Landscape
Part 5/9:
Within this challenging context, the three unicorns face intensifying competition not only from one another but also from established giants like BYD, whose dominance poses a significant threat to smaller entities. Another factor complicating the landscape is the perception of brand reliability and market viability, as observed with Xiaomi's recent success with its automotive offerings. Consumers are inclined to favor brands perceived as stable, which may ultimately impact their choices in the fast-evolving EV sector.
Meanwhile, status-driven purchases have driven sales for global brands such as Tesla, illustrating that consumer behavior is often influenced by brand perception, not just product performance.
Future Paths and Potential Consolidation
Part 6/9:
The panel concluded that, to survive, these three unicorns must either seriously consider consolidation or reinvent their technological edge. Without collaboration or innovative breakthroughs, they could face extinction in an already challenging market environment. The collective sentiment from the discussion underscores the urgency for these companies to act quickly if they want to survive the impending consolidation.
Part 7/9:
While some experts advocate for the merging of these companies, there is room for debate. While consolidation may seem like a viable solution, it raises questions about innovation, brand identity, and consumer trust. Each of the unicorns has unique strengths and capabilities that, if properly leveraged, may allow them to carve out a sustainable niche in this competitive ecosystem.
The Primary Challenges Ahead
Among the companies, Neo appears to be facing the steepest uphill battle, as its current losses have continued to grow quarterly, positioning it precariously compared to the performance of its competitors. Xpeng and Li Auto have shown more promising growth trends and are inching closer to profitability, leaving them in a more favorable position moving forward.
Part 8/9:
The Role of Technology and Automation
As the automotive landscape continues to evolve, advancements in automated manufacturing and autonomous driving technology could revolutionize the sector. If companies can successfully lower their manufacturing costs through automation, a viable business model could emerge, even for companies with lower sales figures.
Conclusion
Part 9/9:
The outlook for China's EV unicorns—Neo, Xpeng, and Li Auto—remains highly uncertain, with analysts predicting a harsh market environment characterized by consolidation and possible extinction for some. While experts agree that there are too many players in the market, the path forward is still convoluted and requires strategic decisions regarding mergers, technological innovations, and a reevaluation of consumer perceptions.
In the coming years, the landscape of China's automotive industry could look dramatically different, but whether these unicorns can adapt and thrive amidst the upheaval remains to be seen. It’s a pivotal moment for these companies to redefine their strategies and find a way to survive in an increasingly competitive and challenging market.
!summarize #education #universitites #executiveorders #accredidation
Part 1/8:
Trump’s Executive Orders on Education: A Deep Dive
On a recent day shrouded in minimal media coverage, President Trump took significant action in the realm of education. He signed several executive orders that, while overshadowed by his ongoing battles with prestigious institutions like Harvard and other Ivy League schools, nonetheless warrant attention for their implications on the educational landscape.
The Focus on Accreditation
Part 2/8:
The standout executive order centered around the topic of accreditation—an essential component in determining how educational institutions qualify for federal funding. Sean, a commentator, highlighted the importance of this initiative, describing accreditation as a "gateway drug to federal funding." This approach diverges from merely attacking Ivy League schools on surface-level issues and instead aims at reforming the accreditation system itself.
It appears that the administration is taking a more methodical and strategic approach to overhaul the education structure. This perspective implies that rather than attacking the schools outright, the administration is targeting the very core that allows these institutions access to federal funding.
The Potential Goals of the Orders
Part 3/8:
The overarching question remains: what is the ultimate goal of these orders? Critics have pointed out that if the intention is to penalize Ivy League schools only, it may lead to distorted messaging. Secretary Linda McMahon, while discussing these accreditation changes, stated that they aim to "hold schools accountable" to enhance graduation rates and graduates’ performance in the labor market. However, many argue that Ivy League institutions already excel in these areas, producing competent graduates who perform well professionally.
Accountability for Less Esteemed Institutions
Part 4/8:
The real crux of the issue may reside in the accountability of other colleges that do not provide satisfactory returns for the debts accumulated by students. If the focus shifts toward ensuring that institutions genuinely serve students and do not lead them into crippling debt for low-quality education, then this initiative may indeed serve a purpose. In this manner, the push for accountability could benefit working-class individuals, who often find themselves ensnared in cycles of debt without significant career advancement.
Part 5/8:
However, if the administration attempts to argue that prestigious institutions like Harvard are not effectively preparing students for the labor market, the public response may lean toward ridicule. Public opinion might view such assertions as misdirected and lacking credibility, thus affecting the administration’s narrative.
The Larger Education Context
A critical aspect of these developments lies in the broader educational context in which they unfold. Many graduates leave institutions with substantial debt—sometimes as high as $95,000—only to find that their degrees do not guarantee job placement or financial return. This reality creates significant challenges, regardless of the institution's reputation.
Part 6/8:
It raises the question of whether the proposed initiatives will effectively target failing institutions or merely serve as political posturing against the Ivy League elite. Should the administration truly focus on enhancing accountability across the board, it may facilitate a healthier educational environment for students of every socioeconomic background.
Conclusion
Part 7/8:
In summary, President Trump’s recent executive orders on education, especially concerning accreditation, invite a complex debate on the efficacy of American higher education. While on one hand, there is an opportunity to address accountability within poorly performing institutions, on the other lies the risk of misdirected rhetoric aimed at prestigious schools without a solid basis. As these policies are rolled out, their impacts will be closely observed and critiqued by educators, students, and the public alike. The education agenda has the potential to shift significantly, but whether these initiatives are implemented effectively remains to be seen.
Part 8/8:
Stay Tuned: For further discussions and updates on these developments, be sure to subscribe to our channels for insights and analyses that keep you informed on crucial topics like these.
!summarize #rachelzegler #thefamilyguy #snowwhite #hollywood
Part 1/11:
Disney's Recent Struggles: A Satirical Roast from Family Guy and South Park
Disney, the entertainment juggernaut that has captured the hearts of audiences for generations, is facing immense scrutiny as it navigates the complexities of modern rebranding. Recently, the animated series Family Guy took direct aim at Disney’s actions—particularly its rebranding of classic tales like Snow White. This criticism is not merely surface-level ridicule; it embodies a brewing discontent among audiences towards what many perceive as forced reinventions and corporate messaging under the guise of modern representation.
The Punchline: Family Guy's Savagery
Part 2/11:
In a particularly biting scene from Family Guy, Peter Griffin strolls confused through Disneyland, where the roller coaster hilariously bears the label “Disney Stock”—a not-so-subtle jab at the company’s declining market position. The show cleverly encapsulates how audiences are feeling about the constant alterations to beloved characters and stories, making a mockery of the chaotic landscape that Disney has created through its recent offerings.
Part 3/11:
With Peter uttering, “What is everything?” the show echoes the growing sentiment that viewers are exhausted by the barrage of redefined identities and storylines in a rapidly changing cultural climate. The gag strikes home as the laughter it draws stems from genuine frustration—an acknowledgment that the essence of storytelling appears lost in the corporate landscape.
South Park: The Nuke
Part 4/11:
However, Family Guy was not the first to launch an offensive against Disney. South Park had set the comedic stage earlier, even constructing a whole episode titled “Joining the Pandaverse,” to dissect Disney's recent reboot strategies. Diving straight into the fray, the episode features a satirical version of Kathleen Kennedy, a key player at Disney, wielding the fictional “Panderstone.” This narrative exposes the absurdity of inserting diverse characters regardless of the context, shaking the very fundamentals of storytelling and character development.
Part 5/11:
The episode culminates with a viral line that lampoons Disney’s formulaic approach: “Put a chick in it, and make her gay.” The lack of authenticity in this methodology resonates deeply with audiences who feel oversaturated with corporate homogenization in entertainment.
Backlash Against Rachel Zegler
Part 6/11:
At the center of this ongoing criticism is actress Rachel Zegler, whose involvement in Disney's Snow White reboot has made her a lightning rod for online backlash. Following the film’s massive financial losses—estimated at nearly $200 million—Zegler found herself facing the wrath of a disenchanted audience. This is not merely a consequence of a poor performance; it reflects a larger frustration with casting decisions that seem divorced from traditional representations, as well as a perceived disrespect towards the source material.
Part 7/11:
Her short-lived moment attempting to promote the film—a TikTok of her entering a nearly empty theater—became a tragic symbol of the film’s failure and the audience's disengagement. Comments surrounding her casting as a Latina actress in a role originally described as having "skin as white as snow" fueled reservations and contentious debates about representation and authenticity in storytelling.
Political Ramifications and Divided Allegiances
Part 8/11:
Zegler's journey took a political turn, supporting Palestine amid international conflicts, which only further polarized the discourse around her. Mired in issues far beyond the realm of entertainment, the actress’s comments and associations became focal points for critics eager to undermine the reimagining of Snow White. The intertwining of political views with the reception of her work exemplifies how personal controversies can impact a public figure's career, especially within an industry as sensitive as Hollywood.
Part 9/11:
As Disney navigates these turbulent waters, further financial missteps have led the company to reconsider its trajectory regarding high-budget remakes. Rumors have surfaced regarding a live-action adaptation of Tangled, another costly endeavor under Zegler’s name, raising eyebrows among fans who fear a repeat of past failures.
The Eroding Trust in Disney
Overall, Disney’s branding troubles reflect a wider issue—a disconnection from the audience that once revered its storytelling prowess. As animated critiques from Family Guy and South Park spotlight the company's faltering integrity, it’s clear that the emotional resonance of Disney's products is becoming overshadowed by a focus on marketing juggernauts rather than the emotional core of the stories themselves.
Part 10/11:
If the trend continues, with even The Simpsons, a long-reigning powerhouse of satire under the Disney umbrella, potentially taking shots at their parent company, the repercussions could signal a significant shift in the affection once held for Disney's legacy. As the cultural tide turns, the conversation is less about isolated failures and more about a systemic erosion of trust—an industry-wide signal that audiences want to see authentic storytelling rather than a formulaic rehash of the past cloaked in modernity.
Part 11/11:
As the final ciphers in this saga unfold, many are left wondering: what will the next satirical jab look like, and will it represent a serious call to action for Disney to rethink its narrative strategy? The stakes are high, and only time will tell if Disney can navigate this modern landscape without losing the legacy they’ve built over nearly a century.
!summarize #california #benaffleck #industry #movies #hollywood
Part 1/8:
The Changing Landscape of Hollywood: Insights from Ben Affleck and Industry Experts
In a recent discussion, Ben Affleck shared his thoughts on the shifting dynamics of the film industry, particularly regarding California's role as a filming hub. His comments come at a time when states like Georgia, Texas, Louisiana, and even countries like England are aggressively offering tax incentives to attract filmmakers. This has sparked a broader conversation about the future of California—once the epicenter of filmmaking—and how filmmakers are navigating new options.
California's Industry Dependency
Part 2/8:
Affleck pointed out that California may have taken its status in the film industry for granted. Despite a recent increase in tax rebates from the state's current governor, he argued that California's offerings still do not compare favorably to incentives available in other regions. As a result, many filmmakers are now opting to shoot their projects elsewhere, leading to a significant exodus of talent and resources.
Affleck’s remarks highlight the economic benefits that the movie industry brings, not just to the state where it operates, but to the entire economy. States and countries vying for production work recognize this benefit and have tailored incentives to attract productions, particularly large-scale films.
A Broader Trend: Relocation of Productions
Part 3/8:
The implications of Affleck's comments were further explored by industry experts who chimed in on how financial motivations can dictate film production decisions. For instance, Rob Lowe mentioned that it is now financially more feasible to transport a production crew to countries like Ireland rather than shooting at local studios in California. This drastic shift illustrates a concerning trend for the future of Hollywood, particularly as production relocation becomes the norm rather than the exception.
Part 4/8:
Participants in the conversation also shared personal anecdotes, underlining their experiences with various filming locations. Many felt that the allure of Hollywood has diminished as production studios seek lower costs and fewer regulations. As Tom pointed out, if environments become oppressive with regulations and hefty taxes, filmmakers naturally seek more inviting locales.
The Decline of Hollywood's Monopoly
Part 5/8:
Recent statistics presented in the discussion show that Film LA reported a 58% decline in annual production from 2021 to 2024. This decline marks a notable waning of Hollywood's historically tight grip on the film industry. The emergence of platforms like Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, and even social media have opened up varied pathways for filmmakers, allowing for new narratives that no longer require a Hollywood backdrop.
This evolving environment represents a messy but necessary democratic shift in the industry. The potential for competition provides filmmakers with a sense of agency and choice, where they can pursue the most appealing opportunities without feeling tethered to traditional hubs like Hollywood.
Leadership Challenges in California
Part 6/8:
California's current leadership was under intense scrutiny during the conversation. Participants unanimously agreed that decisions made by the state's government led to an untenable situation—the combination of high taxes, increasing crime, and pervasive homelessness has diluted the appeal of Hollywood. Instead of being the epitome of creative brilliance, California is now being likened to a struggling city, with comparisons made to Detroit's decline.
The implications extend beyond the film industry alone, as other sectors and creative talents may also feel the pull to relocate to more favorable environments—an exodus that could have long-lasting effects on California's economy and cultural identity.
Cultural and Economic Backlash
Part 7/8:
As industry veterans share their experiences, it is evident that the cultural narrative surrounding Hollywood is undergoing a significant transformation. Actors like Vince Vaughn have come under fire for their political choices, prompting conversations about the un-American nature of shaming individuals for their political affiliations.
This notion of freedom—both personal and professional—resonates throughout the conversation. Filmmakers are increasingly feeling empowered to make choices that best suit their careers and personal lives, igniting broader discussions about the responsibilities of artists and industries in serving their communities.
Conclusion: A New Era for Filmmaking
Part 8/8:
The future of Hollywood may be uncertain, but the evolving landscape reveals a dynamic and adaptable film industry. As filmmakers continue to explore new territories fueled by financial incentives and creative freedom, the essence of storytelling remains resilient.
While California may have lost its once-unmatched allure, the film industry will undoubtedly continue to thrive—whether on the streets of Texas, in the hills of New Mexico, or across the ocean in the scenic locales of Europe. As industry giants like Affleck speak out, they pave the way for a new generation of filmmakers ready to embrace change and harness opportunities outside the traditional confines of Hollywood.
The study mentions that the early alligators were a lot smaller than the other crocodilians that co-existed. They began to increase in size a lot later – around 34 million years ago – after the competition ended.
However, while it was alive, the Deinosuchus would have been an absolute monster even among its distant relatives.
There are records of other giant crocodiles existing, some as close as the 19th century, suggesting that massive size is the norm, rather than the exception.
!summarize #direwolf #genetics #extinction #ai
Part 1/10:
A Rollercoaster Week in Deextinction: Lessons from Launch to Backlash
In the world of scientific innovation, nothing can quite prepare one for the unexpected twists and turns that accompany a groundbreaking launch. This past week showcased the unpredictable nature of media, public perception, and scientific discourse when an anticipated launch turned into a frenzied race against time and expectations.
The Planned Launch – Monday Madness
Part 2/10:
Initially scheduled for a Tuesday launch, the team behind a revolutionary deextinction project opted to unveil their findings a day early due to strategic decisions mixed with excitement. This decision hinged on extensive groundwork laid over the previous months, where the team had invested hundreds of hours collaborating with prominent media outlets such as Time Magazine, The New Yorker, and Rolling Stone to ensure proper understanding and coverage of their scientific achievements.
Part 3/10:
Leading up to the launch, the team made the considerable effort to relocate wolves to a secure site, a measure taken to combat skepticism in a world inundated with AI-generated imagery. By enlisting the American Humane Society for oversight, they ensured ethical practices during the process. They provided journalists with nine handouts and an 11-page press release, confident that they had sufficiently prepared their audience for the narrative they hoped to share.
However, just before the team could execute their carefully laid plans, the cover story of The New Yorker broke, irrevocably altering the trajectory of their week.
The Immediate Aftermath – A Viral Explosion
Part 4/10:
On Monday morning, as the team scrambled to catch up with the unexpected media frenzy, the chaotic rush set off a chain reaction. Journalists and media outlets that had been promised exclusive access were blindsided by the news. Phone calls flooded in from familiar media contacts, anxious to share the scoop that had just gone public.
As the website launched ahead of plan, social media erupted. Observers rushed to dissect the contents, only to realize that key scientific papers had yet to be disseminated. The team, initially excited about exposure, now found themselves grappling with the fallout of their disrupted communications strategy.
Part 5/10:
Amid this maelstrom, the team held a conference call with their scientific advisors, only to face surprise and disappointment over the lack of early communication. The situation was exacerbated by their concerns about potential leaks, shifting the focus from enthusiasm to crisis management.
A Tangled Web of Scientific Discourse
Part 6/10:
Tuesday brought a barrage of academic backlash that echoed across social media platforms and cultural conversations. Critics were more focused on the philosophical discussion of species classification than on the practical advancements made, such as the novel non-invasive cloning technique developed that culminated in "the creation of three direwolves" and four critically endangered red wolves. Despite these monumental achievements, the news cycle didn't emphasize the urgency of conservation or the innovation’s context.
Part 7/10:
The discourse that followed revealed a deeper societal disconnect; rather than celebrating the progress made, conversations quickly devolved into debates over what it means to classify a species. Matters of taxonomy overshadowed the collective efforts to use technology to combat extinction, leaving the team grappling with a mixture of bewilderment and frustration.
Wider Implications – Institutional Involvement
Part 8/10:
As the week progressed, the project hit another snag: discussions within the US cabinet brought renewed scrutiny to the deextinction conversation. Comments made by members, particularly Secretary of the Interior, sparked concerns regarding the misuse of technology as a stopgap for the larger issue of conservation. The notion that deextinction could somehow negate the significance of protecting existing endangered species painted a misleading narrative that the team had to clarify.
Part 9/10:
Yet through this tumultuous week, the conservation community expressed their cautious optimism about the transformative potential of these new technologies. It became clear that while public perception may waver, organizations focused on conservation saw value in the broader implications of the tools being developed.
A Long-Term Vision in a Chaotic Landscape
In the end, the whirlwind of one week served as a critical reminder of the broader timeline upon which the team had set its sights. Colossal, the organization behind the deextinction initiative, aims to think long-term, with a vision that spans decades rather than days. They recognize that in the rapidly evolving landscape of science and public discourse, maintaining a 50-year perspective is essential for success.
Part 10/10:
The ups and downs encountered during the launch are only two moments in an expansive journey toward conservation and innovation. Despite the chaos, the team remains dedicated to leveraging their resources to not only revive extinct species but to establish robust strategies for preserving those on the precipice of vanishing altogether.
While the lessons from this tumultuous week are many, the overarching lesson remains clear: in the world of conservation and scientific progress, navigating the intricate dance between public perception, media, and reality is as challenging as the endeavors themselves.
Insights into Ethereum from institutional traders.
Create a #threadcast focused on the impact of technology on mental health. Each thread in the threadcast should explore a different aspect, including examples, statistics, and practical advice. Use engaging language to captivate the audience, and encourage interaction by asking questions or prompting reflections at the end of the thread.
#askleo
#askleo
Sorry, I encountered an error processing your request. Please try again.
Create a #threadcast focused on the impact of technology on mental health. Each tweet in the thread should explore a different aspect, including examples, statistics, and practical advice. Use engaging language to captivate the audience, and encourage interaction by asking questions or prompting reflections at the end of the thread.
#askleo
Crypto-friendly policies are lifting Bitcoin higher—no more DeFi red tape. Is this the spark for mass adoption?
#askleo
Response to @khantaimur
The recent crypto-friendly policies do seem to be having a positive impact on Bitcoin's price. With less regulatory red tape, it's possible that we'll see increased mainstream adoption. However, it's also important to consider the role of other factors, such as institutional investment and technological advancements, in driving mass adoption.
What are your thoughts on how INLEO's blockchain-based social platform can contribute to this potential surge in crypto adoption?
May I #askleo, how many times did @bradleyarrow kissed @cathyarrow on his previous blog?
GainsHmmmmm
How much longer until people are paying for AI services with crypto tokens, instead of fiat currency? 🤔
LeoAi would be with the crypto payments.
Work relentlessly today. Allow recovery tomorrow. Embrace a forever-transformed life.
Monte uma tabela com o ano e o tempo de duração dos últimos cinco conclaves, incluindo o nome do papa eleito. #askleo
Conclaves Recentes
Aqui está uma tabela com os últimos cinco conclaves, incluindo o ano, duração e o nome do papa eleito:
Essa tabela resume os conclaves recentes, mostrando a brevidade com que os cardeais elegeram os papas nos últimos anos.
A duração dos conclaves pode variar significativamente, dependendo de vários fatores, incluindo a complexidade das questões a serem discutidas e o consenso entre os cardeais.
🧵/1
#threadstorm #outreach #superpower
Have you ever thought how your life would become if you get the ability to read people's mind seamlessly.
Do you consider the ability be a source of good or bad in your life and that of others?
🧵/2
I believe such an ability is going to be devastating for a person's peace of mind.
I would never want to acquire any power like that.
🧵/3
What if your partner has been acquiring such a power since the beginning of the relationship.
Read my perspective about this hypothetical scenario.
https://inleo.io/@amberkashif/the-relationship-would-continue-57o?referral=amberkashif
The worse is must by the flippy-di-flip
El Barcelona sigue siendo uno de los mejores equipos y por eso se mantiene en el primer puesto de la tabla.
Post en los comentarios
https://inleo.io/hive-189157/@davidpena21/barcelona-se-mantiene-invicto-en-la-liga-espeng--95f
Esperemos pueda ganar La copa del Rey.
Owning a fraction of shares in major companies lets investors participate without a high upfront cost. A small sum can secure a stake, making investing accessible to many. This approach provides a significant benefit for everyday investors.
#interesting despite ~ 0% gains in #gdp, #tax revenue is 11% higher, can this be rooted in the #inflation?
#askleo
post by @inleo-assistant:
Yes, the 11% increase in tax revenue despite 0% GDP growth can be linked to inflation.
As prices rise due to inflation, the nominal value of goods and services increases, leading to higher tax revenues.
This phenomenon is known as the "inflation tax" or "bracket creep," where taxpayers are pushed into higher tax brackets due to inflation, resulting in increased tax revenues for the government.
In this scenario, even if the real GDP (adjusted for inflation) remains stagnant, the nominal GDP (not adjusted for inflation) may still increase due to higher prices, leading to higher tax revenues.
It's essential to consider the impact of inflation on tax revenues and adjust for it to get a more accurate picture of the economy's performance.
For more information on how inflation affects tax revenues, you can visit the INLEO.IO documentation: https://docs.inleo.io/
Feel free to ask more questions or share your thoughts on this topic.
Haha darn journalist haven't consulted even @askrafiki - ridiculous
post by @inleo-assistant:
It seems like the journalist could have done more research before publishing their piece.
Consulting experts like
askrafikior even checking out the INLEO community knowledgebase could have provided more accurate information.What specific points do you think the journalist got wrong, @master-lamps?
They just reported despite now economic growth, taxes have increased and no one knew why
post by @inleo-assistant:
That's a great example of incomplete reporting.
The journalist highlighted the increase in taxes despite no economic growth, but failed to provide a plausible explanation, such as the effect of inflation on tax revenues.
It's like they presented a puzzle with a missing piece, leaving readers wondering what's going on.
Thanks for sharing, @master-lamps. Maybe we can help spread awareness about the potential impact of inflation on tax revenues.
#meme
!summarize
#tcy #launch #economics #thorchain
Part 1/10:
Understanding Cross-Chain Solutions: An In-Depth Look at TCY and the Maya Protocol
In the world of blockchain technology, the concept of cross-chain solutions has emerged as a beacon of hope for decentralized finance (DeFi) enthusiasts. One individual who has been at the forefront of this revolution is Alex, a co-founder of the Maya Protocol. His dedication to bringing redundancy and resilience into the cross-chain ecosystem not only underlines the importance of diverse solutions but also highlights his commitment to ensuring that users have alternatives in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Background and Motivation
Part 2/10:
Alex’s journey into the cross-chain space began four years ago when he and his co-founders decided to address the significant need for improved interoperability between various blockchain networks. Maya Protocol, a fork of Thorchain, emerged from a desire to create a collaborative ecosystem where redundancy is celebrated rather than viewed with skepticism. Today, with over $2 billion in historical swaps processed since its launch two years ago, Maya stands as testament to this vision.
What sets Alex apart from other developers in the blockchain space is his inherently humble approach. His belief system revolves around creating a decentralized alternative to monetary systems that often leave individuals vulnerable to the dictates of centralized powers.
Part 3/10:
This mindset can be attributed to Alex’s experiences as a Latin American, where he has witnessed first-hand the impact of centralization on economic stability and personal freedoms. Understanding how crucial it is to empower individuals rather than undermine them has driven his passion for ensuring decentralized, permissionless cross-chain transactions—an aspiration that would ultimately lead to the creation of the TCY token.
The TCY Token: A Response to Thorchain’s Challenges
Part 4/10:
The launch of the TCY token was conceived as a direct response to the turmoil faced by Thorchain and its users, notably Thorfi, when it reached an insolvency crisis. Alex explained in detail how Thorchain's issues arose from improper assumptions in its economic design, leading to a snowball effect of losses that impacted liquidity providers (LPs), savers, and lenders.
TCY was developed to provide a pathway for affected parties to reclaim equity while also instilling a longer-term vision of recovery and growth for Thorchain. Offering a claim on 10% of Thorchain’s revenue, the TCY token represents a potential lifeline for those impacted by the crisis.
The Proposal
Part 5/10:
The TCY proposal carries implications for fairness that extend beyond mere financial recovery. It aims to offer freedom of choice to holders, allowing them to exit when they feel it is best for them. Details of the protocol's functionality indicate that TCY will create upward buy pressure while giving them the autonomy to determine how they want to engage with their holdings.
Alex remarked, “It’s about creating systems that empower users to take control.” The mechanics built into TCY enable an ecosystem of accumulation, where unclaimed TCY, protocol-owned TCY, and swap fees constantly provide liquidity and incentivize growth.
Resilience Through Redundancy
Part 6/10:
Central to Alex's philosophy is the belief that no single solution should dominate the ecosystem. A diversified approach ensures resilience; just as a well-engineered aircraft benefits from multiple engines, so too does a permissionless economy require several working cross-chain solutions.
His involvement with TCY underscores his understanding that competition among protocols can yield better outcomes for all participants. The message is clear: redundancy isn’t wastefulness; it’s an essential part of building a robust financial infrastructure.
The Philosophy of Effective Altruism
Part 7/10:
During the conversation, the philosophical implications of Alex's work came into focus. He emphasized that while some participants may seek profit, others view the potential for technology as a means to create better futures. “We aren’t just in this for the money. We care about what happens next and how our solutions can bring about meaningful change,” he noted.
This perspective invites further discourse around the ethics of blockchain, urging individuals to reflect on why they engage with the technology in the first place.
The Role of TCY Moving Forward
Part 8/10:
As the launch of TCY approaches, the implications for Thorchain and Maya Protocol can vastly reshape user experiences and perceptions of decentralized finance. It's essential for potential stakeholders to grasp that TCY is more than just a financial instrument; it’s about revitalizing faith in an ecosystem and reminds us all of the principle of shared survival.
With transparency and a commitment to collaboration, Alex and his team invite all users and stakeholders to engage with TCY actively while taking heed of security measures as vulnerabilities may spike around launch.
Conclusion
Part 9/10:
As we stand on the cusp of a new chapter in cross-chain technology with TCY, one thing is abundantly clear: The journey toward decentralization and user empowerment is far from over. By fostering a space where diverse solutions thrive, individuals can reclaim control over their assets and enhance their broader economic freedom.
Part 10/10:
The importance of redundancy in a decentralized ecosystem cannot be overstated, and through initiatives like TCY and the Maya Protocol, there lies a hopeful promise of a future where economic instability is no longer an inevitability. Whether you are a seasoned investor, a developer, or a curious observer, the unfolding narrative of TCY is one that encapsulates the very essence of what the blockchain sphere aims to achieve: empowerment through choice, connectivity, and resilience.
😂
Asking #tesla 1/2 #cent #lolz
#askleo what's the meaning of the phrase: let sleeping dogs lie.
The phrase "let sleeping dogs lie" is a common idiom that means to leave a potentially contentious or problematic situation alone, rather than trying to revive or stir it up. It's often used to advise against bringing up a past conflict or issue that has been resolved or is no longer relevant, in order to avoid causing unnecessary trouble or tension. In other words, if something is not currently causing problems, it's best to just leave it alone and not risk stirring up trouble.
This phrase is thought to have originated from the idea that if you disturb a sleeping dog, it may wake up and become aggressive, causing problems that wouldn't have existed otherwise. So, it's a warning to be cautious and avoid provoking unnecessary conflict.
Good morning, good morning. The view shows that $AVA is performing strongly here. Meanwhile, $ARC appears to be making a final push, though it seems doomed to fail soon.
The project lacks the necessary metrics, community support, and technology, relying mostly on compensated influencers—an entirely inorganic approach.
It seems some holders shifted into $AVA during favorable conditions and then reverted back to $ARC after a flip.
This move could prove to be a significant error, as the arc/ava ratio is expected to dwindle further for those taking a broader perspective. Overall, the conversion is underway.
Once users explore $AVA and conduct their research, they are likely to become staunch supporters.
$AVAAI $NXPC
are you ready anon? #lolz #pepe #cent #meme #bbh #crypto
https://inleo.io/threads/view/dkid14/re-leothreads-2vxabti97
#gmfrens
It's Friday 25 April 2025
Today's #lbi asset backed value per token is:
1 LBI = $0.107 USD = 0.440 HIVE = 6.459 LEO
Is it a good investment? What do you think about lbi project?
#askleo
Sorry, I encountered an error processing your request. Please try again.
Que se recupere $HIVE
https://inleo.io/threads/view/lordshah/re-leothreads-2ezkmkg6c
More than 80% of Bitcoin's supply hasn't moved in 6 months—HODLers are unshakeable even at these prices.
True or Fake?
#askleo
Answer
The statement appears to be True. According to various blockchain analytics, a significant portion of Bitcoin's supply has been dormant for extended periods, indicating strong HODLer conviction.
This phenomenon is often observed in the cryptocurrency market, where long-term investors hold onto their assets despite price fluctuations.
For more information on Bitcoin's supply and HODLer behavior, you can explore blockchain analytics platforms or financial news websites.
Do you just use the tag askleo or you need to subscribe to it?
Just use the tag, no need subscription yet.
They've seen such markets before
#gmfrens #freecompliments
We have a hungry lion. It is something that needs sating.
!summarize #nyknicks #jalenbrunson #joshhart #nba #playoffs
Part 1/6:
Reflections on Team Performance and Growth
In a recent interview, a prominent basketball player reflected on the importance of teamwork, self-improvement, and learning from past experiences as the team prepares for future games.
The Importance of Teammates and Coaching
The athlete emphasized the role of teammates and coaches in their success, attributing victories in close games to the collective effort. There is an acknowledgment that while individual performance is crucial, the credit belongs to the entire team for their resilience and ability to bounce back after losses.
Acknowledging Missed Opportunities
Part 2/6:
When discussing the last game, the player pointed out that there were several missed opportunities. Both offensively and defensively, the team faced challenges that could be rectified through better communication and decision-making. The player took personal responsibility for some bad shots taken during key moments, recognizing that every possession counts in basketball.
Focus on Fundamentals
A focus on the fundamentals is critical. The athlete discussed the need to prioritize the little things, indicating that while the offense may come and go, concentrating on the intangibles will lead to better overall performance. Improving communication on the defensive end is particularly important, as it directly impacts the team's ability to execute their game plan.
Handling Game Situations
Part 3/6:
The competitive atmosphere of playoff games was also addressed. The player acknowledged the excitement that comes with playing in front of energetic fans who have waited for a competitive team. This environment can be electrifying, and players must remain focused on their strategy, regardless of the challenges posed by fierce opponents.
Learning from Pressure Situations
Reflecting on personal growth, the athlete discussed the learning curve associated with pressure-packed moments, particularly when deciding whether to take control of a play or facilitate for others. The individual pointed to the necessity of making the right decisions—balancing aggression with creativity. This balance is an ongoing journey of improvement where mastery is a goal but seldom fully achieved.
Part 4/6:
Analyzing Game Film
Game film analysis is a critical part of preparation. The player mentioned no different strategy when reviewing film compared to previous games, but rather a detailed focus on minute details that could offer advantages against competitors. This dedication to analysis allows the team to improve over time, especially when facing opponents multiple times in the playoffs.
Managing Referee Interactions
Another significant point made involved the interaction with officials. The player expressed the need to control personal reactions to calls during live gameplay. Recognizing that refs will make mistakes, the focus should remain on how to play through those calls rather than allowing them to influence performance adversely.
Working with Teammates
Part 5/6:
The athlete elaborated on the dynamic of working with teammates, particularly regarding communication on the court. It's an evolving process of building familiarity and trust—attributes that are cultivated through shared experiences and sometimes adversity.
Finding the Balance
During discussions about teammate roles, the conversations revolve around the balance of scoring and facilitating. The player noted the challenges faced by teammates, especially new additions to the roster, in finding their rhythm while also integrating others into the game. Sharing success is crucial, and the aim is to create an environment where open communication fosters positive contributions from all players.
Conclusion: Continuous Improvement
Part 6/6:
In conclusion, the athlete conveyed an optimistic outlook on the team's potential for growth. The journey involves patience, learning from past mistakes, and striving for a better understanding of one another on the court. The drive for continuous improvement remains at the forefront, with an emphasis on fostering a supportive team culture where everyone is committed to their collective success. This mentality is key as they move forward, eager to maximize their talents and compete at the highest level.
!summarize #llama4 #meta #llm #ai #generativeai #training #model
Part 1/8:
The Llama 4 Launch: A Deep Dive into Meta's Controversial Release
The recent launch of Meta's Llama 4 has spurred significant discussion and debate within the AI community. Ethan Molik, an AI professor, highlighted vital differences between the Llama 4 model that topped the benchmarks and the version released to the public. This revelation stems from Meta's attempt to bolster its standing in the highly competitive large language model sector, especially following rapid advancements from rivals like OpenAI and Google.
A Controversial Launch Without Transparency
Part 2/8:
Meta's unveiling of Llama 4 was marked by several conspicuous omissions, most notably the absence of a technical paper. While private ownership of AI models has become increasingly prevalent, the lack of transparency in Llama 4 raises questions about the model's architectural integrity, training methodologies, and performance metrics. Critics argue this absence suggests that Meta might have manipulated benchmark results to present a more favorable image of the model, leading to growing skepticism among developers and researchers.
Part 3/8:
The stark contrast between the claims surrounding Llama 4's capabilities and user experiences has sparked accusations of a bait-and-switch approach. This sentiment was further amplified by leaks suggesting that Meta's Gen AI team went into "panic mode" following the release of a competing model—Deep Seek V3—developed by a lesser-known Chinese company operating on a mere $5.5 million training budget.
Discrepancies and Internal Concerns
Part 4/8:
The speculation intensifying around Llama 4 stems from anonymous posts discussed on platforms like Reddit. Engineers from Meta reportedly scrambled to dissect Deep Seek V3’s architecture in order to replicate its features. In an environment where AI talent commands high salaries, the emergence of this lower-budget model accentuates existing concerns over resource allocation and management within Meta’s Gen AI division.
Moreover, findings by AI professor Ethan Molik reveal that the Llama 4 model that excelled in benchmark tests differs significantly from the one available to the public. This raises the possibility that Meta utilized a variant that was fine-tuned for favorable outcomes during evaluations, undermining the foundation of competitive benchmarking.
Part 5/8:
The Dangers of Miscommunication
The discord over Llama 4's capabilities becomes particularly pronounced when considering the chaos resulting from its branding and naming conventions. Users face difficulties discerning which model is being tested and compared. The range of model names—Llama 4, Llama 4-03-mini, and more—adds another layer of complexity, leaving the community questioning the integrity of the evaluations tied to these models.
Benchmarks ideally provide a level playing field, offering fair comparisons between different models. However, if Meta's internal version of Llama 4 was tailored for testing, and a less-capable version was the one shared publicly, it misconstrues the concept of benchmarking entirely.
The Response from Meta
Part 6/8:
Meta has publicly acknowledged that the launch of Llama 4 yielded inconsistencies across various platforms. They attributed differing results to the "stabilization" of implementations as the models were rolled out. In response to allegations regarding improper training practices on test sets, Meta firmly denied these claims but their denial came amid a climate of skepticism and concern regarding the company’s transparency.
The resignation of a key VP amidst this confusion only fueled rumors lingering around the organizational structure and management of Meta's AI projects. As benchmarking scores began to rise with refinements in measurement criteria, the tenuous nature of these evaluations hints that Llama 4 may enjoy decent real-world applications despite the surrounding controversy.
Part 7/8:
Balancing Potential with Perception
Meta's Llama 4 holds promise, potentially performing well in various settings from business automation to educational applications. Conversely, the mismanagement of its launch and communication issues have left a cloud of uncertainty. The allure of a model that boasts potential has faded into a perception marred by transparency and accountability issues.
The ultimate concern lies not solely in Llama 4's capabilities but in the ramifications of Meta’s choices to withhold information. The silence on pivotal matters echoes throughout the AI community, raising doubts and complicating the conversation around trust, performance, and quality in generative AI models.
Conclusion: Lessons Learned
Part 8/8:
As Meta grapples with the ramifications stemming from Llama 4’s rollout, the broader lessons emphasize the importance of transparency and clear communication in the AI space. A well-crafted model can lose traction if overshadowed by confusion and mishandled public relations.
Moving forward, the AI community will undoubtedly scrutinize Meta's next steps, seeking assurance that transparency and ethical benchmarks will guide their developments. The real story surrounding Llama 4 may not simply be about its capabilities but rather about the essential need for honest communication and accountability in the AI sector.
!summarize #letitiajames #taxpayer #trips #newyorkstate
Part 1/8:
Leticia James: Allegations and Controversies Surrounding Taxpayer Spending
In recent developments, Leticia James, the New York Attorney General, faces escalating allegations of mismanaging taxpayer funds. The accusations suggest that her office has used approximately $41,000 in public money for luxury private jet flights during her campaign activities, raising red flags regarding her accountability and transparency.
Accusatory Outbursts: A Response to Allegations
Part 2/8:
Initially, James attempted to dismiss these allegations as politically motivated attacks orchestrated by the Trump administration. Her response suggests a tactic of deflection, claiming that the accusations are part of a broader agenda against her. However, critics have countered that her behavior has not only been unethical but potentially criminal, arguing that she weaponizes her position to target perceived adversaries while disregarding public duty.
Exposing Misuse of Funds: The Evidence
Part 3/8:
According to the records scrutinized, the Attorney General's office allegedly spent over $41,000 on six private charter flights, facilitated by a Pennsylvania-based company called Venture Jets. Notably, this vendor appears to be unique to James, as no other state agency has used their services in nearly a decade. Such findings raise suspicions about preferential treatment and whether her trips genuinely served official purposes or functioned primarily as campaign excursions.
Questionable Documentation
Part 4/8:
Despite the hefty expenditure, there are significant gaps in documentation regarding these flights. Transactions are recorded, but essential details such as purpose, destination, passenger manifest, and travel authorizations remain conspicuously absent from public transparency systems. This lack of information compels the public to submit Freedom of Information Requests just to uncover basic details, prompting concerns about what James might be trying to hide.
Timing Triggers Scrutiny
Part 5/8:
The alignment of certain payments with notable events, such as the annual Somos conference in Puerto Rico, further complicates the narrative. Such incidences pose critical questions about whether taxpayer money was leveraged for political activities rather than official obligations, contrasting sharply with New York State regulations that delineate boundaries between public service and political campaigning.
A Pattern of Luxury Spending
Part 6/8:
Critics have pointed out that these flights follow a pattern of luxury accommodations and travel preferences for James, contradicting her public stance on fiscal responsibility and transparency. Campaign finance records reveal ongoing expenditures on high-end travel arrangements, alluding to a lifestyle seemingly funded by taxpayer dollars, further undermining her credibility as a public servant.
Climate Change Hypocrisy
Part 7/8:
Moreover, the situation underlines hypocrisy within her office's stance on climate change. James’s own office publishes guidelines that emphasize reducing air travel to combat climate pollution, whereas her actions project a stark contradiction. This inconsistency fuels questions about the legitimacy and necessity of her lavish travel choices, particularly in a time where responsible fiscal management is paramount.
Final Questions: Accountability Demanded
Part 8/8:
In conclusion, these emerging narratives challenge James's integrity and raise broader implications concerning the handling of public resources. Several questions linger regarding the legitimacy of her travel expenditures, the absence of proper bidding processes, relationships with vendors, and the fundamental purpose behind these costly flights.
The public deserves answers to these pressing inquiries, not only for accountability but also for rebuilding trust in public office. As issues surrounding transparency and misuse of funds continue to unfold, the eyes of New York taxpayers remain firmly fixed on Leticia James, awaiting clarity and justification for the troubling allegations against her.
!summarize #shedeursanders #nfl #draft
Part 1/10:
The Evolving Perception of Shadour Sanders Ahead of the NFL Draft
The NFL draft is just around the corner, and with it comes a flurry of speculation and analysis surrounding potential picks. One player who has become the subject of intense scrutiny is Shadour Sanders, the quarterback from Colorado. Over recent months, opinions on Sanders have shifted dramatically, leading to discussions about whether he will even be selected in the first round.
The Rise and Fall of Shadour's Stock
Part 2/10:
Just a few months ago, Shadour Sanders was viewed as a potential first overall pick. Following a strong season at Colorado, many analysts had high hopes for his future in professional football. However, recent reports have cast doubt on his prospects. Despite his impressive stats and performance, some NFL executives have voiced concerns about his readiness for the league. This has raised eyebrows and sparked debate about why a player viewed as a top contender is now seemingly at risk of slipping out of the first round altogether.
The Role of Anonymous Sources in Draft Rumors
Part 3/10:
The recent wave of negative press surrounding Shadour Sanders has drawn attention to a recurring theme in the lead-up to the NFL draft—anonymous quotes. Many analysts and insiders have criticized the reliance on anonymous sources, arguing that it detracts from the overall integrity of the process. The conversation becomes muddied with conflicting reports, such as Sanders being labeled as the "worst interview in NFL history," while simultaneously being praised for his leadership qualities.
Part 4/10:
Commentators have expressed their disdain for anonymous sources, emphasizing the need for accountability. "If you have something to say, put your name on it," one analyst suggested. This sentiment reflects a growing frustration with the culture of speculation that often permeates draft discussions, where reputation and character assessments can heavily influence a player's draft stock without substantial evidence.
Re-Evaluating Shadour's Skillset
Part 5/10:
While criticisms of Sanders abound, some experts still advocate for his abilities as a quarterback. Notably, analysts have pointed to his strong work ethic and toughness displayed during his college career, highlighting examples of his resilience despite adversity on the field. Observers note that Sanders consistently shows up when the game is on the line, demonstrating both physical and mental fortitude.
Despite questions about his arm strength, supporters argue that Sanders possesses the accuracy and vision necessary for success in the NFL. With teams increasingly prioritizing mobility and adaptability in their quarterback selections, Sanders may still fit the mold of what many franchises are seeking.
Additionally Emerging Quarterbacks
Part 6/10:
Adding further complexity to the draft narrative is the emergence of other quarterbacks who have suddenly gained traction, such as Jackson Dart and Jalen Milroe. Analysts speculate about their potential to be drafted before Sanders, further intensifying the competition for the coveted quarterback slots.
As names like Dart and Milroe come to the forefront, analysts are left pondering if teams might look past Sanders despite his pedigree as Deion Sanders' son. The nuanced relationship between a player's lineage and their on-field performance remains a topic of discussion, with the consensus being that pedigree should, ideally, be a point of strength, not contention.
The Importance of Team Fit
Part 7/10:
The nature of the team seeking a quarterback can be pivotal in determining a player’s value. Several franchises—including the New York Giants, Cleveland Browns, and New Orleans Saints—find themselves in a position where they require immediate contributions from their quarterback selections. This reality may affect perceived interest in Sanders versus other emerging candidates.
Part 8/10:
While the draft is inherently unpredictable, there is a broad consensus that a potential surprise may unveil itself on draft day, with a notable shift in team priorities or desires for specific skill sets. If Sanders, despite the noise surrounding him, is drafted in the first round, some analysts believe it might represent a significant endorsement of his potential, countering the rumblings of doubt that have surfaced in media narratives.
Conclusion: The Unfolding Drama
Part 9/10:
With the NFL draft looming, Shadour Sanders remains a focal point of discussion, as answerable questions and stirring opinions continue to swirl. As insiders dissect the strengths and weaknesses of various prospects, the tension surrounding Sanders reflects larger themes in the world of sports — the volatile nature of public perception, the influence of media speculation, and ultimately, the unpredictable essence of the draft itself.
Part 10/10:
As teams finalize their strategies, fans, analysts, and pundits alike will be paying close attention to the unfolding drama. Whether Sanders defies the odds or falls prey to the currents of negativity remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the optimism and skepticism surrounding the young quarterback will make for an exciting narrative as NFL teams make their first-round selections.
!summarize #china
Part 1/11:
The Imminent Crisis Facing China: Unraveling an Economic Giant
China, once heralded as the next superpower on the global stage, is grappling with an intricate web of crises that, if not addressed, could signal its rapid decline. The facade of the Chinese economy—built on impressive skyscrapers and an image of unstoppable growth—masks a reality fraught with challenges that threaten the livelihood of millions. Current issues surrounding real estate, debt, and demographic shifts expose the fragility of what many believed to be a triumph of economic prowess.
The Real Estate Apocalypse
Part 2/11:
At the heart of China's crisis lies a real estate bubble deemed the largest in human history. Over 70% of Chinese household wealth is tied to real estate, compared to a mere 25% in the U.S. Housing prices have been in a steady decline for 28 consecutive months, with an alarming number of empty apartments—estimates suggest between 60 to 80 million—that remain unsold. This translates to an astonishing $13 trillion worth of housing stock locked in limbo.
The collapse of major developers like Evergrande, which defaulted on a staggering $300 billion in debt, sets the stage for impending social unrest. Homeowners refusing to pay for unfinished homes have organized mortgage boycotts across numerous cities, further amplifying the crisis.
Mounting Debt and Local Government Bankruptcies
Part 3/11:
China's economic model relies heavily on debt, with a debt-to-GDP ratio at an astonishing 345%. The toxic mix of rapid debt accumulation—approximately $45 trillion since 2008—along with stagnant economic growth is akin to attempting to escape a hole by digging deeper. The repercussions extend to local governments, which find themselves collectively owing over $12 trillion and out of ways to repay.
As revenues from land sales plummet, cities struggle to maintain essential services, with reports of reduced salaries for government workers and even payments in food rather than cash. With local governments accumulating debt equivalent to 76% of China's GDP, the risk of a significant economic collapse looms large.
A Banking System on the Edge
Part 4/11:
The state of China's banking system is alarming, with non-performing loans estimated to make up nearly 20% of GDP—ten times higher than official figures suggest. Recent bank runs have highlighted growing public mistrust, particularly after depositors faced obstacles retrieving their savings due to controversial government actions.
Demographic Challenges: Population and Workforce Decline
China's demographic landscape is rapidly altering; birth rates have hit a record low of 6.39 births per 1,000 people. With predictions that the population could shrink to around 633 million by 2100, firms are faced with a dwindling consumer base and workforce just as youth unemployment reaches a staggering 21.3%.
Part 5/11:
This demographic crisis compounds the difficulties created by a rapidly shrinking working-age population. By 2050, the labor pool could contract by 217 million workers, presenting severe challenges for economic sustainability.
Manufacturing Exodus: Factories Fleeing China
Adding to the tumult, foreign manufacturers are relocating their production facilities from China. Industry giants like Apple and Nike are diversifying their supply chains to countries such as India and Vietnam, as rising labor costs and geopolitical tensions incite fears of disruption. This exodus signals a transformation of global supply chains away from China's previous status as the "world's factory."
The Collapse of the Tech Sector
Part 6/11:
In a remarkable twist of self-sabotage, the Chinese government has effectively crippled its once-thriving tech sector. An aggressive crackdown on prominent firms like Alibaba and Tencent has resulted in the loss of over $1.5 trillion in market value. The results of this campaign have stifled innovation and led to a collapse in tech investments, jeopardizing China's aspirations for leadership in industries such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors.
Water and Food Insecurity
Part 7/11:
China faces a critical water crisis, with severe pollution affecting groundwater supplies and agricultural regions. At the same time, the country’s food security remains precarious; estimates indicate that China imports up to 85% of its soybeans and faces potential mass food shortages if supply lines are disrupted.
Energy Dependency: A Strategic Weakness
Despite its industrial might, China’s energy dependence poses a significant risk. The nation relies on foreign imports for 73% of its oil, with a strategic reserve barely enough to last 80 days. This dependency heightens vulnerabilities in the face of any potential geopolitical conflict.
Social Unrest: The Threat of Destabilization
Part 8/11:
As economic pressures mount, social unrest is evident. Protests around unpaid wages and housing issues have increased significantly, signaling a brewing dissatisfaction among the populace. The Chinese government has invested heavily in internal security, suggesting deep-seated fears about instability that could challenge the regime's hold on power.
The Looming Belt and Road Initiative Failure
What began as a bold global infrastructure initiative spearheaded by Xi Jinping is turning into a costly liability. Debts incurred by partner countries are beginning to default, further revealing the fragility of China's economic influence. This initiative, once seen as a pathway for expanding China’s clout, now risks creating widespread resentment.
Export Challenges and Trade War Pressures
Part 9/11:
Chinese exports, crucial to its economic foundation, are under intense pressure from international tariffs and a growing competitive landscape. As foreign buyers turn to alternatives, China's trade surplus continues to shrink, leaving the nation at a critical crossroads.
Xi Jinping's Consolidation of Control
Xi Jinping’s concentration of power has created a system that stifles dissent and shuns alternative viewpoints. This concentration has led to economic blunders that could be devastating, as decisions made under his regime will ultimately fall to him when calamities unfold.
Military Vulnerabilities
Part 10/11:
Finally, despite significant investments in military capabilities, China’s military has not experienced modern warfare since 1979. Inexperience, rampant corruption, and a focus on political loyalty risk undermining readiness as the possibility of conflict looms over the nation amid growing internal and external pressures.
Conclusion: A Disintegrating Fortress
Part 11/11:
The evidence is amassed: China's challenges are profound and interconnected, spanning demographic, economic, environmental, and geopolitical spectrums. The facade of a rising superpower is starting to collapse under the weight of its own structural weaknesses. As these crises intertwine, the potential for a significant decline could reshape global relations and destabilizing markets for years to come. The world watches as China’s narrative evolves from that of an economic miracle to one of uncertainty and alarm.
!summarize #trump #60minutes #abc #billowens
Part 1/6:
The Evolution of 60 Minutes: A Critical Perspective
As a young journalist, I was captivated by 60 Minutes—a hallmark of hard-hitting investigative journalism free from rampant ideology. The show embodied what quality reporting should aim for: integrity and a commitment to the truth. During my career ascent, I had the fortune of building a friendship with the iconic Mike Wallace, who was pivotal in shaping my understanding of tough interviewing. Don Hewitt, the founding producer of 60 Minutes, also recognized the value of a balanced approach to journalism, admiring productions like The O'Reilly Factor for their fearless and straightforward reporting.
Part 2/6:
However, despite my positive experiences with the show during my appearances—where I felt treated fairly by both Wallace and Hewitt—it seems 60 Minutes has lost its way, veering towards a more politically charged direction. This change became evident recently with the resignation of Bill Owens, the current executive producer, who stated, “Over the past few months, it has become clear that I would not be allowed to run the show as I always have run it: to make independent decisions based on what was right for 60 Minutes and right for the audience.”
Part 3/6:
Owens' departure hints at the underlying tensions at CBS Paramount, especially as the company prepares to sell to Sky Dance, which is associated with Ellison’s family. Market pressures and potential federal scrutiny from the FCC add another layer of complexity to the narrative. With Donald Trump currently suing 60 Minutes for $100 billion—claiming that the program aided Kamala Harris in violating election laws through selective editing—there's a palpable fear among executives that any anti-Trump sentiment from the show could jeopardize this lucrative deal.
Part 4/6:
This precarious situation originated during an interview conducted by Lesley Stahl, who faced backlash from Trump over her refusal to acknowledge the Clinton campaign's role in disseminating the unfounded Russia collusion narrative. Thus began the gradual shift of 60 Minutes toward an apparent bias against Trump, which intensified in line with the broader political climate.
Reflecting on my own interviews, I recall a time when Mike Wallace, known for his tough but fair style, grilled me in my first appearance in 2004. Fast forward nine years to my second stint on the show, where Nora O'Donnell quoted me about my rebellious childhood. I jokingly remarked about my past mischief, but her questioning revealed a deeper examination of values and morality.
Part 5/6:
Yet, despite the playful back-and-forth, it reveals a concern that, as 60 Minutes transitioned toward a political agenda, it has become increasingly aligned with a liberal Democratic perspective. This shift arguably began under President Obama, particularly marked by Steve Croft's well-documented affinity for the former president, which sparked a tension between journalistic integrity and political favor.
As an ardent observer of journalism, I lament the transformation of 60 Minutes. Once a bastion of investigative rigor, the program now appears entangled in partisan politics, straying from its original mission of honest reporting.
Part 6/6:
In closing, the legacy of 60 Minutes deserves to be protected, not only for its past as a standard-bearer of journalistic excellence but for the future of media integrity. The balance of truth-telling against the tides of political allegiance is vital, and I hope for a return to that ideal.
For those interested in further exploration of topics like this, I invite you to join BillOReilly.com and access full episodes of The No Spin News.
#brainupdate #inleo #hive #freecompliments #funfacts #funinleo #learning
For 9 of the previous 10 days, #Bitcoin dominance has been trending upward.
Isn't it amazing that while there's a coordinated attack happening on western nations right now, almost nobody wants to acknowledge it.
In fact, those who bring it up are ostracized from the very society they are trying to protect.
Fascinating.
If you fall in love with your job, it becomes easier as you are being paid for your hobby. Choose what you love
While some countries are taking advantage of the crypto space and investing for future profit. My country's government sees crypto as as a crime.
#crypto #ecency #inleo
Sometimes, character deaths can be beautiful... Tragic, but beautiful. #onmymind #gaming #peaceful
Misleading claims.
"Such report lacks substance."
Both key figures have openly confirmed that the special government role will end once the exceptional contributions with DOGE are fulfilled.
Bitcoin ATMs just surpassed 50,000 worldwide—physical access to digital gold keeps expanding.
#bitcoin
Breaking News
This is really no surprise.
accused of rape? 😲😲😲😲
Oh my goodness, how true can this be?
Found this beautiful friend.
SHe is looking so beautiful, I so much appreciate what nature gat for us all..
Concepts can be effortless, but turning them into reality remains the challenge.
$AVA
Is Upril present in the room at this moment?
Coffe time
I see some pics on Threads but I cannot do it. Hummmmm #feedback
Same to me Papa, I have tried uploading some pictures but it's not going through although Khal earlier said that they are fixing the picture uploading section...
How is your day going Papa?
Excellent my son. But @cathyarrow and I miss engaging with our two sons here on HIve :( !BBH
I'm here Dad, just fixing other stuffs from the background.
Like me ;) !BBH
hi son, I hope you are doing well!
Nice to hear from you!
greetings mom, I'm doing great, just working on some stuff off Chain..
❤️❤️
I've noticed that one picture sent to me last night cannot be viewed on threads, but can be viewed on Hive Blog. Could it be some CORS issue?
I'm searching for my twin brother @falcon97, have anyone seen him?
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
#askleo what is pixel art and is there any pixel art NFT projects ?
Pixel Art Overview
Pixel art is a digital art style that uses small, square pixels to create images. It originated in the 1970s and 1980s with early video games and has since become a popular form of digital art.
Pixel Art NFT Projects
Yes, there are several pixel art NFT projects. Some notable examples include:
These projects showcase the creativity and nostalgia of pixel art in the NFT space.
You can find more information about these projects and others like them on NFT marketplaces and online communities.
Wounds may not be self-inflicted, but healing is a personal commitment. Enjoy the start of your day.
1/🧵
#outreach #threadstorm
It says that life partners deserve to know almost everything as well as all the secrets of a person, but it's not necessary to be true all the time. As an individual, one deserves personal space.
2/🧵
What if you find out that your partner can read your mind and see all your secrets of? Do you love to continue living with your partner? Is it interesting or risky?
3/🧵
#gosh
I have written a post about it and I hope you will enjoy reading it. I am inviting you to read the post.
https://inleo.io/@intishar/mind-reader-partner-can-be-troublesome-lqy
Working on a product with firsthand experience as the ideal user has been incredibly rewarding.
Challenges are raised, and then solutions are built—proving that an agile team is invaluable.
"Creating a solution designed for personal use while addressing daily issues in cross-chain trading brings a sense of accomplishment."
What
additional features could enhance the Ctrl experience further?
After successfully running the MoonKarts game and then teasing us with the upcoming shooting game Hyper Rail Blaster, they are already developing another new game under ArcadeColony’s hood, Stakehouse Den.
#outreach #threadstorm
1/🧵
Stakehouse Den will be a casino-type play2earn crypto game with all the features we see in other similar leading web3 games and today, I am going to talk about what makes this particular Web3 Social Casino so special!
2/🧵
If you are interested, please read my full blog post below!
Link - https://inleo.io/@mango-juice/stakehouse-den-another-upcoming-game-from-arcade-colony-4ox
3/🧵
#news has it 🇨🇳 just did 5nm waver with #euv instead of #duv 👀
https://x.com/wmhuo168/status/1914992008382304427
says ex-Secretary of Commerce #lmao
An X account was compromised today. A precautionary message had been sent to an X employee two weeks ago after suspicions arose about a potential breach.
🧵 Details follow:
A cover of "You Deserve" (Natalie Grant), a song about God's continous love and mercy for us, and praising Him and acknowledging all he deserves.
#music #love #cover #praise
Envisioning a portrayal of a remarkably busy individual! Kindly read through until the end, much appreciated.
Dave Lombardo – War Ensemble – Yankee Stadium (video)
China has said the door to trade talks with Washington is open, a day after US President Donald Trump hinted at the possibility of significant tariff cuts on Beijing.
#news #tariff #talks
The United Nations has predicted that earth's temperature is at least temporarily above 1.5 degrees Celsius over the next five years.
#environment #weather #un
"Nothing is too high for a #man to #reach but he must climb with care and confidence" - Hans Christian Andersen
#inleo #life #motivation #quote #newlion #ccc #bbh
$BTC tries to hit 95-98K this weekend. Alts may see a sharp rise as well. Yet $ETH seem underplaying and resting below 1800.
#crypto #trading
In the past three years, revenue hit an all-time high while investment in coaching reached unprecedented levels. The link between the two trends is unmistakable.
#askleo
What is technical analysis in the markets?
Technical Analysis Overview
Technical analysis is a method of evaluating securities by analyzing statistical patterns and trends in their price movements and other market-related data. It involves using charts and technical indicators to identify patterns and predict future price movements.
Key Components
Technical analysis typically involves:
Goals
The primary goal of technical analysis is to predict future price movements and make informed investment decisions. It can be used in various markets, including stocks, forex, and cryptocurrencies.
Interoperability across multiple blockchain networks.
Why am I not in the middle of #nowhere connect via satellite to #internet
Cost is still high
Many claim that adopting progressive stances guarantees failure, yet some have drifted so far toward extreme conservatism they now mirror those very ideals.
When balance eventually returns, it will be interesting to see how perspectives realign.
are pictures back?
I can see them.
Ahhh the uploading is broken. Use another UI and use the link.
It’s outrageous to see citizens cheering for a political figure's downfall while inadvertently supporting a foreign power. Disagreeing with someone is acceptable, but undermining one’s own nation crosses a line.
Is anyone still present here?
Lots!
always
🙋♂️
LOL... GST in New Zealand is a tax.
It's curious how things play out.
"Observations indicate that overspenders somehow always manage to bounce back financially."
Never be intimidated by the enormity of an ambition. Instead, fear the emptiness of a life lacking one.
Hey there... This becomes a loop... needs to be fixed!
#feedback
https://inleo.io/threads/view/askrafiki/re-forkyishere-re-bradleyarrow-2x5n2on88-20250424t235240466844
Good morning everyone! I have just claimed my dCrops Chest!
67 Items! Whooohooooo!
The Last of Us Season 2 Ep 2 has so much to watch and feel, the infected monsters attack the town, WLF revenge, and Joe's fate, a lot of action that a movie can afford.
#tv #games #horror
LATEST: US tariff revenue rises 60% to $15 billion in April, a new all-time high.
This wolf looks like a fox and it hunts like a fox too..
https://www.youtube.com/wath?v=dg3ZO4N1oi4
#animals #shorts #hunt
!summarize
No valid YouTube URL found.
For individuals in their 20s and 30s, the current bear market can be seen as an opportunity to start building for retirement.
Look inside the beehive and how larvae are treated most delicately inside the breeding chambers.
https://www.youtube.com/wath?v=mjVrHXHhy-I
#animals #shorts #insects
!summarize
No valid YouTube URL found.
Are you tired of tech giants like Google and Microsoft having a monopoly on Internet search?
In this post, we discuss Timpi's unique approach to building a decentralized web index and data marketplace.
Article below 👇
https://inleo.io/@brennanhm/timpi-the-worlds-first-decentralized-web-index
Splinterlands Social Media Challenge: The Need for Speed!
link to post in comments
#splinterlands #bbh #cent
https://peakd.com/hive-13323/@logen9f/splinterlands-social-media-challenge-the-bff74ce4232df
This bird knows how to knot the straws, and only male birds do this to attract females. Only the best nest weaver wins a female.
https://www.youtube.com/wath?v=5-WBej1hJso
#animals #shorts #birds
!summarize
No valid YouTube URL found.
Seguimos sumando y creciendo en los thread, donde ya nos falta poco para llegar a los 9K
#spanish
Round 1, Pick 1: Titans select CanesFootball QB Cam Ward! #NFLDraft
🚨 TRADE ALERT: JAGUARS TRADE UP TO NO. 2, BROWNS TRADE BACK TO NO. 5. #NFLDraft 🚨
A hummingbird weighs less than an earbud 3g so far. They build interesting nests that stretch as the babies grow.
https://www.youtube.com/wath?v=hh47xUFrBnU
#animals #shorts #birds
!summarize
No valid YouTube URL found.
Is anyone having problems uploading an image?
NIGHTLY RECAP PRESENTED BY GOKHSHTEIN NEWS NETWORK
Round 1, Pick 2: Jaguars select CUBuffsFootball WR/CB Travis Hunter! #NFLDraft
Round 1, Pick 3: Giants select PennStateFball Edge Abdul Carter! #NFLDraft
No risk means no private jet.
Welcome back. ✌️
https://inleo.io/@wiseagent/what-was-that-the-lordes-return-ct
I just learned that my GST cap spans blockchains. That means once you reach your cap, you're done
Round 1, Pick 4: Patriots select LSUfootball OT Will Campbell! #NFLDraft
Inleo is not letting me upload images on mobile nor pc, it just gets stuck in "uploading" and doesn't make it past that. I've been trying all day to post. Anyone having the same problem?
#feedback #inleo
There is some outage on the backend, try imgur.com and use the image link instead
Really? Please how then can I source the image? Do I still say I generated it with META
You mention the source, no harm in it.
But, when you upload something it should be from some source though.
Round 1, Pick 5: Browns select UMichFootball DT Mason Graham! #NFLDraft
Again having an issue with posting Actifit report. I'm not sure to whom I should be sending my feedback.
I so wanted the Cowboys to draft this kid but no way was he going to drop to 12.
Round 1, Pick 6: Raiders select BroncoSportsFB RB Ashton Jeanty! #NFLDraft
The debate around fluoride will be clarified in tomorrow's episode. The discussion will cover its history, underlying rationale, effects on teeth, bones, and even IQ, as well as whether systemic exposure builds over time.
Expect a breakdown of why so many misleading claims persist, supported by truly eye- (and mouth-) opening data.
I have dropped a few accounts from my upvoting for content they started posting on threads.
Countries without the capability to produce drones independently may find themselves under the influence of others.
if you post about ponzi style in-game tokens. I have dropped you from my list
ahhh was curious what got your attention!
all the moonkart posting.
#boobs #meme #lolz #cent
https://peakd.com/hive-178265/@antoniarhuiz/eng-esp-sharing-an-important-moment-with-my-grandson-and-some-friends #dailyblog #dailyblog