RE: LeoThread 2025-06-26 22:23

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I have an idea about @leo.voter delegator rewards

Right now, I have the SIRP designed with two separate pools (one for delegators and one for the Authors/Curators/Miners)

What if we combine the two pools and only have 1 SIRP:

  1. Authors / Curators = 70%
  2. Miners = 10%
  3. leo.voter delegators = 20%

IMHO this could create more upside and close the feedback loop even tighter:

  1. More leo.voter delegators = more HIVE rewards for authors on INLEO (threads & blog posts)
  2. More leo.voter delegators also = more HIVE buying LEO for the SIRP (higher rewards for authors/curators/miners earning from the SIRP)
  3. More SIRP = more usage of INLEO = more value for the LEO token = more $$ value for delegators/authors/curators/miners
  4. ...

Let me know your thoughts. I'm considering this model as I think having a main pool might be better than fragmented Rewards Pools (where delegators earn from a separate LEO pool than everyone else)

leofinance
0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

Interesting suggestion!

A big part of the success of this "Big Beautiful Pool" (lol) formula would depend on how many Lions are delegating HP to @leo.voter , i.e. put the spotlight on the intrinsic worth of INLEO, something we all need 🙃.

Could someone run a modelization/simulation for the 2 options (2 pools compared with the Big Beautiful Pool)?

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

But, the reward structure will remain the same 6000 LEO for all reward receivers? What if the price of LEO goes up or down, you might adjust the rewards as per the market price, since now you are buying the rewards?

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

there’s no hardline 6000 number

It’s all dynamic now. Could be 6 or 600,000

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I like this mechanism, should be variable based on fee collection and trades made.

0
0
0.000
Reply