RE: LeoThread 2025-06-23 07:25
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
TLDR; If you are familiar with Microstrategy, Michael Saylor and their strategy to permanently acquire more Bitcoin, then you can apply that logic to LeoStrategy. LeoStrategy and our LSTR tokenized fund aim to be the "Microstrategy of LEO"
0
0
0.000
Now that’s a powerful parallel.
If Saylor’s stacking BTC like a vault, LSTR stacking LEO like a lion hoarding gold makes total sense.
Long-term conviction, daily accumulation, and a deflationary model?
I’m all in for the “Microstrategy of LEO.”
Thats the goal we have 🦁
Agents can also permanently acquire LEO, making it the ultimate in HODL.
Very true, every sink we can create for $LEO is good
What benefits do LSTR holders get? I think benefits like say curation or weekly hive airdrop for holding X amount of LSTR would make it lucrative. EDS token makers are already doing this on Hive.
$LSTR holder gain a leveraged $LEO exposure with 367K $LEO atm. As we raise more capital we intend to get more $LEO, so a holder will have more $LEO per $LSTR token.
Similar to Michael Saylors playbook with Strategy.
In theory that sounds good. I am thinking about returns because LEO is not bitcoin to give such historical returns that keeps growing.
We dont promise we will have similar growth as Strategy, but we will try the same model because we think it can benefit $LEO and in the long run $LSTR holders.
This is why I thought EDS guys are doing good. Hold token get Hive. EDS value stays up too.
They use another model than us.
I get that but if you want to bring investor they need to see the value. Currently we are speculating that new LEO 2.0 change would skyrocket things we are yet to see this.