RE: LeoThread 2024-12-09 18:11

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Highly recommend reconsidering a lot of witness votes

I’m looking at the private hive witness chat and seeing a lot of rent seekers doing nothing but complaining while INLEO onboards more users to hive than have ever been here

A regime shift is needed



0
0
0.000
30 comments
avatar

Wish I knew who are the ones trying to slow down the progress... 🙂

0
0
0.000
avatar

I hope I stay in that "regime shift". I believe I am attempting to do what no other witness has done, and that is give back to Hivers.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sadly those at the top make so much damn passive hive that you need about 1000 people in terms of rewards voting for you. It wont be easy but it's possible just wont be over night. And people do love their gravy train. Hive is crazy centralized as much as people want to say it's not. Just take a look at some of the votes blocktrade does on the DHF. If it wasn't for their single 20million+ vote the proposal wouldn't even be close to passing!

0
0
0.000
avatar

indeed a change of regime is needed. Please am a newbie, Onboarded using Keystore. Please can I get resource credit from you to enhance my engagement?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Welcome, I will delegate you a bit and see how it goes..

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why is leofinance crossed off in the witness votes on peakd?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think beacause of the rebrand. But it certainly looks weird.

0
0
0.000
avatar

No, it's because they failing as a witness (by missing blocks, i.e. not producing when scheduled). When I pointed that out the whole drama unfolded and now apparently I'm the bad guy ;-)

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is because their node has been missing blocks for over 8 days!
And when someone notifies them, they don't fix it or disable their node. They rather pretend we're trash-talking about them, and spin up a smear campaign.

0
0
0.000
avatar

one hundred thousand percent.
If anyone wants more info. I did and do a monthly witness review in my subscriber content.

0
0
0.000
avatar

How about you publish a list of recommended witness to vote and the reasons for them deserving of being voted?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I guess - do your own research because it's not really a great choice to depend on a judgement of someone who is failing to do their job as a witness (that's why all that dramat started).

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I have a couple of witnesses that are sacrosanct as far as my vote is concerned. I leave the rest of my votes open pending the time I'm able to research or when someone shows me what they have been building and I get bought.

I was just looking to see if there's someone worthy of my vote that I've missed.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your list looks fine, one of the witnesses on your list was missing blocks but disabled their block production and sorting things out so that's not an issue (and exactly that's what the original poster here failed to do).

I think @engrave would be a good choice and not because of what he builds, but because he can simply be trusted to do his job. But again - do your own research :-)

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is complete bullshit! There is no private witness chat. It's public and anyone can access it!

You have been perfectly aware for almost 24 hours that your witness node has been missing blocks for over eight days and you are doing nothing to fix it, except campaigning against witnesses who care about it!

It's still missing blocks right now.

image.png


It's nice to talk about a "regime shift", but shouldn't you demonstrate first that you care about the main duty as a witness, namely a reliable block production?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sounds like it. Just make sure your focus is on INLEO and growth, and don't let this drama get in the way of that.

Chasing out the rent seekers is way easier when you have overwhelming support.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Of course that is needed, I made a post about it about a month ago, with the big question, who to vote for… Very little reaction besides @bradleyarrow 🤷🏼‍♂️

0
0
0.000